How Trump United India, China, and Russia, against America
For India, whose economy relies heavily on exports to the United States as its largest export destination, the trade shock felt like betrayal rather than partnership. What particularly stung New Delhi was the hypocrisy: the same West that condemns India's Russian oil purchases quietly continues buying Russian uranium, palladium, and fertiliser. The message from Washington was clear - rules for thee, but not for me.This double standard has eroded trust and triggered something deeper: India's search for energy sovereignty. The country's foreign policy has long prided itself on strategic autonomy, but Trump's aggressive and transactional approach has made policymakers in South Block question whether America can be trusted as a long-term partner.The geopolitical implications became clearer when Trump threatened China with similar measures, demanding Beijing cut Russian oil imports or face 100% tariffs. Suddenly, the two biggest Asian giants, despite their mutual distrust, found themselves standing shoulder to shoulder on one issue: resisting American coercion.The effect has been quiet coordination. At international forums, India and China began pushing back against US narratives, defending their right to import Russian oil. Moscow, watching this unfold with glee, started nudging both nations toward the long-dormant Russia-India-China framework. The RIC idea isn't new, floating since the early 2000s, but thanks to Trump, it's back in vogue.Russia has begun pitching the RIC as an alternative pole to US-led alliances like NATO and the Quad. China smiled. India didn't dismiss it. That alone represents a seismic shift.Of course, no one is pretending this is a love triangle. India and China still glare at each other across the Himalayas. But the Trump factor has made dialogue between old rivals not just necessary, but strategic. It's not friendship; it's survival.Meanwhile, Trump's attempts to reinvent himself as a dealmaker included pushing for a Ukraine ceasefire on suspiciously Kremlin-friendly terms. He openly dismissed full Ukrainian territorial restoration as "unrealistic" and cut Europe out of negotiations.advertisementHistorically, India and China have clashed militarily, diplomatically, and economically. But when both are targeted by the same actor, old rivalries don't vanish but they pause. Whether at BRICS summits or G20 meetings, both nations began coordinating stances on oil trade, sanctions, and multipolarity.There's no formal India-Russia-China alliance, no mutual defence pact, no signed economic union. Border tensions between India and China remain real, and mistrust runs deep. But what Trump has created is shared pressure, and pressure creates alignment, even if temporary.The RIC axis isn't forged in friendship but in fear of US unpredictability, economic punishment, and global instability. Strategic autonomy is no longer a philosophical choice for India but an economic and diplomatic necessity. Trump's wrecking ball approach has made that painfully clear.This isn't conspiracy; it's consequence. America may not be prepared for a world where the very powers it tried to divide start working together.- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
From Indian Bank to Jindal Steel— Ajit Mishra of Religare Broking suggests 3 stocks to buy for the short term
Stocks to buy for the short term: The Indian stock market benchmark, Nifty 50, experienced high volatility on August 7, after US President Trump announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports to the US. The index, however, ended with mild gains, snapping its two-day losing run. Ajit Mishra, SVP of research at Religare Broking, underscored that although tariff-related concerns triggered fresh volatility, the Nifty managed to hold above the 24,450 mark on a closing basis. This reaffirms the significance of this level as a strong support — the lower band of the previous consolidation range that had earlier led to a rally. Mishra believes a decisive move above the 24,800 could pave the way for a further rebound towards the 25,000 mark. "Amid the prevailing uncertainty, we continue to advise a cautious approach and prefer maintaining hedged positions," said Mishra. After a prolonged consolidation phase in the form of a rectangle pattern, Indian Bank shares broke out above the upper resistance band, signalling the start of a fresh up move. However, following the breakout, it underwent a time-wise correction, forming a new base above the pattern's neckline. This base-on-base formation reflects a healthy base-building process and resilience amid the broader market correction. The formation of a buying pivot, along with sustained closes above the 20-week EMA, confirms the resumption of the primary uptrend. Indian Bank technical chart Jindal Steel has recently signalled the end of its corrective phase by breaking out above the descending trendline. This was accompanied by a breakout from a tight rectangular consolidation pattern, supported by rising volumes—further reinforcing the bullish outlook. Jindal Steel is now trading above its 20-week EMA, adding to the positive bias. Moreover, the successful retest and rebound from the support zone suggest strong upside momentum following this period of sideways consolidation. Jindal Steel technical chart TVS Motor stands out as one of the top performers within the auto pack and is currently trading at all-time high levels, reflecting a sustained bullish structure. The price action continues to form a higher high–higher low pattern, confirming a strong uptrend, supported by key short- to medium-term moving averages. TVS Motor registered a breakout from a cup and handle pattern, accompanied by a notable rise in volumes—further validating the bullish continuation signal. Given the robust chart setup and a favourable sectoral backdrop, we expect the prevailing strength to persist and the positive momentum to extend further. TVS Motor Company technical chart Read all market-related news here Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations expressed are those of the expert, not Mint. We advise investors to consult with certified experts before making any investment decisions, as market conditions can change rapidly and circumstances may vary.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
New Bill to boost construction equipment industry on the cards: Gadkari
