Trump on ‘good form', Starmer says after US president's trade deal gaffe
The Prime Minister also said he rushed to pick up signed documents which Mr Trump dropped on the floor to prevent a security scare following the completion of the British-American trade deal.
The two leaders had posed for pictures with the official paperwork after finalising the transatlantic agreement at the G7 summit on Monday, when the president accidentally let a sheaf of files fall to the ground.
He also mistakenly referred to the pact as 'a trade agreement with the European Union'.
Sir Keir said he bent to pick up the paperwork because there are 'quite strict rules about who can get close to the president'.
Asked whether people should be concerned about the US leader's health, the Prime Minister told reporters at the G7 conference in Canada: 'No. I mean, look, there weren't many choices with the documents and picking it up, because one, as you probably know there were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president.
'I was just deeply conscious that in a situation like it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forwards – not that any of you rushed to!
'There's a very tightly guarded security zone around the president, as you would expect.'
He added: 'But no, he was in good form yesterday, and I mean we had, I don't know how many sessions yesterday together at the G7 and then into the evening session as well.
'And I'm just really pleased that we signed the executive order and for JLR's 44,000 people, that is a huge relief in terms of the protection of their jobs and their livelihoods, and that's really important to me.'
Mr Trump, who turned 79 on Saturday, abruptly left the summit of leaders from the world's major economies amid escalating conflict in the Middle East on Monday.
Hours before his departure, he and Sir Keir rubber-stamped a long-coveted deal that will slash tariffs for British carmakers and the aerospace sector, but leaves the future of import taxes on UK steel hanging in the balance.
The agreement will grant the auto industry a reprieve by the end of June as levies drop from 25% to 10%, while the aerospace sector will face no tariffs.
Tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium.
The two leaders pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed'.
The Prime Minister said the move marked a 'very important day' for both sides while the US president praised Sir Keir as a 'friend' who had done a 'great job' securing the deal that eluded leaders before him.
'We're very long-time partners and allies and friends, and we've become friends in a short period of time,' Mr Trump said.
'He's slightly more liberal than I am to put it mildly.'
'We make it work,' Sir Keir joked.
Asked on Tuesday why he thought the US president liked him despite their differing political backgrounds, the Prime Minister said: 'That's really for him to answer rather than me, but we do have a good relationship.
'I think that is in the national interest, frankly. There's long been a close relationship between the US and the UK.
'As I've said many times, on defence and security and intelligence sharing in particular, we are closer than any two countries, and I'm very pleased that I've got a good relationship with him – notwithstanding, as both he and I acknowledge, that our political backgrounds are different.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
9 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Coalition of the willing to reconvene ‘in weeks' as UK pushes Russian oil cap
Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelensky will convene a meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' in the coming weeks, Downing Street said as the UK pushed for allies to tighten the oil price cap on Russia. The Prime Minister on Tuesday announced a series of measures aimed at ramping up pressure on Vladimir Putin as he continues to resist calls for an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Sir Keir said he 'strongly' believes that restrictions on the price of Russian crude oil should be strengthened to deplete its energy revenues. He also dismissed suggestions that plans, led by Britain and France, for a 'coalition of the willing' to send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine were dead in the water as progress towards a potential truce stalls. In a bilateral meeting with the Ukrainian president on the sidelines of the leaders' conference on Tuesday, the two leaders 'agreed to drive forward the next stage of military support', Number 10 said. 'Their meeting followed an extensive session with wider partners, focused on maintaining momentum to secure a just and lasting peace for Ukraine,' the readout said. 'The Prime Minister and president agreed to drive forward the next stage of military support – adding that a strong Ukraine is essential to guarantee peace in the long term. 'They agreed to convene the next coalition of the willing meeting in the coming weeks. 'They also discussed ramping up the economic pressure on Putin, with the Prime Minister updating the president on the new sanctions announced by the United Kingdom today. 'They agreed there should be no place to hide for those who fund Putin's war machine.' Mr Zelensky said they had agreed that 'to force Russia to end this war, coordinated sanctions by all G7 countries are needed against their energy and banking sectors, shadow fleet, and military-industrial complex'. Britain announced sanctions on 20 Russian oil tankers as well as measures to tighten the net around companies managing the vessels, with Downing Street saying the UK would also seek to 'move with partners' to tighten the energy price cap. A wider package of measures which Sir Keir suggested would be forthcoming from leaders gathered at the summit in the Canadian Rockies is yet to materialise after splits opened up in the approach to Russia on Monday. Allies face an uphill struggle to lower the cap from the existing rate of 60 dollars per barrel after Donald Trump signalled his reluctance to impose further measures on Moscow. The US president suggested he wanted to wait to 'see whether or not a deal is done' with Ukraine before targeting the Kremlin with further action. Speaking to reporters with him in Kananaskis, Sir Keir was asked if tightening the oil price cap would be possible without the backing of Washington. 