
My life's a mess. Will turning it into a game make everything better?
We all find it hard, at times, to fit in self-care. But if there's one thing I've noticed since becoming a mum of two small children, it's that even the most basic level of personal care requires military-level planning. Often, I pour from an empty cup because I haven't had time – or, more likely, I've simply forgotten – to refill it.
Fortunately, there's an app for that. Lots, in fact. The global self-care apps market was valued at about $3bn (£2.2bn) in 2024 and is projected to reach $14bn by 2033. Many of these apps turn self-care into a game to help users look after themselves. There are gamified apps for meditation, drinking more water and consuming less alcohol. There's even one called Zombies, Run! that claims to put a 'post-apocalyptic spin on a workout' by challenging users to outrun the undead.
Gamification expert Kimba Cooper-Martin says of the trend: 'Gamification taps into psychological motivators like achievements, competition (even with yourself) and rewards. It makes tasks more engaging and less like chores.'
So, I put four gamified apps – Finch, Habitica, Ahead and Pokémon Sleep – to the test for one week each to see if any of them could help me take better care of myself. All are available for iOS and Android and have free versions or free trials, plus extra features for between £4.99 and £9.99 a month.
I thought I'd love Finch, which launched in 2021 and encourages users to look after themselves by, um, making them look after a pet. I'm a child of the 90s, after all, and once kept my Tamagotchi alive for nearly two weeks – although, in fairness, this was mostly because my dad took it to work with him and left his meetings to feed it.
As you complete self-care goals on Finch (drinking more water, meditating, running) your little pet (they call it a birb) will go on adventures, grow, be happy. And if you don't hit your goals? Don't worry: according to the app's creators, the pets 'never die because it can be too anxiety inducing'.
I downloaded the app with much anticipation. Sure, I already have a baby, a toddler and a spaniel to look after, but what's another mouth to feed?
'You hatched a birb,' my phone tells me when I open Finch for the first time, before inviting me to choose its pronouns. The app then suggests a name: Squiggles. Unconvinced, I click 'shuffle' and a new moniker is generated for my pixelated pet: Peach. Better.
And so Peach and I begin our adventures. I'm allowed to choose my own goals and decide to keep it simple. Get out of bed is one. Brush my teeth is another. I do set a few slightly more intentional ones, though: take three deep breaths; have a stretch break; do one thing that makes you happy. Each time I complete a goal, I get to check it off and Peach rewards me with merry little cheeps, the occasional burst of digital ticker tape, and messages letting me know that she now has 123 Rainbow Stones, whatever they are. I'm also thrown daily affirmations each time I log on to the app. 'I'm not lost, I'm exploring,' preens one. 'I allow myself time to unwind,' gloats another.
I play along and even buy Peach a little toadstool hat for 500 Rainbow Stones (seems steep to me); try to hatch her a micropet by promising to take three deep breaths for seven days in a row (unsuccessful); and even plan to send her off on adventures in Finchie Forest powered by a 'potion' (bought with more Rainbow Stones).
While I like keeping track of my goals, I find that the concept is lost on me. Maybe the app's colourful display is too busy or maybe I'm simply too old for this business, but I find the whole thing overstimulating to the point of being unusable.
At one point, Finch advises me that Peach is just four more 'full-energy' days away from becoming a toddler. Sadly, my actual toddler, himself already full of energy, is not only slowly sapping mine but is also – rightly – keeping me away from my phone, meaning I sometimes go a day or two without checking in on poor Peach.
Before long, the app feels like another job, so I enact the biggest act of self-care thus far and delete it.
Perhaps the best way to ensure you keep on top of self-care is to make it a habit, part ofyour daily routine. That's the thinking behind Habitica, which features in-game rewards and – eek! – punishments to motivate users.
I'm initially impressed. The app invites me to list a range of habits and then select whether they have a positive or negative impact on my life. Putting my phone down for at least an hour, for example, is a positive habit. Spending more than 15 minutes at a time scrolling on Vinted is negative. I enjoy thinking about what habits I already have, exploring if they're helpful or unhelpful, and then siphoning them off accordingly.
