logo
Fact-checking three key claims about Trump's mega-bill

Fact-checking three key claims about Trump's mega-bill

Yahoo03-07-2025
President Donald Trump's flagship piece of legislation - which he's labelled the "big beautiful bill" - has faced major objections from Democrats as well as from some Republicans.
It has been subject to tense negotiations amid questions about how much it could cost and its proposed cuts to some US welfare schemes.
Elon Musk has also weighed in, repeating threats to form a new political party if the "insane spending bill passes".
BBC Verify has looked at claims made about the bill's possible impact in three key areas - the US national finances, medical cover, and taxes.
The White House has said the bill "reduces deficits by over $2 trillion" - but senior Democrats have insisted it would actually add trillions.
BBC Verify has examined various independent studies about the bill's impact and interviewed six tax experts who all agreed that it would increase the national deficit.
The deficit is what happens when the US government spends more than it collects through taxes and other forms of revenue.
Musk criticised lawmakers who "voted for the biggest debt increase in history" when it was being passed in the US Senate.
The debt is the overall sum of money owed by the government - essentially the accumulation of past budget deficits - which means it has to borrow money and pay interest on this.
Trump's mega-bill heads for final vote in overnight US House session
A look at the key items in Trump's sprawling budget bill
'Our food doesn't even last the month' - Americans brace for Trump's welfare cuts
The US national debt is currently about $36tn (£26tn) - of which about $29tn is money owed by the government to investors around the world.
Larger deficits and a bigger debt can theoretically result in higher interest rates - the idea being that investors worry more about a country's capacity to pay its debts as those rise and they therefore demand higher interest payments.
That can feed into higher interest rates for consumers which make things like housing and cars less affordable, and restrict business investment and therefore productivity and jobs.
The current version of the bill is estimated to add about $3.3tn (£2.4tn) to the US deficit over the next 10 years, despite an initial economic boost, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) - the government agency which provides independent analysis of spending.
The CBO said the spending cuts proposed in the bill would be outweighed by the tax cuts.
An analysis from the Tax Foundation think tank concluded that the bill "would increase economic output but worsen deficits". It projects that the bill would increase the level of US GDP by around 1% after 10 years relative to where it would otherwise be, but that it would also add $3.6tn (£2.6tn) to the deficit over the same period.
Some banks have said they are in favour of the bill - with the American Bankers Association writing an open letter to lawmakers saying it provides "much needed tax relief" which would boost the economy.
The experts BBC Verify spoke to said although the bill may provide some economic growth, its cost would be significantly more than this boost.
"Most analysis finds that the bill will produce a small, temporary, short-lived boost – but that over time the bill will actually be a drag on the economy," says Bobby Kogan, a federal budget expert at the Center for American Progress, a nonpartisan policy institute.
And Mark Zandi, an economist at the financial consultancy Moody's Analytics, says: "It will result in continued massive budget deficits, and a high and rising debt load."
"We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill and you're not gonna feel any of it. Your Medicaid is left alone. It's left the same," Trump claimed at an event about the bill last week.
However, various studies show there will be significant reductions to Medicaid under the bill.
Medicaid is the government-run scheme which provides healthcare insurance for about 71 million low-income adults, children, pregnant women, elderly adults and people with disabilities.
Analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) - an independent health policy research group - found that the bill would cut $1tn (£729bn) from future Medicaid spending over the next 10 years.
The White House has said the bill "removes illegal aliens, enforces work requirements, and protects Medicaid for the truly vulnerable".
The CBO estimates that nearly 12 million Americans would lose health insurance by 2034 under the terms of the Senate bill - with just 1.4 million of these being people "without verified citizenship, nationality, or satisfactory immigration status".
"The largest Medicaid cut in American history came in President Reagan's first year in office… These Medicaid cuts would be at least four times the size," said Mr Kogan.
Trump has repeatedly said that not passing the bill would lead to massive tax rises on Americans - in part because the tax cuts passed during his first-term in office are due to expire at the end of this year.
"If it's not approved, your taxes will go up by 68%," the president said last week.
We asked the White House for the calculations behind Trump's claim - they responded saying the bill "prevents the largest tax hike in history" but didn't answer our question on where the specific figure comes from.
The Tax Policy Center estimates that not extending tax cuts introduced under Trump in 2017 would lead to a hike of 7.5% on average.
The body also says roughly 60% of tax payers would have to contribute more if they expire.
"The 68% figure is incorrect… It could be roughly drawn from a count of taxpayers that would see an increase in taxes, as opposed to an estimate of the actual tax increase," says Elena Patel, a tax policy expert and assistant professor at the University of Utah's business school.
Overall, the tax changes in the bill would benefit wealthier Americans more than those on lower incomes, according to the Tax Policy Center analysis. About 60% of the benefits would go to those making above $217,000 (£158,000), it found.
"There is no question that this bill will result in a massive redistribution from the poorest to the richest," says Ms Patel.
What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 1600: Real Talk on Crime
The 1600: Real Talk on Crime

