KY Senate president praises Trump's pro-coal moves, questions fossil fuels' role in climate change
FRANKFORT — Saying that fossil fuels' role in causing climate change is 'subject to debate,' Republican Senate President Robert Stivers touted President Donald Trump's recent executive orders aimed at boosting the coal industry as a 'step in the right direction' toward making the United States and Kentucky competitive in coal production again.
Stivers, who was among Kentuckians present when Trump signed the executive orders last week, told reporters Tuesday morning Trump is offering a 'two-pronged approach' by first incentivizing coal mining and distribution and then expediting the process to get coal mining permits. Stivers said the policies put 'Kentucky in a good position' to be 'a low-cost energy producer.'
Heavy reliance on coal has eroded a KY economic advantage. Can Trump reverse the trend?
Stivers said producing more coal is also a national security issue, so the U.S. can control more of its own resources instead of relying on importing energy materials. The U.S. already has significantly decreased its dependence on energy from other countries.
The U.S. has been a net exporter of energy since 2019, reports the U.S. Energy Information Agency, and a net coal exporter since at least 1949. In 2023, annual U.S. coal exports increased by about 15% and equaled about 8% of total energy exports, reports the agency. The U.S. is most dependent on other countries for crude oil which accounted for the largest share of U.S. energy imports in 2023.
When Stivers was elected to the legislature in 1997, the state generated nearly $300 million annually in coal severance tax, he said. In the last few years, it's been close to $100 million, which is a 'a reflection of production,' which has declined steeply, Stivers added.
The Trump administration policies are likely to be an economic booster in Kentucky, Stivers predicted. Coal production in Stivers' home of Clay County in Eastern Kentucky peaked at 2.5 million tons annually in 1980, according to the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet. Clay County now produces no coal.
In recent years, Western Kentucky — led by an Alliance Resource Partners mine in Union County — has surpassed Eastern Kentucky in coal production.
Alliance Partners CEO Joe Craft, a Republican megadonor, also was at the White House with Stivers last week to watch Trump vow to revive 'beautiful, clean coal,' a promise he also made in his first term.
'It won't just be miners going back to work,' Stivers said. 'It'll be all the peripheral jobs that will come back, that you'll see that used to be there … supply stores, lumber companies, little grocery stores, mom and pop operations. That's the hope.'
Kentucky generated about 68% of its electricity from coal in 2023, the third-highest of all states. Over the last 25 years, Kentucky has fallen from producing the country's cheapest power to the 12th cheapest as natural gas, solar and wind have often become cheaper than maintaining aging coal-fired power plants. The last large coal-fired power plant built in the country was in 2013.
During the press conference, Stivers pushed back on fossil fuels like coal contributing to climate change. He said 'the assumption that fossil fuels are a contributor to climate change is subject to debate.' Stivers' assertion contradicts scientific studies that consistently identify the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels — coal, oil and gas — as by far the leading cause of climate change.
'If it is a factor in climate change, do you want us with some of the strongest regulatory processes doing more fossil fuels than shipping it and allowing our products to be produced in Russia, China and India that have limited or no environmental concerns and produce way more than what anybody in the United States does in the realm of fossil fuels contaminants?' Stivers said. 'I would rather do it here. We're more cognizant of potential impacts, or at least aware there is an argument of that.'
China in 2023 released more heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions than any other country, followed by the U.S, India, the European Union and Russia, according to an independent tally. Historically, the U.S. is the world's No. 1 emitter of greenhouse gases emissions, which accumulate in the atmosphere, because of the country's earlier and rapid industrialization dating back to the 1800s.
During the Tuesday press conference, Stivers also was asked about the response to Kentucky's recent devastating floods, which have renewed conversations about the state's disaster funds. Before the legislature finished the 2025 legislative session, it passed a law to create a new state aid fund for communities affected by February floods. Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear said it would not be 'enough' to cover damage from those storms. Beshear also has warned that a spending cap imposed by the legislature will limit state resources available for flood recovery.
When asked about Beshear's concern that the state could run out of funding if it faces another natural disaster this year, Stivers said he finds Beshear's 'lack of knowledge problematic' and that calling the legislature into a special legislative for one day would cost less than the governor traveling to Davos, Switzerland, for an economic forum, or paying the salary of Beshear's Senior Adviser Rocky Adkins, a former House speaker.
'He is creating a crisis without the crisis existing,' Stivers said. 'One day is all it takes.'
In 2021, the Legislative Research Commission said a special session costs about $65,000 a day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Florida law gives local leaders more control over beach access. Will they use it?
