You're all wrong — 'Waterworld' is a good movie
'Waterworld,' which celebrates its 30th anniversary this month, stars Costner as the Mariner, a drifter in a world covered in water. The Mariner reluctantly agrees to help Helen (Jeanne Tripplehorn) and the young Enola (Tina Majorino) search for dry land while avoiding the villainous Deacon (Dennis Hopper), who believes the little girl holds the secret that will change the world.
Upon further examination, 'Waterworld' is not nearly as bad as you think. It's not free from criticism, but there's often more positive than negative.
What if the world was covered in water? 'The future... The polar ice caps have melted, covering the Earth with water. Those who survived have adapted to a new world,' the narrator says at the beginning. Recruiting the legendary Hal Douglas — arguably the most famous voice-over artist for trailer — to do the narration elevates the severity of the issue and raises the film's expectations.
Would I have opened the film with Costner's Mariner converting his pee into drinking water? I would not. It does, however, establish the Mariner as a self-sufficient man, and as you come to learn more about him, the term 'creature' might be a better tag because of his gills and webbed feet.
The concept of treating everyday items like they're worth more than gold was genius. Things we'd normally take for granted — like a jewelry box, dirt, plants, and crayons — are essential tools for survival.
The most stunning scenes in 'Waterworld' are the chase sequences on water. Watching Costner maneuver up, down, and around his trimaran is riveting. Costner is the chef, and the boat is his kitchen. The fast-paced action pairs perfectly with James Newton Howard's adventurous and upbeat score. The two major set pieces at the atoll and the Exxon Valdez oil tanker are loud, explosive, and pulse-pounding. Costner's bread and butter are dramas, but he can hang as an action star in these scenes.
Steven Spielberg, who went through hell and back to direct 'Jaws,' advised Reynolds and Costner not to film on open water. Reynolds and Costner did not listen to Spielberg's advice, which led to several problems. Reading the tea leaves, Costner had a specific vision for the film and assumed creative control, which led to Reynolds quitting before the release.
While the relationship between Reynolds and Costner suffered, the film's visuals are breathtaking. Costner, who was undeniably one of the five biggest movie stars at the time, looks like an iconic hero whenever he's on the boat and staring out into the abyss. Reynolds perfectly captured the feelings of existential dread many would face had they never seen dry land.
'Waterworld' has its problems, from unintentional comedy and an underdeveloped romance to awkward sequencing and silly tone. Visuals are certainly not one of the aspects holding the film back.
'Waterworld' has always drawn comparisons to 'Mad Max,' George Miller's iconic dystopian franchise. For starters, screenwriter Peter Rader said that producer Brad Krevoy offered him a job in the late '80s to write a 'Mad Max' rip-off. By the time screenwriter David Twohy rewrote the screenplay in the early 1990s, 'Waterworld' was essentially 'Mad Max 2 on water.'
'Waterworld' isn't subtle about the 'Mad Max' similarities. The Mariner is a stand-in for Max Rockatansky; the ocean becomes the new Wasteland; the Deacon and the Smokers mirror Lord Humungus and his gang; and the Mariner's mission — find dry land for Helen and Enola — resembles Max fighting to protect the settlers on their journey to the northern paradise.
I'm not saying 'Waterworld's' nautical action is better than the invigorating driving sequences in the 'Mad Max' franchise. However, I do believe these sailing scenes — especially when the Mariner has to outrun the Smokers — are enthralling examples of inspired filmmaking from Reynolds.
Many of the reviews that panned 'Waterworld' cited how the Costner epic is a worse version of 'Mad Max.' If 'Mad Max' is an A-tier movie and 'Waterworld' is a B-level 'Mad Max,' why is that a bad thing? Do you think people sit down and watch 'Under Siege' and say, 'Well, I don't like it because it's the inferior version of 'Die Hard'?' Sorry, 'Alien,' but I have to dock points off the review because you're a worse version of 'Jaws.'
Those are insane statements that no one would make. 'Waterworld' isn't as good as 'Under Siege' and 'Jaws,' but it has enough story and originality to deserve to lose the rip-off designation.
Nothing like bad press in the lead-up to a movie to tank a film's chances of succeeding at the box office. Before the release in July 1995, the top story behind 'Waterworld' had nothing to do with anything shown on-screen. Money, particularly the budget, generated the most headlines.
Universal initially authorized a $100 million budget. Logistical delays, on-set accidents, and poor weather pushed the shoot from 96 days to over 150 days. The budget skyrocketed to $175 million, the most expensive film ever made at that point. These rising costs led to the nicknames 'Fishtar' and 'Kevin's Gate,' a play on two of the most notorious flops ever, 'Ishtar' and 'Heaven's Gate.'
