
Drug Level Changes Predict Renal Transplant Success in Kids
In paediatric kidney transplant recipients, high variability in tacrolimus trough blood levels was significantly associated with allograft rejection occurring beyond 12 months post-transplant; however, rapid tacrolimus metabolism was significantly associated with rejection episodes occurring between 6 and 12 months.
METHODOLOGY:
Tacrolimus remains essential in contemporary immunosuppressive regimens, yet its narrow therapeutic window and wide interpatient and intrapatient variability complicate dosing. Although high variability in tacrolimus blood levels and a low concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio — an approximation of tacrolimus metabolism — predict kidney transplant rejection in adults, comparable paediatric data are scarce.
Researchers in Germany conducted a retrospective study to assess the predictive value of tacrolimus intrapatient variability (TacIPV) and C/D ratio for transplant outcomes in children receiving kidney transplantation.
They analysed 13,159 tacrolimus trough blood levels in 255 paediatric kidney transplant recipients (median age at transplantation, 11 years; 59% boys) who received a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen; the median follow-up duration was 60 months.
TacIPV was quantified during months 6-12 post-transplant, and the C/D ratio was evaluated during both early (first 6 months) and late (6-12 months) periods.
Measured outcomes encompassed the incidence of allograft rejection, the occurrence of opportunistic infections, and the degree of graft dysfunction.
TAKEAWAY:
Overall, allograft rejection occurred in 45% of patients — 9% within the first 6 months post-transplant, 6% between 6 and 12 months, and 30% after 12 months.
High TacIPV during months 6-12 post-transplant was associated with an increased risk for allograft rejection beyond 12 months post-transplant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; P = .002); a TacIPV threshold of more than 23% could distinguish patients who did vs did not experience allograft rejection.
A low C/D ratio during the first 6 months post-transplant was correlated with a higher risk for allograft rejection between months 6 and 12 (inverse HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.05-9.09; P = .04); a C/D ratio cutoff of less than 1.0 could distinguish patients who did vs did not experience allograft rejection.
Opportunistic infections and graft dysfunction occurred in 42% and 10% of patients, respectively.
IN PRACTICE:
"TacIPV and C/D ratio may serve as cost-effective, non-invasive predictive markers for early identification of patients at risk for rejection," the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Maral Baghai Arassi, Department of Pediatrics I, Medical Faculty, University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. It was published online on July 21, 2025, in Pediatric Nephrology.
LIMITATIONS:
This study could not establish direct causal relationships between tacrolimus exposure, the factors influencing it, and transplant outcomes. The cohort may not fully represent the broader population of kidney transplant recipients as patients with incomplete tacrolimus monitoring data were excluded. Additionally, as most patients were of Caucasian descent, the findings may not fully generalise to more diverse populations.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by a Young Investigator Award from the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology; a grant from Chiesi, Germany; and other sources. One author reported receiving research grants and consulting fees from various pharmaceutical companies.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Discovered a Way to Reverse Time—and Possibly Erase Mistakes
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: In the physical world, time marches in one direction, but things aren't so straight forward in the quantum realm. Researchers have discovered that it's possible to speed up, slow down, or reverse the flow of time in a quantum system. This isn't exactly time travel, but is instead implementing or reverting to different quantum states from different points in time. In the subatomic universe of quantum physics, you can achieve things considered impossible in our flesh-and-blood physical world. Things like superposition, entanglement, and even teleportation all seem possible when things go quantum. Now, scientists from the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW) and University of Vienna are adding a kind of time travel to the list. In a series of papers published on preprint servers and in various online journals (including Optica, arXiv, and Quantum), researchers including ÖAW's Miguel Navascués and University of Vienna's Philip Walther explain the possibility of speeding up, slowing down, and even reversing the flow of time within a quantum system. Navascués compares the phenomenon to different movie-watching experiences. 'In a theater [classical physics], a movie is projected from beginning to end, regardless of what the audience wants,' he told the Spanish-language newspaper El País. 'But at home [the quantum world], we have a remote control to manipulate the movie. We can rewind to a previous scene or skip several scenes ahead.' The researchers achieved this by 'evolving' a single photon as it passes through a crystal. Using an experimental device called a 'quantum switch,' the single photon of light returns to its previous state before it ever makes the journey. In a way, this is less Doc Brown-style time travel and more about reverting or otherwise altering the states of quantum particles, or 'time translation' as Navascués described in 2020. However, this isn't exactly like a rewind button on your TV because usually, viewers can see how things got from plot point A to B—just sped up and in reverse. In quantum mechanics, however, simply observing a system causes it to change, which makes it impossible to track a system's progress through time. Crucially, these rewinding protocols still work because they can be performed without knowing what the changes were or its 'internal dynamics,' according to the scientists. And this quantum time machine doesn't just go one direction—Navascués said they've also hit upon a method for going forward in evolutionary time as well. He told El País: 'To make a system age 10 years in one year, you must get the other nine years from somewhere. In a year-long experiment with 10 systems, you can steal one year from each of the first nine systems and give them all to the tenth. At the end of the year, the tenth system will have aged 10 years; the other nine will remain the same as when the experiment began.' Sadly, these sci-fi findings in the quantum world can't be sized up to send humans backward and forward in time, because a single human represents a mind-boggling amount of information to 'rejuvenate'—in fact, the scientists estimate it would take millions of years to pull it off for just one second. But for the teams at ÖAW and the University of Vienna, the point isn't jetting off to the distant future, but the ability to increase the capability of quantum processors by arming them with the possibility of reversing errors in a system. After all, if life had a rewind button, wouldn't you use it? Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the IssueGet the Issue Get the Issue You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Diet Swap Study Reveals How Ultra-Processed Foods Can Derail Weight Loss
