logo
1 in 4 Americans Can't Afford to Pay Their Credit Card Bills: Survey

1 in 4 Americans Can't Afford to Pay Their Credit Card Bills: Survey

Newsweek23-04-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Nearly 25 percent of all Americans are facing unsecured debt that they say is "unmanageable," according to new data released from Experian.
The rise in debt after the pandemic has caused many Americans to take on additional jobs and use budget apps amid high inflation, the new survey revealed. Newsweek spoke to several experts on the matter.
Why It Matters
Consumers in the United States owed $17.57 trillion in total debt as of the third quarter (Q3) of 2024, according to Experian data.
As the U.S. Department of Education will once again begin reporting missed student loan payments to credit bureaus on May 5, Americans could face even more financial consequences in the coming months to their loan balances.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal student loan payments were paused, and interest was set at 0 percent. When the pause officially ended last year, the government introduced a temporary "on-ramp" to prevent immediate financial fallout.
A sticker shows that the American Express credit card is accepted at the front of a business on February 11, 2025, in Chicago, Illinois.
A sticker shows that the American Express credit card is accepted at the front of a business on February 11, 2025, in Chicago, Illinois.What To Know
The new Experian data revealed 23 percent of U.S. adults say they currently have unsecured debt that is "unmanageable."
This is causing many to take on another job or side hustle (36 percent) or use budgeting apps (23 percent).
Debt can grow for a variety of reasons. While it may be logical to take on a loan or use a credit card for big purchases like homes or cars, 41 percent of U.S. adults said their biggest misconception about debt before they had to manage it was that minimum payments were enough.
However, for those who only pay the minimum amount, the level of debt can skyrocket due to high interest rates.
Rod Griffin, senior director of public education and advocacy for Experian, said that much of the "unmanageable" debt consumers face is due to these credit card expenses.
"People are becoming reliant on credit cards for everyday purchases and often lack a plan for how they're going to repay them or a plan for how they are going to use credit cards so that they don't get into trouble," Griffin told Newsweek.
But student, car and home loans also take a toll.
As the Biden administration made student loan forgiveness a pillar of its Department of Education, nearly 4 million borrowers collectively saw at least $140 billion in student loan debt canceled in 2024, according to Experian.
This led to overall lower debt levels, but as President Donald Trump's new Education Department has restricted those options, the level of debt could see a significant uptick.
What People Are Saying
Rod Griffin, senior director of public education and advocacy for Experian, told Newsweek: "The pendulum is starting to move a bit toward people having more issues with repaying the debt. For quite a while, we saw the level of credit card debt increased but the ability of people to make those payments seemed to be very strong. We didn't see increasing delinquencies, didn't see people having significant difficulty. We're starting to see people have a bit more now."
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "In the years during and following the pandemic, unsecured debt - debt accrued through financial products like credit cards and consumer loans - skyrocketed as millions of Americans needed the support of these debt types to finance their lives as inflation took its toll. After leaning on this credit the past few years, the bills are piling up, and monthly payments that were once smaller and more manageable are no longer as easy to tackle."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Unmanageable debt is hitting hardest among Gen Y and Gen Z. These younger cohorts are dealing with student loan balances that seem to never go down. There are countless stories of people making payments for years, only to watch their balances increase over time. That becomes an unimaginable situation, especially when you're also trying to cover basics like transportation, health insurance, and rent."
What Happens Next
Griffin said moving forward, it's likely younger generations will continue to have lower credit scores and less debt that increases over time when they enter a different stage of life.
While millennials were reluctant to use credit cards when they came of age, their changing life priorities are forcing higher amounts of debt now.
"Millennials as they grew older and entered into relationships, were growing their careers, starting to have families, buying homes, all of those things then involve more credit use, just by nature of you buy a house you tend to need to have credit established," Griffin said.
Escalating debt could have a more significant impact on low-income households, but the middle class is also facing challenges, Beene said.
"It's a worrying sign, as this debt typically carries higher interest rates and can easily become more unmanageable more quickly, and it's not just affecting lower income households," Beene said. "Middle class households are also increasingly having issues with keeping these debt forms under control."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariffs keep coming. Stock markets don't seem to care.
Trump's tariffs keep coming. Stock markets don't seem to care.

