logo
Tiotropium Use in COPD Linked to Minimal Risk for Dementia

Tiotropium Use in COPD Linked to Minimal Risk for Dementia

Medscape5 hours ago

The initiation of tiotropium monotherapy was associated with, at most, a modest increase in dementia risk among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with long-acting beta 2-agonist combined with inhaled corticosteroid (LABA-ICS) over a long-term follow-up, although the clinical significance of this finding remains uncertain.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative data from Ontario, Canada, to examine whether the initiation of tiotropium monotherapy affects the risk for dementia in older adults with COPD.
They included 30,960 new users of tiotropium monotherapy and compared them with 19,530 new users of LABA-ICS (mean age, 75.1 years; 46.7% women), all of whom had COPD without dementia and had started the medication from September 2004 through February 2012.
The participants were followed up for a median of 7.59 years from the time of cohort entry.
The study endpoint was incident dementia or censoring (death, insurance termination, or 10-year follow-up), whichever happened first.
TAKEAWAY:
Compared with the initiation of LABA-ICS, tiotropium monotherapy was associated with a 9% higher risk for dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14).
However, in the secondary as-treated analysis, the initiation of tiotropium was not associated with an increased risk for dementia compared with LABA-ICS (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.93-1.32).
Subgroup analysis revealed an 18% higher risk for dementia with tiotropium monotherapy vs LABA-ICS in adults younger than 75 years and a 12% higher risk in men.
IN PRACTICE:
'On balance, this evidence does not provide a compelling argument that patients with COPD should avoid tiotropium due to concerns about cognitive decline,' the authors of the study wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Che-Yuan Wu, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It was published online on May 19, 2025, in JAMA Internal Medicine.
LIMITATIONS:
This study was potentially confounded by unmeasured factors such as smoking, dyspnea, peripheral biomarkers, spirometry measures, and other anticholinergic drugs. The assumption that the LABA-ICS comparator had no effect on the risk for dementia might not be true. The data for midlife medication dispensing and dementia biomarkers were unavailable.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by the Heart-Brain Connection Brain-Heart Research Integrative Innovation Team Endeavor IMPACT Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Brain Canada, and other sources. Few authors reported receiving financial support and grants from study funders and other sources.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage
More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage

Washington Post

time36 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage

A small, growing number of employers are putting health insurance decisions entirely in the hands of their workers. Instead of offering traditional insurance, they're giving workers money to buy their own coverage in what's known as Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements, or ICHRAs . Advocates say this approach provides small companies that couldn't afford insurance a chance to offer something. It also caps a growing expense for employers and fits conservative political goals of giving people more purchasing power over their coverage. But ICHRAs place the risk for finding coverage on the employee, and they force them to do something many dislike: Shop for insurance. 'It's maybe not perfect, but it's solving a problem for a lot of people,' said Cynthia Cox, of the nonprofit KFF, which studies health care issues. Here's a closer look at how this approach to health insurance is evolving. Normally, U.S. employers offering health coverage will have one or two insurance options for workers through what's known as a group plan. The employers then pick up most of the premium, or cost of coverage. ICHRAs are different: Employers contribute to health insurance coverage, but the workers then pick their own insurance plans. The employers that use ICHRAs hire outside firms to help people make their coverage decisions. ICHRAs were created during President Donald Trump's first administration. Enrollment started slowly but has swelled in recent years. They give business owners a predictable cost, and they save companies from having to make coverage decisions for employees. 'You have so many things you need to focus on as a business owner to just actually grow the business,' said Jeff Yuan, co-founder of the New York-based insurance startup Taro Health. Small businesses, in particular, can be vulnerable to annual insurance cost spikes, especially if some employees have expensive medical conditions. But the ICHRA approach keeps the employer cost more predictable. Yuan's company bases its contributions on the employee's age and how many people are covered under the plan. That means it may contribute anywhere from $400 to more than $2,000 monthly to an employee's coverage. ICHRAs let people pick from among dozens of options in an individual insurance market instead of just taking whatever their company offers. That may give people a chance to find coverage more tailored to their needs. Some insurers, for instance, offer plans designed for people with diabetes. And workers can keep the coverage if they leave — potentially for longer periods than they would be able to with traditional employer health insurance plans. They likely will have to pay the full premium, but keeping the coverage also means they won't have to find a new plan that covers their doctors. Mark Bertolini, CEO of the insurer Oscar Health, noted that most people change jobs several times. 'Insurance works best when it moves with the consumer,' said the executive, whose company is growing enrollment through ICHRAs in several states. Health insurance plans on the individual market tend to have narrower coverage networks than employer-sponsored coverage. It may be challenging for patients who see several doctors to find one plan that covers them all. People shopping for their own insurance can find coverage choices and terms like deductibles or coinsurance overwhelming. That makes it important for employers to provide help with plan selection. The broker or technology platform setting up a company's ICHRA generally does this by asking about their medical needs or if they have any surgeries planned in the coming year. There are no good numbers nationally that show how many people have coverage through an ICHRA or a separate program for companies with 50 workers or less. However, the HRA Council, a trade association that promotes the arrangements, sees big growth. The council works with companies that help employers offer the ICHRAs. It studies growth in a sample of those businesses. It says about 450,000 people were offered coverage through these arrangements this year. That's up 50% from 2024. Council Executive Director Robin Paoli says the total market may be twice as large. Still, these arrangements make up a sliver of employer-sponsored health coverage in the United States. About 154 million people were enrolled in coverage through work last year, according to KFF. Several things could cause more employers to offer ICHRAs. As health care costs continue to climb, more companies may look to limit their exposure to the hit. Some tax breaks and incentives that encourage the arrangements could wind up in a final version of the Republican tax bill currently under consideration in the Senate. More people also will be eligible for the arrangements if extra government subsidies that help buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act's individual marketplaces expire this year. You can't participate in an ICHRA if you are already getting a subsidy from the government, noted Brian Blase, a White House health policy adviser in the first Trump administration. 'The enhanced subsidies, they crowd out private financing,' he said. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Cannabis Use May Double Risk of Death From Cardiovascular Disease, Study Finds
Cannabis Use May Double Risk of Death From Cardiovascular Disease, Study Finds

