PM Anwar says Tatarstan has enormous potential, ready to develop ties with it
As of 2022, the population of Tatarstan stood at 3.9 million people, comprising more than 70 ethnic groups, with more than 50 per cent of the population being Muslim.
The prime minister said Malaysia is ready to work and develop ties with the republic, which is part of the Russian Federation. 'I believe that Tatarstan has enormous potential, (there is) a large number of proposals. We are ready to work and develop our ties,' Anwar said during a meeting with the Rais (Head) of Tatarstan Rustam Minnikhanov.
The meeting was held in the Kazan Kremlin and was attended by the Prime Minister of Tatarstan Alexey Pesoshin, the Deputy Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation Roman Marshavin, representatives of ministries and departments and heads of major machine-building enterprises.
Anwar led a delegation that comprises Minister of Agriculture and Food Security Datuk Seri Mohamad Sabu; Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation Chang Li Kang; Minister of Higher Education Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir; and Minister of Plantation and Commodities Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani as well as Malaysia's Ambassador to Russia Datuk Cheong Loon Lai.
Meanwhile, Rustam, in a media statement, said that Anwar's visit to Kazan was a significant event.
'We are very glad to see you. Your visit encourages us to work even more actively. Our contacts should be more intensive,' he said, thanking Anwar for visiting Tatarstan and his participation in the Kazan Forum 2025.
'It is gratifying that a solid delegation of business circles is participating in the forum with you. The Kazan Forum has been held with federal status for three years now and is the main platform for establishing cooperation between Russia and the countries of the Muslim world.
'It is also a great honour for us that you participate in the meeting of the strategic vision group of the Russia-Islamic World (of the forum),' said Rustam.
The Rais also thanked Anwar for the support provided by Malaysia, and emphasised that Tatarstan attaches great importance to the development of cooperation with Malaysia within the framework of friendly Russian-Malaysian relations. There is an increase in mutual trade turnover, ties are developing in agriculture, oil and gas and petrochemical sectors, IT technologies and in several other areas, he added.
'Our republic is a pilot region for the implementation of the principles of Islamic (partnership) banking and financing in Russia. We are also doing a lot of work in terms of developing the halal industry. These are also promising areas for our cooperation. Our colleagues from Malaysia provide us with great support. We learn from you, adopt the best practices,' said the Rais.
Earlier, the Rais also presented the Malaysian Prime Minister with an English-language collection of poems by the classic poet of Tatar literature, Gabdulla Tukai.
Anwar's official visit to Russia started in Moscow on May 13 and will end tomorrow.
The Republic of Tatarstan is located on the eastern frontier of Europe at the confluence of the Volga and Kama rivers, with a distance from Moscow of 797 km. It covers a territory of 68,000 km², which is roughly the size of countries such as Ireland, Lithuania or Sri Lanka.
The Volga River is one of Russia's most prominent watercourses, whose meandering presence through Tatarstan not only enhances the region's natural splendour but also holds significant economic importance.
Tatarstan is also famous for a UNESCO site, the Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex, which was once the capital of Volga Bulgaria and now serves as a pilgrimage site for Muslims and a treasure trove for history lovers. The region's main source of wealth is oil, with a strong petrochemical industry. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
RMK13's vision meets the streets of Bukit Bintang: Delivering dignity through action
THE launch of the 13th Malaysia Plan (RMK13) by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim recently marked a significant milestone in our national development journey. With its strong emphasis on equitable growth, resilience and social wellbeing, RMK13 charts a bold path forward, not just for rural communities and industrial zones, but also for high-density urban centres like Bukit Bintang where I have been active in community work over the past decade. RMK13 sets out to uplift the quality and dignity of life for all Malaysians, promising to lift the baseline and the quality of life for the people and to build a decent standard of living. As a local community activist, I view this plan as an important opportunity to bring lasting improvements to those often overlooked in the shadows of city skylines. Everyday concerns in the city In Bukit Bintang, the concerns are familiar: affordable housing, accessible healthcare, quality education and the rising cost of living. While RMK13 allocates RM40 bil for health and RM67 bil for education, the key question is how to ensure that every ringgit reaches the people who need it most. For example, public clinic congestion remains a challenge, especially for senior citizens. Families with school-going children often feel compelled to spend on tuition just to keep up. And even basic expenses—from groceries to childcare—have steadily crept up for those living in high-cost districts. Under RMK13 the commitment towards an inclusive and responsive development is crystal clear. What matters now is making sure the delivery mechanisms match the lived