
From leaks and media doubts to ‘historic success': What Pete Hegseth said on US strikes on Iran
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday (June 26) defended the recent American strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, calling them 'historically successful' and rejecting leaked intel that downplayed their impact. In a heated Pentagon briefing, he also criticised the media for focusing on scandal, leaks, and gender identity, insisting that Americans 'don't care' about whether pilots are male or female.
Hegseth pushed back against leaked intelligence assessments that reportedly downplay the impact of the operation.
Speaking at a Pentagon news conference, Hegseth dismissed early analysis suggesting the strikes may have delayed Iran's nuclear progress by only a few months. 'Destroyed, defeated, obliterated – choose your word,' Hegseth said. 'This was a historically successful attack.'
President Donald Trump earlier insisted the strikes were 'devastating,' adding that doubting their success was 'not only unpatriotic' but 'makes the pilots who dropped the bombs very upset.'
The briefing began with Hegseth blasting reporters for what he described as their obsession with scandal. 'You're hunting for scandals all the time,' he said, accusing the press of ignoring 'historic moments' such as stronger US military and increased European defense spending.
He zeroed in on media coverage of the leaked intelligence report, accusing journalists of rooting for failure. 'You, the press corps, cheer against Trump so hard,' Hegseth said. 'It's like in your DNA. You have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.'
Hegseth expressed frustration over the media's reliance on leaks, claiming they distorted the narrative. 'When someone leaks something, they do it with an agenda,' he said. 'That is what has changed—this new cycle based on irresponsible reporting.'
Hegseth faced repeated questions about whether Iran managed to move enriched uranium out of its Fordow nuclear facility before the strike.
Satellite images taken ahead of the bombing showed trucks lining up outside the site.
Pressed on whether enriched uranium had been relocated, Hegseth responded, 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit wasn't exactly what we wanted to hit.'
When another reporter followed up, asking again about the possibility of uranium being moved, he insisted, 'Of course, we're watching every single aspect.'
A third question on the same topic led Hegseth to say, 'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be moved or otherwise.'
Hegseth dismissed concerns over gender recognition in the military after being questioned about the lack of acknowledgment for a female pilot who took part in the recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
During a tense exchange at the Pentagon, a reporter challenged Hegseth on his initial post-strike messaging that praised only 'the boys,' despite confirmation that a female pilot was part of the mission.
Hegseth brushed off the criticism, describing 'boys and bombers' as a 'common phrase.'
'I will keep saying things like that whether they are men or women,' he said. 'I am very proud of that female pilot, just like I am very proud of those male pilots.'
Hegseth went further, accusing the media of fixating on identity politics rather than military accomplishments.
'I don't care if it is a male or female in that cockpit. And the American people don't care,' he said. 'It's the obsession with race and gender. We don't do that anymore. We don't play your little games.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Senate Parliamentarian blocks key Medicaid cuts in Trump's tax bill, jeopardizing July 4 deadline
The Senate parliamentarian delivered a crucial setback to Republicans on Thursday, ruling that a core Medicaid provider tax overhaul in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending bill violates Senate procedural rules. The provision, intended to save $250 billion by slashing state taxes on hospitals and health providers, was a linchpin in offsetting the bill's trillions in tax breaks, primarily benefiting corporations and wealthy Americans. With Democrats uniformly opposed, Republican leaders must now scramble to revise or remove the provision entirely, as defying the nonpartisan parliamentarian's guidance is virtually unprecedented. The ruling intensifies pressure on GOP senators racing against Trump's July 4 deadline for passage, with the bill's fate now hanging in the balance. The fallout extends beyond Medicaid: The parliamentarian also rejected GOP measures blocking immigrants from healthcare programs and restricting gender-affirming care under Medicaid, further eroding the bill's planned savings. Republican leaders had leaned heavily on these health cuts to fund permanent extensions of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which expire this year. Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) hailed the rulings as a victory, stating they excised 'morally bankrupt' cuts threatening vulnerable Americans. Yet for Republicans, the decisions risk ballooning the bill's deficit impact, which the Congressional Budget Office already estimated at $2.8–$3.4 trillion over a decade. Even before the parliamentarian's ruling, the Medicaid cuts faced fierce resistance within the GOP. Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) warned the provider tax reductions would cripple rural hospitals reliant on those funds—potentially triggering closures in their states. Hawley revealed Trump personally directed him late Wednesday to revert to the House's milder approach (freezing provider taxes instead of cutting them), signaling disarray in Republican strategy. Hospital associations nationwide echoed alarms, predicting the Senate's deeper cuts would 'wipe out balance sheets' and devastate healthcare access. To placate critics, Senate GOP leaders floated a $15 billion rural hospital fund as a safety net. But Collins demanded at least $100 billion, calling the initial figure woefully inadequate, while fiscal hawks like Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) deemed even $15 billion excessive. Tillis, facing reelection in battleground North Carolina, bluntly warned colleagues the cuts could cost Republicans the 2026 midterms, comparing the political fallout to Democrats' Obamacare implosion in 2014. Meanwhile, House Republicans from New York and California threatened to sink the bill over unrelated state tax (SALT) disputes, highlighting the fragile coalition. With the parliamentarian's decision constraining GOP options, Republican leaders now face three untenable choices: strip the Medicaid provisions, revise them to comply with rules (a complex task under time pressure), or force a floor vote requiring 60 senators to override objections, a near-impossible threshold given Democratic unity. The ruling also undermines Trump's ultimatum for passage by July 4, though Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) insisted Republicans have 'contingency plans' and are 'plowing forward.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added urgency by noting the U.S. is nearing its debt limit deadline in August, complicating the timeline further. As the Senate grinds toward potential weekend votes, human stakes underscore the policy clash. In Missouri, mother Courtney Leader told CNN her 9-year-old daughter with cerebral palsy relies on Medicaid for life-sustaining care: 'Without Medicaid, we would lose everything, our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter.'
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
'China owned', 'Vsl no link Israel': Vessels near Hormuz transmit unusual messages to avoid attacks amid ceasefire uncertainty
Ships transiting near the Strait of Hormuz have begun broadcasting unusual messages about their nationality in an apparent effort to avoid being targeted, as uncertainty continues to cloud the ceasefire between Iran and Israel read more An aerial view of the Iranian shores and the island of Qeshm in the strait of Hormuz, on December 10, 2023. Reuters File Ships transiting near the Strait of Hormuz have begun broadcasting unusual messages about their nationality in an apparent effort to avoid being targeted, as uncertainty continues to cloud the ceasefire between Iran and Israel, according to a Reuters report, citing maritime risk analytics firm Windward and ship tracking data on Thursday. According to the report, citing Windward, the practice began after hostilities erupted earlier this month between Iran and Israel, prompting US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Though a ceasefire was brokered by US President Donald Trump after 12 days of conflict, maritime security threats remain high in the region. The Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) confirmed that the overall risk to vessels in the area remains elevated despite the truce. 'The perception among shipowners is that due to the convoluted nature of shipping it's hard to know or ascertain clearly a chain of ownership to nationalities which may be under higher threat in shipping, namely the UK, US and Israel,' Reuters quoted Ami Daniel, chief executive officer of Windward, as saying. Between June 12 and 24, as many as 55 vessels transmitted 101 unusual messages while sailing through the Gulf and Red Sea, according to Reuters, citing Windward. These messages included identifiers such as 'China owned' and 'Russian crude,' in an apparent effort to deter attacks by signaling affiliation with countries perceived as less likely to be targeted than Western nations. Commercial maritime traffic surged by 30% on June 24, the day after a ceasefire was announced, reported Reuters, citing the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC). The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world's most vital energy corridors, with around 20% of global oil and fuel consumption passing through its narrow waters. Under normal circumstances, vessels in the region typically broadcast their destinations or use standard signals such as 'For Orders.' In high-risk areas, messages like 'Armed Guards on Board' are occasionally