Health Line

time38 minutes ago

  • Health Line

Cannabis Use May Double Risk of Death From Cardiovascular Disease, Study Finds

A new scientific analysis indicates that cannabis use may increase the risk of cardiovascular health issues, including stroke. In an accompanying editorial, two health experts say these risks are serious enough to warrant the regulation of cannabis in the same manner as tobacco. Previous research has reported on the health benefits of cannabis for people with chronic pain and other ailments, but experts say the potential effects of cannabis should be discussed with your doctor. Medical experts are sending out another strong warning about cannabis use and the risk of cardiovascular health issues. In an analysis published in the journal Heart, researchers report heightened risks of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and death from cardiovascular disease associated with frequent cannabis use. In an accompanying editorial, two health experts say the dangers from cannabis use are serious enough to warrant the substance being regulated much like tobacco. The editorial authors say the warnings are particularly important because the recent widespread legalization of the drug may have convinced many people that cannabis use is safe. 'Frequent cannabis use has increased in several countries, and many users believe that it is a safe and natural way to relieve pain or stress. In contrast, a growing body of evidence links cannabis use to significant harms throughout life, including cardiovascular health of adults,' wrote Stanton Glantz, PhD, an emeritus professor at the University of California San Francisco, and Lynn Silver, MD, a professor in UCSF's Department of Epidemiology and a program director at the Public Health Institute in Oakland, CA. 'Specifically, cannabis should be treated like tobacco: not criminalized but discouraged, with protection of bystanders from secondhand exposure,' the editorial authors added. Robert Page II, PharmD, a professor in the Department of Clinical Pharmacy and the Department of Physical Medicine/Rehabilitation at the University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, noted the analysis relied on observational studies, but said the message is clear. 'This meta-analysis validates current large observation studies that cannabis should be considered a potential risk factor for premature development of ASCVD (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), said Page, who was chair of an American Heart Association writing group that authored a 2020 report on cannabis, medical cannabis, and heart health. Page wasn't involved in the present study. 'If we ignore these signals, we are destined to repeat the fatal history of cigarette smoking, which took years to finally realize its devastating effects on cardiovascular health and mortality,' he told Healthline. Cannabis and heart health In their analysis, researchers looked at 24 studies published between January 2016 and January 2023 that included about 200 million people. The study participants were mostly between the ages of 19 and 59. Cannabis use tended to be more frequent in males and in younger people. The researchers said their analysis of that data revealed that cannabis use doubled the risk of dying from cardiovascular disease. They also reported that people who used cannabis had a 29% higher risk of acute coronary syndrome, a condition that causes sudden reduced or blocked blood flow to the heart, as well as a 20% higher risk of stroke. The researchers acknowledged that many of the studies they analyzed lacked information on missing data and had imprecise measures of cannabis exposure. Most of the studies were also observational. Nonetheless, their analysis comes less than a month after another study concluded that chronic use of cannabis is associated with a higher risk of endothelial dysfunction, a type of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in which there are no heart artery blockages but the large blood vessels on the heart's surface constrict instead of dilating. In addition, another analysis from earlier this year reported that cannabis users were six times more likely to have a heart attack than non-users. A 2024 study concluded that people who use cannabis to treat chronic pain had a higher risk of atrial fibrillation and other forms of heart arrhythmia. The researchers in the new analysis say their findings are particularly important because the use of cannabis has soared in recent years. They also note that the potency of the drug has increased. There was no delineation in the analysis, however, on the risks of smoking cannabis compared to ingesting it. Cheng-Han Chen, MD, an interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in California, said both methods may present health risks. Chen wasn't involved in the study. 