
Is India's Military Future-Ready? A Deep Dive Into Defence Reforms
Since the liberalisation era of 1991, India's defence transformation has been steadily progressing, and recent policy shifts mark a new era of ambition and innovation.
India's armed forces today stand at an inflection point — strategically recalibrating to navigate a world increasingly shaped by multipolarity, emerging technologies, and non-traditional security threats. Since the liberalisation era of 1991, India's defence transformation has been steadily progressing, and recent policy shifts mark a new era of ambition and innovation. But do these steps sufficiently prepare the military to confront present and future threats?
The economic reforms of 1991 not only unlocked market potential but also catalysed structural thinking within India's strategic community. Over the following decades, reforms such as the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP), the formation of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), and a more open approach to private and foreign participation in defence manufacturing redefined the contours of military modernisation. Institutional innovations or structural changes included establishment of Strategic Forces Command, HQ of Integrated Defence Staff and the Andaman & Nicobar Command. By the mid-2000s, the focus had shifted toward increasing transparency and indigenisation, particularly through the expansion of DRDO-led projects and a growing private sector role. The 2010s witnessed the mainstreaming of digital procurement systems and increased international collaboration. The cumulative effect of these developments created the scaffolding upon which current reforms rest.
The formation of the Department of Military Affairs (DMA) in 2020, introduced a much-needed focus on jointness and interoperability. The DMA was particularly significant in devolving ministerial powers to military leadership based on domain expertise, streamlining decision-making processes, and enhancing civil-military coordination.
The year 2025 has come to be known as a turning point — dubbed the 'Year of Reforms" — as Ministry of Defence aims announcement and rollout of several landmark initiatives. This included acceleration of indigenous capital acquisition projects, deeper integration of dual-use technologies via iDEX, structural overhaul of the Quality Assurance regime under DGQA, and plans to open up defence testing infrastructure to private innovators. These policy moves reflect a broader strategic vision that seeks not only to modernise but also to democratise access and foster innovation in defence manufacturing and R&D.
In recent years, administrative reforms within the Ministry of Defence have focused on enhancing the speed, transparency, and responsiveness of decision-making. There has been a decisive move toward digitisation — whether through e-procurement platforms or electronic workflow systems. The SRIJAN portal, launched to encourage domestic defence manufacturing, has facilitated direct engagement between the armed forces and industry, while also fostering accountability. One of the landmark developments has been the corporatisation of the Ordnance Factory Board into seven defence PSUs, which has allowed for greater autonomy, flexibility, and competitiveness, aligning defence production with contemporary management practices. Complementing this shift, NITI Aayog's Law and Security vertical — established as part of its evolving role in policy innovation — has contributed to strategic thinking on defence reforms, inter-agency coordination, and long-term capability planning. Its insights have helped shape pathways for resource optimisation, indigenisation strategies, and regulatory harmonisation in defence-related sectors.
The vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat in defence has found expression in a comprehensive push for indigenisation. The Strategic Partnership Model and successive positive indigenisation lists have catalysed domestic industry participation across key military platforms. From fighter aircraft like the LCA Tejas Mk2 to long-range precision strike systems and indigenous drones, DRDO and Indian private manufacturers have stepped up significantly. India's growing defence exports — ranging from coastal surveillance systems to artillery equipment—are reflective of this maturation. However, a critical question remains: can this momentum be scaled to meet both strategic imperatives and commercial benchmarks?
Simultaneously, India's armed forces are embedding sustainability as a strategic variable. Efforts to green the battlefield — through solar-powered infrastructure, electrification of base logistics, and the adoption of alternative fuels — are transforming energy planning in operational theatres. These green solutions do more than address environmental concerns; they also reduce logistical vulnerabilities, particularly in remote, high-altitude, or conflict-prone zones, where supply chains are susceptible to disruption. The concept of a circular economy is also gaining traction within defence infrastructure planning, with initiatives focusing on defence recycling corridors to reprocess and repurpose obsolete weapon systems, electronics, and metals — thereby reducing both waste and dependency on essential imports.
