Faith or Fanaticism: Is Religious Conversion A Command By Allah? Analysis
Their calm and confident manner during the interview raised concerns among viewers and experts alike, suggesting a deep-rooted ideological influence. The women, showing neither hesitation nor remorse, stated that their actions were in line with religious duty. Rehman and his family, much like the earlier exposed figure Chhangur, allegedly turned religious conversion into a full-time operation based out of Delhi.
In today's DNA, ZEE News questioned whether such acts are truly endorsed by Islamic scripture. To explore this, the news channel consulted Islamic scholars and examined Quranic teachings on the matter. The scholars unanimously stated that Islam strictly prohibits forced or manipulative conversions. According to their interpretation, the Quran does not support coercion in matters of faith under any circumstances.
#DNAWithRahulSinha | दिल्ली से यूपी..धर्मांतरण पर बड़ा खुलासा, ब्रेनवॉश कैसे किया जाता है..LIVE देखिए
क्या धर्मांतरण..अल्लाह का हुक्म है?#DNA #ReligionConversion @RahulSinhaTV pic.twitter.com/f4p7Ib6GL5 — Zee News (@ZeeNews) July 22, 2025
A key verse cited was Surah Yunus, Ayah 99, which clearly states: 'If your Lord had willed, all the people on earth would have believed. Will you then compel people to become believers?' Scholars explained that this verse conveys a powerful message of religious freedom and coexistence, rejecting any form of force or deceit in conversion practices.
Further, scholars pointed out that pressuring or luring individuals into changing their faith through fear, greed, or misinformation is both a sin in Islam and a crime under Indian law. They emphasized that such actions distort the essence of Islamic teachings and do not reflect the principles of the Prophet Muhammad, who preached tolerance and respect for all faiths.
In light of this, religious scholars condemned the actions of Abdul Rehman and others accused of similar offenses, calling them dangerous extremists who exploit religion for personal or political agendas. They warned that such misinterpretations of the Quran not only mislead people but also harm the social fabric of the country.
Through this investigation and conversations with Islamic scholars, it becomes evident that the Quran does not endorse forced religious conversion. Instead, the practice promoted by figures like Abdul Rehman stems from personal fanaticism and deliberate misreading of sacred texts, which must be addressed both spiritually and legally.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
39 minutes ago
- India.com
Star Power, Street Dogs: How Celeb Voices Are Shaping Indias Canine Conundrum
The Nation is going through a heated argument over the Supreme Court order to remove stray dogs from Delhi-NCR and their relocation to dedicated shelters within eight weeks. The ruling aimed to safeguard public safety has found strong support among the 'mass' middle and lower-class citizens, but has sparked fierce opposition largely from the upper-class dog lovers and animal activists. Protests erupted at Delhi's India Gate, where self-proclaimed animal lovers held candle marches. Bollywood celebrities, including Varun Dhawan, Janhvi Kapoor, and Sanya Malhotra, also voiced support for stray dogs on social media, urging compassion. However, critics argue that these public figures often own foreign breeds rather than adopting local strays, questioning the sincerity of their activism. Watch Today's Full Episode सड़क या शेल्टर..'शेरू-टॉमी' के लिए क्या अच्छा? मुनीर को ट्रंप के सबसे बड़े तोहफे का DNA टेस्ट क्या सोने में गिरावट का दौर शुरू हो गया? देखिए #DNA LIVE Rahul Sinha के साथ#ZeeLive #ZeeNews #DNAWithRahulSinha @RahulSinhaTV — Zee News (@ZeeNews) August 12, 2025 Supporters of the court's decision highlight the growing menace of dog bites. Official data reveals that 10,000 people are bitten by dogs daily in India, with 37.15 lakh cases reported last year alone. Dog bites lead to around 120 rabies deaths in three years and cost the nation approximately Rs 2 lakh crore annually in healthcare and economic losses. Anti-rabies injections alone cost the government Rs 150 crore yearly. Advocates also point to safety concerns, recalling incidents like the death of 14-year-old Shahvez in Ghaziabad from rabies after a stray dog attack. They accuse elite activists of being disconnected from the struggles of common citizens who face stray dog threats daily. Some suggest looking abroad for solutions. The Netherlands, now free of stray dogs, achieved this by taxing new dog ownership, imposing heavy fines for abandonment, promoting adoption of strays, and establishing a 'dog police' force. The debate remains polarised between those who see strays as a public hazard and those who view them as family. As protests and counterarguments grow, the question remains whether India can balance compassion for animals with the safety of its people.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Muslim marriages can be dissolved through verbal consent: Gujarat HC
