
Tariff-related recession fears ignite widespread commodities selloff – Saxo Bank MENA - Middle East Business News and Information
– Ole Hansen, Head of Commodity Strategy, Saxo Bank
US President Trump has imposed the steepest and harshest American tariffs in a century on all its major counterparts, sparking threats of retaliation and a broad selloff around the world on concerns that a global trade war on this scale and magnitude will drive an economic slowdown—not least in the US, where inflation forecasts have spiked, and sentiment among consumers and businesses has fallen sharply during the past couple of months.
There is a general understanding of why Trump wants to reshape the global economy, with his primary goal being the reversal of a two-decade trend of US companies moving production overseas to capitalise on cheaper labour costs, which, in turn, has boosted their stock prices but contributed to domestic job losses and economic stagnation in certain sectors and parts of the nation. This shift has had significant impacts on American manufacturing and the broader economy, as well as its ability to be self-sufficient in key materials.
Economic implications: short-term pain, long-term uncertainty
However, it is crucial to recognise that reversing such long-standing trends is a complex and time-consuming process. It cannot be achieved overnight—let alone in four years—and will inevitably involve trade-offs and temporary setbacks for both the US and its trading partners. What Trump delivered on this so-called 'Liberation Day' was an economic war declaration likely to cause chaos across global supply chains, while in the short term raising the risk of an economic fallout, hurting demand for key commodities, with energy and industrial metals being the sectors most at risk. Financial markets responded strongly to the tariff announcement, with the USD, equity markets, and US Treasury yields all seeing sharp declines.
Energy and industrial metals among the hardest hit
Commodities suffered broad declines, with the Bloomberg Commodities Index trading down around 1.2% since Monday, with losses led by the growth- and demand-dependent sectors of energy and industrial metals. At this stage, however, the weakness has not triggered any major technical breakdown, potentially limiting selling pressures from momentum-focused traders. In addition, the USD trades sharply lower, and together with rising inflation expectations, the risk of a major correction seems limited at this stage.
Metals tariffs were largely left unchanged, with steel and aluminium at 25%, and no tariff yet on copper while the Section 232 investigation continues. Prices nevertheless fell, with growth risks weighing on prices—not least in China, the world's top exporter and consumer of raw materials—as it faces tariffs of at least 54%, with the threat of another 25% on top for buying Venezuelan oil.
HG copper futures in New York briefly slumped to USD 4.825 before stabilising around USD 4.935, with the tariff-related premium over LME prices in London still elevated around 13%, highlighting a market where trades—as opposed to a deflated premium in gold and silver—still expect tariffs to be introduced. However, uncertainty about the level of tariffs will continue to create a great deal of volatility in the COMEX-LME spread.
Gold's haven credentials on display despite deleveraging risks
Gold trades a tad softer on the day after briefly hitting a fresh record high overnight at USD 3,167—a move that was supported by geopolitical and economic tensions, as well as the weaker USD and rising inflation expectations driving down US real yields. However, while these supportive factors will continue to underpin bullion prices, a current rush to deleverage amid spiking volatility will also be felt in gold—not least given its recent record run of gains. What will determine the depth of a potential correction hinges on the investor base, and a battle between short-term, technical-focused traders and long-term accumulators from real money allocators, high-net-worth individuals, and central banks. Given how far gold has travelled in the past three months, a correction to USD 3,000—let alone USD 2,960—would not trigger any major alarm bells.
Silver slump as COMEX tariff premium evaporates
Silver and platinum, two semi-industrial metals, have both suffered sharp corrections once again as wrong-footed longs head for the exit. The weakness has been led by selling in the New York futures market after a fact sheet distributed by the White House stated that bullion (gold) and 'other certain minerals that are not available in the United States' should not be subject to reciprocal tariffs. With silver and platinum imports accounting for the bulk of US consumption, traders concluded that these two metals would not be impacted, and with that, the tariff premium on futures prices in New York compared with spot prices in London has seen a sharp contraction. A 51% year-to-date increase in silver flows to COMEX-monitored vaults now faces the risk of a partial reversal, potentially adding supply to a market already weakened by short-term recession concerns.
