logo
Navy tracks suspicious Russian ‘spy ships' in the English Channel

Navy tracks suspicious Russian ‘spy ships' in the English Channel

Telegraph25-03-2025

The Royal Navy has tracked three suspicious Russian 'spy ships' in the English Channel.
A British minehunter and helicopter were deployed on Wednesday to escort Admiral Vladimirskiy, a Russian survey ship, as it travelled along the British south coast.
Built in Poland in the 1970s, the Vladimirskiy once served the Soviet Union and it is now suspected of being part of the Kremlin's shadow fleet of spy ships, which are fitted with monitoring equipment.
HMS Cattistock, which detects and destroys mines in the sea, worked closely with the Wildcat, a multi-role helicopter which operates from Royal Navy boats, to 'keep a constant watch' through the busy shipping lanes.
A Russian landing ship known as RFN Alexander Otrakovsky and a Russian merchant vessel known as MV Ascalon were later also escorted through the Channel and North Sea.
The two Russian ships had recently left the Mediterranean and were sailing towards the Baltic Sea when they were escorted by the British Type 23 frigate HMS Somerset and fleet tanker RFA Tidesurge.
Repeat offenders
The operations were revealed by the Royal Navy a week after its warships and helicopters tracked a Russian task group returning from Syria as it passed through British waters.
The same group, including the minehunter, the helicopter, the Type 23 Frigate and the tanker, were used to monitor and report every move of four Russian vessels as they passed through the English Channel and the North Sea.
It marked the third time in six weeks that the Royal Navy has shadowed Russian task groups returning from Syria.
HMS Cattistock's commanding officer, Lieutenant Commander Rob Garner, said: 'Cattistock has escorted a number of Russian warships and government-owned vessels through UK waters in recent weeks and months, demonstrating the Royal Navy's operational readiness and steadfast commitment to UK security at sea.
'I am extremely proud of my ship's company's professionalism and determination to get the job done as we continue to work closely with other Royal Navy ships and aircraft, the RAF P8 force and fellow Nato navies.'
The Royal Navy said that HMS Somerset has been activated three times to monitor Russian convoys returning from the Mediterranean in the past month alone.
Commander Joel Roberts said: 'Somerset has been frequently activated to conduct this type of operation given the tempo of Russian activity around the United Kingdom's territorial and sensitive waters.'
He added that the Royal Navy offers 'deterrence, persistence, flexibility and can deliver or facilitate a range of military and diplomatic options'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level
Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Family visa income threshold should not rise to skilled worker level

Skilled workers are only eligible to come to the UK if they earn a salary of £38,700 or more, compared to £29,000 required mainly for British citizens or settled residents to bring their partner to the country under family visas. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) set out its recommendations after a review requested by the Home Secretary to look at how to set a minimum income requirement (MIR) for family visas that balances economic wellbeing and family life. The previous government planned to introduce the higher threshold for family visa applicants to be equivalent to the skilled worker level. But the committee's report said: 'Given the family route that we are reviewing has a completely different objective and purpose to the work route, we do not understand the rationale for the threshold being set using this method. 'We do not recommend the approach based on the skilled worker salary threshold as it is unrelated to the family route and is the most likely to conflict with international law and obligations (e.g. Article 8).' Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights is the right to private and family life that can be applied to migration cases in the UK. The UK's current £29,000 threshold is high compared to other high-income countries reviewed by the MAC. The analysis found a high proportion of applicants for partner visas are women and 90% are under the age of 44. Pakistan is the largest nationality to use the route applying from outside the country. The committee's analysis gave some options that a threshold of £24,000 to £28,000 could give more priority to economic wellbeing, such as reducing the burden to taxpayers, than on family life. It also suggested a criteria of £23,000 to £25,000 to ensure families can support themselves but not necessarily require them to earn a salary above minimum wage. Chairman of MAC, Professor Brian Bell, said: 'While the decision on where to set the threshold is ultimately a political one, we have provided evidence on the impacts of financial requirements on families and economic wellbeing, and highlight the key considerations the government should take into account in reaching its decision.' While the committee said it is not possible to predict how different threshold changes would impact net migration, it said lowering the amount to £24,000, for example, could mean an increase of around one to three percent of projected future net migration. The report added: 'Determining the MIR threshold involves striking a balance between economic wellbeing and family life. 'Whilst a lower threshold would favour family life and entail a higher net fiscal cost to the taxpayer, a higher threshold (below a certain level) would favour economic wellbeing. 'But a higher number of families would experience negative impacts relating to financial pressures, prolonged separation, relationships, adults' mental health and children's mental health and education.' The committee advised against raising the threshold for families with children as despite them facing higher living costs, the impacts on family life appear 'particularly significant' for children. It also recommended keeping the income amount required the same across all regions of the UK. The MAC also said their review was 'greatly hindered' by insufficient data and urged for better data collection by the Home Office on characteristics of each applicant to be linked to outcomes to inform further policy decisions. Reacting to the recommendations, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the report shows that raising the salary threshold will drive migration numbers down and urged for the threshold to be increased to £38,000. 'Migration figures remain far too high. It's time to end ECHR obstruction, raise the salary thresholds, and take back control of who comes into this country,' he said. 'As Kemi and I said on Friday, if the ECHR stops us from setting our own visa rules, from deporting foreign criminals or from putting Britain's interests first, then we should leave the ECHR.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The Home Secretary commissioned the independent Migration Advisory Committee to undertake a review. 'We are now considering its findings and will respond in due course. More broadly, the government has already committed to legislate to clarify the application of Article 8 of the ECHR for applicants, caseworkers and the courts.'