The Gujarat High Court has ruled that a Muslim marriage can be dissolved through 'Mubaraat', a form of divorce wherein couples can end their marriage through verbal mutual consent without a written agreement in place. For the purpose of 'Mubaraat', the expression of a mutual consent for dissolution of 'Nikah' is sufficient to dissolve the marriage in itself, the HC bench stated. (Representative Image) A bench of Justices AY Kogje and NS Sanjay Gowda made the observation while recently setting aside a Rajkot family court order which rejected a suit filed by a Muslim couple seeking dissolution of marriage by 'Mubaraat, a form of divorce by mutual consent. The bench sent the matter back to the family court and asked it to conclude the proceedings preferably within a period of three months. Disagreeing with the family court's stand that a written agreement is necessary to dissolve the wedlock, the HC, citing the Quran, Hadith and Muslim Personal Law, noted that such an agreement is not necessary if a Muslim couple seeks dissolution of marriage through mutual consent. Following a marital discord, a young Muslim couple from Rajkot had approached the family court for declaration of their marriage to have been dissolved by 'Mubaraat', which according to the couple, is recognized as a form of divorce by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. However, the family court rejected the suit holding the petition for declaration of dissolution of marriage by way of 'Mubaraat' is not maintainable in the present form, the HC order stated. The couple challenged the order in the HC, saying the lower court had committed "an error in holding that Mubaraat Agreement is sine qua non (an essential condition) for entertaining such suit, whereas even as per Shariat, requirement of written agreement is not necessary at all". "It is argued that the family court has erroneously considered that agreement to part has only to be in Written Form, whereas Shariat does recognize agreement which is not even in written form," the HC observed. Citing religious texts and Personal Law, the HC noted "There is nothing to suggest that there has to be a written agreement of 'Mubaraat' nor there is a practice prevailing regarding maintaining of the register to record such agreement for mutually dissolved 'Nikah' (marriage)." For the purpose of 'Mubaraat', the expression of a mutual consent for dissolution of 'Nikah' is sufficient to dissolve the marriage in itself, the bench stated. The bench allowed the couple's petition and set aside the lower court's order and sent the matter back to it "to consider the family suit treating it to be maintainable and to proceed on merits". "With due regard to the age and future prospects of both the parties, the (high) court deems fit to direct the family court to conclude the proceedings as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order of this court," the bench said.
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
Muslim marriages can be dissolved through verbal consent, rules Gujarat HC
Last Updated: Ahmedabad, Aug 12 (PTI) The Gujarat High Court has ruled that a Muslim marriage can be dissolved through 'Mubaraat', a form of divorce wherein couples can end their marriage through verbal mutual consent without a written agreement in place. A bench of Justices AY Kogje and NS Sanjay Gowda made the observation while recently setting aside a Rajkot family court order which rejected a suit filed by a Muslim couple seeking dissolution of marriage by 'Mubaraat, a form of divorce by mutual consent. The bench sent the matter back to the family court and asked it to conclude the proceedings preferably within a period of three months. Disagreeing with the family court's stand that a written agreement is necessary to dissolve the wedlock, the HC, citing the Quran, Hadith and Muslim Personal Law, noted that such an agreement is not necessary if a Muslim couple seeks dissolution of marriage through mutual consent. Following a marital discord, a young Muslim couple from Rajkot had approached the family court for declaration of their marriage to have been dissolved by 'Mubaraat', which according to the couple, is recognized as a form of divorce by the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. However, the family court rejected the suit holding the petition for declaration of dissolution of marriage by way of 'Mubaraat' is not maintainable in the present form, the HC order stated. The couple challenged the order in the HC, saying the lower court had committed 'an error in holding that Mubaraat Agreement is sine qua non (an essential condition) for entertaining such suit, whereas even as per Shariat, requirement of written agreement is not necessary at all". 'It is argued that the family court has erroneously considered that agreement to part has only to be in Written Form, whereas Shariat does recognize agreement which is not even in written form," the HC observed. Citing religious texts and Personal Law, the HC noted 'There is nothing to suggest that there has to be a written agreement of 'Mubaraat' nor there is a practice prevailing regarding maintaining of the register to record such agreement for mutually dissolved 'Nikah' (marriage)." For the purpose of 'Mubaraat', the expression of a mutual consent for dissolution of 'Nikah' is sufficient to dissolve the marriage in itself, the bench stated. The bench allowed the couple's petition and set aside the lower court's order and sent the matter back to it 'to consider the family suit treating it to be maintainable and to proceed on merits". 'With due regard to the age and future prospects of both the parties, the (high) court deems fit to direct the family court to conclude the proceedings as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order of this court," the bench said. PTI PJT PD RSY view comments First Published: August 12, 2025, 21:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
