North Wales Police officer denies wanting to hurt man during arrest
PC denies wanting to hurt man during arrest
He admitted punching Mr Clark in the face, but described the punches as "distraction blows" when they were both lying on the ground, and he could not reach his taser or baton.
Giving evidence at Caernarfon Crown Court, PC Williams said Mr Clark had assaulted his colleague, knocking her to the ground while they were both trying to arrest him.
PC Richard Williams, 43, from North Wales Police, denies intentional strangulation and causing actual bodily harm on Steven Clark in May 2023.
A police officer has said he did not want to hurt a man he is accused of assaulting during an arrest.
The court heard that PC Richard Williams and his colleague, PC Einir Williams, had gone to an address in Porthmadog, Gwynedd, in May 2023 to answer a domestic violence call.
They decided they needed to arrest Mr Clark, but as PC Richard Williams tried to put handcuffs on him, he said Mr Clark went straight towards PC Einir Williams "like a rugby tackle", knocking her to the ground.
PC Richard Williams said he pulled Mr Clark away, but the pair ended up on the ground.
He told the court: "I had my hands around him, which naturally led to a headlock, but he continued to resist – he was pulling away from me.
"I was concerned for my safety and my colleague's safety.
"I punched him a number of times with my left hand. It's my weaker hand, but it was the only hand free.
"Little short punches was all I could do as distraction strikes, to stop him pulling away.
"We were lying on the ground and I couldn't get to my baton, my taser or my incapacitant spray."
He added that "at not point did we want to hurt Steven Clark. I did not want to use violence towards Steven Clark".
Both police officers were wearing bodycams which recorded much of the incident.
Richard Edwards, the prosecuting barrister, told PC Williams that the video evidence painted a very different picture, saying Mr Clark reacted the way he did because he was in pain because the handcuffs had not been applied properly.
"Did you intentionally strangle Steven Clark?" Mr Edwards asked the officer.
"No," PC Williams replied.
"Did you unlawfully assault Steven Clark?"
He responded: "No."
The trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
I was 15 when my nude pics were leaked – grown men sent them around at the football club & everyone blamed ME
LIKE many young girls, Jess Davies wanted to impress her school crush and decided to send him an explicit photo of herself. Little did the 15-year-old know that he would send it around the school and she would become a victim of image abuse. "That image got bluetoothed around my school, and then it got shared around my hometown, which was a small hometown in Wales, everyone knows everyone," she explained on the Should I Delete That podcast. Image-based sexual abuse is a criminal offence, it's when someone takes, shares, or threatens to share sexually explicit images or videos of a person without their knowledge or consent, and with the aim of causing them distress or harm. This can include digitally altered images, also known as 'deepfakes' - something Jess has gone on to lobby the government to include in the Online Harms Safety Bill. Now 32, Jess has opened up about the trauma it caused and more shockingly, how she was blamed for the abuse. She revealed that once the photo had circulated in her hometown, it was then shared to grown adult men on the local football team. Instead of seeing Jess as a victim, whose private photo was shared without her consent, people blamed her. "Everyone knew my age because it was a small town, and yet, the whole narrative was around how it was my fault," Jess added. "That I shouldn't have sent it, what kind of girl are you? "There was never any conversation around why are men in their twenties and thirties passing around a child's image?" Jess was left as a teenage girl worrying about how to navigate the situation, and she decided she had to laugh it off. Vicky Pattison shares deepfake porn clip of herself as she warns of dangers on C4 doc She revealed that boys in year 7 would run up and ask for a hug as they had seen the image as well. "I was laughing but secretly, this was humiliating," she said. In the end, her parents also found out about the image, as her nan was told about it from one of the men on the football team, where the image was being circulated. Now, as Jess has gotten older, she realises that the way people treated her for the image was not okay and that she was held more accountable than the grown men sharing the image. It has now led Jess to become an advocate for female rights and sexual abuse. Her BBC documentary 'Deepfake Porn: Could You Be Next' was used to lobby the UK government to criminalise deepfake porn. Jess also has a new book, No One Wants To See Your Dick, a guide for surviving the digital age to help us understand and tackle online misogyny and question society's understanding of consent.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The RAC sent us a measly £40 after we waited two days for a rescue that never came: SALLY SORTS IT