Major predictions what will and won't be in Rachel Reeves' Spending Review
Major predictions what will and won't be in Rachel Reeves' Spending Review

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Major predictions what will and won't be in Rachel Reeves' Spending Review

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will on Wednesday announce her major Spending Review, setting out government budgets for future years - here's everything you need to know Rachel Reeves will this week announce her major Spending Review, setting out government budgets for the next three years. The Chancellor will take to the despatch box in the Commons at 12:30pm on Wednesday, after Prime Minister's Questions. She will set out how much each department has been allocated in her spending plans over the next few years. Billions of pounds will be splashed on the NHS, schools and tech, but some areas are expected to face painful cuts. ‌ Negotiations went down to the wire, with Cabinet ministers battling it out for bigger allocations of cash from the Treasury. Downing Street said the Spending Review was finally "settled" on Monday, just two days before Ms Reeves's big statement. ‌ No10 said tough decisions had to be made in the first few months of the Labour Government, but claimed the economy was on a firmer footing after the mess the Tories made of the public finances. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the PM's official spokesman said: "The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change." Here's everything you need to now about the Spending Review. What is a Spending Review? The Spending Review is how the Government hashes out departments' budgets. Ms Reeves will set out detailed plans for day-to-day spending over the next three years and for capital budgets for the next five years. Day-to-day spending refers to funding for resources, including salaries and supplies, for areas including the NHS, the armed forces, the police, prisons and other public services. Capital spending involves the investment allocated for long-term projects like infrastructure and buildings, such as new roads or hospitals. ‌ Ms Reeves launched this phase of the Spending Review in December. She ordered Cabinet ministers to go through every single pound the government spends to find savings and efficiencies in their budgets. It is the first time in over a decade and a half that government departments have been asked to take such an approach. Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones earlier this year embarked on a tour of nations and regions to shadow doctors, nurses and police officers to learn how taxpayers' cash is being spent across Britain. He spent time on the frontline observing public sector workers to review what money is spent on but also how public services can be modernised so money is spent more efficiently. ‌ What is the process of a Spending Review? The Spending Review was only settled on Monday - two days before Ms Reeves will announce the plan in Parliament. Negotiations went down to the wire, with multiple members of the Cabinet said to be dissatisfied with the level of funding proposed. Fears have been raised in recent weeks that the Government's key pledges - such as to hire 13,000 new neighbourhood police officers and PCSOs or to build 1.5million new homes - will be put at risk if not enough funding is allocated to those areas. Deputy PM and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper were the last two Cabinet ministers to agree a deal, with both said to be unhappy with the amount of money offered to their departments. ‌ The Spending Review process is competitive, with departments being forced to go head-to-head to win funding from a limited pot of money. Advisers have been keeping their cards close to their chest, remaining tight-lipped about how much their department has been offered. One source said: "You take the best deal you can get." What will be in the Spending Review? There will be a £190billion increase in funding for day-to-day spending over the period, funded partly by tax hikes in the Budget in the autumn. A shake-up of borrowing rules has also freed up around £113billion for capital investment for big ticket items like homes, transport and energy projects. ‌ One of the biggest winners of Wednesday's Spending Review is expected to be the science and technology sector, which will get an £86billion package of funding into research areas, including into new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries. The health service is also expected to be a big winner, with a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget - amounting to around £30billion in additional funding by 2028/29. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. This includes a major expansion of free school meals to 500,000 more pupils. The Ministry of Justice, which was one of the first departments to settle its budget, will see a £4.7billion funding injection to build three new prisons amid an ongoing overcrowding crisis in jails. The Ministry of Defence also already had a clearer idea of its funding settlement, with the PM having earlier this year announced plans to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an aim to get it to 3% by 2034. ‌ Some £15.6billion will also be handed to mayors for major transport projects across the country. This will go towards plans to improve trams, trains and buses in the North and the Midlands. While huge amounts of cash will be announced in the Spending Review, departments are also expected to face deep cuts. Ms Reeves last week admitted not every department will "get everything they want". "I have had to say no to things that I want to do too," she said. "That's not because of my fiscal rules. It is a result of 14 years of Conservative maltreatment of our public services, our public realm and of our economy." ‌ What won't be in the Spending Review? Unlike Budgets, Spending Reviews have no legal basis. Instead, they set out what the Government intends to do with its spending plans over the following years. There will be no tax changes in the Spending Review as these require new legislation. When the Chancellor presents the Budget, all the measures on taxation are contained in an annual Finance Bill. Parliament debates the Budget and scrutinises the Finance Bill. This does not happen with a Spending Review. It means some announcements - including the winter fuel payment U-turn - might be mentioned at the Spending Review. But details on exactly where the money will come from to pay for the policy are not expected until the Autumn Budget later this year.