realities of people in the city. Making the unseen visible One area where we must continue improving is how we identify those most in need. In the city, poverty and hardship do not always look like they do in rural districts. In places like Besut or Bagan Serai, RM100 can be stretched much farther than in Bukit Bintang, which lies at the heart of Malaysia's capital. Beneath the neon lights of Bukit Bintang, poverty persists in ways not often obvious. Around the Central Market, Medan Pasar, and even near the Jalan Sultan Ismail-Jalan Bukit Bintang junction, homeless individuals can be found sleeping on the streets. Single mothers are also found in pockets of the city where lower-income families reside, such as the Hang Tuah Public Housing flats and the Salak South People's Housing Project (PPR). As for the hardcore poor, while the numbers are relatively low in Bukit Bintang, even a single household is one too many. Some are found in the Blue Boy Mansion and Selangor Mansion, whose names may evoke grandeur but in reality house many low-income residents. RMK13 rightly reminds us that GDP growth means little if people's freedoms and dignity are still shackled by hunger, injustice or exclusion. As someone who lives and serves in Bukit Bintang, I see that reality every day. Walking the talk in Bukit Bintang While RMK13 outlines a national framework, real impact comes from local leadership stepping up to meet immediate needs. For years, my team and I have been actively serving on the ground in Bukit Bintang to safeguard the welfare of our community. For example, through the Jualan Rahmah initiative led by the Domestic Trade and Costs of Living Ministry (KPDN), we work closely to bring affordable grocery sales to the heart of the city. Our role includes identifying suitable sites, assisting with crowd control and registration on the day, and verifying that participants are Malaysian. In addition, we distributed 99 Speedmart vouchers worth RM100 each to around 2,000 elderly residents and households in need. These help them cope with rising costs and manage their daily expenses. We also support residents who often fall through the cracks of national assistance schemes such as Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) and Sumbangan Asas Rahmah (SARA). Many walk into the Federal Territories Residents' Representative Council office to check their eligibility or request help with registration. To make access even easier, we now invite the Welfare Department and the Inland Revenue Board to set up booths during certain community programmes so that residents can check, clarify and register on the spot. These may not be grand initiatives, but they deliver meaningful help to those who need it. By connecting national policy with local action, we help ensure that no one is left behind. Looking ahead RMK13 is not just a document of targets and budgets. It is, in many ways, a moral and social obligation. It reminds us that, to quote PM's address when tabling RMK13, 'justice is not merely a moral principle but a social instrument that unites society'. I believe Bukit Bintang reflects both the promise and the challenges of urban Malaysia. It is not perfect, but it is real. The needs here are immediate, and the solutions must be practical and close to the ground. RMK13 has set the right course. It is our responsibility to ensure that its aspirations translate into everyday improvements for the people—from dwellers of the Jalan Hang Tuah Public Housing flats and traders along Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, to students in Victoria Institution and senior citizens living near the famous Jalan Kenanga. Even small wins in a place like Bukit Bintang can go a long way in showing how RMK13 can work where it matters most. ‒ Aug 13, 2025 Ben Fong Kok Seng is the Chairperson of the Bukit Bintang Parliamentary Zone, Federal Territories Residents' Representative Council. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Expedia Malaysia
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
SIBUR Develops New Polyethylene Grade for FMCG Packaging
MOSCOW, RUSSIA - Media OutReach Newswire - 13 August 2025 - SIBUR, Russia's largest polymer producer, has developed a new grade of metallocene linear low-density polyethylene (mLLDPE) for flexible FMCG new grade – suitable for the production of barrier and lamination films, dairy packaging, as well as stretch films for wrapping – was developed by experts from SIBUR's R&D centre with the direct involvement of several packaging grade, named mLL20183 FE, is comparable to foreign-made counterparts in terms of its physical and mechanical properties and has strong sales potential not only in Russia but also in international made from this polyethylene feature excellent sealing characteristics, strength, and tear resistance. Its improved processability enables film manufacturers to use blown film lines more efficiently. Additionally, the seamless transition between grades with different melt flow indices helps reduce operational polyethylene is produced using metallocene catalysts (additives) based on zirconium or titanium, which enhance polymer properties, making it stronger, more transparent, and more produces metallocene polyethylene at the Nizhnekamskneftekhim production complex. By 2028, the company plans to fully modernise production by building a new plant capable of producing up to 300,000 tonnes of this premium polymer annually, which holds significant export #SIBUR The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Make or break in Alaska: Why the Trump-Putin summit could redefine the rules of peace — Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 13 — On August 15, US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. The announcement alone has injected new urgency — and uncertainty — into a conflict that has not only ravaged Ukraine but also strained the very principles of the international order. What makes this meeting 'make or break' is not just the prospect of peace but the terms under which it might be achieved. According to credible reports, Russia's conditions would 'lock in' its occupation of territories seized since the February 2022 invasion. The Kremlin's proposal reportedly demands Ukraine's withdrawal from areas in Luhansk and Donetsk that Kyiv still controls. In other words, Russia is seeking a settlement that formalises its control over large swathes of the Donbas in exchange for a cessation of hostilities. For Ukraine, this is a diplomatic nightmare. Not only would it mean ceding sovereign territory, but it would also set a precedent for rewarding military aggression. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made it clear that no Ukrainian leader can legally or morally sign away territory. He has warned that surrendering these areas would hand Moscow a ready-made springboard for future offensives, rather than guaranteeing lasting peace. What is particularly alarming is Ukraine's exclusion from the Alaska meeting. This is no trivial oversight. It signals the possibility of deals being cut over Ukraine's fate without Ukrainian participation — violating the basic principle of 'no peace about Ukraine without Ukraine.' If this summit produces an agreement in which Kyiv is not a party, the legitimacy of the outcome will be fatally compromised. The risks extend far beyond Ukraine. The international system, particularly since the end of the Second World War, has been anchored in the principle that borders cannot be altered by force. This norm is not merely an idealistic slogan; it has been a practical bulwark against the chaos of unrestrained territorial conquest. Should the Alaska summit produce an agreement that legitimises Russia's occupation, it will send a dangerous message to other revisionist powers: force works, and obdurate patience pays. Exactly the values that go against the principle of non-aggression espoused by Asean. Putin's strategy is transparent. By continuing to consolidate his territorial gains while dangling the prospect of peace, he maximises Russia's leverage. The Kremlin's other reported demands — such as a pledge to halt Nato's eastward expansion — are designed to lock Ukraine into a security grey zone, too weak to defend itself and too isolated to deter future aggression. For Trump, the optics of brokering peace with Putin could be politically advantageous. He has hinted at 'land swaps' that, in his words, could benefit both sides. Yet, history warns us that peace purchased at the expense of sovereignty rarely holds. The Munich Agreement of 1938 is the most infamous example of a settlement that emboldened, rather than restrained, an aggressor. Then, as now, the desire to halt war in the short term risked planting the seeds for greater conflict later. The Alaska summit could also have far-reaching implications for Europe's security architecture. Nato, already tested by the war in Ukraine, will have to contend with the prospect of a member state — the United States — participating in an agreement that might weaken the alliance's deterrence posture. Russian traditional nesting dolls, known as Matryoshkas, with images of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump are placed on a shelf during a demonstration at a gift shop in central Moscow, Russia August 12, 2025. — Reuters pic For any genuine peace framework to emerge from Alaska, several non-negotiable elements must be present. First, Ukraine must be at the table. Peace cannot be imposed on a sovereign state by external powers, however influential. Second, any deal must come with robust, enforceable security guarantees, ideally backed by a coalition of states, to prevent a repeat of Russia's February 2022 invasion. Third, humanitarian issues — such as the return of abducted Ukrainian children — must be prioritised and resolved immediately. Fourth, an international monitoring mechanism must be established to oversee the implementation of any ceasefire and ensure compliance by both sides. Without these elements, any agreement will be little more than a temporary truce dressed up as a settlement. The stakes are not just territorial; they are about whether the post-Cold War security order can survive intact. Since 1945, the prohibition on territorial conquest has been one of the few near-universal norms in international relations. Breaking it in Ukraine will not just embolden Russia — it will encourage similar tactics in other regions where borders are contested, from the East to the South China Sea to the Caucasus. At the same time, dismissing the summit outright would be a mistake. The alternative — continued bloodshed, displacement, and economic destruction — remains intolerable. The Alaska summit is a rare opportunity. Used wisely, it could open a path to genuine reconciliation. Mishandled, it could mark the moment the rules-based order began to unravel in earnest, with which East Asia cannot but feel the future impacts too, including Asean. The world will be watching, not just for the handshake but for what it truly represents: peace at the expense of principle — or peace forged through principle. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and Director of the Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
