
Asian grooming gangs raped me 15 times a day from age of 12 & burnt me with cigarettes – but it was ME who was punished
NEARLY 20 years on, Nicola Riley is still too afraid to shop in her own town centre.
Every time she passes a man in the street, she worries that it could be one of the men that made her childhood hell and that they might recognise her.
8
8
8
For Nicola was groomed and raped as a child by hundreds of men, who filmed and photographed her and passed her picture around amongst their gangs.
The teenager could not go into her local town centre without being badgered by strangers who thought she was an easy target for sexual assaults.
And even now, aged 33, Nicola is too anxious to go to her local shops.
She says: 'I'm terrified of leaving my own home, I've even moved to a new town because I can't stand the flashbacks, or the threat of seeing one of my abusers.'
Nicola grew up in a loving and secure home in Blackburn, Lancs, but was self-conscious because of a bone disorder.
So when she was targeted by young men outside her school, she initially felt flattered.
But it was the start of four years of grooming, during which Nicola was forced to perform thousands of sex acts on hundreds of men and was raped up to 15 times a day.
Only two of her abusers were jailed and Nicola is now bravely speaking out in support of the national inquiry into grooming.
She says: 'All my life, I've felt like a failure.
'The abuse left me feeling utterly worthless, and then the agencies who should have looked after me; the police, social services and youth workers, let me down even further.
National inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal finally ordered by Keir Starmer in another Labour U-turn
'I was actually punished for being groomed – I was taken to a secure unit which was like a cell.
'The social workers made me feel like it was my fault.'
Nicola, now 33, had a happy childhood living with her mother and two siblings in Blackburn. She was sporty and enjoyed running and netball and was part of a Majorette dance troupe.
But in high school, she became self-conscious about her right arm, which is slightly shorter than her left, due to a bone condition called Ollier's disease.
Nicola says: 'To me, it was a big deal. I felt I didn't fit in at school and I was on the outside of everything that was happening.'
Aged 12, older girls in her school introduced her to a group of Asian men, who were in their early twenties.
Nicola says: 'One seemed to really like me and I was flattered.
'He pointed at me and said, 'Bring her' and I actually felt special. I had no idea of what was to come.'
8
8
8
For a couple of months, the men groomed Nicola with alcohol, takeaways, clothes and jewellery.
She says: 'I thought it was great.
'They'd pick me up after school and drive around really fast. They gave me new clothes which I hid from my mum. They bought me a secret phone. I felt really lucky.'
But then, the attacks started.
Nicola says: 'They were forcing me to drink and take drugs and making me stay out later than I was allowed.
'I got into trouble at home, which was exactly what they wanted, because it pushed me further into their clutches.
'The man who I thought was my boyfriend made me perform sex acts on him as well as other men.
'Then, he introduced his cousins and his uncles, and the men were getting older and older. He'd say, 'If you like me, you must do this.'
One man had guns, and he made me hold them, letting me know what would happen if I ever refused to have sex with him
Nicola Riley
'When I refused, they quickly became nasty, threatening to hurt my family and burn my house down.
'They put cigarettes out on my arm to let me know they were serious.'
Soon, Nicola was skipping school most days to be with the gang.
She says: 'They drove me to Manchester, and I was raped by men there.
'Sometimes it was in the car, other times in flats above takeaways and tyre shops. One room had bolts on the door, and I was locked in until I did as they said.
'They'd drive me to the middle of nowhere and leave me there if I misbehaved. I even got out of a car on a motorway one night. They beat me up and filmed it.
'One man had guns, and he made me hold them, letting me know what would happen if I ever refused to have sex with him.
'I was raped by one man after another, some from the same family, day after day, up to 15 times a day. I became reliant on the drugs and alcohol to block it all out, and they used them as bribes.
'My mum was out of her mind with worry, out looking for me every night and pleading with the authorities for help.'
Aged 13, Nicola was taken into care, but the abuse continued.
Steps to Keep Your Child Safe From Grooming
By Emma Kenny, true crime psychologist and parenting expert
Encourage your child to share their day-to-day experiences. Ask who they talked to on the way home, what happened at the bus stop, and if anything made them feel uncomfortable. The more openly you talk, the more confident they'll be to speak up if something feels off.
If possible, arrange for your child to walk or travel with friends. Identify safe spaces along the route, trusted neighbours or shops where they can go if they feel threatened.
Groomers often switch to online contact once they've made initial in-person connections. Monitor your child's digital devices in a respectful but proactive way. Agree on ground rules for social media use, and encourage them to show you anything that makes them feel uneasy.