transmitted to deter piracy or potential attacks. However, according to Daniel from maritime analytics firm Windward, the appearance of unusual messages significantly increased after June 12. Prior to that date, such messages were mostly confined to the Red Sea, which had been a hotspot for attacks by Houthi rebels following the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I've never seen it in the Persian Gulf,' Reuters quoted Daniel as saying. A Panama-flagged container ship, Yuan Xiang Fa Zhan, en route to Pakistan, was broadcasting the message 'PKKHI all Chinese' on Thursday as it transited the Strait of Hormuz, according to vessel tracking data from LSEG. Meanwhile, the China-flagged supertanker Yuan Yang Hu, carrying crude oil from Saudi Arabia to China, was transmitting 'Chinese ship' while crossing the strait. Once it cleared the waterway, the signal changed to 'CN NBG,' referencing the Port of Ningbo-Zhoushan. In the Red Sea, the Singapore-flagged container ship Kota Cabar broadcast the message 'Vsl no link Israel' as it navigated the high-risk area. The Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) also issued a warning about electronic interference affecting the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in the region. Disruptions to GNSS can cause ships to veer off course, heightening the risk of collisions or grounding. With inputs from agencies


NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Shares Test Footage Of Bunker Busters To Prove Damage In Iran Strikes
On Thursday, in a news conference at the Pentagon, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff described in great detail the planning and execution of the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Gen. Caine shared test footage of the bunker buster bombs. 12 of these were used during the Iran strikes, a US official told CNN. Pentagon releases test footage showing how bunker-busters work. @SecDef Hegseth: 'Because of the hatred of this press... your people are trying to leak & spin that it wasn't successful. It's irresponsible.' Gen. 'Razin' Caine, on the mission: 'I have about this.' — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 26, 2025 They pushed back against the classified Defense Intelligence Agency report that the attacks damaged the facilities but did not destroy them, and that the country's nuclear programme has been pushed only by a few months. Hegseth said that the strike was "decimating - choose your word - obliterating, destroying." He added that the report was "low confidence" and had "gaps in the information". They played videos of how the bombing took place on the nuclear sites, explaining how the bombers attacked. Unlike other normal bombs, the damage done by a bunker-buster bomb, cannot be seen on the surface level. They are designed to deeply bury and then function. "A bomb has three effects that cause damage: blast, fragmentation and overpressure. In this case, the primary kill mechanisms in the mission space were a mix of overpressure and blast," Gen Caine added. 'The video I'm about to show you is the cumulation of 15 years of testing and development…100s of test shots on various models.' - and if that wasn't explicit enough, the building model and impact measuring poles should resolve that bad faith take — TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy) (@ALegalProcess) June 26, 2025 Hegseth blamed the media for questioning the success of the strike and said the media cannot cheer for Trump. "Searching for scandals, you miss historic moments like recruiting at the Pentagon, historic levels in the Army, the Air Force and the Navy", he said. Gen. Caine did not get political, but focussed on the two officers at the Defence Threat Reduction Agency who studied the subterranean nuclear plant at Fordow for 15 years to plan the attack, the personnel who developed the 30,000-pound bombs that the B-2's dropped, the crew who flew the 37-hour mission, and the troops who defended an American base from Iranian retaliation. He described how all the six bombs "went exactly where they were intended to go" and added that "unlike a normal surface bomb, you won't see an impact crater". He said the bombs targeted ventilation shafts located on the opposite sides of Fordow, that Iran tried to cover with concrete before the strikes. On each side, he said, the first bomb opened the shaft and the four bombs after it entered "at greater than 1,000 feet per second". The final and sixth bomb would act like a "flex weapon" in case any of the bombs preceding it had an issue. However, they did not speak about Natanz, which was attacked with only two penetrator bombs, and Isfahan, which was struck by only one missile fired from a Navy submarine. Asked by reporters on what happened to the 880 pounds of uranium buried in the underground tunnels at Isfahan, Hegseth said, "We're looking at all aspects of intelligence and making sure we have a sense of what was where." US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to share that, "The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move."