Class is in session! TV man Dan Corder schooled 'Piers Morgan Uncensored' panel about SA's so-called '142 race laws'
Image: Instagram/dancorderonair
South African TV presenter Dan Corder, was a guest on 'Piers Morgan Uncensored'
The TV and radio host was on a panel discussion with International Editor at SABC Sophie Mokoena, 'Kill The Boer' author Dr. Ernst Roets, and podcaster Gareth Cliff.
The panel weighed on the controversial topic; Is a white genocide happening in South Africa?
Corder known for his bold views did not hold back when sharing his view on the terrible things happening in South Africa'.
The presenter addressed the misinformation about the 142 race laws against whites in the country and what they state. Corder explained that he took time to read the laws and broke down 25 of them on his show.
'Here's what actually the vast majority of the laws say. They say there needs to be meaningful representation in South Africa to reflect our country fairly on three things, not just one, race, gender, and disability, but these grifters will say that they're race laws.'
Corder's bold views and strong presence have been commended by many South Africans even music producer Prince Kaybee commented on X that Corder cooked.
'Lol Ernst Roets must stop defending fake news, he couldn't defend the so called race based laws, @DanCorderOnAir cooked him on a two plate stove with ease, what a marvellous display of 'beating an entitled child' if I may🙂'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Police fire rubber bullets at Germiston residents in housing stand-off
EKURHULENI - Police fired rubber bullets at residents who tried to block the eviction of scores of houses in Germiston on Tuesday by throwing stones and torching a municipal building, officials said. After police gained access to the housing complex in Ekurhuleni, a squad of men moved in and hauled furniture and personal belongings out of the homes. Shocked residents accused the government of failing them amid South Africa's housing crisis, saying they believed the homes were part of a scheme to provide houses for black South Africans disadvantaged by the previous racist apartheid system. Two people were arrested for setting alight the nearby offices of the municipal home affairs department, police said, adding they were acting on a June court order to evict people from the complex, which was reportedly home to 450 families. "Unfortunately, the people got wind of the eviction and closed the road. Innocent people and the police were thrown with stones and we had to retaliate to ensure that we dispersed them," Major General Fred Kekana, the deputy provincial police commissioner, told AFP. "Somebody allegedly threw a petrol bomb at the Department of Home Affairs. Two arrests have been made so far," he said. Some residents insisted they had not been issued an eviction order and had been paying rent for years. "Our government is failing us. They are chasing us yet we have titles for these houses," 37-year-old resident Akhona Mbadi, a mother of four children, told AFP. After taking power following the end of white minority rule in 1994, the African National Congress-led government adopted a Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) to provide subsidised housing and other services to black South Africans disadvantaged by apartheid. By 2017 nearly 14 percent of South African households lived in RDP or government-subsidised homes, according to government figures. However, homelessness has risen dramatically from 13,000 in 1996 to more than 55,700 in 2022, according to government statistics.
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Gayton's Tweets: Will He Survive Racism Storm?
Will the Minister Sports, Arts and Culture keep his job? Plus, Micah Reddy from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists explains the successes and challenges of investigative journalism, and Legal expert Emma Sadlier breaks down how South African law affects the internet.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary
Criticism of President's National Dialogue: A Missed Opportunity for Unity Image: X The President's planned 'National Dialogue' is being sharply criticised by civil society groups, who say it is 'neither national nor a dialogue' as it fails to unite the country. In an interview with IOL on Tuesday, Paul Maritz, Free SA Campaigns Director, contended the national exercise is neither truly national nor a meaningful conversation about the country's future. The organisation stated that divisions can only be overcome through honest dialogue and that the current format excludes entire sectors of society, including key political parties. 'South Africans must remain in constant conversation about our shared future. Unfortunately, in this case, the President's planned National Dialogue is neither national nor a dialogue in any meaningful sense. 'Entire sectors of society, including key political parties, were excluded from the outset. That makes this look far more like a PR exercise than a sincere, open conversation about where we are 30 years into democracy and how we move forward together,' said Maritz. Free SA expressed a pattern of disengagement from prominent foundations that had been expected to back the process. The Steve Biko Foundation, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group have all withdrawn, casting a pall over what many hoped would be a more inclusive national conversation. The organisations cited violations of the dialogue's core principles and called for postponement to ensure adequate preparation, coherence, and participatory integrity. Responding to the withdrawal by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Free SA noted the importance of former President Thabo Mbeki's role in persuading parties and citizens to engage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Former President Mbeki's role is significant, both because of his stature and because he represents a tradition of thoughtful political engagement,' the organisation said. 'His withdrawal, or that of organisations he supports, would be a serious blow to the credibility of this process. If respected voices like his are not fully on board, ordinary citizens will rightly question whether this is worth their time.' The Democratic Alliance (DA), the country's second-largest political party and a governing partner in a national unity framework, is among the groups that have rejected the National Dialogue. Free SA assesses that if a ruling coalition partner cannot be won to participate, the broader public is unlikely to be convinced of the process's legitimacy. 'If you cannot convince your coalition partner to participate, how can you hope to convince the rest of the country? The process loses legitimacy without their involvement before it even begins,' Maritz argued. Meanwhile, The MK Party (uMkhonto weSizwe Party) has condemned the National Dialogue as an expensive political stunt, while services are collapsing nationwide. The party described the Dialogue as a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, bypassing Parliament, and granting the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making without democratic oversight. 'This National Dialogue is a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, not a platform for genuine national problem-solving," the party asserted. The MK Party also highlighted what it calls urgent national failures that deserve attention before any dialogue can yield real progress. It pointed to a litany of service delivery and governance crises across several provinces, arguing that public resources are being diverted to political theatre rather than addressing urgent needs: Free SA and its critics argue that the National Dialogue risks becoming more about optics than addressing root causes such as poverty, inequality, and governance failures. 'From what we can see, it risks being nothing more than a political tool. It does not seriously address the root causes of poverty, inequality, and poor governance. 'A true national dialogue would require a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to make space for voices that may disagree with the President's vision,' Maritz said. IOL Politics