If your parental alarm bells are going off, do not dismiss those feelings. Challenge unusual behaviour or new relationships gently but firmly. Seek professional advice if you suspect your child is at risk.
If you have any evidence or strong suspicions that someone is grooming your child, contact the police immediately. Support and guidance from organisations like the NSPCC or Barnardo's can also be invaluable in helping you navigate this distressing situation.
She says: 'The groomers parked outside the care home to wait for me every day.
'It seemed to me that the staff acted like it was my own fault and I believed that.'
Nicola was moved to a foster placement in Wales, but the gang tracked her down and brought her back.
She was later placed in a secure unit in Blackburn.
She says: 'The secure unit was a cell. I didn't have a TV, so I couldn't mix with other kids. I thought it must all be my fault.'
Attacked with metal bars
Aged 14, two of the abusers attacked Nicola and another girl with metal bars when they refused to have sex and they went to the police.
In August 2007, Zulfar Hussain, 46, and Qaiser Naveed, 32, were jailed for five years and eight months, after admitting abducting a child, sexual activity with the same child and supplying the youngster with ecstasy.
Just before she turned 16, Nicola left the secure unit and went to a hostel.
She says: 'By the age of 16, I was questioning whether the men's behaviour was acceptable. But I couldn't escape them.
'When I went out, random men would approach me and ask me for sex; they recognised me from photos or videos.
'One night, a stranger stood up for me and told them to leave me alone, and we began dating.
When I went out, random men would approach me and ask me for sex
Nicola Riley
'I felt safe with him, and it was the start of me taking my life back.'
Mum-of-three Nicola has struggled with stress, anxiety and trauma since her ordeal but hopes, one day, to qualify as a support worker, helping other children.
She says: 'My family have stood by me, which I'm grateful for.
'Mum and I are very close, and she has helped me through a lot, including recent surgery on my arm.
'I am determined to turn this pain into something positive, because I don't want the evil of my childhood to overshadow the rest of my life.
'I welcome the national inquiry, but I hope it's thorough and that they look closely at the failings of police, social services and care workers.'
8

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour are in PANIC – Farage is streets ahead in polls & welfare rebels are set to pile more misery on flailing Starmer
WHEN it rains, it pours… and Sir Keir Starmer cannot catch a break. A poll today shows Labour is on course for a thumping at the next election at the hands of Nigel Farage. 4 4 The YouGov 'gold-standard' MRP puts Reform on course to win the most seats on 271, while the PM's current 412 would be more than halved to 178. Sir Keir's supporters point out there are still four years to go until the next election, giving plenty of time to turn things around. But it is the fact his government has become so unpopular so soon after last year's landslide that should really worry them. A map of the projected outcome shows Reform winning in all parts of the country, flipping once Labour strongholds in the Red Wall, while reducing the Tories to a rump of 46. That so many Labour MPs - including a string of Cabinet Ministers - look to fall in a Farage wave spells trouble for Sir Keir. Rebels who in good times would ordinarily remain loyal to the government could throw caution to the wind and vote how they like. As one party insider tells me: 'Why would they care about rebelling on something they feel strongly about if they'll be out in four years time anyway?'. It means the current revolt over benefits could be just the start of the PM's troubles. Such is the scale of the revolt over the government's package of welfare savings that No10 has gone into crisis mode. Ministers may be keeping calm in public but, like a duck's feet furiously paddling below the surface, in private they are panicking. I can reveal that Sir Keir's diary was being rejigged today so he can personally lead the ring-round of Labour rebels upon his return from his NATO dash to Holland. It is therefore perhaps a happy coincidence that his aides recently discovered the Downing Street vending machine has started stocking Red Bull. They are going to need all their energy for a fraught few days that could decide the fate of Labour's entire premiership. The golden rule in politics is knowing how to count - so some numbers: around 120 Labour backbenchers are threatening to torpedo the government's £5billion package in benefit cuts. They say the squeeze on Personal Independence Payments specifically could push 250,000 claimants into poverty. Combined with the opposition parties, they have marshalled enough troops to easily wipe out Sir Keir's 156 majority when the vote happens in just five days' time. Defeat would strike a humiliating blow to Sir Keir's authority and throw into doubt his ability to push through any serious reform. If he cannot even convince his troops to get behind £5billion in welfare cuts, what hope does he have of reining in a sickness benefits bill set to balloon to £100billion within five years? Downing Street has been left with two options: postpone the vote and buy time to redraw their proposals in a way that satisfies the rebels, despite the stench of weakness. Or