logo
INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of ICU Medical, Inc.

INVESTOR ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of ICU Medical, Inc.

NEW YORK, May 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of ICU Medical, Inc. ('ICU' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: ICUI). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.
The investigation concerns whether ICU and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices.
[Click here for information about joining the class action]
On April 22, 2025, ICU disclosed receipt of a warning letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ('FDA'), citing unauthorized changes to two of the Company's infusion pump products. The FDA's warning letter stated that the pumps were 'adulterated' and 'misbranded,' noting that the Company's modifications 'can significantly impact the functionality of the device with respect to the infusion pumps delivery profile, [and] alarm functionality.' The FDA further stated that these changes may have significantly impacted the safety and efficacy of the devices, raising concerns about the adequacy of ICU's regulatory disclosures.
On this news, ICU's stock price fell $6.04 per share, or 4.42%, to close at $130.68 per share on April 22, 2025.
Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.
Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT:
Danielle Peyton
Pomerantz LLP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ISS Conference Scrapped as NASA Budget Cuts Threaten Crew and Cargo
ISS Conference Scrapped as NASA Budget Cuts Threaten Crew and Cargo

Gizmodo

time9 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

ISS Conference Scrapped as NASA Budget Cuts Threaten Crew and Cargo

The International Space Station (ISS) still has a few years left in orbit before it's due for retirement, but the future of the orbital lab is looking a little shaky as NASA is forced to tighten its purse strings. The Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS), which operates the ISS National Lab, is canceling an upcoming space station research conference, SpaceNews reported. The ISS Research and Development Conference was due to be held at the end of July in Seattle, but CASIS announced this week that, after consulting with NASA, 'the current regulatory and budgetary environment does not support holding' the annual conference this year. The announcement comes a little over a month after the release of the current administration's so-called skinny budget, which included funding for NASA in 2026. The budget proposes a $6 billion cut to the agency, 24% less than NASA's current $24.8 billion budget for 2025. The budget also proposes reducing the size of the ISS crew ahead of its planned retirement in 2030, when it's expected to be replaced by multiple commercial space stations. Funding for the ISS could be reduced by a quarter, from $1.24 billion to $920 million, according to the proposed budget for 2026. 'Crew and cargo flights to the station would be significantly reduced,' the budget proposal read. 'The station's reduced research capacity would be focused on efforts critical to the Moon and Mars exploration programs.' During a briefing held in late May, Dana Weigel, NASA's ISS program manager, revealed that the space agency had already been facing resource issues regarding the space station before the 2026 budget proposal. 'The station has been faced with a cumulative multi-year budget reduction,' Weigel is quoted in SpaceNews as saying. 'That's the challenge that I've had that we've been managing through today. That has left us with some budget and resource challenges that result in less cargo.' The cargo includes supplies for onboard crew members. For more than two decades, the space agency has maintained a crew of at least four NASA astronauts on board the ISS, along with international crew members from Russia, Japan, Canada, and other countries. NASA has previously flown four or five cargo missions a year, but the agency has only planned for three drop-offs in 2025. 'We're evaluating the potential for moving to three crew,' Weigel said during the briefing. 'That's something that we're working through and trying to assess today.' NASA is also considering extending the duration of missions on the ISS from six to eight months, Ars Technica previously reported. Meanwhile, five commercial space stations, including Orbital Reef, Axiom Station, and Starlab, are currently in the works but nowhere near being ready to host astronauts in low Earth orbit. The ISS maintains a steady presence of orbital science above Earth's surface, which would leave behind a major gap to fill.

