Daubhill celebrates historic railway link with community festival
Daubhill celebrated its connection with railway history at a community day on Saturday.
Olive Tree Primary School hosted the event, reminding people that the towns of Bolton and Leigh were linked by the first public railway in the North-West of England in 1828 – two years before the historic Liverpool and Manchester Railway.
Principal Zainab Patel told visitors at the Adelaide Lane school that the original railway line passed through the site of the school.
She said: 'We are proud to be celebrating the rich heritage and cultural diversity of the Daubhill area.
"It is an absolute privilege to be hosting 'A Day for Daubhill'—a celebration of everything that makes our community so unique and vibrant.'
Fine weather and a rousing performance by Bolton's Shree Muktajeevan Swamibapa Pipe Band got the day off to a rousing start.
A model railway, food stalls, games, a visiting fire engine, and information stands ensured there was something to interest everyone.
The special guest was India's Consul General, Vishakha Yaduvanshi, who said: 'It's my immense pleasure to be here today to attend the 200 years of Bolton and Leigh Railway which laid the foundation of railways.
"It is a historic moment indeed.'
Julia Hulton, whose great-great-grandfather, William Hulton, formed the Bolton and Leigh Railway company, and Bolton South MP Yasmin Qureshi, were also among the guests and dignitaries attending.
Derek Bullock, chair of the Bolton & Leigh Railway CIC, said: 'The event celebrates not just this historic anniversary but also the vibrancy of Daubhill today.'
It was a point echoed by Councillor Ayuub Patel, who represents Rumworth Ward.
He said: 'This anniversary is a proud moment for Daubhill and the wider community.
"It's a chance to honour our rich railway heritage while celebrating the diversity and energy of the area today.
'Rumworth has many residents from an Anglo-Indian background, so today is also a celebration of the economic and cultural contributions they have made to the wider community.'
'A Day for Daubhill' is one of a number of events leading up to the anniversary date in 2028.
In March, a mayoral reception, with the mayors of both Bolton and Wigan (covering Leigh and Atherton) took place, and there are plans for a 'Bolton & Leigh Greenway' which will provide a walking and cycling link along parts of the original railway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How to handle toxic in-laws, according to a clinical psychologist
Dr Sheri Jacobson has a PhD in counselling and psychotherapy, and a degree in cognitive behavioural therapy. She worked for many years as a senior therapist with the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, as well as for MIND, MENCAP, a women's centre and the NHS. She is the founder of Harley Therapy. It's rare to find a family without at least some conflict between first-degree relatives. Imagine, then, the whole extra layer that can come with in-laws. We haven't known these people since childhood, and aren't as acclimatised to their ways. Getting used to this can take time. The gaining of an in-law represents a significant shift in the dynamics of your family. But while people often dwell on the difficulties that arrive with their in-laws, it's important first to note the positives in your by-marriage relationships. Your in-laws can give you social, practical and financial support. They're often sounding boards, or can help you with the day-to-day challenges of getting older. In-laws often increase the diversity of the types of personalities in your circle. Plus, this wider family often shares important experiences: celebrating joyful occasions, such as weddings and graduations, and offering support in times of bereavement. That said, there can often be tensions and difficulties involving hierarchy and power structures. People are often used to interacting in specific ways with certain dynamics at play, and it can take time to recalibrate to a new family set-up. Our loyalties and allegiances often realign – for example, if a close sibling gets married, that can lead to feelings of envy towards their new spouse if they aren't confiding in us as much. Families have different styles. On top of this, every individual brings into the mix their own underlying patterns of behaviour shaped by their unique past experiences. These can sometimes manifest in less desirable behaviours, such attention-seeking, wilfulness, manipulation or sulking. Whatever the reason for conflict, the same principles and values apply. Always try to start with compassion and empathy: aiming to understand, as opposed to being judgemental. This is the best way to de-escalate a situation, so it becomes less threatening to everyone. Here are four common in-law scenarios, and how to defuse them. 