roll the dice and try to peel off as many mutineers as possible with the prospect of concessions. For now, Starmer has chosen to go to the negotiating table, with both him and his deputy Angela Rayner publicly stressing the vote on Tuesday will happen. Over the next few days the PM, his ministers and his whips will use a mix of olive branches, arm-twisting, and downright dark arts to smash the revolt. A 'bleeding stumps' pitch has seen rebels told that popular policies - like more cash for hospitals and school breakfast clubs - could all be at risk without welfare savings. Meanwhile the more career-driven MPs are being gently warned that their hopes of a government job will evaporate if they walk through the wrong voting lobby. The name of one ambitious newbie who has been excitably telling colleagues he wants 'regime change' has worked its way back to No10. He can kiss goodbye to a ministerial red box… But even MPs loyal to Starmer - and there are still a lot of them - are not convinced anything other than serious concessions will pull the rebels back from the brink. One member of the government tells me: 'It's hard to see how they can get this over line on the current voting timeline without some concessions to get some of the heavy hitters to change course. 'But it is unclear if that reality has yet fully landed with No10.' Another supportive MP reckons a commitment on the floor of the House of Commons to soften the package later down the line is 'the only way to keep the show on the road'. One senior rebel insists they 'can find a compromise' but Downing Street 'need to take their fingers out of their ears'. And the rebellion is not just contained to the backbenches. One MP swears that as many as five Parliamentary Private Secretaries - the first rung on the ministerial ladder - are willing to abstain in protest. Whether Sir Keir wins the vote or not, this whole mess is symptomatic of a deeper problem running through his premiership: a growing sense he is not in control. A string of embarrassing u-turns - from winter fuel cuts to the grooming gangs national inquiry - are a dangerous smoke signal to his MPs that he can be pushed around. And worryingly to the government - much like the Brexit Spartans who hamstrung Theresa May's government - the new Labour rebels are organised. Experienced committee chairs on the soft left of the party have developed a sophisticated shadow whipping operation to marshal their troops. That No10 was totally blindsided by the ambush on Monday night is testament to their tactics - and exposed a Downing Street intelligence operation sorely lacking. Terrified of party whips getting wind, the ringleaders recruited disgruntled MPs to their cause through snatched conversations in corridors and on the Commons terrace. As one MP warns: 'They have spreadsheets and they can count. This whole saga has given them intel on how to whip'. And you can bet that fighting benefits cuts will not be their only rallying cause over the next four years. Axing the two-child benefit cap - on which the PM has already shown ankle at the mere flickers of backbench grumblings - will be next. The danger for Sir Keir now is spiralling into a doom loop of chaos, which breeds unpopularity, which breeds more chaos, which breeds more unpopularity.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Tories designing investment visa to attract ‘golden geese' to UK
The Conservatives have announced plans for an investment visa to woo back 'golden geese' non-doms who have left the country under Labour. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said he was working on plans for a 'genuinely world-beating offer for wealth creators', which would include exemptions from Labour's inheritance tax on global assets. It comes after Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said he would introduce a £250,000 ' Britannia card ' to lure the wealthy back to Britain. Research suggests that 16,500 high-net-worth individuals are expected to leave the UK in 2025, after Rachel Reeves scrapped the non-doms regime and changed inheritance tax rules to apply to foreign holdings. Mr Griffith said in a speech at the Prosperity Institute on Thursday that the Tories were working on their own proposals to attract the wealthy to London. 'Instead of increasing wealth, [Labour has] attacked those who create it, shooing away the golden geese, the entrepreneurs, investors, and the top talent that our country was famed for, the world over,' he said. 'Too many of our best and brightest young people, the future wealth creators, are exchanging Docklands for Dubai, Manchester for Miami or Leeds for Lisbon.' Death tax 'out of kilter' Asked by The Telegraph how the Conservatives' plan would work, Mr Griffith said he was exploring a new investment visa for wealthy foreigners, which would give high-net-worth individuals the right to live in the UK in exchange for a multimillion-pound investment in British companies. 'The UK does not currently have an investment visa at all,' he said. 