We feel unjustly treated by the RAC following a breakdown in a dangerous situation, which involved getting the police to arrange our car to be towed to safety as the RAC could not attend us in time. We spent two days waiting for action from the RAC – which it failed to take. Now it says we have no claim. We paid £409 for cover this year which includes a 'get you home' service. When we complained it sent us a £40 cheque. We haven't cashed it. Please help. P.F., Shrewsbury. Sally Hamilton replies: This was a serious breakdown in your recovery service that landed you with an unexpected £510 bill for recovery, storage and taxis. You felt extra miffed by the rejection of your claim as your husband, aged 92, has been with the RAC since owning his first car in 1972. You have rarely called it out and certainly not in the last five years. The paltry sum offered as an apology riled you further, not helped by the fact it came with no explanation or apology. A letter was only sent to you later after your son intervened on your behalf. In this, the RAC simply stated that its terms say it cannot guarantee attendance times but agreed it 'fell short' in your case, for which it sent you the £40 cheque. While saying it understood this must have been distressing, it did not uphold your complaint about the police having to intervene. It said this can be necessary in dangerous situations. It certainly was dangerous. You described how your breakdown nightmare began one day in late February, when you were driving to your local Tesco. The car lost power, forcing you to pull on to a narrow grass verge with large volumes of traffic roaring past. With no power, your hazard lights didn't work. It must have been frightening. Fortunately, a highways maintenance vehicle came to your aid and offered protection by parking behind your car. Scam Watch Households should beware a scam email that impersonates high-street bank NatWest, consumer website Which? warns. Fraudsters say that your account needs to be 'reauthenticated' by clicking on the link in the email. While it may look genuine, it is sent from a random email address and has nothing to do with the bank. Do not click on the link in the email as it is an attempt to steal your personal and financial information. Instead, forward it to report@ When you phoned the RAC, it said there would be a two-hour delay and so advised you to call the police. They arrived half-an-hour later, put cones up and allowed you to sit in their vehicle while you waited for the RAC. The officer also called the firm but again was told it would take at least two hours. As he couldn't wait, he called a local recovery service to tow the car to a compound 30 miles from where you live. This cost you £192. The officer kindly drove you home. The next day you had to pay the compound a fee in cash to release the car. Luckily you had enough notes between you. You took a taxi costing £50 to the compound. You sat there all day until the facility closed. The RAC did not appear, so you took another taxi home and arranged recovery to a local garage. I was shocked that the RAC didn't take your situation seriously and as you had hit a roadblock with your complaint, I asked it to take a fresh look at your case. I am pleased to say it didn't take long to see the failure of its service to you that day. It made a U-turn and met your £510 claim in full, to which £75 was added as an apology. A spokesman says: 'We've apologised to Mr and Mrs F and reimbursed all their costs and added a gesture of goodwill in recognition of their valued long-standing membership. 'This doesn't reflect the high level of service we provide to the thousands of members we rescue every day, and steps have been taken to ensure this doesn't happen in the future.' Opened standard account thinking it was an Isa I found online what I thought was an excellent 4.25 per cent one-year fixed rate Individual Savings Account (Isa) from MBNA and opened an account with £20,000. I received a text offering me the possibility of further investment into the account. This set off alarm bells as £20,000 is the maximum allowable in an Isa in a tax year. When I queried this, MBNA said I had opened a standard account and that it doesn't offer Isas. I asked if I could cancel the arrangement. But they said the money could not be withdrawn. I.S., Gloucestershire. Sally Hamilton replies: You were annoyed with yourself for the blunder but after doing some research online, believed that under consumer law you would be permitted a cooling off period of at least 14 days, allowing you to change your mind without penalty. And since you had realised your mistake within days, you believed there was plenty of time to get out of the arrangement. But it was not to be. MBNA said it sympathised with your predicament, but its hands were tied. Under the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, a cooling off period does apply to many