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

The 1600: Real Talk on Crime

The Insider's Track Good morning, Residents of the nation's capital are waking up this morning to a much heavier and more visible law enforcement presence on the streets after President Trump seized control of the city's police force and surged 800 National Guard troops to address a crime situation that makes DC, in the words of the POTUS, "one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the world." This is vintage Trump in action. Cynical, over-the-top, but also savvy. His ability to use the bully pulpit to shift the national conversation and attention onto terrain more favorable to him, on his terms, continues to be his greatest power (which is why his inability to do it on the Jeffrey Epstein story has been so notable). Talking about crime in America, particularly urban crime, is really two conversations that we tend to mash into one. There's crime in the strict definition: homicides, shootings, carjackings, robberies, etc. Then there's the more ambient forms of social disorder: homeless encampments that pop up and spread, a noticeable increase in crazy people roaming the subways, brazen shoplifting and farebeating, street takeovers, etc. Democrats and the left like to focus on the former at the expense of the latter. But the latter is arguably a bigger political problem than actual violent crime, because it tends to be much more visible and socially corrosive. Here in the Big Apple, Trump got about 100K more votes in 2024 than he did in '20. I am convinced that a significant slice of those votes could be attributed strictly to the fact that you can't pop into a CVS or Walgreens in the city to pick up toothpaste without having to get the merchandise unlocked for you. I'm not kidding. I believe that experience alone probably created tens of thousands of new Republican voters in New York. There is something so dehumanizing about having to press a button and wait for some underpaid teenager to saunter over and unlock your deodorant, that it gives you the time to wonder whether the liberal governance of your city has actually made your day-to-day life worse. As far as actual violent crime, the Post, Times, CNN, NBC et al. have pointed out how DC is actually seeing "historically low" crime rates, or at least a significant dip in crime. That may be true (though it probably isn't. The city's police department is under investigation for allegedly cooking the stats to make them look better than they are). But it doesn't reflect what people see with their own eyes. Dems made this exact mistake with inflation during the Biden years. "Oh, it's transitory." "It's not as bad as you think." Or my favorite, "Inflation is good, actually." Then you go to the grocery store and your bill is, like, double what it was a few months earlier for the same stuff. But the New York Times told me inflation is "only" up 3 percent?! DC also does have a very specific violent crime problem, which is carjackings. I suspect that's because of how easy it is to get onto the interstate and disappear into one of three or four states within a few minutes. But crimes like carjacks scare the public because it could (and does) happen to anyone. This is the other thing that doesn't get talked about in the crime discourse, because it is impolitic to say. Urban crime doesn't draw the ire of the political class unless it starts to happen in places where they, or their kids or friends' kids, start to see it. In DC, you might have a spate of gang shootings in Anacostia that never make the news. But when a college kid gets grazed in a drive-by while having brunch in Dupont Circle, or a Congressional intern gets murdered walking to the Metro, that becomes a political problem for the mayor and, by virtue of DC's weird and confusing governance structure, the federal government. The shame of it all is that what's happening in DC masks what is an actually remarkable crime story playing out across the country. In nearby Baltimore, the city is tracking to have its lowest murder rate in 50 years. Up I-95, in Philly, fatal shootings are at a decade low. In St. Louis, all categories of violent crime are down sharply. Boston recorded just 24 murders in all of last year. Here in NYC, the first half of the year showed the lowest number of shootings and murders in recorded history. Putting aside the "ambient social disorder" problem, the actual chances of getting shot or violently assaulted in our big cities has plummeted. The murder spike we saw during Covid is, for all intents and purposes, now over. This is amazing, and reflects a combination of smart policing, new technologies, poverty reduction and community involvement. But it's very difficult to wave around stats like this without coming across as apathetic to people's "lived experience." Because the fact is there is no "good" level of crime. And crime is one of those few things, like inflation and immigration, that voters really, really care about because they see its effects in their day-to-day lives. The Rundown European Union leaders have issued a fresh appeal to President Donald Trump on Ukraine, imploring him ahead of his crunch summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday to protect the country and Europe's security interests and not to exclude Kyiv from any agreement. Read more. Also happening: U.S. economy: Federal data shows that inflation held fairly steady in July, defying fears of a tariff-driven spike in consumer prices and good news for President Trump, who is continuing to push for the Federal Reserve to slash interest rates. Here's the latest. Redistricting: Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott has warned Democrats that he could "eliminate" 10 of his state's 12 Democratic-held seats if the two parties were to launch a nationwide battle to redraw congressional maps. "All those big, blue states, they've already gerrymandered. Look at the map of Illinois, look at the map of California, New York and Massachusetts and so many other blue states, they gerrymandered a long time ago, they've got nothing left with regard to what they can do," he said. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.

The rollout of Trump's D.C. crackdown included Fox News stars and charts.
The rollout of Trump's D.C. crackdown included Fox News stars and charts.

