PIP benefits: 'Worrying' number of teens lose payments at age 16
Teenagers with incurable conditions are among hundreds a week being stripped of disability benefits after their 16th birthdays.Nearly a third of those who received Disability Living Allowance (DLA) in childhood had claims for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) rejected when trying to move to the adult benefit, BBC analysis has found.Disability charity Scope said a "complex, adversarial and difficult to navigate" system contributed to the rejections.With widespread benefits reform proposals expected within weeks, Prime Minister Keir Starmer this week called the current system "unsustainable, indefensible and unfair".
The conditions most likely to result in a refused claim were those that may be managed more successfully by an adult than a child, like diabetes or asthma, experts said.But among those to have had claims rejected since PIP's introduction in 2013 are thousands living with life-changing conditions including cancer, blindness, psychosis, deafness and epilepsy.The 124,000 young people affected since then include Holly Crouch, who said the decision by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) had left her feeling "like a burden" when "nothing changed but my age".She said she had been refused PIP when she applied as a teenager, despite providing evidence from specialists saying she was at risk of sudden, life-threatening epileptic seizures.
'I'm not faking this'
Miss Crouch said the DWP had decided she no longer needed support because she had been seizure-free for several weeks.Holly's parents subsequently lost their Carers' Allowance payments but still have to provide constant supervision.The 21-year-old from East Sussex said: "My condition has not magically disappeared and I'm not faking this."Everything was taken so quickly and I felt angry, neglected and like I hadn't been believed. It was so hard to deal with."
Holly said she had lost three jobs because of her epilepsy and had to "rely on others for everything" without PIP."I'll never feel like an adult as I can't do things everyone else is able to, like drive or work," she said. "My parents even have to be there when I shower or boil a kettle as I could have a seizure."I understand there could be changes to conditions, but that's what reviews are for - you shouldn't just have your money stopped at 16 when you are not old enough for the process."James Taylor, Scope's executive director of strategy, said the number of young people losing out on financial support was "worrying".He called on the government to work with disabled people and "fix our broken welfare system".
Three-quarters of those deemed ineligible for PIP had failed the DWP's points-based assessment, according to BBC analysis. While appeals can be lodged and some people do receive higher awards under PIP than DLA, the BBC heard of young people refused benefits despite the significant impact of their disabilities on daily life.They include:Several who reportedly failed the assessment because they were able to work part-time or attend school or collegeA teenager with Down's syndrome who told his PIP assessor he could do everything he was quizzed about, but did not explain the intensive support he needed to do soA teenager with learning difficulties who said he could cook for himself but did not mention he had broken several microwaves in trying to do soConcerns were repeatedly raised about PIP assessors lacking knowledge of specific conditions and decisions being taken without recourse to medical evidence or contacting those involved in a claimant's care.Disability and welfare rights organisations say the system results in wrongful decisions, with DWP outcomes frequently overturned at tribunal.The Royal National Institute for Blind People, Epilepsy Society, the National Autistic Society and Contact are among those calling for rapid reform.
What is PIP and how are claims decided?
• Personal Independence Payment is a benefit for over-16s with long-term physical or mental health conditions• It is not means-tested and aims to fund the extra living costs associated with having a disability• Assessments focus on how capable someone is of living independently and use a series of questions about daily activities• Points are awarded based on the individual's abilities and what help they need• Those points are added up to determine whether the threshold for a claim is met• A third party - like a parent or carer - can apply to represent someone without the capacity to do so themselves
A recent Resolution Foundation report found the number of young people in receipt of disability benefits falls significantly between the ages of 15 and 17.The think-tank said the failure to qualify - or apply for - PIP was leaving many "facing a financial cliff-edge" as they approached adulthood.Fightback4Justice, which advocates for disabled people in the welfare system, has called for the process to be more transitional.Its founder, Michelle Cardno, said: "Young people are being treated as adults from the day they reach 16, when most do not understand the system."
Sally Donley acted for her son Euan Hawes when he was invited to transition from DLA to PIP.She says she spent two hours talking with an assessor about the impact of Euan's disabilities, which include autism, obsessive compulsive disorder and sensory processing disorder."His assessment was with a nurse who had no background in his issues and he ended up only scoring points for not mixing with others," said Ms Donley, from Hampshire."Because I said he could cook eggs in the microwave, they said he could cook for himself and they said he goes to college independently - but it's a specialist college he travels an hour in a taxi to."
'Horrendous stress'
Euan's claim was refused, but the decision was eventually overturned and he was granted PIP's highest rates when Ms Donley took the DWP to a tribunal."The stress this puts on families is horrendous and cruel," she said. "You have parents trying to care for children with disabilities and they're having to take hours to gather evidence for court appeals."They need to listen and they need to look at medical evidence."The government is being called upon to bring the rest of the UK in line with Scotland, where the transition to adult disability benefits can now take place at 18.Ms Donley, who supports those calls, added: "Euan's 18 now and I'm still fighting for him. I know I'll be fighting for him until my last breath."
