
Why India has an incentive to act tough in Trump trade talks
Agencies Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump
The ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China, two of the world's most powerful nations, could present India with a crucial opportunity to finalize its own trade deal with the US before the 90-day reciprocal tariff deadline. As India and the United States engage in intense negotiations, Swaminathan Aiyar, Consulting Editor at ET Now, believes that India has the potential to be a strong negotiator, much like its neighbor China, and secure a favorable deal for itself. "The Chinese stood up, when Trump increased the import by 125%, so did they and ultimately Trump had to back down on that and has backed down on various things. So, on the one hand this means that some kind of deals are definitely more possible. It also means that every country including India we have an incentive not to give way very easily," said Aiyar. Aiyar explained that India has an incentive by bringing up how China stood up against the wishes of US, and was rewarded. "If all of us stand up, then we have this guy who from being a dragon now is beginning to chicken out on various deals, so let us talk tough, let us act tough. So that is the global position right now. For the very fact that the Americans say they are willing to ease the restrictions on high-end chips in return for the rare earths is a sign of chickening out in a big way," said Aiyar. "As I said, we all have an incentive now to act tough because Mr Trump is very keen on reaching deals with the major countries before the 90-day deadline. Let us see what happens. As I said, I would look for last minute developments rather than anything right now despite the talks in London," added Aiyar.
Both sides are looking at an interim trade deal before the first tranche of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) as the USA's 26 per cent reciprocal tariff on India is suspended till July 9 this year. It was imposed by the US on April 2. However, Indian goods still attract the 10 per cent baseline tariff imposed by America.
India, US remain 'optimistic'
Recently, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said he's 'very optimistic' about prospects for a trade deal between the US and India, suggesting an agreement could come before a July deadline for higher tariffs. The same sentiment was shared by Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal. According to a recent report by the finance ministry, a successful US-India bilateral trade agreement could flip current headwinds into tailwinds, opening up new market access and energising exports. The possible optimism is seen with the US trade team that's currently in India for negotiations has extended its stay, reported Bloomberg quoting its sources, in a sign talks are progressing ahead of a July deadline. India and the US are working on a phased trade deal with an early agreement targeted for July, the deadline for implementation of the so-called reciprocal tariffs. At the same time, those tariffs are facing legal challenges in Washington.While Indian officials say talks remain on track, there have been signs of tension in recent days. New Delhi appears to be adopting a tougher stance in negotiations, threatening retaliatory tariffs on US goods last week. Trump has also claimed that India offered to slash tariffs on US goods to zero, while downplaying any sense of urgency to reach a trade deal.
What are India, US hoping from the trade deal?
The US remained India's largest trading partner for the fourth consecutive year in 2024-25, with bilateral trade valued at $131.84 billion. The US accounts for about 18 per cent of India's total goods exports, 6.22 per cent in imports, and 10.73 per cent in the country's total merchandise trade. With America, India had a trade surplus of $41.18 billion in goods in 2024-25. The two trading partners look to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030.To boost bilateral trade, India is seeking duty concessions for labour-intensive sectors like textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, chemicals, grapes, and bananas in the proposed pact with America. On the other hand, the US wants duty concessions in sectors like certain industrial goods, automobiles (electric vehicles in particular), wines, petrochemical products, dairy, and agriculture items such as apples, tree nuts and GM (genetically modified) crops. While the import of GM crops from the US continues to remain a non-starter due to regulatory norms in India, New Delhi is open to import non-GM products like Alpha alpha hay (a kind of cattle feed).On April 10, the United States temporarily suspended additional tariffs on Indian exports for a 90-day period, effective until July 9. The pause was seen as a goodwill gesture and an effort to build momentum in trade discussions. This development followed a broader tariff overhaul on April 2, when the US imposed universal duties on imports from nearly 60 countries in a bid to reduce the American trade deficit and strengthen domestic production. As part of that move, Indian exports were slapped with an additional 26% duty—covering sectors ranging from seafood to industrial metals like steel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump won't allow mob rule in America, says White House amid LA unrest