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

The rollout of Trump's D.C. crackdown included Fox News stars and charts.

On Monday morning, the former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, now the U.S. attorney for Washington, appeared alongside President Trump to announce a federal takeover of the capital's police force, pledging to crack down on 'young punks' and other criminals. On Monday evening, Ms. Pirro was back on Fox News with her former colleague Sean Hannity — he introduced her as a 'friend of the program' — echoing the same calls for law and order she had made earlier that day and, for years before that, as a co-host of Fox News's 'The Five.' Right-wing media has embraced Mr. Trump's crackdown in Washington, dismissing Democrats' concerns about creeping authoritarianism and any exaggerations about the level of crime in the nation's capital (Washington's violent crime rate fell sharply last year, though it remains higher than that of Los Angeles, New York and Chicago.) MAGA influencers like Charlie Kirk have called for a 'full military occupation' of other major cities. Ms. Pirro's return to her old network home was a small illustration of Fox News's feedback loop with the second Trump administration, which, like its predecessors in both parties, regularly cites media coverage that validates and amplifies its policy goals. The network has numerous ties to this administration, which includes more than two dozen Fox alumni as members. Another prominent former host, the onetime 'Fox & Friends' personality Pete Hegseth, who is now the defense secretary, also spoke at the president's news conference on Monday. Hours later, he appeared on Laura Ingraham's Fox News program. Mr. Trump has fixated on crime and disorderliness in Washington for more than two years. The day before he was inaugurated in January, Mr. Trump declared that he would make the capital 'safe, clean and beautiful again,' and he refocused his efforts after a prominent former member of the Department of Government Efficiency was attacked in an attempted carjacking this month. In the wake of that incident, Will Cain, a Fox News afternoon host, declared on his program that 'Washington, D.C., is less safe than some capital cities in third-world countries,' and displayed charts comparing the city's crime rate with places like Mexico City. A CNN reporter pointed out that Mr. Trump brandished some of the same charts at his Monday news conference with Ms. Pirro and Mr. Hegseth. 'You might have seen this image today from the president, or you saw it last week here on 'The Will Cain Show,'' Mr. Cain told viewers on his Monday broadcast. Mr. Trump has long monitored the nuances of how Fox News covers him. (The president also recently sued Rupert Murdoch, who controls Fox News, over an article in the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal that Mr. Trump deemed defamatory; The Journal defended its reporting.) As Mr. Hannity wrapped up his Monday interview with Ms. Pirro, he thanked her for her government work and added, 'We miss you here at Fox.' 'I miss you, too, Sean,' Ms. Pirro replied.

ICE Must Improve Conditions in N.Y.C. Migrant Holding Cells, Judge Rules
ICE Must Improve Conditions in N.Y.C. Migrant Holding Cells, Judge Rules

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

ICE Must Improve Conditions in N.Y.C. Migrant Holding Cells, Judge Rules

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration on Tuesday to swiftly remedy conditions inside migrant holding cells in New York City where detainees have complained of squalid and overcrowded conditions. The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan, ordered the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to hold fewer people in the 10th-floor holding cells of the agency's Lower Manhattan offices at 26 Federal Plaza, where ICE has been accused of detaining dozens of migrants for days or weeks in tight quarters meant to hold detainees for just a few hours. The judge also ordered ICE to allow migrants to place calls to their lawyers and to ensure that they have access to proper medical and hygienic care following allegations that detainees were deprived of showers, given meager meals and forced to sleep on the concrete floor without any bedding. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court on Friday by legal organizations representing a Peruvian immigrant, Sergio Alberto Barco Mercado, who was arrested by ICE and held at 26 Federal Plaza last week. Judge Kaplan issued a temporary restraining order while he fully reviews the case and considers whether to issue a longer-lasting order. ICE has repeatedly denied that the cells at 26 Federal Plaza are overcrowded or that conditions are inadequate. The ruling is a short-term victory for immigration activists who have spent months denouncing the conditions in the holding cells, which have filled up as ICE has increased arrests in New York's immigration courts, straining the agency's detention capacity. Many of the more than 3,200 people ICE has arrested in the New York City area since Jan. 20 have been detained at 26 Federal Plaza at some point, according to new federal data released this week. The holding cells emerged as a flashpoint this summer, as migrants shared details of overcrowding so severe that some of them slept sitting upright or on the floor by the toilets, which filled the cells with a 'horrific stench,' according to the lawsuit. A cellphone video recorded by a detainee last month offered the first glimpse of the conditions, escalating criticism from congressional Democrats who have been denied access to inspect the cells. The lawsuit argued that ICE was violating the Constitution by depriving detainees access to lawyers and its own policies by holding them in the cells for longer than 72 hours. The legal groups representing Mr. Barco Mercado are: the American Civil Liberties Union; the New York Civil Liberties Union; Make the Road New York, an immigrant advocacy group; and Wang Hecker, a law firm. This is a developing story and will be updated. Ashley Cai contributed reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store