Things then get a bit other-worldly. The more positive habits I check off, the more 'gold' I accumulate for my avatar, who I can also send off on quests – completing tasks, battling monsters and collecting enchanted feathers. I'm able to get gold, too, by completing a daily scheduled task like brushing my teeth or by ticking off an item on my personalised to-do list, such as collecting my son's prescription from the pharmacy. I can then use said gold to 'buy' rewards, which can either be, say, potions for my avatar (potions again!) or customised prizes that I input: listening to a podcast, watching an episode of my favourite TV show, allowing myself more than 15 minutes on Vinted. If I partake in bad habits, I lose gold or damage my avatar.
I understand the theory: that if you do something – a good habit – and something positive happens as a result, you're more likely to repeat that habit. Similarly, if you do something bad and something negative happens, you're unlikely to do it again.
I'm not entirely convinced, though, by relying on extrinsic motivation: to me it risks eroding the power of intrinsic motivation. I should spend an hour away from my phone because it's good for my brain, not because if I do, I get some guilt-free scrolling time in return.
Like Finch, Habitica encourages me to build a streak by using the app every day. But, although there isn't a digital dependant relying on me this time, I still feel guilty every time I forget to log on. I even find myself feeling stressed about not recording health habits on the app, even if I've carried them out in real life. I also – and perhaps this is my age at play again – find the cluttered design a bit tiresome. So I delete this one, too.
By the time I try Ahead, I'm a bit frustrated with self-care apps. Finch and Habitica – though, I'm sure, helpful for their fans – are too overstimulating for me. So I'm pleasantly surprised when I download Ahead – which bills itself as 'Duolingo for your emotional intelligence' – and find the app has been created by scientists from Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard universities. This, combined with a clean and intuitive design, gives it a reassuring air of grown-up credibility.
It opens with a quiz about how I'd respond to different events: if a friend moved a coffee date, for example, or if I made a mistake at work. The language is clear and accessible, if sometimes a bit too wacky. (Do you get 'hot like a jalapeno' in arguments? Apparently I do!) Then, from my results, it calculates what I'm most in need of help with, covering everything from anxiety to anger. It also asks me – and I particularly like this bit – how much time I'm able to commit to the app per day, ranging from three to five minutes to more than 15. I choose five to 10 minutes, a middle ground, which I resolve to do while winding down before bed. I also commit, somewhat tentatively, to a five-day streak of logging on to Ahead to 'work on myself'.
Working on myself, it transpires, involves clicking through a series of very short courses that have the vibe of workplace fire safety training, even down to the short recall quizzes I'm asked to complete at the end of each one. In them, I'm taught about how to manage my emotions, spot distorted thinking and establish whether any of my worries are helpful. Each mini-course comes with sources to back up the theory and a timestamp that tells me how long it will take (most are around three to five minutes). They're easy to do, surprisingly informative, and – hurrah! – there's not a single potion or quest in sight. Learnings and techniques picked up along the way are safely stashed within the app for me to refer back to as needed. And I do.
I don't manage my five-day streak. However, crucially, I don't feel guilty for missing a day, knowing the courses are there for me to pick up when I can.
I was initially sceptical that Pokémon Sleep, a sleep-tracking app based on the Pokémon franchise, would work for me given I often share a bed with my own little Pikachu – my 10-month-old baby – who still wakes frequently at night. I also suffer from bouts of insomnia, made worse, I think, by the postpartum hormones raging through my body. Would the pressure of gamifying my sleep make it harder to drop off?
The premise of the app – which, I should say, is intended for entertainment purposes only – is supposedly simple: help the fictional Professor Neroli research Pokémon's sleep habits using a Snorlax (a large, blue-green creature that sleeps a lot) as, I guess, a kind of sleep bait, encouraging different Pokémon to come over and have a nap next to it. The more you sleep, the greater your Snorlax's 'Drowsy Power' will become and the more Pokémon you will attract and wake up to in the morning. Got it? Good.
The app uses your device's accelerometer to estimate your sleep state by detecting body movement. Professor Neroli suggests sleeping with the app open and running, your phone face down on the mattress and uncovered by pillows and blankets.