Hollywood's classic rule says a film needs to make 2.5 times its budget to be considered profitable. That's not an official rule, but it's a good barometer of success. 'Waterworld' ended its theatrical run, grossing $264 million worldwide. Even math novices know that gross does not equal profit.
Here's the not-so-secret truth about 'Waterworld': It eventually made a profit thanks to TV broadcast rights and home video sales, among other things. 'Waterworld' was also the ninth-highest-grossing movie of 1995. Studios today would sign up for a movie with 'Waterworld's' margins. Sequels have been commissioned for movies that have made way less than 'Waterworld.'
Now, 30 years later, it's time to retire the 'Kevin's Gate' nicknames in favor of 'Kevin's Gate Made Money.' 'Waterworld' might have been a disappointment, but it was no disaster.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geek Tyrant
2 days ago
- Geek Tyrant
Awesome JAWS Poster Art From Artist Tyler Stout Pays Tribute To Quint — GeekTyrant
I had to share this great Jaws print with you that was created by artist Tyler Stout. This was a limited edition Comic-Con exclusive of only 150 prints. They sold out at the event, but I managed to score one, and this is a beautiful peice! The poster was created for CODA Gallery. Quint, the rugged shark hunter from, is one of the most unforgettable characters in cinematic history. Played masterfully by Robert Shaw, Quint is the epitome of grit and resilience, an old-school seaman with a weathered exterior and a deep-rooted trauma that fuels his obsession. What makes Quint such a powerful character isn't just his fearlessness or bravado, but the depth of his past, especially the haunting USS Indianapolis monologue that reveals the true horror he's lived through. He's not just a shark hunter; he's a man shaped by survival, driven by vengeance, and unwilling to back down. His intensity, gruff charm, and unwavering determination make him a compelling force in the story and the emotional anchor of the film's tension.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Pete Davidson Shared The Most "Humiliating" Tattoo He Ever Got, And My Jaw Is On The Floor
You're already aware that Pete Davidson has gotten a lot of tattoos — so many, in fact, that he's currently in the process of getting all of them covered up. Obviously, anyone who's gotten as many tattoos as Pete is going to have a few ink-related regrets — and during a recent appearance on Hot Ones, the comedian and actor revealed the most "humiliating" tat he ever sat down to receive. Drumroll, please... Related: The tattoo in question was on Pete's chest, and it was a compliment that comedian Dave Chappelle once paid him after Pete did a set at the age of "19 or 20." Allow Pete to explain: 'This was before [Dave] was back, so seeing him was like crazy, going 'What the fuck?'," he recalled. "And I got off stage and he was like, 'I watched your whole set — it was really good,' and I was like, 'Oh, thanks.'" Related: "I was like, 'You know, how do you keep coming up with new stuff? I'm working on new stuff and it's, like, difficult,' and he goes, 'Jokes come and go, but swag is forever.' And guess who got that tattooed on his chest?' Related: Apparently, Pete found the tattoo so embarrassing that he actually covered it up with a different tattoo at one point. Can you guess what he chose? Time's up! If you guessed "the shark from Jaws," then congratulations on taking a huge risk and hitting it big, I suppose. Related: 'I covered it with Jaws because I needed something huge to black it out," Pete explained. "I just put a giant shark over it. That's pretty bad, dude — but he was like my idol. He still is, but that's so dumb. I could've just told people he said that to me." Hey, we've all been there — right? Maybe not. Watch the whole segment with Pete right here. Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword
Tom's Guide
4 days ago
- Tom's Guide
You're all wrong — 'Waterworld' is a good movie
'Waterworld' is an ambitious sci-fi action movie with a unique premise, stunning visuals and intense action. But Kevin Costner's post-apocalyptic adventure is remembered as one of Hollywood's biggest flops and disappointments. 'Waterworld,' which celebrates its 30th anniversary this month, stars Costner as the Mariner, a drifter in a world covered in water. The Mariner reluctantly agrees to help Helen (Jeanne Tripplehorn) and the young Enola (Tina Majorino) search for dry land while avoiding the villainous Deacon (Dennis Hopper), who believes the little girl holds the secret that will change the world. Upon further examination, 'Waterworld' is not nearly as bad as you think. It's not free from criticism, but there's often more positive than negative. What if the world was covered in water? 