Agricultural commodity slump led by cotton
Cotton futures fell 4.4% on the opening—the maximum daily move allowed by the exchange—following the announcement of US tariffs. The fibre is often used as a barometer of global growth because its demand is closely linked to the health of the global economy, with consumers often cutting back on clothing during an economic downturn. With losses seen across the grains and soybean sectors in anticipation of a reaction from China, a major buyer of both crops, adverse weather conditions in Brazil are once again supporting Arabica coffee, while cocoa has surged due to expectations of a smaller-than-expected mid-crop harvest in West Africa.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Has Soft Power Come to an End?
By Prof. Abdelhaq Azzouzi Anyone following international events and strategic thinking trends will come to the conclusion that capitals such as Washington, Beijing, and Moscow are now leaning heavily on the theories of Carl von Clausewitz, the 18th-century Prussian general and military historian, as well as those of Sun Tzu, the 6th-century BC Chinese military strategist. This trend stands in contrast to the intellectual frameworks developed by strategic thinkers like Joseph Nye, who passed away just a few weeks ago. Nye lamented in his final writings the rupture caused by President Trump with American soft power. Writing in the Financial Times, he noted: 'His background in New York real estate gave him a distorted view of power, focusing only on coercion and deals. American soft power will therefore have a hard time during the next four years.' Joseph Nye, who was once Dean at Harvard University, authored two essential books I always recommend to my students. The first, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (1990), explores the ability of the United States to exert global influence through non-coercive means — based on attraction and persuasion rather than blatant force or hard power. The second, titled Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, elaborates on the advantages of diplomacy and cultural appeal, emphasizing how a nation's political values, culture, or other forms of influence can achieve cultural dominance. Nye warns, 'Although hard power can achieve goals, it can also jeopardize the economic, political, and even cultural aspirations of major powers.' He cautions that if America wishes to remain strong, 'Americans must be attentive to their soft power.' Nye bridged the worlds of theory and practice, which gave his writings remarkable resonance. He was a founding figure of the Harvard Kennedy School — often regarded as a factory for strategic minds and public policy leaders in the U.S. — and held several governmental positions under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. At the height of the COVID-19 crisis, Nye penned an article for Project Syndicate titled 'Geopolitics After the Pandemic,' in which he observed that long-term projections about the impact of the pandemic remained uncertain. He proposed that there was no single guaranteed scenario through to 2030. Instead, he outlined five potential geopolitical trajectories: 1. The end of the liberal world order. 2. The rise of authoritarian regimes resembling those of the 1930s. 3. A world order dominated by China. 4. The adoption of a global green agenda. 5. A continuation of the current status quo. Despite the value of these theories and scenarios, they require deeper clarification and adjustments. It is true that the U.S. administration, under President Trump, decided to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development, withdrew from several international organizations, and largely disregarded values that constitute the core of soft power. But does this mean that American soft power has truly ended? Certainly not. Soft power persists — often alongside hard and smart power — especially through the limitless, diverse, and evolving products of American civil society. This presence ensures America retains global leadership in areas such as technology, scientific research, cinema, music, the English language, media, food culture, and fashion. A prime example is Netflix, which as of 2025 boasts over 301.6 million subscribers worldwide. It captivates individuals and governments alike with its dramatic and documentary productions. This kind of success is only possible for countries or companies with a vast cultural industry capable of attracting global consumers. It is a clear manifestation of soft power — one that places the languages and cultures of other countries under immense pressure. It is true that we are witnessing the continued erosion of the liberal world order and the return of fascism in some parts of the world. But this does not preclude the potential rebirth of liberalism. Major crises sometimes produce unexpected outcomes. The Great Depression, for instance, triggered waves of isolationism, nationalism, and fascism, culminating in World War II. Yet it also led to groundbreaking economic programs in the U.S. known as the New Deal, the rise of America as a global superpower, and ultimately the dismantling of colonial empires. Finally, even if, contrary to Nye's prediction, we do not see the emergence of a pragmatic green global agenda amid American isolationism and its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change, we will likely witness the rise of nationalist rhetoric in many countries — a trend that could dangerously escalate international tensions. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Sports Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Arts & Culture New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan


See - Sada Elbalad
16 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Tesla Shares Recover amid Calls to De-escalate Tensions between Trump, Musk
Taarek Refaat Tesla shares recovered from heavy losses amid signs that the rift between CEO Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump is easing, easing investor concerns about the potential political fallout for the electric car maker. Tesla shares rose 5% in early trading. Politico reported that Musk and Trump were expected to speak on Friday, but a White House official told Reuters there were no plans for a call. Musk indicated via his X social media platform that he was open to easing tensions with Trump. The dispute between Trump and Musk wiped more than $150 billion off Tesla's market value on Thursday, the company's largest single-day drop. Tensions escalated after Musk escalated his criticism of a tax and spending bill that proposed partially ending a $7,500 tax incentive for electric vehicle buyers by the end of 2025. In response, Trump proposed cuts to government contracts with Musk's companies, including SpaceX. Tesla's stock has fallen 29.5% since the beginning of the year, after falling 14% on Thursday. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Sports Neymar Announced for Brazil's Preliminary List for 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers News Prime Minister Moustafa Madbouly Inaugurates Two Indian Companies Arts & Culture New Archaeological Discovery from 26th Dynasty Uncovered in Karnak Temple Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan


Egypt Independent
21 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
How much damage could Donald Trump do to Elon Musk?
Tesla stock soared in the months after the November presidential election because investors were convinced Donald Trump was about to do massive favors for his largest financial backer, Tesla CEO Elon Musk. But Trump can also do great damage to Musk's many business interests. The risk of that damage is one reason that Tesla shares (TSLA) tumbled 14% in trading Thursday following the very nasty and public spat between Trump and Musk. But it's not just Tesla that could be at risk. SpaceX depends on government contracts for a significant share of its revenue. And Tesla, SpaceX and Musk's other companies, including social media platform X, artificial intelligence company xAI and brain-computer interface company Neuralink all face regulation from the federal government. In addition, Musk faces possible investigations of his own activities from agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is looking into whether he violated rules when purchased his initial stake in X, then called Twitter, ahead of launching his takeover bid for the company. Trump appeared to threaten that he would take such action against Musk, as he posted on his Truth social media platform Thursday that, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' To which Musk replied on his social media platform X: 'This just gets better and better,' followed by two laughing face emojis, along with 'Go ahead, make my day.' Tesla has relatively few government contracts. But there are numerous federal policies that directly affect its finances, including a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicle buyers that allows Tesla and other automakers to raise prices. That was likely worth billions to Tesla last year alone. In addition, Tesla reported more than $8 billion in sales over six years of regulatory credits to other automakers to help them comply with federal and state emission standards. Trump is in favor of rolling back those standards and stripping states of the power to set their own emissions rules, which would destroy the market for those credit sales. A note from JPMorgan to clients Thursday estimates the loss of the EV tax credit could cost Tesla $1.2 billion a year and the loss of regulatory credit sales another $2 billion. Musk has also pegged the future of the growth of Tesla on operating a self-driving taxi service without any driver on board. Tesla's current 'full self driving' offering (FSD) requires a driver to be present to take control of the car. The service is due to debut in Austin, Texas, later this month. He admits his ambitious growth plans could be constrained by regulations. In addition, the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has also already announced investigations into accidents involving existing Tesla cars operating with FSD. Many Tesla fans assumed those investigations would be dropped under a Tesla-friendly Trump administration. SpaceX has received $15.2 billion in contracts from NASA, as well as $5.8 billion from the Department of Defense, along with a few million more from other agencies, according to Replacing SpaceX on those contracts, however, is not realistic. That's because there is no other company available to replace it. For example, Boeing, the only other company able transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS), had problems on its only crewed flight last year. That required its Starliner spacecraft to return to Earth without two astronauts, who were stranded at the ISS for nine months instead of the planned trip of a handful of days. But SpaceX also is subject to the oversight of both NASA and the FAA. Its Starlink satellite internet communication service is also seeking approval from the FCC to expand its service.