I'm not a Pokémon fan (unless you count trading cards in the playground when I was 10) but seeing a tiny, snoring Charmander curled up on my screen when I awoke on the first morning elicited an unexpected squeal of delight. I also found it interesting – and useful – to dig into the data the app provides. It divides sleep into three categories – a doze, a snooze and a slumber – and each morning sends you a report on how you slept, noting what percentage of your sleep was spent in each one. It tells you, too, how long it takes you to fall asleep, which was fascinating for someone who, too often, lies awake for hours on end wondering why they can't sleep. (While using the app, I learned it's typical for it to take me about 20 minutes to get to the land of nod.) I should, however, point out that phones, smartwatches etc are not 100% reliable when it comes to measuring sleep and often unable to distinguish slumber from simply being still. In other words, if you just lie there hoping to drop off, your tech may assume you already have.
Professor Neroli was, in addition, irritating. It was a little galling, for example, when he chastised me – after a night when the baby had been up from midnight to 2am – for my sleep score of 85, telling me I was aiming for 100 and should 'try to get as much sleep' as possible. That, and the fact you need to clock up an uninterrupted 90 minutes of shut-eye in order to even log sleep data, suggests this app probably isn't designed with new parents in mind.
Maybe self-care apps aren't for me, not least because I'm trying to spend less time on my phone. I'm already addicted to WhatsApp, Instagram and Vinted, and I'm not sure it's helpful to add another app into the mix. I realised, over the course of the experiment, that not only was I not sold on the level of fantasy involved in many of the apps I'd chosen, I also didn't like how much they dragged me away from the real world.
On reflection, too, I found the pressure of gamification to be in conflict with the whole idea of self-care: it just made me more stressed.
This, it transpires, isn't uncommon. Dr Frankie Harrison, a clinical psychologist, says: 'There's a fine line between using these apps as a helpful tool and turning self-care into another task to complete. For some people, especially those dealing with anxiety or trauma, tracking habits or emotions too rigidly can actually add pressure rather than relieve it.'
There's no doubt these apps have their place. Some people, I'm sure, find them extremely useful, especially if they thrive on structure and accountability as well as fun. But, at least for me, they're not a magic fix, no matter how many powers, Pokémon or potions are involved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
3 days ago
- STV News
Israeli soldiers again fire on Palestinians seeking aid, killing at least ten
At least ten people have been killed in the latest shooting by Israeli forces of Palestinians trying to reach food and aid at two separate sites. On Saturday, Israeli forces opened fire near two aid distribution sites run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as crowds of hungry Palestinians sought food. Witnesses and health workers said at least ten people were killed, a day after US officials visited a GHF site and the US ambassador called the internationally decried system 'an incredible feat.' Omniya Mahra, holds her sons Oday, 4, left, and Mohammed, 3, who suffer from malnutrition and a genetic nerve disorder. / Credit: AP Near the northernmost GHF distribution site near the Netzarim corridor, Yahia Youssef, who had come to seek aid Saturday morning, described a panicked and grimly familiar scene. After helping carry three people wounded by gunshots, he said he saw others on the ground, bleeding. 