'The future... The polar ice caps have melted, covering the Earth with water. Those who survived have adapted to a new world,' the narrator says at the beginning. Recruiting the legendary Hal Douglas — arguably the most famous voice-over artist for trailer — to do the narration elevates the severity of the issue and raises the film's expectations. Would I have opened the film with Costner's Mariner converting his pee into drinking water? I would not. It does, however, establish the Mariner as a self-sufficient man, and as you come to learn more about him, the term 'creature' might be a better tag because of his gills and webbed feet. The concept of treating everyday items like they're worth more than gold was genius. Things we'd normally take for granted — like a jewelry box, dirt, plants, and crayons — are essential tools for survival. The most stunning scenes in 'Waterworld' are the chase sequences on water. Watching Costner maneuver up, down, and around his trimaran is riveting. Costner is the chef, and the boat is his kitchen. The fast-paced action pairs perfectly with James Newton Howard's adventurous and upbeat score. The two major set pieces at the atoll and the Exxon Valdez oil tanker are loud, explosive, and pulse-pounding. Costner's bread and butter are dramas, but he can hang as an action star in these scenes. Steven Spielberg, who went through hell and back to direct 'Jaws,' advised Reynolds and Costner not to film on open water. Reynolds and Costner did not listen to Spielberg's advice, which led to several problems. Reading the tea leaves, Costner had a specific vision for the film and assumed creative control, which led to Reynolds quitting before the release. While the relationship between Reynolds and Costner suffered, the film's visuals are breathtaking. Costner, who was undeniably one of the five biggest movie stars at the time, looks like an iconic hero whenever he's on the boat and staring out into the abyss. Reynolds perfectly captured the feelings of existential dread many would face had they never seen dry land. 'Waterworld' has its problems, from unintentional comedy and an underdeveloped romance to awkward sequencing and silly tone. Visuals are certainly not one of the aspects holding the film back. 'Waterworld' has always drawn comparisons to 'Mad Max,' George Miller's iconic dystopian franchise. For starters, screenwriter Peter Rader said that producer Brad Krevoy offered him a job in the late '80s to write a 'Mad Max' rip-off. By the time screenwriter David Twohy rewrote the screenplay in the early 1990s, 'Waterworld' was essentially 'Mad Max 2 on water.' 'Waterworld' isn't subtle about the 'Mad Max' similarities. The Mariner is a stand-in for Max Rockatansky; the ocean becomes the new Wasteland; the Deacon and the Smokers mirror Lord Humungus and his gang; and the Mariner's mission — find dry land for Helen and Enola — resembles Max fighting to protect the settlers on their journey to the northern paradise. I'm not saying 'Waterworld's' nautical action is better than the invigorating driving sequences in the 'Mad Max' franchise. However, I do believe these sailing scenes — especially when the Mariner has to outrun the Smokers — are enthralling examples of inspired filmmaking from Reynolds. Many of the reviews that panned 'Waterworld' cited how the Costner epic is a worse version of 'Mad Max.' If 'Mad Max' is an A-tier movie and 'Waterworld' is a B-level 'Mad Max,' why is that a bad thing? Do you think people sit down and watch 'Under Siege' and say, 'Well, I don't like it because it's the inferior version of 'Die Hard'?' Sorry, 'Alien,' but I have to dock points off the review because you're a worse version of 'Jaws.' Those are insane statements that no one would make. 'Waterworld' isn't as good as 'Under Siege' and 'Jaws,' but it has enough story and originality to deserve to lose the rip-off designation. Nothing like bad press in the lead-up to a movie to tank a film's chances of succeeding at the box office. Before the release in July 1995, the top story behind 'Waterworld' had nothing to do with anything shown on-screen. Money, particularly the budget, generated the most headlines. Universal initially authorized a $100 million budget. Logistical delays, on-set accidents, and poor weather pushed the shoot from 96 days to over 150 days. The budget skyrocketed to $175 million, the most expensive film ever made at that point. These rising costs led to the nicknames 'Fishtar' and 'Kevin's Gate,' a play on two of the most notorious flops ever, 'Ishtar' and 'Heaven's Gate.' Hollywood's classic rule says a film needs to make 2.5 times its budget to be considered profitable. That's not an official rule, but it's a good barometer of success. 'Waterworld' ended its theatrical run, grossing $264 million worldwide. Even math novices know that gross does not equal profit. Here's the not-so-secret truth about 'Waterworld': It eventually made a profit thanks to TV broadcast rights and home video sales, among other things. 'Waterworld' was also the ninth-highest-grossing movie of 1995. Studios today would sign up for a movie with 'Waterworld's' margins. Sequels have been commissioned for movies that have made way less than 'Waterworld.' Now, 30 years later, it's time to retire the 'Kevin's Gate' nicknames in favor of 'Kevin's Gate Made Money.' 'Waterworld' might have been a disappointment, but it was no disaster.