NBC News

time3 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump's tariffs keep coming. Stock markets don't seem to care.

At least for now, the U.S. stock market is on board with President Donald Trump's increasingly aggressive use of executive power. On Tuesday, major stock indexes hit fresh all-time highs as investors digested an inflation report that was mostly tamer than feared. While the details of the report suggest an overall mixed picture for the economy, it suggested fears of large immediate price increases from Trump's tariffs may no longer be warranted. 'Many prices will end up rising in time due to tariffs, but we don't see inflation pressures persisting,' James Knightley, chief international economist at ING, said in a note to clients. 'We are in a very different situation to 2021/22 when inflation soared to 9%.' While the rate of inflation for some goods exposed to tariffs picked up in July, it was weaker for others, like appliances and apparel. Last month's heavier price increases were instead mainly found in service sectors like airfare and auto insurance rates. 'The strength was concentrated to a few specific components and not broad based,' analysts with Citi said in a note. Tariffs are costs added to imports in the form of taxes. Goldman Sachs analysts have estimated that consumers have been responsible for as much as 22% of the cost increases, with the percentage set to climb as the tariffs work their way more fully into supply chains — though Trump attacked Goldman's estimates Tuesday. Efforts by firms to stockpile goods ahead of the tariffs' impacts, as well as summer discounts and ongoing tariff deadline extensions by Trump, have insulated consumers from further effects. Tariffs continue to get negative reaction in surveys, with a mid-July Fox News poll showing Americans disapproved of Trump on tariffs by a 26-point margin. That was virtually unchanged from April, when Trump revealed shock new tariff levels in his Rose Garden 'Liberation Day' speech announcing soaring new import duty levels. Stocks, meanwhile, continue to shrug them off. After Tuesday's inflation report, traders increased the odds of a rate cut by the Federal Reserve at its next meeting in September. When markets expect the Federal Reserve to loosen financial conditions and make it easier for businesses to borrow money, stocks tend to rise because firms will have to pay less money in interest. Stocks' recent behavior is in stark contrast to their dramatic spring sell-off in the wake of April's 'Liberation Day' speech. Investor reaction was so intense that Trump instituted a 90-day pause to reconsider what was set to be a cornerstone of his second administration's economic policy. Today, Trump's focus on tariffs hasn't abated — but he has dialed back the more maximalist tariff levels he initially outlined. Combined with signs of a shakier labor market, investors are more convinced that the Fed will err on the side of supporting the economy by lowering interest rates to support overall business activity. The performance of the stock market itself isn't a full picture of the broader economy, however. Instead, the gains of the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq increasingly reflect the outsized returns of a handful of tech companies that investors believe will reap massive gains from their investments in artificial intelligence technology. The so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks — Alphabet (Google's parent), Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — now account for one-third of the weighted average of the S&P 500, the broadest index of stocks Reuters reported last month, citing data from LSEG Datastream consultancy. According to analysis from Morgan Stanley, at the end of July, just 9% of companies that make up the S&P 500 were at 52-week highs. The index's movements are thus now heavily correlated with changes to the outlook of a handful of companies. If just one of them underperforms, it can take the entire market down with it. 'When a handful of stocks dominate the market ... if you do have a period of disappointment from those stocks, you could see disproportionate impacts on your portfolio from just a handful of company-specific issues,' Michael Reynolds, vice president of investment strategy at Glenmede financial group, told Reuters. Small businesses remain especially vulnerable to the impact of tariffs, since they have less pricing power than larger firms. The National Federation of Independent Businesses, the country's largest small-business trade group, reported Tuesday that a shrinking share of respondents say they are profitable. 'Increased costs are affecting everyone. I believe things will improve, but it will take time — six to 12 months. I just hope small businesses can hold on that long,' the NFIB quoted an unnamed fabricated metal product manufacturing firm in Michigan as saying in a July report. The U.S. economy isn't out of the woods yet, said Kevin Gordon, director and senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab financial group. Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report a separate measure of inflation that tracks wholesale inflation, or what producers get for their products and which tends to be more closely watched by the Federal Reserve. If it shows more pronounced signs of inflation than what Tuesday's report suggested, stocks could quickly come down from their new highs. Barring that, conditions remain more benign than feared, he said, potentially setting the stage for further stock gains. 'Weaker growth is not a concern at the moment,' he said. 'Yes, there's been some pullback, but it doesn't mean we're in any kind of recessionary scenario.'

CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?
CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the supposed fallout of the Paramount/Skydance merger continues, the 2025 TV schedule is the beginning of the end for CBS's The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. With Colbert's surprise cancellation still lingering, and the corporate players proclaiming the move as a 'financial decision,' the validity of that motive has been questioned by not only celebrities and fellow late night hosts, but also the American public. A new poll reported by Yahoo seems to back that viewpoint, as the axing of The Late Show lead to some interesting data. Perhaps the most telling result are the top two results that pollsters pegged for why Paramount/CBS cancelled the almost 10 year program; as well as its legendary late night fixture. 40% of Americans disapproved of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's cancellation. 35% of Americans surveyed think that Stephen Colbert is 'about right' in sociopolitical content (versus 28% saying he's "too political," and another 3% saying he's "not political enough.") 37% of responses expressed that 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with Trump administration.' 36% agreeing that another cause was 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump.' Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon are tied at 25% for the title of "favorite late-night show host." By the numbers, it would appear that 'the Average American' does not feel that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's reported financial losses are truly the cause of its cancellation. Which aligns with some of the opinions we've seen from other late night notables. One such example would be Andy Cohen's remarks about the CBS cancellation, in which the Watch What Happens host offered a breakdown of what he felt would have been a more financially motivated strategy. Meanwhile, Skydance CEO David Ellison's alleged feelings on CBS personalities acting 'like they're the IP' poses a counterpoint that appears to be acting in the name of 'fundamentals.' Yet if you trust former Late Show with David Letterman producer Rob Burnett's thoughts, he might tell you the perceived threat to the Paramount/Skydance merger was the true problem. For all of the inside baseball discourse that exists around Stephen Colbert's May 2026 departure, the 'true cause' has certainly seemed to be up for debate. And that debate has hit every corner of the interwebs, from celebrities to the audiences watching at home. As the discourse continues to run around the Internet, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will continue running -- for at least a few more months -- in its usual 11:35 PM ET slot on CBS, with new episodes heading to streaming for those with a Paramount+ subscription after they've aired. Solve the daily Crossword

In Illinois, Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries says affordability could be key message for the midterms
In Illinois, Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries says affordability could be key message for the midterms

Chicago Tribune

time34 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

In Illinois, Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries says affordability could be key message for the midterms