'It's the same daily episode,' Youssef said. Health workers said at least eight people were killed. Israel's military said it fired warning shots at a gathering approaching its forces. At least two people were killed in the Shakoush area, hundreds of meters from where the GHF operates another site in the southernmost city of Rafah, witnesses said. Nasser Hospital in nearby Khan Younis received two bodies and many injured. Witness Mohamed Abu Taha said Israeli troops opened fire toward the crowds. He saw three people, two men and a woman, being shot as he fled. Israel's military said it was not aware of any fire by its forces in the area. The GHF said nothing happened near its sites. GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired warning shots to prevent deadly crowding. Israel's military on Friday said it was working to make the routes under its control safer. The UN says nearly 1,400 Palestinians have been killed whilst seeking food from aid distribution centres. Israel and GHF have claimed that the toll has been exaggerated. White House special envoy Steve Witkoff arrives to meet families of hostages at the plaza known as the hostages' square in Tel Aviv. / Credit: AP The GHF — backed by millions of dollars in U.S. support — launched in May as Israel sought an alternative to the UN-run system, which had safely delivered aid for much of the war but was accused by Israel of allowing Hamas to siphon off supplies. Israel has not offered evidence for that claim, and the UN has denied it. From May 27 to July 31, 859 people were killed near GHF sites, according to a United Nations report published Thursday. Hundreds more have been killed along the routes of UN-led food convoys. Hamas-led police once guarded those convoys and went after suspected looters, but Israeli fire targeted the officers. Airdrops by a Jordan led coalition of Israel, the UAE, Egypt, France, and Germany, are another approach, though experts say the strategy remains deeply inadequate and even dangerous for people on the ground. 'Let's go back to what works & let us do our job,' Philippe Lazzarini, the head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, wrote Saturday on social media, calling for more and safer truck deliveries. Nearly a week has passed since Israel, under international pressure amid growing scenes of starving children, announced limited humanitarian pauses and airdrops meant to get more food to Gazans, who now rely mostly on aid after nearly 22 months of war. Despite this, the UN and partners say not nearly enough aid is coming in, with months' worth of supplies piled up outside Gaza waiting for Israeli approval. Trucks that enter are mostly stripped of supplies by desperate people and criminal groups before reaching warehouses for distribution. Families of the 50 hostages still in Gaza fear they are going hungry too, and blame Hamas, after the militants released images and video of an emaciated hostage, Evyatar David. Evayatar David's family have given permission for the video to be used to raise awareness for the plight of their son. ITV News is not showing the full video as released by Hamas. A still of captive hostage Evyatar David, taken from a video released by Hamas. / Credit: Hamas US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, met with hostages' families Saturday, a week after quitting ceasefire talks, blaming Hamas's intransigence. 'I didn't hear anything new from him. I heard that there was pressure from the Americans to end this operation, but we didn't hear anything practical,' said Michel Illouz, father of Israeli hostage Guy Illouz, whose body was taken into Gaza. He said he asked Witkoff to exert pressure and set a time frame, but got 'no answers.' Protesters called on Israel's government to make a deal to end the war, imploring them to 'stop this nightmare and bring them out of the tunnels.' In part of Gaza City, displaced people who managed to return home found rubble-strewn neighbourhoods unrecognisable. Most Palestinians in Gaza have been displaced, often multiple times, and are crowded into ever-shrinking areas considered safe. 'I don't know what to do. Destruction, destruction,' said Mohamed Qeiqa, who stood amid collapsed slabs of concrete and pointed out what had been a five-story building. 'Where will people settle?' Gaza's Health Ministry says 93 children have died from malnutrition-related causes since the war began. It said 76 adults have died of malnutrition-related causes since late June, when it started counting adult deaths. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


ITV News
4 days ago
- ITV News
Gaza is 'on the brink' but what does it take for famine to be declared?