A DWP spokesman said: "Building on our Get Britain Working White Paper, we will bring forward proposals for reforming the health and disability benefits system within weeks, so that it provides children, young adults and their families with the support they need in a way that's fair on the taxpayer, and helps those who can work secure employment."
More about this storyThe Shared Data Unit makes data journalism available to news organisations across the media industry, as part of a partnership between the BBC and the News Media Association.Read more about the Local News Partnerships here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Wes Streeting: ‘I won't shrink away from opening NHS to private sector'
Wes Streeting has said he will not rule out leaning more heavily on the private sector to cut NHS backlogs. The Health Secretary said he 'refused to be bound by outdated ideological battles', saying using independent hospitals to provide taxpayer-funded care did not contradict the principles of the health service. Writing for The Telegraph, below, he said he would fight for the future of the NHS, warning of a 'national emergency' facing the country. He made the comments as new figures showed that almost 1.4 million people have had private care on the NHS since Labour won the election. They include more than 500,000 patients – more than the population of Liverpool – who have received such treatment since an agreement to 'turbocharge' such efforts was published in January. The deal with the independent sector, announced by Sir Keir Starmer, offers vacant private care appointments to NHS patients while keeping treatment free at the point of use. Officials have pushed the services particularly in parts of the country that have some of the longest waits and lowest levels of private healthcare uptake. The biggest surge in the use of the private sector by the NHS came in the North East and Yorkshire, followed by the South East and North West. Mr Streeting, a survivor of kidney cancer, said the NHS saved his life and he is now fighting to make sure it is there for others. He said: 'Millions are waiting in limbo for treatment that could transform their lives. 'Behind the staggering six million people on waiting lists are real human stories. Parents missing work to care for children in pain. Grandparents unable to play with grandchildren. People forced to take sick days that threaten their livelihoods. This isn't just a statistic – it's a national emergency. 'That's why I refuse to be bound by outdated ideological battles when confronting this crisis. My priority is simple. And in my effort to get there, I won't shrink away from using the independent sector to get NHS patients seen faster.' On Wednesday, the NHS was declared 'the big winner' from the Government's spending review, with a record cash injection of £29 billion a year. Mr Streeting stressed: 'Money alone won't fix this. We need reform too.' The Government is expected to go further in its use of the private sector, as it prepares to draw up a 10-year plan for the NHS, which promises three major shifts – from hospital to community, from analogue to digital and from treating sickness to prevention. Mr Streeting said it was 'nonsense' to suggest that using the private sector was at odds with NHS principles. 'What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters,' he said. The Health Secretary said it was 'ambitious but essential' that the NHS meets its target of ensuring that 92 per cent of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. It has not been achieved since 2015. The independent sector agreement, launched in January this year, is part of an NHS Elective Reform Plan to clear waiting backlogs, especially in the most challenged specialities. 'Going further than New Labour' Before the election, Mr Streeting said a new Labour government would 'go further than New Labour ever did' in use of the private sector for NHS patients. 'If you want to understand my appetite for reform, think New Labour on steroids,' he said in a speech in May 2024. Tony Blair's New Labour government funded a network of 30 private clinics carrying out operations and tests for NHS patients between 2003 and 2010. It also introduced patient choice, allowing patients to opt for care in a private hospital. However, the drive divided the Labour party and lost momentum. Polling from YouGov shows strong support for the Independent Sector agreement, with 70 per cent of the public showing strong support for the NHS using the private sector to clear the backlog. The most common procedures delivered through the independent sector are ophthalmology (23.8 per cent of all treatments), trauma and orthopaedics (20.9 per cent) and dermatology (14.9 per cent). Mark Cubbon, the director of elective care, cancer and diagnostics at NHS England, said: 'Independent sector providers play an important role in supporting NHS efforts to get patients the care they need quicker, with the latest figures showing record numbers of treatments are being carried out. 'NHS use of the private sector has risen significantly since 2021, and our new partnership agreement will help us go even further to widen access to treatment for thousands of patients.' 'Pivotal role in NHS's recovery' David Hare, the chief executive of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network said: 'These figures demonstrate that independent providers are playing a pivotal role in the NHS's elective recovery, helping ensure patients can get the treatment they need – all free at the point of use and paid for at NHS prices. 