What did the House get up to during Budget urgency?
Photo:
VNP / Daniela Maoate-Cox
Parliament sat for two extra days last week for an especially long and jam-packed edition of Budget urgency.
It's pretty much routine for governments to adjourn the Budget debate and move to urgency once all the parties have given at least one speech. The purpose of Budget urgency is to progress legislation directly related to the Budget, but unrelated bills usually get thrown into the mix as well.
On Thursday afternoon the House heard from Finance Minister Nicola Willis, Leader of the Opposition Chris Hipkins, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, Greens co-leader Chloe Swarbrick, Act leader David Seymour, New Zealand First deputy leader Shane Jones, and Te Pāti Māori MP Tākuta Ferris.
After that, Leader of the House Chris Bishop adjourned the Budget debate with just under six hours remaining and asked the House to accord urgency, so that 12 bills could progress through 30 stages of debate.
By the time urgency was lifted and MPs finally got to go home at midnight on Saturday evening, there had been nine first readings, five second readings, two completed committee stages, and two third readings. For more on why the government's urgency plan was so unsuccessful read The House's story
Government urgency plans slow to a crawl
.
Exactly which bills did MPs spend most of their weekend debating?
David Seymour's contentious Regulatory Standards Bill is one of the government's flagship 'cutting red tape' bills. Seymour and his party have long been proponents of reforming New Zealand's regulatory system in the name of lifting productivity and reducing regulatory burden. Specifically, this bill would create principles of responsible regulation that future lawmakers would have to adhere to, as well as a Regulatory Standards Board, which would be in charge of examining current and future legislation against those principles.
During the bill's first reading on Friday afternoon, Seymour told the House: "If you want to tax someone, take their property, and restrict their livelihood, you can, but you'll actually have to show why it's in the public interest. The bill demands you show your working."
Labour's Duncan Webb called the bill "a cherry-picked right wing neoliberal agenda" that, ironically, lacked a regulatory impact statement.
The Regulatory Standards Bill was referred to the Finance and Expenditure Committee and is open for public submissions until 23 June.
You may have heard the Building and Construction (Small Stand-alone Dwellings) Amendment Bill being referred to as the Granny Flat Bill. The proposed legislation is another deregulation-oriented bill.
If passed, Chris Penk's bill would allow stand-alone dwellings (up to 70m2) to be built without requiring building consents, as long as they adhere to certain requirements.
The bill is now with the Transport and Infrastructure Committee and is also open for public submissions until 23 June.
The Public Finance Amendment Bill is, while not explicitly a budget bill, it is certainly budget-adjacent. Broadly speaking, it aims to promote increased transparency of government in its management of public finances, and also seeks to improve the practical functionality of the Public Finance Act.
It was referred to the Finance and Expenditure Committee after its first reading late on Saturday night and is open for submissions until 7 July.
The last bill to be sent to select committee during budget urgency was the Judicature (Timeliness) Legislation Amendment Bill. The bill's purpose is to increase the efficiency of the courts and by extension the police and corrections systems. Being an omnibus bill, it does this by amending several justice-related laws and making technical changes to the running of court proceedings.
All parties except Te Pāti Māori supported the bill at first reading before it was sent to the Justice Committee, which will report back to the House by 23 September.
The Taxation (Budget Measures) Bill (No 2) was agreed by the House and, pending Royal Assent, gives legal effect to budget announcements.
Specifically, it changes KiwiSaver (increasing employer and employee contribution rates but reducing government contribution from 50 to 25 cents per dollar earned, capped at $260.72), increases the Working for Families abatement threshold, and brings in income testing for the initial year of the Best Start scheme.
The other bill that is all but law is Louise Upstons' Social Assistance Legislation (Accommodation Supplement and Income-related Rent) Amendment Bill.
The bill aims to ensure households are treated more equitably when calculating housing subsidies, and perhaps more notably, it seeks to mitigate the double subsidisation of housing subsidies, which in the context of accommodation, is a term for when a boarder and the person receiving board payments are both claiming accommodation subsidies for the same accommodation costs.
When the House adjourned at midnight on Saturday evening, MPs were halfway through the debate on the first reading of the Legal Services (Distribution of Special Fund) Amendment Bill, which they will likely resume when they come back for the next sitting block, which commences on 3 June.
*RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a few seconds ago
- Otago Daily Times
Transtasman alliance could be global force for good
New Zealand and Australia need to give much greater attention to the combined impact they could have on the world stage, an international relations specialist says. Prof Robert Patman says the two countries' close relationship could be used to help address global issues. He urges the governments of both countries to formulate a plan to campaign for change on issues they have shared views on, such as the erosion of international law by great powers. ''I think both Canberra and Wellington need to give that issue a lot more attention,'' Prof Patman said. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (left) and New Zealand counterpart Christopher Luxon. PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES Speaking on the Otago Daily Times' Global Insight, the University of Otago academic said global issues were too big for superpowers to solve unilaterally, allowing middle and small powers to work together on transnational solutions. ''[That] opens the door for New Zealand and Australia to play a constructive role and win over majority support... to bring about effective change.'' Prof Patman would like to see New Zealand and Australia collaborate to push for reform of the United Nations Security Council, where five countries - China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States - have veto rights on council resolutions. Watch full interview here He wants the veto constrained or even abolished, or, alternatively, for the General Assembly to be empowered, when there is a two-thirds majority, to overrule any veto. ''There's a lack of global leadership on key issues... So, I do think there's real scope for Australia and New Zealand.'' In this episode of Global Insight, Prof Patman also outlines the state of the New Zealand-Australia relationship, considers what could threaten or strengthen that partnership and details the Christchurch Call as an example of New Zealand's leading role in influencing collaborative change at an international level.
RNZ News
a few seconds ago
- RNZ News
Government refutes claim FBI's new office in Wellington to counter China
The government is batting away suggestions the FBI's new office in Wellington aims to counter China, despite that claim being made by the agency's director. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation director Kash Patel - a Trump appointee - on Thursday announced the opening of a new dedicated attaché office in the capital. An official statement was accompanied by a video , in which Patel said the issues New Zealand and the US worked on together were "some of the most important global issues of our times". Top of the list of those issues was: "countering the CCP (Chinese Communist Party)" in the Indo-Pacific region. Other issues included countering narcotics trade, cyberintrusion and ransomware and protecting citizens across the world. FBI spokesperson Ben Williamson also told the Daily Mail the opening was a "historic step" in strengthening the working relationship with New Zealand including to "confront the growing threats of our time emanating from the Indo-Pacific - particularly from hostile nation-state actors like the Chinese Communist Party". Patel told the newspaper the FBI had "a strong relationship and collaborated closely with our counterparts in New Zealand for years". He was first spotted at the Beehive on Wednesday, and the statement confirmed he had met with the Minister Responsible for the spy agencies GCSB and NZSIS Judith Collins, Police Minister Mark Mitchell, and Foreign Minister Winston Peters. FBI director Kash Patel at the announcement of the standalone FBI office in Wellington. Photo: OLA THORSEN Collins said it was an "excellent" meeting with "a lot of good discussion around the need for the FBI and our intelligence agencies, as well as police, to work even more closely together". "The upgrade of the FBI presence here into an office that reports through to Washington DC, not through to Canberra, has got to be a good thing ... we were the only one of the Five Eyes partners that did not have an FBI office here - we had people, but not a full office. "You know, we just love being our own office." Collins said New Zealand was "fortunate to be part of Five Eyes" given it had a population the size of Alabama: "we cannot do everything by ourselves". She pushed back on suggestions the office was a response to China's influence, saying it was "about the transnational crime that we see, the increasing influence of major drug traffickers across the Pacific, but also interference in countries' systems - particularly when I look at some of the gun-running sort of type behaviour that we know goes on the Pacific from transnational and global criminal outfits". When it was pointed out Patel himself had referred to China, Collins said: "well, I don't respond to other people's press releases". "That's up to him, he doesn't answer to me," she said. Collins said the US was "very focused on fentanyl" and knew New Zealand was focused on disrupting methamphetamine trade. "We know that we do have international criminals ... let's just understand that our security agency is also involved in this. We're not going to single out any particular country." When pressed on China's warships being sent near New Zealand waters, and launching intercontinental ballistic missiles into the Pacific, she said the FBI was "focused on parts of that but not all of that - I mean, obviously it's not Defence ... the point is that it's a US decision and we're happy to support it". She did not expect "any response at all" from China to the news. "This is our country, our sovereign right to do what we do." The secrecy around Patel's travel to New Zealand was for security reasons, she said: "the US, actually, they've made their own arrangements and so consequently we've obviously respected that". From left Police Minister Mark Mitchell and