The United Nations has warned that the "worst-case scenario of famine" is "playing out" in Gaza and the situation had reached a deadly point. The Secretary General António Guterres said Gaza was "on the brink of famine" but stopped short of formally declaring famine in the region. "Palestinians in Gaza are enduring a humanitarian catastrophe of epic proportions," he said. "This is not a warning. "It is a reality unfolding before our eyes. "This nightmare must end." The latest Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) alert showed two out of three famine thresholds had been breached in Gaza and the situation had drastically worsened over the past few months. It has warned that failing to act would result in "widespread death". So why hasn't a famine officially been declared? When is a famine declared? Declarations are generally made by the UN using data and analysis from the IPC. Famine is defined as a severe, widespread shortage of food leading to malnutrition, starvation and death. For a region to be classified as in famine, it must meet these three conditions: 1) One in five households have an extreme lack of food 2) At least 30 per cent of the population is acutely malnourished 3) At least two people - or four children under the age of five - in every 10,000 die from starvation daily What is the situation in Gaza? Two out of three famine thresholds have been breached in Gaza, according to the IPC. Its data showed more than one in three people - 39 per cent - of the Gaza population had an extreme lack of food and were going days without eating. The IPC said more than 500,000 people – that is nearly a quarter of Gaza's population – were enduring famine-like conditions, while the rest of the population faced 'emergency levels of hunger'. According to the UN World Food Programme, every child under the age of five in Gaza - more than 320,000 children - was at risk of acute malnutrition. In June, 6,500 children were admitted for treatment for malnutrition, the highest number since the conflict began. "This signals a critical deterioration in nutritional status and a sharp rise in the risk of death from hunger and malnutrition," the IPC said. But the threshold not yet met, according to the IPC, was the number of deaths from starvation. Gaza's Hamas-run Health Ministry said 89 children had died showing signs of hunger and malnutrition since the war began and that 65 adults had also died from malnutrition-related causes since June. But the IPC said collecting robust data under the current circumstances in Gaza remained very difficult, as health systems, already decimated by nearly three years of conflict, were collapsing. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said no-one was starving in Gaza and that Israel has supplied enough aid during the war. How important is a formal declaration of famine? According to the WFP Executive Director Cindy McCain, waiting for a formal declaration of famine would be too late. "Waiting for official confirmation of famine to provide life-saving food aid they desperately need is unconscionable," she said. "We need to flood Gaza with large-scale food aid, immediately and without obstruction and keep it flowing each and every day to prevent mass starvation. "People are already dying of malnutrition, and the longer we wait to act, the higher the death toll will rise." The humanitarian director for Save the Children International Rachael Cummings agreed. 'If we don't have the conditions to react to this mass starvation, we will see this exponential rise,' she said. 'So we will see thousands and potentially tens of thousands of people die in Gaza. "That is preventable.' How can the risk of famine in Gaza be reversed? The Gaza population relies on aid and it needs more than 62,000 tons every month to cover basic humanitarian food and nutrition assistance, according to UN agencies. Following international pressure, Israel promised new measures at the weekend to help allow aid into Gaza, including pauses in fighting and designated humanitarian corridors. But organisations operating in the territory said "barely a trickle" of what was required had managed to get through. COGAT, the Israeli military body that facilitates the entry of aid, said more than 220 trucks entered Gaza on Tuesday. But UN agencies say that is far below the 500 to 600 trucks a day that are needed. Food is one thing but WFP and UNICEF have warned that the lack of fuel, water and other vital aid was also undermining their efforts to prevent famine and deaths. The aid agencies said allowing commercial food imports into the region was also critical to provide dietary needs, like fresh fruit, vegetables, dairy products and protein. Along with restoring essential services, such as health, water and sewage infrastructure. How many famines have been declared in the world? Famine declarations are rare. The IPC declared a famine in Somalia in 2011, South Sudan in 2017 and 2020 and parts of Sudan's western Darfur region in 2024.


The Herald Scotland
6 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Marjorie Taylor Greene says there is genocide in Gaza, amid starvation
More: Two Israeli rights groups say Israel is committing genocide in Gaza Hers is an uncommon statement in a caucus that has rallied around Israel since October 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. Israel has strongly rejected claims that the country is perpetuating a genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Recently the Israeli military announced it would pause action in certain parts of Gaza for hours each day and increase aid drops in the enclave. Reports of mass starvation have spread since Israel first cut off supplies to the region in March, then reopened aid lines, with new restrictions, in May. More than 125 people have died due to malnutrition, including 85 children, the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry said over the weekend. A 5-month-old baby, Zainab Abu Haleeb, died of malnutrition at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza on July 26. In recent weeks, more than 800 people have been killed while trying to reach food, according to the United Nations, mostly in shootings by Israeli soldiers posted near controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution centers. "I can unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th was horrific," Greene wrote in an earlier social media post over the weekend. "Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific." "This war and humanitarian crisis must end!" Her post on July 28 calling Israel's attack on Gaza a genocide was part of a direct criticism of her Republican colleague Rep. Randy Fine, who was elected in April to fill the seat vacated by former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz. Fine, a Jewish member of Congress and staunch defender of Israel, has been outspoken on social media, denying the crisis in Gaza in multiple posts and writing in another, "starve away."