'I know him better than you'; 'he doesn't like it when you do things that way' – a mother-in-law's possessiveness is often driven by an underlying anxiety. Perhaps she senses her adult child is being 'taken away', and she still wants to be included. A mother might behave in a controlling way or use 'guilt-tripping' in order to remain relevant and central to her child's life. In all in-law relationships, there's the possibility of divided loyalties – that the wife is 'against' the mother, or vice versa. There's no right way to deal with this. Some people prefer to speak directly to their in-laws, and others prefer to enlist support from outside. The most important thing is for the couple to safeguard their own relationship – to discuss and air their views about this problem in non-belligerent ways. An opening comment such as: 'When your mother criticises my cooking, I feel undermined' might be helpful, and then take it from there. The key here is to explain how you are feeling, and open a discussion. If, as is often the case, your mother-in-law's behaviour is driven by anxiety, the best way to counter this is to make her feel included (while also making sure she doesn't take over). For example, if it's your anniversary dinner, and she tries to invite herself, say something like: 'We'd love you to be there, but tonight is just for the two of us. Let's do something separate next week.' Start by putting yourself in your daughter-in-law's place, to try and understand the root of why she's behaving like this. Perhaps she's trying to assert her independence, or establish a position within a new family hierarchy. Or maybe a memory of her earlier experiences is being played out: it could be that she was neglected when she was younger, or quite the opposite – she's used to being the centre of attention. Either way, it's difficult to cope with a daughter-in-law when she's demanding, 'drive me here', or 'I need this, now', especially if this squeezes out the preferences of other people. Your son's self-involved wife might also disengage, appear aloof or prioritise her own family over yours, which can lead to a lot of upset and sullen family dinners. This is a hard situation to manage and it's important to be sensitive. Family ruptures can happen easily. Though it has to be said that, in some contexts, the cycle of rupture and repair – heated arguments followed by making up – is not uncommon. Communication is nearly always a good idea, but be careful not to accuse your daughter-in-law of anything directly. Instead of: 'You always cancel when I plan a dinner, but you never cancel on your own family – that's not fair,' consider saying: 'I feel sad when you don't come to our dinners, as family time is special to us. Is there something about our gatherings that makes you feel unwelcome?' If you'd rather avoid such disclosures, or feel that this type of communication won't lead anywhere, my advice would be to work on acceptance of the situation. Realise that it might never really change. Some people maintain some distance to protect themselves from emotional strain. The alternative is to lower your expectations – appreciating that your daughter-in-law's behaviour might be linked to her past experiences rather than being personal. Sometimes, it can help to vent to a third party, such as a close friend or a therapist, who can hear you out and support you to better manage the situation. This can cover a wide spectrum from, 'let me drive' to a partner who takes total economic control, or restricts his wife from having a social life of her own. In a milder scenario, this may manifest with your son-in-law by arguing with your child's opinions, or by being dismissive of them. Various things can drive this sort of behaviour, including a perceived threat to the man's authority, or uncertainty of his place in the family hierarchy. In certain cultures, the 'husband in charge' scenario is more accepted, and this can be harder to question or challenge. Whatever the cause, it can be important to keep an eye on a bossy son-in law, as in its most serious form, damaging control can escalate. 'Let's not see your family today' can swiftly become: 'I'm better with money than you are, let me look after the account.' As a parent, it's important to look out for signs of overly domineering and manipulative behaviour. If you find that your daughter seems unrecognisable from her usual self, or she seems nervous, silent or on edge, you may want to intervene. This is a difficult situation, as you may see a problem and your child may not, and attempting to point it out could push her further away. Bring up the problem gently: don't accuse or point fingers. Say something like: 'I know you are devoted to your husband, but I'm concerned in seeing some of the ways he is with you. I care about you greatly, and I'm here for you regardless. Whenever you are ready, I would like to help.' If your son-in-law becomes menacing or abusive – whether violently or otherwise – seek support from the relevant professional services. Whether the inappropriate behaviour is aimed at you personally – or in a more general sense – there are ways of dealing with it. It's not uncommon for older relatives to have 'blind spots', owing to the generation in which they grew up – they just don't see the world in the same way as you do. If your partner's father is being racist or lascivious to the people around you, a comment such as: 'Remember, we don't use those sorts of comments today' might help, delivered in an approachable tone. If you are feeling personally targeted, then it's important to set boundaries. Say to your father-in-law: 'I know you mean well, but it's not OK to comment on my low-cut dress.' Or, 'I don't like it when you come up and hug me – I hope you understand.' It's also important to let your partner know you feel a bit nervous around his dad. All of this can be hard to do. But you aren't only looking after yourself: you are also prioritising safety for younger family members, and guarding them from inappropriate sexual or pejorative comments. Reshaped families can add much to our lives, and all the more so when we consider the feelings of every single member. As told to Miranda Levy Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Glass from Guildhall and Bloody Sunday belt go on display to mark new initiative