'Obviously today we're going to focus on Ukraine,' Sir Keir said. 'We've got President (Volodymyr) Zelensky coming in. We're putting in extra sanctions today, including sanctions on the shadow fleet. 'Others will be doing, similar actions in coming days. And so that does ramp up the pressure. 'On the oil price, obviously, we're still looking at how we're going to make that work. But I strongly believe that we have to put those sanctions in place. We're having those discussions with President Zelensky today.' Talks to broker a possible peace in Ukraine have stalled as Moscow continues to pound the country with missile and drone attacks and holds out on US-backed proposals for an unconditional truce. Meanwhile, the UK and France have been leading efforts to assemble a so-called 'coalition of the willing' made up of nations prepared to send peacekeeping troops to Kyiv to enforce a potential ceasefire. Asked whether those plans were dead in the water, Sir Keir told reporters: 'On the coalition of the willing, no, not at all. That is obviously intended to answer the question, how do you ensure that if a deal is reached, a deal is kept so it's a lasting deal? 'Because the concern, has always been, that there have been deals, if you like, before, Putin has then subsequently breached them. 'So how do you stop that happening again? And the military planning is still going on, as you would expect, so that, when the time comes, we're ready to act.' Mr Zelensky is attending the G7 conference in Kananaskis, along with leaders from Canada, the US, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and Britain. As well as sanctions on Russia's shadow fleet, Britain has also targeted two UK residents – Vladimir Pristoupa and Olech Tkacz – who the Government said had operated 'a shadowy network of shell companies' aiding Moscow. The branch of the Russian defence ministry leading the country's underwater intelligence gathering operations, known as Gugi, has also been sanctioned. Sir Keir said: 'These sanctions strike right at the heart of Putin's war machine, choking off his ability to continue his barbaric war in Ukraine. 'We know that our sanctions are hitting hard, so while Putin shows total disregard for peace, we will not hesitate to keep tightening the screws. 'The threat posed by Russia cannot be underestimated, so I'm determined to take every step necessary to protect our national security and keep our country safe and secure.'
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Senate Republicans circle wagons as Trump beats war drum on Iran: ‘They've all had their spines removed'
Senate Republicans are largely standing with President Donald Trump as he escalates U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran. On Tuesday, the president demanded that Iran lay down its weapons in an 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER ' and said that he knew exactly where Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was hiding. Trump insisted that Iran was 'very close' to a working nuclear weapon. He also disregarded testimony from his own Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who said in March that Iran was not working toward building a nuclear weapon. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters that Trump would have constitutional authority to bomb Fordow, which is located deep inside a mountain near the city of Qom. 'Under Article II of the Constitution, the president is the commander in chief, and he has the authority and responsibility to keep Americans safe and defend American servicemen and women,' Cruz said. 'Congress has the authority to declare war, and war is considered sustained and longstanding hostilities,' he maintained. 'A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorization to engage in sustained hostility, to engage in continued warfare, does require congressional coming to the floor.' Other Republicans echoed Cruz's words on Iran. While Republicans in the House like Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and MAGA hardliner Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia have criticized the idea of U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran, the Senate still has plenty of majority members who have a more traditionally Republican interventionist foreign policy. 'I think he's doing quite well actually,' Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, a member of the Armed Services Committee, told The Independent. 'He's been very well measured in allowing Israel to do what they think they need.' Ernst said if necessary, Trump would consult Congress. 'I think we'll need to understand the situation and get briefings on it, and then we'll take measure as necessary,' she said. Republicans in the Senate have historically been uneasy with Trump's plans to negotiate with Iran. In March, 51 Republican Senators sent a letter to the Trump administration regarding its negotiations with Iran. During Trump's first administration, he withdrew with the Iran nuclear agreement brokered by former president Barack Obama. Trump also put in place sanctions. But in the second administration, he dispatched his envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff to negotiate with Iran in Oman while maintaining hawkish rhetoric on Iran. But on Thursday, Israel began its strikes on Iran, which led to Iran responding in kind. Trump called for a deal between Israel and Iran, but has also signaled support for Israel, which many Republicans in the Senate welcomed. 