'It is thought that ingesting THC increases systolic absorption of the chemical when compared to smoking THC and thus results in greater adverse effects,' he told Healthline. 'However, cannabis smoke comes with a separate set of health concerns, as the smoke contains many carcinogens and mutagens similar to tobacco smoke.' Ziva Cooper, the director of the UCLA Center for Cannabis and Cannabinoids, said the frequency someone uses cannabis, as well as the dosage, are also important factors. Cooper was likewise not involved in the study. She noted that new research is starting to show there are mental health risks to frequent cannabis use. One of those is cannabis use disorder, a condition that is estimated to affect 30% of people who use the substance. 'There are new risks that are emerging that weren't even on the radar,' Cooper told Healthline. She added cannabis can also impair people's ability to drive as well as impair their cognitive abilities. 'These are things that can affect a person's everyday life,' Cooper said. Defending cannabis use Paul Armentano, the deputy director of NORML, a non-profit that advocates for the responsible use of cannabis, acknowledges there are studies that report health risks associated with cannabis use. Armentano wasn't involved in the study. However, he told Healthline there are others who conclude there is no risk or even a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease from cannabis use. These include a 2023 study, a 2020 study, and a 2023 meta-analysis. 'In short, while tobacco smoke exposure's role in cardiovascular disease is well established, the potential role of cannabis smoke is not,' Armentano said. 'Nonetheless, persons wishing to mitigate their intake of cannabis smoke can do so via the use of herbal vaporizers, which heat cannabinoids to the point of activation but below the point of combustion.' Armentano cited studies in 2006 and 2007 that reported no health effects from vaporization. Some research has reported on some overall health benefits derived from cannabis use. A 2023 study concluded that medical cannabis can improve the quality of life for some people with chronic pain. Other research has reported that cannabis can be helpful to people with depression, social anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There are also indications that cannabis products can help ease the side effects of cancer treatments. Talking with your doctor about cannabis In their editorial, Glantz and Silver encourage medical professionals to become leaders in cannabis education. 'There is an important role for public health and public policy in addressing the risks identified [in the new analysis],' they wrote. 'While the trend toward legalization is established, that does not mean that the risks of cannabis use should be minimized or its use encouraged.' Page said he takes cannabis use into consideration when assessing his patients' cardiovascular health. 'While many of the current cardiovascular risk calculators do not include smoking cannabis into their algorithms, I do include it (just like smoking cigarettes) when assessing patients' cardiovascular risk and consider it just as powerful a risk factor as smoking cigarettes,' he said. Page added that people should be informed about the many potential health issues of cannabis use before deciding whether to use it. 'Know the risks and talk to your primary care provider before considering any use, medical or recreational. Many younger adults feel invincible and have the belief that 'This will not happen to me' or 'I could never develop cannabis use disorder.' However, it does and can occur,' he said. 'For older adults, I caution them regarding potential drug-drug interactions as both THC [tetrahydrocannabinol] and CBD [cannabidiol] can have effects on a large majority of medications, both pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically,' Page added. Chen agrees that patients need to educate themselves about cannabis before trying it. 'Any form of cannabis use does involve some risk to your health. Everyone must decide for themselves how much risk they want to expose themselves to,' said Chen. 'I would advise people to avoid smoking cannabis, as the smoke can directly harm the lungs. Also, patients with known pre-existing cardiovascular disease or with cardiovascular risk factors should consider avoiding cannabis use in general, given the potential harm to heart health,' he added. Cooper noted that cannabis has 500 different chemical components, so its effects can vary greatly from person to person.

