
A VPN Company Canceled All Lifetime Subscriptions, Claiming It Didn't Know About Them
Photo-Illustration:The new owners of VPN provider VPNSecure have drawn ire after canceling lifetime subscriptions. The owners told customers that they didn't know about the lifetime subscriptions when they bought VPNSecure, and they cannot honor the purchases.
In March, complaints started appearing online about lifetime subscriptions to VPNSecure no longer working.
The first public response Ars Technica found came on April 28, when lifetime subscription holders reported receiving an email from the VPN provider saying: 'To continue providing a secure and high-quality experience for all users, Lifetime Deal accounts have now been deactivated as of April 28th, 2025.'
A copy of the email from 'The VPN Secure Team' and posted on Reddit notes that VPNSecure had previously deactivated accounts with lifetime subscriptions that it said hadn't been used in 'over 6 months.' The message noted that VPNSecure was acquired in 2023, 'including the technology, domain, and customer database—but not the liabilities.' The email continues:
Unfortunately, the previous owner did not disclose that thousands of Lifetime Deals (LTDs) had been sold through platforms like StackSocial.
We discovered this only months later—when a large portion of our resources were strained by these LTD accounts and high support volume from users, who through part of the database, provided no sustaining income to help us improve and maintain the service.
VPNSecure is offering affected users discounted new subscriptions for either $1.87 for a month (instead of $9.95), $19 for a year (instead of $79.92), or $55 for three years (instead of $107.64). The deals are available until May 31, per the email.
This week, users reported receiving a follow-up email from VPNSecure providing more details about why it made its bold and sudden move. Screenshots of the email shared on Reddit say that the acquisition by InfiniteQuant Ltd. (which is a different company than InfiniteQuant Capital Ltd., an InfiniteQuant Capital rep told Ars via email) was 'an asset only deal.'
A VPNSecure representative claimed on the reviews site Trustpilot that the current owners 'did not gain access to the customer database until months' after the acquisition. According to VPNSecure's owners, their acquisition netted them 'the tech, the brand, and the infrastructure/technology—but none of the company, contracts, payments, or obligations from the previous owners.'
The current owners said they didn't sue the seller because 'a corporate lawsuit would've cost more than the entire purchase of the business.'
VPNSecure also apologized to any customers who felt caught off guard by the changes, noted their backlash, and thanked those who purchased new subscriptions.
The email's authors claimed that they could have chosen to shut down VPNSecure after learning about the lifetime subscriptions but 'chose the hard path.' They also emphasized they 'never will' sell lifetime subscriptions. Unaware of Lifetime Subscriptions
Customers have been incredulous about VPNSecure's owners not knowing about the purchased lifetime subscriptions before buying the company. The firm's email to customers this week said the current owners reviewed six to 12 months of VPNSecure's prior 'financials' before making the purchase, but the listing, profit and loss statements, and communications never mentioned lifetime deals.
The email included a link to a VPNSecure sales listing dated April 2023 that shows an 'estimated valuation' of $282,090–$344,770 and doesn't mention lifetime subscriptions.
Ars looked at the VPNSecure website's history using the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine and didn't find mention of lifetime subscriptions. Lifetime subscriptions to the service were apparently offered only through third parties, like these listings on StackSocial and Wccftech, that no longer link to purchasable subscriptions. VPNSecure's email this week claimed that lifetime subscriptions were sold 'between 2015 and 2017'; however, Ars found ads on ZDNET pushing $40 lifetime subscriptions in 2021 and $28 lifetime subscriptions in 2022. Customer Backlash
Since March, there have been 20 pages' worth of one-star reviews on Trustpilot complaining about lifetime subscribers losing access to their VPN. One Trustpilot user wrote on April 30:
When the service stopped working, I logged a ticket. A couple days later, I got that infamous email informing me my subscription had (already) been canceled. The comms should have been sent earlier (before the service was interrupted), and written with more clarity and empathy.
VPNSecure is responding to the complaints on Trustpilot and has acknowledged that it could have communicated better with customers.
"We acknowledge that notifying users after the deactivation was a poor experience, and we take full responsibility for that,' a company rep wrote on April 30.