'Right now, we should defend Israel against any counter attacks, and then I'll leave it to the administration to mount about a plan that comports with what we want to do here in Congress,' Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a hawk on Iran, told The Independent. But support is not unanimous even among Republicans. Sen. Rand Paul, the sole Republican who did not sign the letter, told The Independent that he would have more to say about war with Iran. But he did have concerns. 'It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress, and bombing another country is obviously war,' the libertarian said. Only a handful of Democrats in the Senate, meanwhile, have voiced their full-fledged opposition to war with Iran. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia introduced a war powers resolution. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent and socialist from Vermont who caucuses with the minority party, also introduced a resolution with other Democrats. 'We should not stand by why Donald Trump tries to drag America to another endless war in the Middle East,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a member of the Armed Services Committee, who joined the resolution, told The Independent. 'There's evidently a serious medical problem with the Senate Republicans,' the Massachusetts senator said. 'They've all had their spines removed,' said Warren. 'None of them seem capable of standing up to Donald Trump, which means they cannot fulfill their oaths to the Constitution of the United States.' But many Republicans will likely continue to support Trump's efforts on Iran. Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota showed up to the Senate wearing a lapel pin shaped like a fighter plane with Israel's flag on it.
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Senate passes landmark crypto regulation bill on a bipartisan vote, sending it to the House
WASHINGTON — After weeks of stops and starts, Senate Republicans teamed up with a bloc of Democrats Tuesday to pass a landmark cryptocurrency bill that would establish the first regulatory framework for issuers of stablecoins. The vote on the GENIUS Act was 68-30. The vote marked the first time that the Senate has passed major legislation regulating digital assets. "With this bill, the United States is one step closer to becoming the global leader in crypto," Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., the author of the GENIUS Act, said in a floor speech. "This bill will cement U.S. dollar dominance, it will protect customers, it will drive demand for U.S. treasuries." "Today will be remembered as an inflection point for innovation in the United States of America," Hagerty said. The GENIUS Act now heads to the Republican-led House, which has been working to pass its own bipartisan bill focused on creating a regulatory framework for digital assets. The Senate action comes as Washington continues to wrestle with how best to regulate the fast-growing cryptocurrency industry. Democrats have been divided over the issue, with some in the party pushing Congress to do more to rein in an industry they see as rife with conflicts of interests for President Donald Trump and his family. The Senate Banking Committee passed an earlier version of the GENIUS Act in April, with backing from five Democrats. But Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and the Democrats — along with two Republicans — blocked the bill from advancing on the floor in May as they demanded stronger national security and anti-money laundering provisions. A group of bipartisan negotiators — Hagerty and Sens. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md.; and Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz. — later struck a deal on changes to the bill that addressed key sticking points for Democrats. The changes called for consumer protection safeguards and limits on tech companies issuing stablecoins, digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, and would extend ethics standards to special government employees. The bipartisan deal unlocked support from a broader group of Democrats, and the legislation advanced on the floor after clearing the 60-vote threshold. 'I think because we worked so hard and so long with them that it got a few more of them to 'yes.' And so I think this is a real legislative victory,' Lummis told NBC News before the vote. 'They did get more of what they wanted. They should be voting yes, because they were extremely influential in shaping the legislation.' But other Democrats were frustrated that nothing in the revised legislation would explicitly prevent Trump and his family from continuing their crypto ventures. New financial disclosures reveal that Trump made one of his largest fortunes last year, $57.3 million, on his family's cryptocurrency company World Liberty Financial. "This is a bill that was written by the industry that will supercharge the profitability of Donald Trump's crypto corruption, while it undercuts consumer protection and weakens our national defense," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, told NBC News. The legislation does include language that would 'prohibit any member of Congress or senior executive branch official from issuing a payment stablecoin product during their time in public service.' But Warren argued that the legislation isn't strong enough to prevent terrorists, drug traffickers and other criminals from using stablecoins for illicit purposes. The bill "is in a better place, but it's not in a good enough place," she said.