More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage
More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

More employers are sending workers shopping for their own health coverage

A small, growing number of employers are putting health insurance decisions entirely in the hands of their workers. Instead of offering traditional insurance, they're giving workers money to buy their own coverage in what's known as Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangements, or ICHRAs. Advocates say this approach provides small companies that couldn't afford insurance a chance to offer something. It also caps a growing expense for employers and fits conservative political goals of giving people more purchasing power over their coverage. But ICHRAs place the risk for finding coverage on the employee, and they force them to do something many dislike: Shop for insurance. 'It's maybe not perfect, but it's solving a problem for a lot of people,' said Cynthia Cox, of the nonprofit KFF, which studies health care issues. Here's a closer look at how this approach to health insurance is evolving. What's an ICHRA? Normally, U.S. employers offering health coverage will have one or two insurance options for workers through what's known as a group plan. The employers then pick up most of the premium, or cost of coverage. ICHRAs are different: Employers contribute to health insurance coverage, but the workers then pick their own insurance plans. The employers that use ICHRAs hire outside firms to help people make their coverage decisions. ICHRAs were created during President Donald Trump's first administration. Enrollment started slowly but has swelled in recent years. What's the big deal about ICHRAs? They give business owners a predictable cost, and they save companies from having to make coverage decisions for employees. 'You have so many things you need to focus on as a business owner to just actually grow the business,' said Jeff Yuan, co-founder of the New York-based insurance startup Taro Health. Small businesses, in particular, can be vulnerable to annual insurance cost spikes, especially if some employees have expensive medical conditions. But the ICHRA approach keeps the employer cost more predictable. Yuan's company bases its contributions on the employee's age and how many people are covered under the plan. That means it may contribute anywhere from $400 to more than $2,000 monthly to an employee's coverage. How is this approach different? ICHRAs let people pick from among dozens of options in an individual insurance market instead of just taking whatever their company offers. That may give people a chance to find coverage more tailored to their needs. Some insurers, for instance, offer plans designed for people with diabetes. And workers can keep the coverage if they leave — potentially for longer periods than they would be able to with traditional employer health insurance plans. They likely will have to pay the full premium, but keeping the coverage also means they won't have to find a new plan that covers their doctors. Mark Bertolini, CEO of the insurer Oscar Health, noted that most people change jobs several times. 'Insurance works best when it moves with the consumer,' said the executive, whose company is growing enrollment through ICHRAs in several states. What are the drawbacks for employees? Health insurance plans on the individual market tend to have narrower coverage networks than employer-sponsored coverage. It may be challenging for patients who see several doctors to find one plan that covers them all. People shopping for their own insurance can find coverage choices and terms like deductibles or coinsurance overwhelming. That makes it important for employers to provide help with plan selection. The broker or technology platform setting up a company's ICHRA generally does this by asking about their medical needs or if they have any surgeries planned in the coming year. How many people get coverage this way? There are no good numbers nationally that show how many people have coverage through an ICHRA or a separate program for companies with 50 workers or less. However, the HRA Council, a trade association that promotes the arrangements, sees big growth. The council works with companies that help employers offer the ICHRAs. It studies growth in a sample of those businesses. It says about 450,000 people were offered coverage through these arrangements this year. That's up 50% from 2024. Council Executive Director Robin Paoli says the total market may be twice as large. Still, these arrangements make up a sliver of employer-sponsored health coverage in the United States. About 154 million people were enrolled in coverage through work last year, according to KFF. Will growth continue? Several things could cause more employers to offer ICHRAs. As health care costs continue to climb, more companies may look to limit their exposure to the hit. Some tax breaks and incentives that encourage the arrangements could wind up in a final version of the Republican tax bill currently under consideration in the Senate. More people also will be eligible for the arrangements if extra government subsidies that help buy coverage on the Affordable Care Act's individual marketplaces expire this year. You can't participate in an ICHRA if you are already getting a subsidy from the government, noted Brian Blase, a White House health policy adviser in the first Trump administration. 'The enhanced subsidies, they crowd out private financing,' he said. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store