products and services bought online, including certain savings accounts. Variable rate accounts typically offer this benefit but providers are not obliged to provide it for fixed rate deals like the one you accidentally picked. Some do so voluntarily, but not MBNA. There are exceptions to the fixed-rate rule. Cash Isas – even fixed-rate ones – can be cancelled within 14 days if a saver has a change of heart. I felt MBNA could have been more flexible, so I asked them to reconsider. A few days later, it came back with the news that it had decided, as a gesture of goodwill, to let you close the account after all with no penalties. A spokesman says: 'This type of account [opened by Mr S] is not covered by the cooling off period as set out by the Consumer Contracts Regulations. As part of the account opening process, we explain withdrawals can't be made during the fixed one-year term. Appreciating that Mr S made a mistake on this occasion, as a gesture of goodwill, we'll help him move the money to an alternate account.' When we caught up last week, you confirmed the money had been released and that you have opened a cash Isa with another bank. Straight to the point I sold four Decleor products on Vinted for £17.50 and posted it to the buyer. But when they received the parcel Vinted messaged me to say the order was suspended as the buyer reported it was empty. Vinted wants a photograph of the package, which I don't have. The buyer is going to get a refund and I am out of pocket. A.H., Coventry. The money has now been sent to your Vinted account. *** I Bought a John Lewis leather bed frame back in 2013 for £699. But it recently started peeling and shedding. It's clear it's not leather at all but a vinyl surface coating with woven mesh underneath, which an upholsterer has confirmed. John Lewis are taking the side of the supplier which claims it is leather. I know the warranty is up but it seems so morally wrong. C.L., via email. John Lewis says the bed frame is out of warranty and it has limited product information available, but it has given you a gesture of goodwill. *** Last May I bought and moved into a new flat. I have since been receiving letters from a bank addressed to women I don't recognise, which I have been returning. I accidentally opened one as I hold a credit card with the same bank. It said this person held an offset mortgage at my address. The bank won't tell me anything, citing data protection. D.G., West Midlands. The bank says it does not hold a mortgage on your property and the letters have now stopped. They were sent to you due to an administrative mistake by another customer. Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@ — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Police attacked with fireworks on second night of violence in Northern Ireland
Police were attacked with fireworks during a second night of anti-migrant riots in Northern Ireland following the attempted rape of a teenage girl. Crowds of masked rioters launched fireworks at riot police in Ballymena, County Antrim, on Tuesday night. The disorder came a day after two 14-year-old boys, thought to be Romanian, appeared in court charged with the attempted rape of a girl. Fireworks and other projectiles were launched at police officers and their armoured land rovers as about 300 people gathered in the vicinity of Clonavon Terrace, in the town centre. A large fire was started by rioters shortly after 9pm in the middle of North Road, an A-road which overlooks the area. A water cannon and rubber bullets have been used against the rioters to contain the 'serious disorder'. The unrest has been condemned as 'racist thuggery' by police. Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson said the violence was 'clearly racially motivated and targeted at our minority ethnic community and police'. A 29-year-old man has been charged with riotous behaviour following the disorder and will appear before Ballymena magistrates' court on Thursday. The victim's family condemned the riots, which were reminiscent of the disorder in England and Northern Ireland after the murder of three girls at a dance class in Southport last year. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said 'there is no justification for attacks on police officers while they continue to protect local communities'. Jim Allister, the North Antrim MP, said Ballymena had been 'overburdened' by 'unchecked migration', which was a source of 'past and future tensions'. On Monday, masked rioters threw petrol bombs, masonry, fireworks, and bricks at police after splitting from a peaceful vigil and setting up barricades in the Clonavon Terrace area of the town. Several officers needed hospital treatment and two police vehicles were damaged. Along Clonavon Terrace, six houses had their windows smashed, with two of them taped off after suffering significant fire damage. Those attacks are being treated as racially motivated hate crimes. In one video, one woman was recorded saying: 'If they are not local, let them f---ing stay there.'