People have also been complaining on Reddit. One user, for example, wrote that the new owners "said they did their due diligence, but a simple Google Search would have shown lifetime deal offers from the past." VPNSecure Ownership
VPNSecure's website lists its owner as InfiniteQuant Ltd. in the Bahamas; however, its terms of service names the company 'HOLDXB Trading FZCO trading as VPN Secure, IFZA Business Park, Dubai - UAE.' According to the Wayback Machine, the terms of service page moved from naming an Australian firm, 'Boost Network Pty Ltd trading as VPN Secure' to HOLDXB until 2024. VPNSecure's email to customers this month noted that the team is 'in the Bahamas' and 'not [in] one [of the] five eyes countries anymore.'
Ars has reached out to the VPNSecure support team for more information but didn't hear back in time for publication. There isn't much information or contact details for InfiniteQuant Ltd., HOLDXB Trading FZCO, or Boost Network Pty Ltd. online. Limited Lifetime Subscriptions
VPNSecure's ordeal is a reminder that so-called lifetime subscriptions often last shorter than advertised. Per comments online, VPNSecure's lifetime subscriptions lasted up to 20 years.
Lifetime subscriptions, as well as lifetime warranties, can also get abruptly voided if a company goes out of business, and as we've seen with VPNSecure, new owners could also jeopardize 'lifetime' offerings. Users can also see capabilities reduced or altered in the course of a "lifetime."
VPNSecure could have potentially mitigated backlash by giving users more advanced warning of the changes and a longer opportunity to select a new subscription before deactivating their accounts. We can't confirm if InfiniteQuant Ltd. knew about the lifetime subscriptions before making its purchase. However, the firm claims to have known about the subscriptions a few months after taking ownership, so it had ample time to warn customers before abruptly deactivating 'dormant' accounts and killing the subscriptions of thousands of customers.
This story originally appeared on Ars Technica.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
L.A. Mayor: Trump administration 'provoked' protests
RFK Jr. has big plans for your food. Here are the facts. May 2, 2025

Associated Press
35 minutes ago
- Associated Press
MLS players' union says dispute over Club World Cup compensation is ongoing
Major League Soccer and its players' union remain at odds over compensation for the players with the three MLS teams taking part in the Club World Cup. The Seattle Sounders, LAFC and Inter Miami are the only MLS clubs among the 32 teams playing in the Club World Cup, which starts Saturday. Each team will earn $9.55 million as a club for participating in the tournament, with a chance to win additional prize money based on performance. The Major League Soccer Players Association said Sunday that the league issued a proposal Friday that did not include any additional participation bonuses for the players and offered 'below-standard' back-end compensation. The union also said the league asked for unrelated concessions to the collective bargaining agreement. Currently, there is a provision of the collective bargaining agreement that caps the amount of prize money that can go to players at $1 million. The MLSPA believes the players are entitled to a bigger share of the funds. 'The timing, substance and retaliatory nature of the proposal sends a clear message: MLS does not respect or value players' efforts with regard to this tournament,' the MLSPA said in statement Sunday. 'Although not surprised, the players and the MLSPA are deeply disappointed by this message.' Major League Soccer issued a statement Sunday to clarify its position. 'As the Seattle Sounders FC, Inter Miami CF, and the Los Angeles Football Club prepare to compete in the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, Major League Soccer has agreed to voluntarily provide additional performance-based compensation to players from the three participating clubs,' the league said. 'MLS has proposed an enhanced structure for the Club World Cup to reward both participation and competitive achievement in the tournament. In addition to the guaranteed $1 million per team for qualifying, 20 percent of all prize money earned from the group stage onward would be allocated to players. If an MLS club wins the Club World Cup, its players could collectively receive more than $24 million in performance bonuses.' The statement went on to say that MLS owners believe that performance-based incentives are appropriate given the expanded format and increased prize pool for the tournament. 'The League values the continued dedication and commitment of its players and looks forward to supporting them as they represent their clubs -- and Major League Soccer -- on the global stage this summer.' The talks between the two sides were ongoing. Last weekend, the Seattle Sounders called attention to the issue by wearing T-shirts before a match that read 'Club World Cup Ca$h Grab.' On Sunday, a number of players posted the hashtag #FairShareNow, including Sounders goalkeeper Stefan Frei and LAFC center back Aaron Long. 'The players remain unified in using their collective voice and demanding a fair share of the rewards earned from their hard work,' the union said. The Club World Cup features an expanded field of club teams from around the globe and will be played across 11 U.S. cities. ___ AP soccer:


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Ram to enter trucks in 2026 with possible future move to Cup for Dodge
BROOKLYN, Mich. — Dodge parent company Stellantis will enter NASCAR racing in 2026 with its Ram brand competing in the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series with an eye toward going Cup racing in the years beyond. Whether that's 2027 or later — 2027 is possible but would be an aggressive timeline — remains to be seen as the announcement Sunday focused primarily on the truck, a much easier lift than going Cup racing. With all trucks in the series using an Ilmor engine and several common body elements, Ram just needed to design a nose, a hood, front fenders and a tail for its racing vehicle. Ram did not announce who will drive its trucks nor the teams that will field its trucks. Ram CEO Tim Kinuskis said he hopes to have somewhere between four and six trucks for the 2026 season opener at Daytona. "We're looking for a date to the prom right now [for trucks]," Kinuskis said. "So how am I going to get the Cup? That's going to depend on how I get to truck. So however we get to truck is going will obviously weigh heavily on do I have a path to Cup? "Our intention is not to do a one-hit wonder and go to truck and not to Cup. That's not our plan." Ram does not have cars so what brand of car — Dodge? Plymouth's possible rebirth? — is still to be determined although Dodge has a lengthy history in the sport and motorsports as a whole. "Ram is coming back to the truck series," Kinuskis said. "It has nothing to do with Dodge, despite the fact that everyone in the world calls it Dodge Ram. ... If we go back to Cup, which is our intention, Ram doesn't have a car, so obviously that would have to be Dodge coming back. "But I'm not making that announcement. I'm not saying Dodge is back. Don't put that headline. But when we get to that point, it wouldn't be Ram, obviously." There is speculation in the industry that GMS, which has competed in all three national series over the last decade and was eventually bought out by Jimmie Johnson in the rebranding to Legacy Motor Club, will be involved in building chassis and/or fielding trucks for Ram. Kinuskis promised a program that will elevate fan engagement, and YouTube star Cleetus McFarland, who has competed in some ARCA races, has been linked to the Ram program. Dodge had Cup teams from 2001-12 before exiting the sport on a high note with Brad Keselowski winning a Cup title at Team Penske. When Penske left for Ford, Dodge had trouble landing a premier team and opted to leave the sport. No new manufacturer has entered the sport since Toyota did so in 2004 in trucks and 2007 in Cup. Kinuskis also said when he returned to Ram earlier this year, his two goals were to reintroduce the Hemi engine and get into NASCAR, where 50 percent of its fan base own trucks. "It's always bothered me," Kinuskis said. "We've always been looking for a way to get back. It took us a long time to find the absolute right time." To re-enter Cup would take some engine development and significant body design, a process that would take at least 18 months, NASCAR Chief Racing Development Officer John Probst said. "The last time that engine ran was 2012 — the core components of the block, the head, the manifold, are all still relevant," Probst said. "Our existing engine builders develop their engines every year. There's been a gap there, so there'd be some development of that engine needed. "But from the basic building blocks they could start from that and do some catch-up development." Kinuskis wouldn't talk about a timeline Sunday for going to Cup racing. "Our full intention is to be back in Cup," Kinuskis said. "But right now we're on a path for Daytona next year with truck, with our eye on when we can be in Cup after that. TBD. "We're a fly with no net right now trying to get to Daytona. That's our focus right now." Keselowski, currently a driver and co-owner at RFK Racing, said the trucks are the right entry point for a manufacturer as it doesn't have to immediately get an engine available and because of the parity in the series. "[The truck series] is a great place for an OEM [original equipment manufacturer] to enter NASCAR and really kind of get that appetite going for the Cup Series," Keselowski said. "It's a big jump from the truck series to the Cup Series, but nonetheless it's a great entry point for OEMs, and hopefully they aren't the only one that will enter the truck series." Bob Pockrass covers NASCAR and IndyCar for FOX Sports. He has spent decades covering motorsports, including over 30 Daytona 500s, with stints at ESPN, Sporting News, NASCAR Scene magazine and The (Daytona Beach) News-Journal. Follow him on Twitter @bobpockrass.