Minister Responsible for the GSCB and NZSIS Judith Collins with FBI director Kash Patel at the opening ceremony for a dedicated FBI law enforcement attaché office in Wellington. Photo: OLA THORSEN Winston Peters said the new office was "a really serious utility added to our crime fighting capacity in the Pacific, and crime and drug dealing and narcotics is an awful scourge, and we've got to get on top of it, so it's great news". He said the subject of China had not been raised in their meeting. "We never raised that issue, we talked about the Pacific, what we could do to improve the law and order situation, the great concern that Pacific countries had and that they needed help, and that we need to be part of the solution." Peters pushed back when asked how China might view it: "No, no, look, we're not going to run to your narrative, that's a waste of our time." He said his 40-minute meeting with Patel on Wednesday took place at "about the same time as the tsunami warning went off", which the FBI director heard. "We all did, but then he realized that when I told him we are a country that put 70 Dart boys throughout the whole of Pacific to give us all the alerts in the world." Mark Mitchell said that as well as meeting with Patel alongside the other ministers, he had also spoken with the director privately. "I like him, yeah. He's very down to earth, very aware and across the issues that we're facing, very aligned - for us, we've got a big methamphetamine problem obviously that we're dealing with as a country, they've got the same sort of issues. "He's got right behind his bureau, he's got his agents back out, highly active doing their work. So, yeah, I was very impressed with him." Mitchell said the new office was not a sign of "growing ties" with the US, saying "we've got very strong pre-existing relationship". "We should be working right across our Five Eyes partnership - especially for me and law enforcement and public safety, it's really important. We have a responsibility out to the Pacific as well, they are really suffering and buckling under the pressure of Class-A drugs and methamphetamine so I think that it's a very positive step." He referred questions about whether it was related to China to Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. "All I'm doing is speaking from my position as minister of police that it's a really good step and a really positive step for us to have a permanent FBI liaison office set up here in New Zealand." Whether the office would have New Zealanders staffing it was an operational matter that police would work on with the FBI, he said - but the benefit of having it was that the FBI was "very good at law enforcement". "They've got very good intelligence networks in terms of the countries that are peddling and sending methamphetamine down to our countries, so ... there's lots of different areas that our law enforcement officers can work and collaborate together to try and make sure that we're safe and the Pacific's safer, and ultimately, the United States is safer as well." With Labour leader Chris Hipkins out of Wellington, deputy Carmel Sepuloni said the announcement was a serious one and had come "as quite a surprise". "I personally haven't received an explanation, and I think that the general public are going to be wanting to know what the rationale is for this." Green Party national security and intelligence spokesperson Teanau Tuiono was disappointed to see the office set up at all. "Just no. We're not another state of the United States, we shouldn't be allowing foreign powers to set up shop like this, we don't like that, we don't like that at all ... it flies in the face of our independent foreign policy." Tuiono reiterated the party's position that New Zealand should exit the Five Eyes intelligence sharing group. "Our policy is we don't like Five Eyes, we think we should step away from Five Eyes, and if you look at what's happening around the world as well with the chaotic nature of the Trump regime, more and more people around the world are looking to build alliances in other ways." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said the US was "a long and strong friend of New Zealand" and having an FBI office "doesn't really change that, it just strengthens the relationship". His response to the Greens' stance was dismissive: "We need to make sure that we understand the world that we're living in which is not the safe one that we'd like it to be. "The idea that New Zealand would pull out of an intelligence sharing agreement with Britain, America, Australia and Canada, I mean - who do they think our friends are in this world?"
RNZ News
a few seconds ago
- RNZ News
Taupō council defers debate over draft water management agreement with iwi
The draft Joint Management Agreement aims to protect the water of Lake Taupō (Taupō Moana) (pictured) and the Upper Waikato River. Photo: RNZ / Libby Kirkby-McLeod The Taupō District Council has voted to defer consideration of a draft water management agreement with local iwi Ngāti Tūwharetoa until after the next local government elections. The draft Joint Management Agreement (JMA) has drawn controversy with one councillor, Duncan Campbell, calling in lobby group Hobson's Pledge to raise his concerns to a wider audience. The purpose of the draft JMA is to protect the water of Lake Taupō (Taupō Moana) and the Upper Waikato River. It would see the council and Tūwharetoa Māori Trust Board collaborate on work such as monitoring and enforcement, district plan reviews, resource consent application assessments, and enabling customary activities. At a meeting on Thursday the council resolved to defer consideration of the draft Joint Management Agreement and direct the chief executive to refer the matter to the incoming council as soon as reasonably practicable following the local government elections in October 2025. Six councillors, including the Mayor David Trewavas, voted in favour of the resolution. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
