Transtasman alliance could be global force for good
Prof Robert Patman says the two countries' close relationship could be used to help address global issues.
He urges the governments of both countries to formulate a plan to campaign for change on issues they have shared views on, such as the erosion of international law by great powers.
''I think both Canberra and Wellington need to give that issue a lot more attention,'' Prof Patman said.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (left) and New Zealand counterpart Christopher Luxon. PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES
Speaking on the Otago Daily Times' Global Insight, the University of Otago academic said global issues were too big for superpowers to solve unilaterally, allowing middle and small powers to work together on transnational solutions.
''[That] opens the door for New Zealand and Australia to play a constructive role and win over majority support... to bring about effective change.''
Prof Patman would like to see New Zealand and Australia collaborate to push for reform of the United Nations Security Council, where five countries - China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States - have veto rights on council resolutions.
Watch full interview here
He wants the veto constrained or even abolished, or, alternatively, for the General Assembly to be empowered, when there is a two-thirds majority, to overrule any veto.
''There's a lack of global leadership on key issues... So, I do think there's real scope for Australia and New Zealand.''
In this episode of Global Insight, Prof Patman also outlines the state of the New Zealand-Australia relationship, considers what could threaten or strengthen that partnership and details the Christchurch Call as an example of New Zealand's leading role in influencing collaborative change at an international level.
bruce.munro@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Project 10: How the government kept the pay equity law change secret
Photo: RNZ Internal documents reveal how ministers worked to keep sweeping pay equity changes secret until the last minute - a move designed to prevent a surge in claims and protect the government balance sheet. In emails and briefings, the ministers and their staff acknowledged their plans would bypass public scrutiny, extinguish existing claims, and potentially breach people's rights. They pushed on anyway, guarding the release of information, so the news would not leak out before the Bill was introduced in May this year. The announcement was sudden, and the bill passed under urgency. The changes led to protests across New Zealand. Photo: RNZ / Rowan Quinn It halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving work had been historically undervalued to support a claim. Claims then had to start again under the new threshold. In the Budget it was revealed the savings from tightening the regime amounted to about $12.8b in total over the next four years. The documents, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, revealed ministerial meetings, including one involving the Prime Minister, were carefully managed, with instructions to withhold their proactive diary release under confidentiality provisions. Ministerial meetings, including one with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, were carefully managed. (File photo) Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii One email from Minister Brooke van Velden's office instructed officials to manually remove digital access to cabinet papers, warning that leaving the default settings in place "will give access to ministers but also SPSs [senior private secretaries] and some ministerial advisors. So you might want to remove that and we can add individual named ministers instead." Another memo described how hard copies were hand-delivered to ministers' offices to avoid creating digital trails. "If you really need a soft copy, I can email it through," wrote an official from the office of Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety, Brooke van Velden. "(For context, I swear I'm not being weirdly difficult - this was the method of distribution that has been advised.)" The strategy was internally referred to as "Project Ten". A comprehensive communications pack was prepared in advance, to be released only after the bill had been introduced and passed. "We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the Bill," one paper said. Minister Brooke van Velden. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii "This is because there is a risk of a large increase in the number of claims being raised if information about the proposed changes is made public beforehand." That advice was followed. The government released the Equal Pay Amendment Act 2025 on May 6 without warning, introduced it under urgency, and passed it through all three readings in a single day - leaving no opportunity for public consultation. The legislation stopped 33 active claims overnight , some of which had been underway for years, and implemented a stricter legal test for future ones. The documents make clear that fiscal concerns were central to the push - a key driver was to significantly reduce costs to the Crown. Officials stressed the need for the law to be passed in time for Budget 2025 , reinforcing the cost-cutting motive. But, they acknowledged the truncated timeline meant there was no opportunity for public submissions on the Bill - a process later criticised as "particularly unusual and draconian". Officials also conceded limited testing and analysis of the policy proposals due to the short timeframe, and raised concerns about unintended consequences arising once the Bill has been passed. Despite the rushed process, the internal discussions reveal the government was aware of the contentious nature of the changes. Officials noted the proposed transitional arrangements, which "retrospectively remove and alter people's rights," were "most likely to be contentious" and "may engage the Human Rights Act and Bill of Rights Act". It proceeded anyway. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
38 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Tension as Cook Islands marks 60th anniversary
The biggest event in the Cook Islands calendar is currently underway, marking 60 years of free association with New Zealand. However it comes as the relationship with New Zealand is tense, after the Cook Islands Prime Minister signed a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with China in February. RNZ Pacific journalist Caleb Fotheringham is in the Cook Islands.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Southland mayoral candidate berates CEO, brags about sporting accomplishments at meeting
Wendy Baker is upset at the council over a letter she received — the contents of which remain a secret. Photo: LDR / Supplied A Southland mayoral hopeful has taken shots at a council chief executive during a fiery public speech. On Wednesday, Wendy Baker presented to district councillors about the council's dog control policy and bylaw review. But her presentation began on an unrelated note when she read out a letter she had received from the minister of sports and recreation about her sporting accomplishments. "I wanted to bring that up because it's a positive letter of praise. And unfortunately, just recently, your CEO - who is extremely well-paid - sent me a letter which was very upsetting to me," Baker said. "This letter as you all know has gone to the ombudsman. A leader needs to build people up, and I will not be bullied when I do amazing amounts of volunteer work which your council ignores formally, I feel." Baker would not divulge the contents of the chief executive's letter, but confirmed to Local Democracy Reporting it was not related to the minister's letter. The letter was out of the blue, unnecessary and untimely, she said. "They should be praising the work I do and not sending a letter that upsets me." In response to questions, council chief executive Cameron McIntosh was tight lipped. "We have raised some matters with Baker. They are between council and Baker," he said. "We will leave it with Baker to decide if she wishes to share the contents of the letter with media." Baker's presentation also took aim at the council over a perceived lack of dog control. She said a dog had come onto her property twice in three weeks - once on the eve of Anzac Day attacking a possum and once attacking a back fence at 4am in the morning. "I pay $4099.50 in rates to SDC... and what do I get for it? Stuff all." Baker said she had begun watching a programme called Mastering Leadership: Common Canine Misbehaviours, and planned to donate it to animal control staff or the library. The mayoral hopeful is one of three candidates currently in the running for the top job this October. At the 2022 election, she finished last out of six candidates with 211 votes. - LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