Lawmakers Need to Get Back Into the Game on Trade
Lawmakers Need to Get Back Into the Game on Trade

Wall Street Journal

time17 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Lawmakers Need to Get Back Into the Game on Trade

In an unambiguous and unanimous ruling, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that President Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' and fentanyl tariff actions exceeded his constitutional and statutory authority. We believe the ruling will stand up under Supreme Court review. While chronic trade imbalances remain, the administration now must deploy other trade strategies and authorities to address global overreliance on the U.S. to support the longstanding economic order. Congress can help by reclaiming its Constitutional authority to direct trade. The trade court's ruling states that the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, or IEEPA, can't authorize sweeping tariffs without violating what is known as the nondelegation doctrine. A three-judge panel ruled that IEEPA doesn't grant unlimited, unreviewable authority for the president to declare national emergencies unilaterally or impose tariffs arbitrarily. The ruling cited foundational Supreme Court cases such as Youngstown Sheet&Tube v. Sawyer, as well as more recent decisions such as Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, on improper delegation of authority from Congress to the executive branch. The court also invoked the 'major questions doctrine' of the Roberts court as part of the argument against Mr. Trump's claim of broad trade authority. In its argument before the trade court, the administration heavily relied on U.S. v. Yoshida International, a 1974 Supreme Court decision that upheld President Nixon's brief imposition of a 10% across-the-board tariff aimed at addressing a trade deficit spike. But that reliance ultimately undermines the administration's case for three key reasons. First, Yoshida involved presidential authority under the Trading with the Enemy Act, a statute that was later expressly amended to curtail executive power. Second, the Yoshida opinion emphasized the narrow and temporary scope of Nixon's tariffs, which stands in contrast to Mr. Trump's broader measures. Finally, following Nixon's actions, Congress enacted Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, granting the president more narrowly defined authority to respond to trade imbalances.

JPMorgan, Citizens duke it out over First Republic's old customer base
JPMorgan, Citizens duke it out over First Republic's old customer base

Boston Globe

time33 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

JPMorgan, Citizens duke it out over First Republic's old customer base

JPMorgan typically wields the Chase brand for its retail operations, but not for this venture. Instead, the signs out front say 'J.P. Morgan.' 'We're testing a new model, leveraging ... the JPMorgan brand,' said Stevie Baron, head of affluent banking at New York-based JPMorgan. 'This is an opportunity to take the JPMorgan brand to focus more up market [though] we've got inspiration from First Republic.' The personalized banking services are available to customers with at least $750,000 of deposits and investable assets parked with the bank. The freshly baked chocolate chip cookies that First Republic used to offer have been replaced by squares of Dylan's chocolate. (JPMorgan also has a previously established private banking arm for much wealthier individuals, but does not have a retail presence specifically for that group.) Advertisement JPMorgan's rollout comes as Citizens Financial Group steps up its efforts to cater to wealthy customers through its own relatively new Citizens Private Bank. Citizens was among the bidders for the failed First Republic in 2023, but lost to JPMorgan. However, at least 150 bankers from First Republic left later that year to help Citizens launch its private bank, including Susan deTray, a California-based executive who leads Citizens Private Bank. Advertisement 'We welcome all competition,' Baron said. 'We feel very good about our hand and our ability to serve this client base.' Last year, Citizens reopened a former First Republic branch in the Back Bay to serve as its first private banking office in Boston. (The chocolate chip cookies stayed on the menu there.) Offering a range of banking services to wealthy clients through Citizens Private Bank has turned a profit more quickly than chief executive Bruce Van Saun expected. The private bank, Van Saun said in an April interview, broke even in August, and now has four branches across the US with more on the way. The Providence-based company is opening its Private Bank branches in many of the same markets as JPMorgan; they have been a magnet for money, with nearly $9 billion in deposits and $5 billion in assets under management as of the end of March. The goal, Van Saun said, is to create a 'First Republic 2.0.' 'We're running a little ahead of what we projected,' Van Saun said. 'I think there's a void in the market where First Republic played and Silicon Valley [Bank] played. I think you win with talent. So a lot of the customers of those banks recognize that the personal level of service that the bankers offer was second to none, and Citizens is going to occupy that space.' This is an installment of our weekly Bold Types column about the movers and shakers on Boston's business scene. Advertisement Jon Chesto can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store