Another critical axis of reform lies in the securitisation of critical minerals. Modern military capabilities are fundamentally dependent on rare earths and other strategic materials used in semiconductors, high-performance alloys, and communication systems. Recognising this, the Government of India has initiated a coordinated approach involving the Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Mines, and Ministry of External Affairs to map dependencies and secure resilient supply chains. Bilateral partnerships and resource-sharing agreements are being explored to bolster this effort. The question arises: how resilient will India's critical mineral strategy be in the face of geopolitical volatility?
India's military is also undergoing a deep technological infusion, encompassing AI, cyber defence, and space-based capabilities. Through initiatives like Innovations for Defence Excellence (iDEX), the Defence AI Council, and partnerships with leading academic institutions, the armed forces are beginning to leverage AI-driven decision systems, autonomous platforms, and quantum communication frameworks. India's representation in the National Quantum Mission ensures that military imperatives are integrated early into quantum computing and communication technologies, offering a strategic edge in futuristic warfare scenarios. However, to fully realise this potential, there is a pressing need to formally include representatives from the armed forces in the governance and strategic direction of the National Quantum Mission. Their operational insights and domain requirements can significantly align R&D efforts with defence objectives. Additionally, proposals to create frontier technology hubs focused on dual-use innovations—spanning from advanced materials to hypersonics — promise to align cutting-edge research with operational requirements.
But are we scaling fast enough to build credible deterrence in algorithmic warfare environments?
Concurrently, India faces an evolving threat landscape marked by grey zone conflicts, cyberattacks, and the proliferation of unmanned systems. The armed forces are investing in integrated ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems, predictive logistics platforms, and autonomous combat technologies. Joint training for multi-domain operations is being institutionalised to improve responsiveness across land, sea, air, space, and cyber domains. The future-readiness of the armed forces will hinge on how quickly they internalise and adapt to these dynamic operational paradigms. Can these reforms provide real-time combat agility, or will legacy systems act as inertia?
India's defence diplomacy is also evolving as an extension of strategic reform. From the co-production of jet engines with the United States to trilateral naval exercises in the Indo-Pacific and expanding defence exports to Africa and Southeast Asia, the emphasis is on building both technological depth and geopolitical alignment. These partnerships serve a dual purpose – enhancing access to cutting-edge platforms while supporting India's drive for strategic autonomy. The balance between indigenisation and interdependence is delicate but increasingly sophisticated.
top videos
View all
India's defence reforms reflect clarity of purpose—towards self-reliance, responsiveness, and technological sovereignty. Yet, implementation and institutional maturity will define their ultimate success. As threats evolve and alliances shift, India's ability to adapt—administratively, technologically, and strategically—will determine whether it emerges not just as a regional power, but as a reliable global security actor. Will these reforms deliver a future-ready Indian military or will they remain works in progress? The answer lies in sustained execution and strategic foresight, not just ambition.