'But with so much more still to do to once again meet the NHS's 18-week target by March 2029, it's vital that local NHS areas build on this progress and ensure that they make full use of existing and potential capacity in the sector to give patients greater choice and access to the care they need.' Rachel Power, the chief executive of the Patients Association, welcomed the announcement. She said: 'Patients waiting for treatment tell us they feel like their lives are on hold, while facing real hardship, uncertainty and pain.' Analysis from the Independent Health Providers Network has shown that 96 per cent of people in England live within 30 minutes' driving distance of an independent provider that delivers NHS treatment. Using private help contradicts NHS principles? What nonsense By Wes Streeting I know what it's like to sit in a doctor's office and hear the word 'cancer'. The gut punch. The fear. The questions about what happens next – and crucially, how quickly. Yet millions are waiting in limbo for treatment that could transform their lives. Behind the staggering six million people on waiting lists are real human stories. Parents missing work to care for children in pain. Grandparents unable to play with grandchildren. People forced to take sick days that threaten their livelihoods. This isn't just a statistic – it's a national emergency. That's why I refuse to be bound by outdated ideological battles when confronting this crisis. My priority is simple. And in my effort to get there, I won't shrink away from using the independent sector to get NHS patients seen faster. Between January and April alone, over 500,000 people received vital treatments through our partnership with independent healthcare providers – the equivalent of treating the entire population of Liverpool in just four months. These aren't abstract numbers. They're people getting life-changing hip replacements, knee surgeries and cancer treatments. Some ask whether using private capacity contradicts NHS principles. Nonsense. What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters. The independent healthcare sector won't affect this principle, and so it would be foolish to turn it away when we so desperately need it in certain specialities. But at the same time, we must see it for what it is. The spending review has delivered proper investment in our NHS with nearly £29 billion in additional funding. But money alone won't fix this. We need reform too. The results of our Plan for Change are already showing. Waiting lists have fallen to their lowest level in two years, marking the first April drop since 2008. We're finally heading in the right direction to creating an NHS Fit for Future. Our Plan for Change sets out the clear milestone: meeting the NHS standard where 92 per cent of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. It's ambitious but essential. Cancer taught me that time is precious. When you're waiting for treatment, every day matters. That's why I won't waste a single day, or a single available appointment slot, in our mission to give patients the care they deserve. The NHS saved my life. Now I'm fighting to ensure it's there – on time – to save yours.
The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young carer who unwittingly breached allowance rules forced to repay £2,000
A young carer who had looked after her disabled mother from the age of eight was forced to repay more than £2,000 when she unwittingly breached carer's allowance benefit earnings rules after joining a government youth employment scheme. Rose Jones, 22, said she was twice wrongly advised by her jobcentre work coach that her wages earned under the Kickstart scheme would not affect her eligibility for carer's allowance. Less than a year after she completed the six-month scheme, under which the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) paid her wages, she received a demand from the DWP demanding she pay back £2,145 of overpaid benefits. 'I was shocked when the letter arrived – it came on my 20th birthday – and I really didn't know what to do. I thought it was a mistake because my work coach had told me it was fine. It was a really scary letter to receive,' Jones said. The case is the latest in a stream of carer's allowance injustices highlighted by a year- long Guardian investigation and a relatively rare case involving a young carer – most unpaid carers are much older adults. At least 144,000 UK carers are repaying more than £250m in earnings-related carer's allowance overpayments caused by what MPs said were 'human mistakes' on the part of carers and repeated DWP administrative and policy failures. Thousands of carers have been prosecuted and millions of pounds of public money wasted. The government last year vowed to reform aspects of carer's allowance after widespread public outrage. It commissioned an independent review of carer's allowance overpayments which is expected to report to ministers in July. Jones began caring for her mother, who has physical and mental disabilities, at the age of eight, helping around the house and with shopping, looking out for her safety, and accompanying her to hospital appointments. Being a carer affected her childhood and education, she said: 'I was always quite hesitant to be away from my mum. I'd worry about her all the time when I was at school and struggle to focus. I wouldn't want to go on sleepovers at friends' houses.' When she turned 16 she started to claim carer's allowance and it was only when she took up a place in 2021 on the DWP's Kickstart scheme aimed at young people at risk of long term unemployment, introduced during Covid in 2020, that it became an issue. Jones said: 'Before I'd accepted the job [though the Kickstart scheme] I told him [the job coach] I was on carer's allowance and I told him the exact amounts I'd be on and that I'd be working from home so I'd be doing the same amount of caring as always. 'He assured me that he was confident that my carer's allowance would not be affected. I asked him a couple of times, not just one phone call. I checked again after a couple of months once I had started earning my wage, and he reassured me, so I thought at this point everything was fine.' The demand, when it came, felt massively unjust. 'I'd been told by the work coach it was fine. I'd been a carer for my mum all my teenage years and felt my experiences had just been disregarded.' Under Kickstart, the DWP paid employers £1,500 a month towards wages and training costs, with participants guaranteed to be paid the equivalent of 25 hours a week at the national minimum wage, in Jones's case £164 a week, or £656 a month. Jones was taken on as a digital marketing assistant by a local firm and under carer's allowance rules was allowed to earn up to £128 a week on top of her carer duties, equivalent to 19.5 hours at the minimum wage for 18- to 20-year-olds. Because she had unwittingly breached the weekly earnings limit, carer's allowance rules meant she forfeited her £67.60 carer's allowance. This 'cliff edge' rule meant had she gone even £1 a week over the limit for six months she would have had to repay over £2,000. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Jones said she was frustrated by different branches of the DWP – the jobcentre, the employment section and the carer's allowance unit – which did not seem to be clear on the rules and had not routinely shared information about her case. She was also shocked that the DWP had known about the earnings breach but had waited months before alerting her, allowing a debt to accrue that will take her years to repay. 'It's left me with a bit of distrust towards the DWP,' she said. Emily Holzhausen, the director of policy at Carers UK, said: 'It's devastating to see a young person who has had a more challenging start in life be badly let down by the DWP. 'It's not the first time that hard-pressed carers have been given the wrong information by people working for the DWP; the very people they trust to get the rules about benefits and entitlements right. 'The fact that the DWP's computer systems don't speak to each other have left many unpaid carers with unacceptable overpayments – despite the DWP having information that could have been used to stop them earlier.' A DWP spokesperson said: 'We understand the huge difference carers make as well as the struggles so many face. 'The carer's allowance overpayment rate is now the lowest on record and we are increasing funding and bringing in more staff to check 100% of alerts to help prevent carers falling into debt. 'But we want to go further, that's why we've launched an independent review of carer's allowance to explore how earnings-related overpayments have happened and what changes can be made.'
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Millions of patients to be treated by GPs instead of hospitals under radical reforms to cut NHS waiting list
Patients will be treated by GPs rather than getting specialist care in hospitals under radical reforms as Keir Starmer battles to tackle the NHS crisis. Routine appointments will be dealt with in community services close to patients' homes in a move they believe could 'fix the waiting list'. The health service will also ramp-up technology meaning patients will have less in-person appointments - instead using like the NHS app and wearable devices to monitor patients remotely. NHS bosses claim half of the 135 million hospital outpatient appointments every year are 'pointless' and follow-ups and consultations could instead be done in high-street surgeries. It comes as the government is set to launch a ten-year plan to create a 'neighbourhood health service', The Times reports. 'As we deliver the transformational shifts in our 10 Year Plan, from hospital to community, analogue to digital, and sickness to prevention, it will have radical implications for services,' Health Secretary Wes Streeting told the NHS ConfedExpo in Manchester. 'Much of what's done in a hospital today, will be done on the high street, over the phone, or through the app in a decade's time.' The plans are set to link family doctors, nurses, social care services and volunteers with money being paid to NHS regions based on how effective their care is rather than how busy the hospitals are. Streeting added: 'We will use financial incentives to invest more in public health outcomes, not just in more activity that reacts to sickness.' Earlier this week, figures revealed that the number of patients waiting has fallen to its lowest point in two years - but the number of patients waiting for more than a year for hospital treatment has increased. The news comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves gave the NHS a cash injection worth an extra £29 billion per year. Speaking to the Commons, the Chancellor said she is making a 'record cash investment' in the NHS, worth an extra 3 per cent a year in real terms. The Chancellor insisted this would lead to 'more appointments, more doctors and more scanners' as Labour seeks to deliver on its manifesto promise to get the NHS 'back on its feet'. But the settlement received a lukewarm response from NHS bosses, who said they would need even more money if the Government is to achieve its aim of treating 92 per cent of patients within 18 weeks of a GP referral by the end of this Parliament. Matthew Taylor, of the NHS Confederation, which represents health organisations, said: 'Difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29billion won't be enough to cover increasing costs of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it. 'On its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sir Jim Mackey, chief executive of NHS England, told the NHS ConfedExpo conference in Manchester that the health service has done 'really well relative to other parts of the public service'. But he added: 'We all know it's never enough because of the scale of advancement, all the ambition, the day-to-day cost pressures... but I think everyone's starting to accept and understand we've got what the country can afford to give us. 'We really need to get better value for that money – it is broadly the equivalent of the GDP of Portugal, so it's a huge amount.' Government documents accompanying the Spending Review show that, on average, from 2023/24 to 2028/29, the NHS in England will receive 3 per cent real-terms growth in day-to-day spending, equivalent to a £29billion increase in annual budgets The Government said it will also invest up to £10 billion in NHS technology and digital transformation by 2028/29, plus £6 billion to speed up tests and treatments. Scanners, ambulances and urgent treatment centres are among things the additional cash – part of the overall £29 billion – will pay for, with the aim of providing up to 4 million more tests and procedures in the next five years. NHS England figures show 7.42 million treatments were waiting to be done at the end of March, relating to 6.25 million patients – up from 7.4 million and 6.24 million respectively at the end of February.