US President Donald Trump 'will never allow mob rule to prevail in America,' the White House said on Wednesday, following escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by the administration's aggressive immigration enforcement House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaking at a press briefing, said President Trump remains firmly committed to upholding law and order in the face of what she described as organized unrest. 'The most basic duty of government is to preserve law and order, and this administration embraces that sacred responsibility,' she said, as images of burning vehicles and masked demonstrators were displayed during the unrest follows a series of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids carried out in Los Angeles last week, a city governed by Democrats, which has long opposed Trump's immigration agenda. Though many protests were peaceful, several incidents of violence, including the torching of self-driving taxis and clashes with police, prompted a militarized gas and other non-lethal methods were deployed, and President Trump authorized the National Guard to intervene, a rare move in recent Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass sharply criticized the deployment, calling it excessive and politically motivated. In response, Leavitt accused both leaders of dereliction of duty. 'Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass shamefully failed to meet their sworn obligations to their citizens,' she said, also alleging that Newsom had 'fanned the flames and demonized our brave ICE officers.'advertisementPresident Trump, speaking Tuesday at Fort Bragg military base, promised to 'liberate' Los Angeles, intensifying tensions with California's Democratic administration has also raised concerns about the organization behind the protests. Trump referred to some demonstrators as 'paid insurrectionists' equipped with professional anti-riot gear, a claim Leavitt said is under investigation. 'It's a good question the president is raising, and one we are looking into, about who is funding these insurrectionists,' she told news agency backlash is intensifying as the fast-growing 'No Kings' protest movement prepares for a massive, coordinated demonstration on June 14, coinciding with both a pro-Trump parade in Washington, DC, and the president's 79th birthday. Organizers estimate that nearly 3 million people could flood streets in cities across the country in what they describe as a unified stand against response, the White House remains defiant. 'President Trump will never allow mobs to take over the United States,' Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, signaling no intention to yield to mounting public inputs from agenciesTune InMust Watch


Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pete Hegseth confirmed Iran working towards nuclear weapon, claims US senator
US senator from Arkansas Tom Cotton on Thursday claimed that defence secretary Pete Hegseth had confirmed that Iran was working towards building a nuclear weapon amid a stalled nuclear deal between the countries. In a post on X, Tom Cotton said, 'Today @SecDef confirmed that Iran's terrorist regime is actively working towards a nuclear weapon. For the sake of our national security, the security of our allies, and millions of civilians in the region this cannot be allowed to happen.' Also Read: Israel preparing strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, suggests US intelligence: Report The US and Iran have been negotiating a nuclear deal for around two months, with Oman mediating. They have held five rounds of talks. US President Donald Trump, after being elected for his second term, had said he wants a deal that curbs Iran's atomic activities and that the US could strike Iran if the talks break down. Also Read: Trump travel ban shows 'deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran Israel, which believes a nuclear-armed Iran would pose an existential threat has also threatened to attack Tehran, with or without US help. Iran has long denied having plans to build a nuclear weapon, although it has been enriching uranium to a higher point than required for civilian purposes, leading to wariness from the US and other western countries. Earlier this week, Trump said he was "much less confident of a deal being made. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame," he told the New York Post. Also Read: A thaw in Iran-Canada ties? Tehran says 'ready for talks' to restart relations Iran has warned of retaliation against US military assets in the Middle East if the talks collapse and the Islamic Republic is attacked. 'I sincerely hope it won't come to that and that the talks reach a resolution,' Iran's Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said. 'But if they don't, and conflict is imposed on us, the other side will undoubtedly suffer greater losses. We will target all US bases in host countries without hesitation," he added.


India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Elon Musk spoke to Trump before apologising over social media feud: Report
Elon Musk privately called President Donald Trump on Monday before posting a message on X saying he regretted some of his social media comments, according to a White House source cited by apology, posted on X (formerly Twitter) on Wednesday, read: "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." Trump later called the gesture "very nice," signalling a possible thaw in their public feud. advertisementAccording to the New York Times that the apology came after Musk spoke privately with Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles on Friday. The talks aimed to find a way to calm tensions between the two men, who had been engaged over a social media FEUD FOLLOWED BY A SOFTENING OF TONE The feud began last Thursday when Musk lashed out at Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Trump responded by downplaying Musk's role in his political success. The argument quickly escalated after Musk even tried to link Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey the next few days, Musk signalled that he wanted to fix the relationship. After his conversation with Wiles and Vance, he deleted several social media posts, including one that alleged Trump's name was in government files related to Musk's efforts, Trump reportedly told his advisers he was not interested in talking to the billionaire and was "done with him." He repeated the same message in press interviews. However, behind closed doors, teams on both sides were working to bring about a MOVES TO MEND TIES Musk seemed more keep to make peace, despite the fact that both men had a lot on the line. Trump threatened to revoke SpaceX's billion-dollar government contracts. Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Musk, who is also one of the biggest donors to the Republican Party, has promised to contribute an additional $100 million to Trump's outside political knowledge of the inner circle of the administration also gives him a great deal of influence. Trump might not want to exclude Musk entirely in order to avoid the issues of his term in the office, where former staffers wrote books on him, revealing some 'critical' InMust Watch