Senate passes bill to protect supply management from any future trade deals
OTTAWA — The Bloc Québécois' long and often rocky road to protect supply management from any concessions in future trade negotiations has come to a successful end. The Senate has adopted Bill C-202, making it the first bill set to receive royal assent in the new session of Parliament.
Article content
'We won,' said Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet enthusiastically, hours after the Senate adopted his party's bill.
Article content
Article content
Article content
C-202 sought to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act to prevent the minister from 'making a commitment' that would increase the tariff rate quota for dairy, poultry, or eggs in trade negotiations. It would also prevent tariff reductions on these products when they are imported in excess.
Article content
Article content
The Bloc wanted to strengthen the long-standing federal government policy to maintain Canada's supply management system, including its production control, pricing mechanisms and import controls.
Article content
The House of Commons unanimously passed the bill last week and the Senate did so 'with division' on Tuesday evening.
Article content
'The notion of unanimity really weighed heavily. It was all parties and the unanimity of elected officials. So, everyone who speaks for Canadians and Quebecers was in favour,' Blanchet said at a press conference.
Article content
Article content
Bloc Québécois MP Yves Perron has been championing this bill for over five years. In an interview with the National Post, Perron expressed his pride.
Article content
'We have just demonstrated that the Bloc Québécois serves a purpose. I think we are capable of moving forward on issues and on a scale that is extremely positive for Quebec, but also positive for the rest of Canada,' he said. 'And the rest of Canada has finally understood this.'
Article content
But the Grain Growers of Canada argued that 'Parliament chose to prioritize one group of farmers over another,' while the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance said it was 'deeply concerned' by the adoption of 'a flawed piece of legislation that sets a troubling precedent, undermining Canada's longstanding commitment to the rules-based international trading system.'
Article content
Even if the Senate passed the bill, many senators still had some reservations on Tuesday. In a speech in the Senate, Alberta Sen. Paula Simons expressed concerns about what Bill C-202 means for national unity because it was from a Bloc MP, which advocates for the separation of Quebec from the rest of Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Alberta Indigenous leaders feel ‘slighted' by Bill C-5
As Prime Minister Mark Carney's first session of Parliament draws to a close, Liberal MPs say they need to push ahead with a major projects bill. Bill C-5 would give the federal cabinet the ability to set aside various statutes to push forward approvals for a small number of major industrial projects, such as mines, pipelines and ports. The legislation would allow the federal government to designate projects in the 'national interest' and fast-track them by granting approvals within two years. It appears Bill C-5 will be pushed through the House this week with the support of both Liberal and Conservative MPs, despite warnings from environmental and Indigenous groups. The legislation is being widely criticized by Indigenous leaders and community members across the country for a lack of consultation and a tight timeline in which the government wants to pass the bill. Story continues below advertisement 'We have not been properly consulted in all the bills, all the legislation throughout. It's a one-shoe-fits-all in the government's favour,' said Grand Chief Greg Desjarlais of Treaty Six First Nations. 'It's a slight, there is just no other way to look at it,' Chief Troy 'Bossman' Knowlton of Piikani Nation said, saying Parliament's urge to push Bill C-5 ahead will affect First Nations. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'It can destroy our past, it can destroy of our footprint that our people had left for thousands of years to tell the story today of who we are.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "It can destroy our past, it can destroy of our footprint that our people had left for thousands of years to tell the story today of who we are." 2:11 Moe, Smith repeat calls for federal action and support for energy projects If the legislation isn't pushed through this week, the House will rise and won't return until September. Some Liberals want to see this dealt with now. MP Karina Gould said the government must strike the right balance on the bill or face court challenges. Story continues below advertisement 'There is a clear desire on the part of Canadians to be able to get big projects done in this country. We haven't been able to find the right balance in order to do that,' she said. Most Liberal MPs appear to be backing both the bill and the process. 'Are we going to continue to put this on hold, to tinker with it and make slight amendments?' said Liberal MP Marcu Powlowski. 'I think it's important we pass this legislation and there's always an opportunity afterwards to amend it.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "I think it's important we pass this legislation and there's always an opportunity afterwards to amend it." Meanwhile, other Liberal MPs say the idea of the legislation is solid, but it's not perfect, and might need more time to finalize. 'I think we should move quickly to get projects done as quickly as possible. That's not to say we should have unfettered discretion and unchecked power in the government; we've got to make sure there are guardrails,' said Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith. The House sitting is scheduled to end on Friday. The Liberal government has said it wants the bill passed before then. For more on this story, watch the video above. 1:46 Can the Liberal government's trade bill unify Canada's economy? — With files from Alessia Passafiume, David Baxter and Sarah Ritchie, The Canadian Press
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Hundreds of groups call on Ottawa to scrap border bill over privacy, rights concerns