New Delhi: The Union government is working on a new Bill to support India's construction equipment (CE) industry, Roads and Highway Minister Nitin Gadkari said on Thursday. The move aims to reduce the imports, particularly from China, and enhance the sector's competitiveness through targeted policy measures. 'We will frame rules and regulations for it. Our Bill will be released in the next session. Once it is approved, the standards will be set. You will not have to face the problems you are facing today. The standards will be set. Once the Bill is approved, all your worries will be solved,' the minister said. He was speaking at the annual session of the Indian Construction Equipment Manufacturers' Association (ICEMA), the apex industry body representing over 150 members, including 95 per cent of the country's OEMs and component manufacturers. India's construction equipment industry , valued at approximately $9 billion, has been facing the heat in recent years from Chinese imports. According to experts, the share of Chinese imports has risen to approximately 25 per cent in segments like excavators. Last year, major domestic players like Tata Hitachi also flagged concerns over the surge in cheaper imports from China. Speaking on efforts to decarbonise the sector, Gadkari said the government is considering a 10 per cent machinery advance for OEMs shifting to flex engines and clean fuels, along with zero per cent interest loans for equipment buyers using alternative fuel technologies. Industry growth Gadkari acknowledged that last year's slowdown in the industry was due to the cancellation of the Bharatmala project , but added that it should not affect progress this year. 'That problem has been solved. We have awarded ₹2 lakh crore so far. Now we will award another ₹5 lakh crore taking the total to ₹7 lakh crore by year-end.' 'We aim to award road projects worth ₹10 lakh crore every year,' he added. Retail sales of construction equipment (CE) grew marginally to 24,568 units during April-July 2025, up from 24,240 units in the same period last year, according to data from the Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA). The minister urged the CE industry to invest in high-capacity machinery for tunneling and pre-cast construction, 'We are building tunnels worth ₹3 lakh crore, but machinery availability remains a bottleneck. European nations have advanced tunnel boring equipment, we need to adapt such machines for Indian conditions. Pre-cast is now mandatory in many projects, requiring specialised machinery. I urge your industry to step up in these areas.' Giving reference to a recent study, he noted that the country's logistics costs have declined from 16 per cent due to enhancements in road infrastructure. He added that the government is working to reduce this further to 9 per cent by December. Skill training Gadkari also advised industry players to provide training and develop skillsets among equipment operators. 'It is very important to give skill training to these people. You should have a three-month course at the regional level on how to operate it, especially in areas where you have strong sales. Come to me, I will give you approval from the Indian government,' he said. Unlike road vehicles, the operation of heavy construction machines currently does not require any formal licensing or regulatory mandate.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tariffs may go either way but stay fully invested and avoid frequent portfolio churning based on news: Prashant Khemka
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads , Founder,, says market uncertainty is a constant, with major events overshadowing the frequent fluctuations. The advice is to remain fully invested and avoid frequent portfolio churning based on news, as this primarily benefits brokers. A balanced portfolio with a mix of domestic and export-oriented names across various sectors like IT, pharma, and chemicals is recommended to outperform the my assessment, despite the market reaction of the last few days, the base case expectation is that these are not the final tariffs. It is more of a negotiating tactic. Donald Trump is negotiating on two fronts with Russia over the Ukraine war and with India on the trade talks. So, he is using the same arrow to hit two targets. Using some leverage from this for the Russia-Ukraine war as well. His behaviour has been quite predictable. In the past also, if you see, whenever the negotiations come to final stages, he just ramps up what is at stake and then he has no ego or problem in backing down. I hope and I assume that is the base case here as has given 3 weeks, for the 21 days before this, extra 25% becomes applicable, and that also is an indication in my view that between now and then, we should see some further developments that would result in final tariffs that are well below the announced 25 plus 25. Having said that, there is some uncertainty and that is what the market is reflecting right you said, it can pan out either way. But from here on, going by the pattern in the past that Trump has exhibited, it seems more reasonable to assume that we would settle back somewhere below what he had originally announced which was 25%. Originally meaning, a week ago or so, he announced 25%. I doubt it would settle anywhere near at 50%. Though between now and three weeks' time, he might even ratchet up further the way the negotiating team is responding with patience and keeping our interests at the forefront because even if you agree to something, let us say, we signed a deal a few months back, there is nothing to say that he would not on top of that come out with further tariffs. We could have agreed a few months ago and he could have still slapped additional tariffs for buying Russian oil. He has done this with other countries with none other than Canada itself adding additional tariffs at a later point in have to give some more time and get used to some of this uncertainty. It is not easy. Obviously, the market can get used to it, but it is not easy on the individual sectors where it impacts the most. But that is the way the last few months have been and possibly for some time it could remain this first of all, the market-wide level uncertainty should not be new to any investor. Whether you look at it over the last 5 years, 10 years, 20 years or longer, there has always been a great degree of uncertainty almost at all times, consistently and persistently. In the recent past, we only remember the major ones like the COVID, the Russia-Ukraine war and now the tariffs in April and so on. But between these events, there would be a great degree of uncertainty as well. It is just that you tend to not remember them at a later point in time and believe me in a few years' time, you would not remember today. It would be lost amongst the major milestones or markers such as COVID and Russia-Ukraine war or so on and so forth. So, this kind of uncertainty is normal at all times though it seems extremely high while you are living through those periods. In terms of portfolio, we remain fully second question was whether we churn from one sector to another on the back of such announcements. The reality is if you were to churn every time something like this happens, I have not seen anyone who makes money doing that. Only people who make money are the brokers because they get brokerage fees in these moves but investors cannot make money churning their portfolios on such news, and certainly not fund managers. If you start churning on the basis of such news, you will completely drive the market against yourself with the impact cost. Even individual investors cannot make money out of such macro if tomorrow or next week or two weeks later, the tariffs are revised down to more acceptable levels and then you will have the reverse and then you will sell what you just bought today and buy the opposite. So that would not make money is our view. Stay fully invested and maintain a balanced portfolio; do not have just domestic names, do not have just export-oriented names, have a good balance. Obviously predominantly it would be domestic oriented names because that is where bulk of the market itself is, bulk of the opportunities are, and bulk of sectors are but we have IT services sector, pharma, chemicals and some of those would be on pressure certain days while others would do well and then it would be the other way around another day. On the whole the idea is to beat the market.