Brit couple found with £1m of cannabis in luggage in latest 'drug mule' fears
Brit couple found with £1m of cannabis in luggage in latest 'drug mule' fears

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Brit couple found with £1m of cannabis in luggage in latest 'drug mule' fears

Sian Warren, 34, and Daniel McDonald, 36, from Salford, have been accused of trying to smuggle cannabis valued at £1million through Heathrow Airport on their way back from Thailand A couple have been charged with trying to smuggle cannabis valued at £1million into the UK after being stopped at Heathrow Airport. Sian Warren, 34, and Daniel McDonald, 36, were on their way back from Thailand when officers from the National Crime Agency reportedly found more than 51kg of cannabis in their luggage. It is understood that the drug was in four cases that the pair were carrying. They appeared at Uxbridge Magistrates' Court where they have been charged with importing Class B drugs and have been bailed under curfew ahead of a plea hearing on June 26 at Isleworth Crown Court. Warren and McDonald, from Salford, went to Bangkok on holiday last month and Warren's dad Tony told The Sun that there must have been a mistake. He said: 'Sian's not brought anything back, definitely not. She had her own suitcase with clothes in it.' It is the latest of several incidents involving British holidaymakers who have been accused of smuggling drugs from Thailand as an expert warned that criminal gangs are 'grooming' naive tourists. In the last few weeks, three British women have hit the headlines after they were accused of attempting to smuggle drugs. Bella May Cullen, 18, was arrested after flying into Georgia from Thailand with around 14kg of cannabis and 2kg of hashish in her luggage. A day later former TUI stewardess Charlotte May Lee was allegedly caught with 46kg of Kush – a high-grade strain of cannabis – in her luggage valued at £1.2million after arriving in Sri Lanka, again from Thailand. And then it emerged another Brit, Isabella Daggett, 21, from Leeds, has been held in a hellhole Dubai prison since March, when she was arrested on suspected drugs offences. Nathan Paul Southern, the Operations Director at The EyeWitness Project, which specialises in the investigation of organised crime, conflict and corruption, says southeast Asia has now become the world 's leading supplier of both narcotics like heroin and synthetic drugs like ecstasy and crystal meth. The 'Golden Triangle' - a large mountainous region on the borders with Myanmar, Thailand and Laos, recently overtook Afghanistan as the world's largest producer of opium, used to make heroin. And he says gangs are 'flocking' to the region from around the world, where they appear to be using grooming techniques used in other types of crimes to ensnare impressionable young Westerners. Mr Southern told the Mirror: 'The idea of charming strangers grooming backpackers isn't new, it's just the same old tactics in a region with a booming drug trade. The same grooming techniques we've seen in romance scams and human trafficking could be getting adapted for drug smuggling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store