Published Jun 18, 2025 • 3 minute read A Canada Border Services officer is handed passports from a visitor entering Canada from Vermont at the Highway 55 Port of Entry in Stanstead, Que., Thursday, March 13, 2025. Photo by Christinne Muschi OTTAWA — More than 300 civil society organizations are calling on the Liberal government to withdraw its new border bill, saying the legislation threatens liberties, refugee and migrant rights and the privacy of all Canadians. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Representatives of four major coalitions held a news conference Wednesday to ramp up pressure on Ottawa to scrap the proposed Strong Borders Act, also known as Bill C-2. 'We are unified in our opposition to this sweeping and dangerous legislation,' said Karen Cocq, spokesperson for the Migrant Rights Network. 'Bill C-2 is not a border bill. It is a power grab and an attack on fundamental human rights and civil liberties.' The bill, introduced this month, would give authorities new powers to search mail, facilitate police access to personal information and make it easier for officials to pause or cancel immigration applications. The federal government says the legislation is meant to keep borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of deadly fentanyl and crack down on money laundering. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Government House leader Steve MacKinnon told reporters on Wednesday the bill 'will make its way through the parliamentary process, receive all due examination and we look forward to that debate.' The bill comes in response to sustained pressure from the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, which cited concerns about the southbound flow of irregular migrants and fentanyl when imposing tariffs on Canadian goods. The measures proposed in the bill have received support from Canada's police chiefs, the national fentanyl czar and child protection advocates. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The groups calling for the legislation's withdrawal say it would allow police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to demand to know whether a person has an online account with any organization or service in Canada. They also warn the bill would permit authorities with a warrant to demand production of a person's online data, unencrypted emails and browsing history from a company based only on 'reasonable suspicion' — not the current standard of reasonable belief. 'Bill C-2 is a multi-pronged assault on the basic human rights and freedoms that people across Canada hold dear,' said Tim McSorley, national co-ordinator of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group. RECOMMENDED VIDEO The bill would strengthen the government's ability to cancel, suspend or stop accepting new immigration applications, and authorize Immigration Department officials to share client information, such as identity, status and immigration documentation, with provincial and territorial partners through agreements. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The legislation also would prevent someone who has been in Canada more than one year from seeking refugee status through an Immigration and Refugee Board hearing, even if their home country becomes dangerous after their arrival. In addition, the legislation would eliminate a provision that allows people crossing from the United States into Canada between official ports of entry to apply for a refugee board hearing after 14 days. The government says the proposed ineligibility provisions are not a ban on claiming asylum but will simply prevent those claims from being referred to the board. It says this will help avoid bottlenecks and allow the board to continue addressing new claims and the significant inventory of pending claims. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The government says that people affected by the ineligibility provisions may still apply for a pre-removal risk assessment to make sure they are not sent back to a country where they could face harm. It says the process will take into account each claimant's situation and may still result in refugee protection being granted. Gauri Sreenivasan, co-executive director of the Canadian Council for Refugees, said that by driving claims away from the board and towards 'the inadequate tool of a pre-removal risk assessment, the bill will merely shift the refugee backlog from one place to another' by passing the burden to an already strained Immigration Department and the Federal Court. NHL Editorial Cartoons Canada Columnists Soccer
Edmonton Journal
4 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Smith, Moe renew calls for Ottawa to allow more resource development
Article content Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe renewed their calls on Wednesday for the federal government to better encourage the development of provincial resources. Speaking from the Saskatchewan side of Lloydminster, Smith again reiterated her prior nine demands she put to Prime Minister Mark Carney, including overhauling the Impact Assessment Act, eliminating the oil and gas emissions cap, lifting the tanker ban off the northern coast of B.C., and scrapping the clean electricity regulations, among others. Article content 'The national self-sabotage that has happened over the last 10 years has to end,' Smith said at a news conference. The two premiers issued a joint statement during that media event, saying their governments came together 'to make a unified call for national change.' 'Alberta and Saskatchewan agree that the federal government must change its policies if it is to reach its stated goal of becoming a global energy superpower and having the strongest economy in the G7,' it reads. Carney has pledged to strengthen Canada's economy and is seeking to pass legislation this week to lay the groundwork for expedited approval of major projects. Bill C-5 proposes granting the federal government sweeping powers over a five-year period to expedite approvals of infrastructure megaprojects deemed to be in the national interest by cabinet. 'The very fact that Bill C-5 has been introduced … I think, is an admission that this hard work does have to happen,' Moe said. Article content Smith said the bill was a necessary, but not sufficient, condition to reach Carney's goal. 'If (Carney) very soon is able to announce a project list that has 20 or more substantial projects on it that include mining projects, and transmission projects, and power projects, and pipeline projects, I think that would send a pretty big message to the world about the direction that we're going,' she said. The premiers met with Carney in Saskatchewan earlier this month to pitch him on megaprojects they would like to see developed. Carney's government has not yet announced which projects, or how many, it intends to pursue. Smith has sought a bitumen pipeline to the Port of Prince Rupert in northern B.C. with the goal of increasing exports to Asia, though B.C.'s government has been cool the idea, noting a private-sector proponent for such a project has yet to materialize. Latest National Stories