In case you needed more incentive to cut down on ultra-processed foods, a new diet swap study out today reveals that people experienced greater weight loss while eating minimally processed foods than they did when they ate a nutritionally similar, ultra-processed diet. In a six-month trial led by scientists at University College London, study participants were assigned one of the two diet regimes to follow for eight weeks, and then took a four week break before swapping to the other diet for another eight weeks. Participants lost more weight while eating the minimally processed diet than the ultra-processed one; they also shed more unhealthy fat. The findings, published Monday in Nature Medicine, suggest that, among other things, ultra-processed diets are especially good at stoking people's food cravings, the researchers said. Ultra-Processed Foods Have Disturbing Health Effects, Large Review Finds Although there is some debate over what constitutes an ultra-processed food, there are generally considered products or ingredients that have gone through high levels of industrialized processing, like breakfast sausages, candy, or sodas. There is a growing mountain of evidence that suggests a diet rich in ultra-processed foods is less healthy overall than a diet made up of mostly whole foods, and that ultra-processed foods may raise the risk of certain diseases. Most of this research, however, only shows a correlation between ultra-processed diets and poorer health outcomes, and not a direct cause-and-effect link. Clinical trials can provide stronger evidence, but they're notoriously difficult to do in the world of nutrition science for many reasons, particularly funding, the researchers said. A New Diet Study Confirms Your Worst Suspicions About Ultra-Processed Foods The results highlight the importance of following government dietary guidelines, Dicken said. But the study also indicates that people who want to lose weight may see the most benefit from sticking to minimally processed foods. As to why the ultra-processed foods are worse for dieting, the researchers have their educated guesses. Ultra-processed foods tend to have more appealing textures and artificially boosted flavors, which often means they are softer or easier to eat, and tastier. Their appearance and packaging might also make them more visually appealing to potential customers. Interestingly, the volunteers in this study reported that both diets were equally satisfying to eat on average, but they also reported having better control over their cravings while on the minimally processed diet. Dicken noted that the researchers weren't able to directly test these potential explanations in this trial, though, so more research is needed to know for sure. The team has already launched their next study, which is testing out a behavioral support program to reduce people's intake of ultra-processed foods. But Dicken cautioned that it will take widespread societal shifts, not individual scolding, to change our collective diets for the better.


Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Scientists Recreated the Universe's First Molecule
Seconds after the Big Bang, the newborn universe gave rise to the first elements—ionized forms of hydrogen and helium. These particles combined, forging helium hydride—the first ever molecule. It would take another several hundred million years for the first stars to be born, and scientists have long puzzled over the exact nature of the chemical processes that led to their formation. To try and tease apart the stellar origin story, scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany recreated helium hydride in the lab. They found that it likely played a much larger role in star birth than they had previously thought, helping primordial gas clouds shed enough heat to collapse into stars. In the study, the researchers recreated collisions between helium hydride and deuterium in what they believe to be a first-of-its-kind experiment, according to a press release. Their findings, published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics on July 24, indicate that the rate of the reaction remains constant as the temperature drops, contradicting earlier work. 'Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,' Holger Kreckel, who is a researcher at Max Planck and the lead author on the study, said in a statement. 'The reactions of [helium hydride] with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,' he added. Two helium hydride reactions produce molecular hydrogen, and likely aided star formation in the early universe. In the first—replicated in the study—deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen that contains a neutron in addition to a proton, collides with helium hydride to yield hydrogen deuteride, a form of molecular hydrogen composed of a hydrogen atom and a deuterium atom. The other reaction occurs when helium hydride collides with a neutral hydrogen atom, producing neutral molecular hydrogen. Both forms of molecular hydrogen act as coolants, helping nebulae lose heat, condense, and ultimately collapse into stars. The researchers used Max Planck's Cryogenic Storage Ring to carry out their experiment. This low-temperature reaction chamber allows scientists to study molecular and atomic reactions in space-like conditions. The team stored helium hydride ions inside the chamber for up to a minute at roughly -450 degrees Fahrenheit (-267 degrees Celsius), then superimposed them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. To observe how the collision rate varies with collision energy—directly related to temperature—they adjusted the relative speeds of the two particle beams. Scientists previously believed rate of reactions would slow down as temperature dropped, but the results of this experiment suggest otherwise. The researchers found that the rate remained almost constant despite decreasing temperatures. This surprising result suggests that helium hydride remains chemically active even in cold conditions, a finding that the scientists argue in their paper should prompt a reevaluation of helium chemistry in the early universe.