'There's no route to come and get a visa to this country simply by virtue of your desire to invest in productive or risk-taking assets that contribute to the economy.' He also said that the Tory scheme would fix the Labour system of taxing global wealth at death that is 'out of kilter with other global jurisdictions'. The Telegraph understands that the plan may involve giving non-dom status to those with investment visas, reviving the system that Ms Reeves has abolished. The UK's ' golden visa ' scheme was scrapped by the Conservative government in February 2022, after the invasion of Ukraine, amid concerns it was mostly used by Russians. First introduced in 2008, Dame Priti Patel, the home secretary at the time, said it would be suspended as part of a 'renewed crackdown on illicit finance and fraud'. Mr Farage said on Monday he would create a 'Britannia card', which would allow wealthy foreigners to live in the UK without a global tax on their assets, for a fee of £250,000. He said the money would be used to fund social security payments, but critics said the scheme would actually cost £34 billion in lost tax revenue. Separately, Mr Griffith said he would like to see London Underground trains upgraded to be autonomous and to run 24 hours a day. 'The Government's industrial strategy talks about autonomous driving in cars one day, but there are no plans that I'm aware of to deploy autonomous driving on our Tube network,' he said. 'Many cities around the world do use autonomous driving on their trains, including Paris, but the lock grip that transport unions have on this Government's mind means that this is a forbidden conversation.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Don't blame Morgan McSweeney – this welfare mess is Keir Starmer's fault
When Labour got into trouble soon after the election, Sue Gray was the scapegoat. Some of the failure to prepare for government may have been her fault, and her replacement, by Morgan McSweeney, as the prime minister's chief of staff certainly ensured a clearer political message from No 10. But it didn't take long for the caravan of blame to circle round and roll over her successor. This week, some Labour MPs privately blamed McSweeney for handling disability benefits reform so badly that more than 100 of them were preparing to vote against their government. They think McSweeney and his 'overexcitable boys' are responsible for a lurch to the right, aiming to balance the nation's books on the backs of the disabled in order to appeal to voters who might be tempted to defect to Nigel Farage. But this is displacement activity. The idea that all Keir Starmer needs is a new set of advisers is the cry of the supposedly loyal dissident through the ages. It cannot be long before someone suggests that No 10 should 'Let Starmer be Starmer', the starry-eyed slogan of people who have watched too much of The West Wing and who imagine that, if only the prime minister could be unleashed from his Blairite prison warders to express his true Ed Miliband brand of socialism, all will be well. But it cannot be much longer after that that the critics realise that the prime minister himself might be the problem. Already, some otherwise loyal MPs are beginning to grumble. Starmer has voted in the Commons only seven times in his first year, they complain (BBC research found that even Tony Blair voted 13 times and Boris Johnson did 57 times); he doesn't talk to MPs; he doesn't understand parliament. The ultra loyalists point out that Blair rode out huge rebellions, winning the votes on foundation hospitals (2003) by 17, and on tuition fees (2004) by five. But those were after he was on his second term, and had been in power for six years. And suddenly, Starmer's seems like an old government rather than a new one. An old hand from Blair's whips office gave me an indirect answer when I asked this week where Starmer had gone wrong: 'Tony Blair was a prime minister who knew what was going on, and who took risks based on good information.' In Blair's time, it was assumed he would win a third election, which he did in 2005, despite the BBC reporting daily, pretending to be impartial, that his 'authority was draining away'. I know politics is said to have sped up, but we have reached that stage five years earlier with Starmer – and the big difference is that most people expect Labour to lose its majority at the next election. Today's mega-poll from YouGov, a seat-by-seat model that suggests Reform would be the largest party in a hung parliament if there were an election 'tomorrow', is 'only a bit of fun' at this stage of a parliament, but the implications are far from fun for the prime minister. Many Labour MPs expect to lose their seats and 'want to leave the Commons standing tall and proud', in the words of one rebel quoted by George Eaton of the New Statesman. Talk of Starmer's fall is premature, of course. Governments with three-figure majorities rarely lose votes in the Commons – if only because they offer concessions to the rebels and, if that doesn't work, they postpone the vote. In this case, though, making concessions or postponing the vote will only make matters worse. The public finances are already crumbling, only a few months after Rachel Reeves 'fixed the foundations'. Any concession will cost more money that the chancellor does not have. And the only reason she and Starmer are in such trouble in the first place is that they are 'reforming' welfare to make savings, rather than making savings as the happy by-product of reform designed to help people into work. No wonder a former senior civil servant to whom I spoke this week was gloomy about the prospects for the government and the country: 'It feels like the end of days, even though we haven't even reached the first anniversary.' This ex-mandarin added: 'The government's security review says that we must prepare for war at home. It looks like it has already begun.'