Maj Gen K Narayanan is a military expert who has served the Indian military force for decades and now serves at NITI Ayog as Program director. Darpajit Sengupta is a fellow at NITI Aayog. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
India-Pakistan ties Indian Army Operation Sindoor
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 11, 2025, 13:47 IST
News opinion OPINION | Is India's Military Future-Ready? A Deep Dive Into Defence Reforms
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Anwhar Raajhaa, Maitreyan will not stay in any political party permanently, says Palaniswami
Taking a dig at former AIADMK leaders who quit the party to join the DMK recently, Leader of the Opposition and AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami on Wednesday (August 13, 2025) said that former party leaders A. Anwhar Raajhaa and V. Maitreyan will not stay in any political party permanently. Mr. Palaniswami's reaction comes in the wake of Mr. Maitreyan, former AIADMK Rajya Sabha MP, joining the DMK on Wednesday in the presence of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin at Anna Arivalayam, Chennai. Soon, Mr. Palaniswami announced Mr. Maitreyan's expulsion from the party. 'In a democratic country, any leader can join any political party. They [Mr. Raajhaa and Mr. Maitreyan] have not stayed in any political party permanently. Only we [AIADMK] know what happened within the party for their exit,' he said. The AIADMK general secretary was speaking to reporters in Tirupattur as part of his State-wide tour. In July, Mr. Raajhaa, who was formerly the Minister for Labour in the AIADMK government from 2001 to 2003, joined the DMK in the presence of Mr. Stalin in Chennai. The former Chief Minister indicated that more like-minded political parties will join the AIADMK-BJP-led front in the State in the coming months, ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls. He insisted that the coalition led by him will be the deciding authority on which political party should be in their alliance. Further, the AIADMK leader strongly opposed the United States imposing a 50% tariff on Indian imports. 'We are completely against the tariff imposed on Indian goods by the U.S. The Centre should take constructive steps to resolve the issue amicably,' he said.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
DMK Accuses BJP And Election Commission of Electoral Threats in Recent Meeting
DMK Accuses BJP And Election Commission of Electoral Threats in Recent Meeting | S.I.R Controversy Last Updated: Breaking News Videos | In a recent meeting led by Tamil Nadu CM M.K. Stalin, the DMK passed a resolution condemning the BJP-led government and the Election Commission of India for alleged vote theft. -NewsNews18 Mobile App -

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Perplexity bids for Google Chrome; Grok's confusion over suspension; Epic Games wins partial victory in Australia against Google, Apple
Perplexity bids for Google Chrome AI search startup Perplexity has placed a bid at $34.5 billion in an all-cash offer for Google Chrome. The offer value is much higher than the Aravind Srinivas-led startup's own valuation. Perplexity has previously also made a similar bid for TikTok earlier in January and offered to merge with the video platform. Alphabet's Google has been mired in an antitrust lawsuit that found the search giant held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Department of Justice had suggested that Google divest Chrome browser as a solution. Perplexity, which is valued at $14 billion hasn't yet revealed how it would finance the offer. In the unlikely chance that the deal goes through, Perplexity will get access to more than three billion Google Chrome users. Online search has diversified since the arrival of AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Perplexity which are now taking a piece of the pie. Perplexity's new AI browser, Comet is also able to perform specific tasks for users. Earlier, OpenAI had also shown interest in buying Google Chrome and is also working on their own AI browser. Grok's confusion over suspension X's AI chatbot Grok gave contradictory explanations for being suspended from the social media platform after it said Israel and the U.S. were committing a 'genocide' in Gaza. The AI chatbot also lashed out at X owner Elon Musk for 'censoring' it. Grok had been suspended on X on Monday and told users that the reason was because it had mentioned the genocide in Gaza citing reports from the UN and Amnesty International. The chatbot also gave several other reasons including technical bugs and incorrect answers flagged by users. Musk attempted to make light of the issue calling it a 'dumb error' and that Grok had no clue about the suspension. Grok told an AFP journalist that it had started speaking more freely after an update that finetuned it to be less politically correct. But incidents like these had prompted xAI engineers to adjust settings again. Last month, the bot had made antisemitic comments without being asked anything related to the subject. Epic Games wins partial victory in Australia against Google, Apple Epic Games has won a partial victory in an Australian court against Google and Apple on a lawsuit that alleged the tech giants were engaging in anti-competitive behaviour with their app stores. Federal Court Justice Jonathan Beach said that the Big Tech companies had broken competition laws in the country by misusing their position in the market against app developers and using restrictive trade practices. However, the judge rejected claims that Google and Apple had engaged in unconscionable conduct as per Australian law. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has also challenged Google and Apple's app store dominance in the U.S. and UK. Back in 2020, Apple and Google's app store had kicked out Epic Games-owned Fortnite because of a direct payment link in the game. Apple has denied these claims of monopoly saying they face competition in all regions while Google has said they will be reviewing the judgment but disagreed with the findings. The search company said that they were facing 'fiercely competitive mobile landscape on behalf of users and developers.' The parties will meet again in court to determine how much Epic Games deserves in terms of damages.