
U.N. lays out survival plan as Trump threatens to slash funding
Guterres' plan calls for 20% cuts in expenditures and employment, which would bring its budget, now $3.7 billion, to the lowest since 2018. About 3,000 jobs would be cut.
Officially, the reform program is pegged to the U.N.'s 80th anniversary, not the new U.S. administration. But the scale of the reductions reflects the threat to U.S. support, which traditionally accounts for 22% of the organization's budget.
U.S. President Donald Trump has suspended that funding and pulled out of several U.N. bodies already, with a broader review expected to lead to further cuts.
"We're not going to be part of organizations that pursue policies that hamper the United States,' Deputy State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott told reporters Thursday.
The planned cuts at the U.N. come as the Trump administration has eliminated tens of billions of dollars in foreign aid as part of its drive to focus on what it sees as U.S. interests. Conflicts from the Mideast to Ukraine and Africa have added to the need for global assistance.
After years of financial struggles, the U.N. under Guterres already was planning to make sweeping structural changes. He warned in January it was facing "a full-blown liquidity crisis.' Overall, spending across the U.N. system is expected to fall to the lowest level in about a decade — down as much as $20 billion from its high in 2023.
"U.N. 80 is in large part a reaction from the secretary-general to the kind of challenges posed by the second Trump administration,' said Eugene Chen, senior fellow at New York University's Center on International Cooperation.
Guterres is expected to release details of his overhaul plans in a budget in September. The plan calls for restructuring many of its programs.
Guterres controls the U.N.'s regular budget, which is only a fraction of the total expenditures of its affiliates. Facing funding shortages of their own, agencies like UNICEF and UNESCO are also planning major cutbacks.
The Trump administration already has stopped funds from going into the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, withdrawn from the U.N. Human Rights Council and left UNESCO.
Guterres' plan has also drawn criticism, both from Trump allies and inside the U.N.
"There are some things that the U.N. does that arguably should be increased in terms of resources,' said Brett Schaefer, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. "And then there are some things that the U.N. shouldn't be decreasing but eliminating altogether.'
He cited the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog and the World Food Program as contributing significantly to U.S. interests and singled out the Food and Agriculture Organization and Human Rights Council as having mandates at odds with American policy.
Meanwhile, U.N. staff in Geneva announced last week they passed a motion of no confidence in Guterres and the plan.
"Staff felt its slash and burn approach lacked focus, had no strategic purpose, and was making the U.N. more top-heavy and bloated,' Ian Richards, president of the U.N. Staff Union in Geneva, posted on LinkedIn about the U.N. 80 report.
That vote has largely symbolic importance, according to NYU's Chen.
Still, Guterres' efforts to get ahead of the inevitable cuts that reductions in U.S. support will bring could help the U.N. adapt, he added.
"Maybe that's a silver lining,' Chen said. "We'll all be primed for reform.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
42 minutes ago
- NHK
Trump threatens sanctions, mulls envoy visit to Russia
US President Donald Trump says he may send special envoy Steve Witkoff to Russia ahead of the August 8 deadline he set for a ceasefire agreement with Ukraine. Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Trump said Witkoff "may be going" on Wednesday or Thursday. He has warned of sanctions if Russian President Vladimir Putin does not agree to a deal, saying "There will be sanctions, but they seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions." He added, "We'll see what happens." The sanctions could be applied to imports from countries that buy Russian products. Putin has said he will not agree to a deal unless Moscow's demands are met.


Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Opposition parties fume over U.S. trade deal not being put in writing
Opposition parties, wary of U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable diplomacy, criticized Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Tokyo's chief tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, on Monday for failing to put the U.S.-Japan trade agreement in writing — a step the government fears could delay or even cancel planned tariff reductions. 'This is the Trump administration we're talking about. If we don't issue a written document, (the U.S.) will keep stretching the deal while Japan continues getting ripped off. Doesn't everyone agree?' said Yoshihiko Noda, chief of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, during a Lower House budget committee meeting. Noda's remarks came after Japanese officials said no official documentation would be released outlining the trade agreement under which the U.S. will impose a 15% 'reciprocal' tariff on most Japanese goods effective Aug. 7 — up from the current 10% but lower than the 25% the United States threatened to impose — while U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said rates could 'boomerang' back to 25% if 'the president is unhappy' with the deal's implementation. The discrepancies between the two countries' reports — while the U.S. fact sheet says there will be 'over $550 billion in a new Japanese/USA investment,' Japanese government documents say it will provide 'up to $550 billion investments, loans and loan guarantees' — is more reason to issue a joint statement, Noda said. Trump's executive order also lacked details about sectorial tariffs, including those on automobiles — the U.S. had agreed to cut a 25% auto tariff in half, to 12.5%. The total for autos will be 15%, including a 2.5% duty charged independent of Trump tariffs. Ishiba, who has not spoken with Trump since Japan and the U.S. reached a surprise trade deal on July 22 in Washington, agreed with Noda that Trump 'isn't a normal guy' and 'changes the rules' but said that issuing a joint document will not serve the nation's interests and may instead jeopardize the agreement. Akazawa said that a document would have been useful to 'put a pin in it,' but that 'the number one fear is being unable to lower the tariffs anymore' if asking for a written agreement changes Trump's mind about them. The U.K. secured a written agreement with the U.S., but Vietnam, the Philippines, the European Union and South Korea, like Japan, have not. Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of the opposition Democratic Party for the People also took issue with the mismatched interpretations of the trade deal and demanded that Japan at least also release its own fact sheet on the prime minister's official website. Taking an extra jab at Ishiba, Tamaki also asked, 'Until when are you planning to stay on as prime minister?' The question of Ishiba's political fate has been in focus since the Liberal Democratic Party, of which he is the president of, suffered yet another defeat in last month's Upper House election, prompting LDP members and opposition parties to call on him to resign. Ishiba, however, reiterated his conviction to continue his premiership for as long as it takes to see the trade deal's implementation through. 'I need to ensure that businesses don't take on unfair losses. How much longer that will take? I can't say for certain now,' Ishiba replied to Tamaki. Rather than taking issue with the agreement not being in writing, Ryohei Iwatani, Nippon Ishin no Kai's secretary-general, criticized the deal for it being 'protection money' against the U.S. 'The deal uses words like 'investment' and 'loans,' but isn't this simply Japan paying the U.S., like protection money?' Iwatani said, adding that even Howard Lutnick, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, bluntly said Japan 'bought the ability to be down to 15%.' Akazawa, advising Iwatani to 'not believe everything the other country's officials say,' reassured him that the trade deal is meant to build a 'strong supply chain in the U.S. that can benefit both Japan and the U.S.'


Asahi Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Trump must not be allowed to insert ideology into AI responses
U.S. President Donald Trump at this year's Group of Seven summit (Asahi Shimbun file photo) U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an AI Action Plan with the goal of making the United States the world leader in development of artificial intelligence. It is a major change of direction from the Biden administration, which emphasized control of the risks associated with AI. The Trump administration wants to accelerate technology and infrastructure development through deregulation and increased investment. The action plan will encourage the export of AI technology to friendly nations in a bid for supremacy in competition with an emerging China. A surprising aspect of the plan is the level of intervention it envisages into the output from generative AI technology such as ChatGPT. National guidelines for AI risk control were revised to eliminate from answers references to diversity, equity and inclusion, widely known as DEI, and climate change. The federal government is supposed to sign contracts only with companies whose AI technology is objective and does not contain ideological bias. While the Trump administration says such measures are needed to protect freedom of speech and American values, the action plan conversely carries the risk of gagging free speech. To begin with, it is very difficult to establish neutral standards to help determine ideological bias. The bias could be defined according to the intent of the administration in power. DEI initially sought to counter discrimination based on gender, race, nationality or disability and to ensure fair opportunity for those who had been treated unfavorably in the past. Trump has long been negative about measures related to DEI and global warming. Since the start of his second term, he has implemented various steps reflecting that thinking. We cannot ignore the attempt to interfere with generative AI, which is spreading rapidly in society and people's daily lives. It is possible that the federal government's procurement conditions will become the standards regarding generative AI. That would have a major impact on Japan as it depends on the United States for much of its generative AI technology. Citing an example of bias in generative AI, Trump pointed to white male figures from American history who were transformed in AI answers into women or members of other races. Generative AI undertakes deep learning using a massive amount of data and subsequently goes through repeated tuning to produce answers. If there is bias in the data used for deep learning, the answers will reflect such bias and the tuning process could generate the wrong answer. Put another way, if the learning data is selected arbitrarily and certain algorithms are intentionally chosen during the tuning process, it would be possible to produce answers that reflected a certain bias. This is one characteristic of generative AI that we must always keep in mind. It could be used by iron-fisted regimes to gag free speech. It was pointed out that the generative AI technology released this year by the Chinese startup DeepSeek avoided or rejected answers that were inconvenient to Beijing, such as regarding the Tiananmen Square incident. Trump's version of intervention that seeks to delete certain references is fundamentally no different. --The Asahi Shimbun, Aug. 4