SPRINGFIELD — As national Democrats continue looking for a message that will resonate with the American public enough to put them back in power, U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Tuesday it could be as simple as: 'America is too expensive.' Speaking in Illinois' state capital about President Donald Trump and GOP funding cuts to public aid and benefit programs, the New York City congressman argued high costs continue to plague average Americans. 'Housing costs are too high. Grocery costs are too high. Utility costs are too high. Insurance costs are too high. Child care costs are too high,' Jeffries said, flanked by U.S. Rep. Nikki Budzinski and U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, both of Springfield. 'America is too expensive. We need to drive down the high cost of living. Donald Trump has failed to do it.' Before arriving in Springfield, where he's expected to appear Wednesday with Gov. JB Pritzker at the Illinois State Fair, Jeffries hit the same message on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe.' As dozens of Texas Democrats fled their state for Illinois to prevent Republicans from passing a gerrymandered Texas congressional map to gain GOP seats for the midterm elections, Jeffries said the GOP efforts are happening 'because Republicans don't have any track record of accomplishment that is designed to focus on the American people, to make life better for the American people, to lower costs for the people of Texas and beyond. And so they want to rig the elections to cling on to power.' Jeffries' comments come as the midterms have begun to take shape more than six months after Trump took office. On economic issues, Trump has instituted a wide array of tariffs, which have increased some consumer costs and created uncertainty for businesses and the financial markets. In July, the consumer price index, which measures the average change in pricing over time, rose 2.7% over the last year for all urban consumers, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. During their event in Springfield, Jeffries, Budzinski and Durbin said massive tax breaks for the wealthy and spending cuts that were cornerstones of Trump's domestic legislation will deprive many Americans of federal health care funding, food assistance and early childhood education programs. 'Democrats are committed to fixing a broken health care system and making sure that health care is available to everyday Americans that's affordable and accessible when they need it,' Jeffries said. 'And lastly, we have to clean up corruption in Washington, D.C., and deliver a government that actually works for the people and not for the privileged few.' Although Democrats are out of power in Washington, Jeffries, who has served in the U.S. House since 2013, said he thinks the party has gained traction since Trump won the White House and Republicans took control of both chambers in Congress. Since then, Jeffries noted a Democratic-backed judge won a coveted seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and he said Trump has become 'deeply unpopular,' following the tax break and spending measure. 'There is a reason why Donald Trump has ordered Republicans to engage in mid-decade gerrymandering of the congressional map. It's because he wants to rig the midterm elections,' Jeffries said. 'Republicans are on the run all across America.' Jeffries on 'Morning Joe' also spoke in support of the Texas House Democrats who traveled to the Chicago area and elsewhere to prevent the Texas House from establishing a quorum to vote on a new congressional map pushed by Republicans. Jeffries said the whole saga has shown how voters across the U.S. should be 'able to choose the people they want to represent them in Washington, as opposed to politicians and party bosses choosing their voters.' 'The Texas Democrats are standing up for the principle of free and fair elections,' Jeffries said. 'Nothing is more American than that. We are at an all-hands-on-deck moment. And so, I certainly support the principle that we have to utilize every single tool in the toolbox in California, in New York, here in Illinois, from coast to coast.' The Texas Democrats have been joined by Pritzker and other Democrats in accusing Republicans of kowtowing to Trump, whose administration is encouraging similar actions in other GOP-led states as a means of holding the party's slim majority in the U.S. House in next year's midterm elections for the remainder of Trump's second term. They have noted repeatedly that political maps are usually redrawn only once per decade following the U.S. census, and have said Republicans are trying to change the rules and disenfranchise Texas citizens for purely political reasons. Texas Republicans have countered that the congressional maps in many Democratic states, including Illinois, are gerrymandered. Pritzker has said that Illinois' 14-3 Democratic majority congressional map passed legal muster. As Republicans try to force Democrats back to Texas to vote on the remap, GOP Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and others filed a petition — in what at least one legal expert called long-shot litigation — with a western Illinois court to compel Illinois law enforcement to enforce civil warrants from the Republican Texas House speaker against the Democratic lawmakers who sought refuge in Illinois. On Tuesday, Jeffries also addressed U.S. Sen. John Cornyn's threat from last week of getting the FBI involved in trying to ensure the lawmakers return to Texas — a request from the veteran Texas Republican that he said was granted by the law enforcement agency. Jeffries called Cornyn's actions 'pitiful' as he's trying to 'weaponize the FBI' for political purposes at a time when he faces a contentious primary reelection bid against Paxton, who is vying for Cornyn's seat. 'It's sad because the senator has (presented) himself for decades as someone of integrity,' Jeffries said of Cornyn on 'Morning Joe.' 'And now that he's in the race of his life and is on his way to losing the Texas Republican primary for his own reelection, he is targeting elected officials who he believes are his adversaries solely for political gain.' 'The FBI obviously should be focused on doing other things in terms of targeting child predators, terrorists or drug traffickers, not being used as political pawns in a game that (Texas Gov.) Greg Abbott and John Cornyn and Texas Republican Party bosses are trying to utilize for their own political power,' Jeffries said on 'Morning Joe.' 'This is the same principle connected to the fact that you have more than 100 people who've lost their lives in Texas, including dozens of children, tragically in the historic flooding. There is clear evidence that there has been mismanagement or failure to act decisively.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store