A new Florida law makes it easier for local governments to allow the public to access the beach even when there are disputes over private property, an issue that has often been hotter than the middle of summer on Perdido Key Beach and has led to lawsuits. However, Escambia County Commissioner Steve Stroberger, who represents the area, doesn't think it's necessary to put the new law into action, at least for now. Under the new law, local governments can allow the public some access to beaches considered "private" without undergoing costly litigation, especially if the beaches were historically used by the public. Gov. Ron DeSantis signed Senate Bill 1622 into law in June to restore 'local control' by allowing local authorities to recognize recreational customary use of Florida's beaches. The law also streamlines beach restoration efforts in small Gulf Coast counties. Perdido Key's beaches generally allow public access to the "wet sand" area, which is south of the mean high-water line. This means that while private property may extend to the high-water mark, the public is generally permitted to walk, swim and fish in the wet sand area. However, access to the dry sand portion of the beach is often restricted to private property owners. Under the new law, counties and cities can adopt ordinances that allow activities like walking, fishing and swimming in the 'dry sand' area of beaches, even on privately owned beachfront property. Escambia County resident Gary Holt has been fighting for more public access on Perdido Key for years. He organized an effort asking the county to remove "no trespassing signs" private property installed in rows on the beach. Private property owners put up so many "no trespassing signs" on Perdido Key, Escambia County passed an ordinance in 2023 limiting them to one sign, 10 feet from the dune line, instead of three signs. Holt said he and others are now in the process of asking Escambia County commissioners to recognize the new law as an executive order signed by DeSantis for customary use of Florida beaches. "Customary use is a game changer for Perdido Key," Holt said. "No more arguing over property lines and who own which white sand! It is a big campaign issue for the West Escambia County residents that love Perdido Key. Also for the local and out-of-state condo owners that were told by local realtors if they bought in Perdido Key they would have a private beach. For the last 10 years the local realtors have used this sales gimmick to separate their condo listing from Orange Beach and Pensacola Beach." The Perdido Key Association, a nonprofit organization that represents property owners, did not return a request for comment about the new law by deadline. Why Escambia Commissioner hesitant to push for new ordinance Stroberger said he has accompanied the Escambia County Sheriff's Office on patrols of the Key and listened to views from law enforcement, property owners and the public on the issue of beach access on Perdido Key, and currently he doesn't believe it's necessary to push for an ordinance recognizing recreational customary use. 'It's not my intention to do anything at this point,' Stroberger said. 'I feel like everybody's working well together down there on the beach. We've even got deputies down there to make sure that everybody abides by the rules.' Stroberger says the deputies are mainly focusing on discouraging trespassers from taking advantage of the restrooms and pools of private condominiums where they are not guests. Public access to Perdido Key Beaches has long been a point of discussion and legal action. In the past there have been several clashes between the public and private property owners over access to the beaches. Disputed public easement: More of Perdido Key Beach is opening up to the public. Here's where you can and can't go The discovery of the original deeds to some Gulf front properties on Perdido Key, dating back to 1957, revealed there are 75-foot public access easements, which opened up about 1.2 miles of beach on that were previously thought exclusive. Some property owners who bought condos and were told the beach was part of the deal are still in litigation with the county over the decision to open it up to the public. Where litigation over 75-foot public access easement stands Last December, an Escambia County judge dismissed several lawsuits filed by condominium associations seeking to overturn the 75-foot access public access easement. Several condo associations refiled in January saying it's a 'cloud' on the title and property owners bought their units under a claim of title exclusive of any other right. They don't believe the county has a valid claim to the easement for several legal reasons, and they were seeking from the court a legal declaration of condominium associations' rights concerning the validity and enforceability of the county's actions. More beach access: Escambia postpones Galvez Landing project, opts to fund Perdido Key beach access instead However, a motion by the plaintiffs to stay the litigation for about five months was filed June 24, the same day the governor signed SB 1622 into law. 'I think everything is essentially on hold,' Stroberger said. 'They want to see what we're going to do. I don't want another lawsuit, and I don't really want to mix it up with everybody, if everybody seems to be doing well on the beach. I do believe that the beaches are for the public, but I also believe in property rights. It's really quite a tightrope we have to walk with that.' The new law repeals a 2018 law that limited the ability of local governments to uphold long-standing public beach access traditions, and DeSantis said one of the goals of passing it is to give local governments the authority to recognize recreational customary use without having to go through 'costly judicial declarations on a parcel-by-parcel basis.' New law also addresses beach erosion The governor said the legislation also improves the process for restoring eroded beaches in certain Gulf Coast counties for those with fewer than 275,000 residents and at least three municipalities, by allowing the state to use the mean high-water line as the erosion control line, eliminating duplicative procedures that delay critical restoration projects. This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: Public beach access in Perdido Key could expand under Senate Bill 1622 Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO defense chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees
NATO defense chiefs were due to hold a virtual meeting Wednesday, a senior alliance official said, as countries pushing for an end to Russia's war on Ukraine devise possible future security guarantees for Kyiv that could help forge a peace agreement. Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO's Military Committee, said that 32 defense chiefs from across the alliance would hold a video conference as a U.S.-led diplomatic push seeks to end the fighting. U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, will take part in the talks, Dragone said on social platform X. U.S. President Donald Trump met last Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and on Monday hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelenskyy toward a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbor, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia won't mount another invasion in coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, have signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the U.S. might play in is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending U.S. troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Zelenskyy said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential.'
Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Nikki Haley: Trump Needs To Rebuild U.S.-India Relationship
In July 1982, President Ronald Reagan welcomed Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to a state dinner at the White House. Toasting the friendship between our "two proud, free peoples," he said: "although our countries may travel separate paths from time to time, our destination remains the same." Four decades later, the U.S.-India relationship is at a troubling inflection point. To achieve the Trump administration's foreign policy goals—outcompeting China and achieving peace through strength—few objectives are more critical than getting U.S.-India relations back on track. The last few weeks have seen an explosive series of events. The Trump administration has threatened India with 25 percent tariffs for purchasing Russian oil, on top of the 25 percent President Donald Trump already slapped on Indian goods. These developments followed months of rising tension, including over the U.S. role in India-Pakistan ceasefire negotiations. Trump is right to target India's massive Russian oil purchases, which are helping to fund Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine. India has also traditionally been among the most protectionist economies in the world, with an average tariff rate more than five times the U.S. average in 2023. But India must be treated like the prized free and democratic partner that it is—not an adversary like China, which has thus far avoided sanctions for its Russian oil purchases, despite being one of Moscow's largest customers. If that disparity does not demand a closer look at U.S.-India relations, the realities of hard power should. Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley announced that she would vote for former President Donald Trump during an event at the Hudson Institute on May 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley announced that she would vote for former President Donald Trump during an event at the Hudson Institute on May 22, 2024 in Washington, the short term, India is essential in helping the United States move its critical supply chains away from China. While the Trump administration works to bring manufacturing back to our shores, India stands alone in its potential to manufacture at China-like scale for products that can't be quickly or efficiently produced here, like textiles, inexpensive phones, and solar panels. When it comes to defense, India's expanding military ties with the United States, Israel, and other American allies make it a crucial asset to the free world's security, and a rapidly growing market for U.S. defense equipment and cooperation. India's growing clout and security involvement in the Middle East could prove essential in helping to stabilize the region as America seeks to send fewer troops and dollars there. And India's location at the center of China's vital trade and energy flows could complicate Beijing's options in the case of a major conflict. In the longer term, India's significance is even more profound. Home to more than a sixth of humanity, India surpassed China as the world's most populous country in 2023, with a young workforce that contrasts with China's aging one. It is the world's fastest-growing major economy—soon to eclipse Japan as the world's fourth largest. India's rise represents the most significant geopolitical event since China's, and is among the greatest obstacles to China's goal of reshaping the global order. Simply put, China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows. Yet, unlike Communist-controlled China, the rise of a democratic India does not threaten the free world. Partnership between the U.S. and India to counter China should be a no-brainer. India and China are unfriendly neighbors that have conflicting economic interests and ongoing territorial disputes, including a lethal skirmish over contested borders as recently as 2020. It would serve America's interests to help India stand up to its increasingly aggressive northern neighbor, both economically and militarily. And it would be a massive—and preventable—mistake to balloon a trade spat between the United States and India into an enduring rupture. If that were to happen, the Chinese Communist Party would be quick to play India and the United States against one another. For its part, India must take Trump's point over Russian oil seriously, and work with the White House to find a solution. As for the United States, the most urgent priority should be to reverse the downward spiral, which will require direct talks between President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The sooner the better. The administration should focus on mending the rift with India and giving the relationship more high-level attention and resources—approaching what the U.S. devotes to China or Israel. Decades of friendship and good will between the world's two largest democracies provide a solid basis to move past the current turbulence. Navigating challenging issues like trade disagreements and Russian oil imports demand hard dialogue, but difficult conversations are often the sign of a deepening partnership. The United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals. To face China, the United States must have a friend in India. Nikki Haley, the Walter P. Stern Chair at the Hudson Institute, was US ambassador to the United Nations and governor of South Carolina. Bill Drexel is a fellow at the Hudson Institute. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