A piece of stained glass from the IRA's bombing of Londonderry's historic Guildhall and a belt worn by one of those killed by soldiers in Derry on Bloody Sunday have been united in a new display to mark the start of a new initiative. Training logs for Loyalist prisoners in the former Long Kesh prison camp where scores of paramilitary prisoners were held are also among the items put together in a collaboration between museums and groups. The Conflict and Legacy Interpretive Network includes National Museums NI, the Museum of Free Derry/Bloody Sunday Trust and Healing Through Remembering. It aims to bring expertise together to nurture diverse perspectives on Northern Ireland's conflict and the legacy of The Troubles and inform the debate on reconciliation. The Network has been awarded more than £200,000 in funding from The National Lottery Heritage Fund to support its Realising The Potential Of The Conflict And Legacy Interpretive Network project. This involves a project co-ordinator being appointed for three years to reach other organisations and communities across Northern Ireland, support the delivery of a major conference and online resources, as well as a touring exhibition. A display giving a taster of what is to come has been unveiled at the Ulster Museum in Belfast within its The Troubles and Beyond gallery. The objects in the display include a piece of stained glass from The Guildhall following the 1972 IRA bombing, training logs for loyalist prisoners in Long Kesh and the belt worn by Patrick Doherty when he was shot dead on Bloody Sunday, also in 1972. William Blair, director of collections at National Museums NI, described a 'complex part of history with many different perspectives'. He emphasised that the legacy of conflict needs to be interpreted sensitively and empathetically. 'Peacebuilding is an ongoing process, and we're all part of that journey,' he said. 'Interpreting our recent past requires care and sensitivity. 'At the Ulster Museum, our Troubles and Beyond exhibition is intentionally presented as a work in progress, inviting visitors to ask: 'What's missing?' 'This question creates space for continued reflection and engagement, and thereby continual evolvement. 'As the exhibition states, 'Whilst we have a shared past, we do not have a shared memory'. 'Everyone's lived experience holds its own truth, and that must be respected.' He added that National Museums NI is 'committed to representing multiple perspectives through the diversity of our collection'. 'More broadly, we're fortunate to be part of a wider network of organisations – brought together through the Conflict and Legacy Interpretive Network – who are actively engaged in exploring our recent conflict and progressing peacebuilding as a result,' he said. 'We are grateful to The National Lottery Heritage Fund for recognising the value and potential impact of this collaborative effort.' Cate Turner, director at Healing Through Remembering, a cross-community organisation dedicated to facilitating discussion around conflict, said they are aware of the need to engage all perspectives. 'Challenges as a result of the past remain evident here in Northern Ireland, and in responding to them, we need to ensure that we adopt an approach that not only engages those directly impacted, but future generations too,' she said. 'The Conflict and Legacy Interpretive Network allows us to leverage specialist expertise to ensure we engage people in ways that will benefit communities.' Maeve McLaughlin, director at the Bloody Sunday Trust said that collaboration is central to the continued success of the Network. 'As the debate around the historical legacy of conflict here continues, museums and heritage organisations have been considering their role and purpose,' she said. 'This has been a difficult area, but in establishing the Network, we have found we can learn from each other and better define the approach. 'We are not simply institutions that record history, but experts in determining how history should be collected, interpreted and shared. 'We look forward to continuing to leverage this collective expertise across this new project.' Dr Paul Mullan, director of Northern Ireland at The National Lottery Heritage Fund, added: 'We recognise that dealing with contested history can be challenging, but as our ongoing investment in reconciliation projects demonstrates, it's important that work to build greater understanding of the legacy of conflict is acknowledged. 'It's thanks to National Lottery players that this meaningful project by the Conflict and Legacy Interpretive Network has the potential to connect with communities across the region and beyond, and demonstrate how important continued dialogue about the past is in building a better future.'' The Conflict and Legacy Interpretive Network exhibit will remain on display at Ulster Museum until the end of the year.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Fears Her Daughter-In-Law 'Clearly Hates' Her After Noticing How Little She's Visited Since the Year Began
A woman said her daughter-in-law "clearly hates" her as she hasn't visited since Christmas In a Mumsnet post on June 23, she questioned if her daughter-in-law should be accompanying her son on routine visits "No children yet, but I suspect in the very near future and I am already upset thinking about how little she will want the children to visit,' the woman frettedA mother is in turmoil over her relationship with her daughter-in-law. On Monday, June 23, the mom wrote a Mumsnet post explaining why she's convinced that her daughter-in-law 'hates' her. She said it's been months since they last saw each other and even that was only because her daughter-in-law and son visited for Christmas. 'I just don't know if we're expecting too much, thinking she should visit more when [our] son does,' the mother wrote. 'No children yet, but I suspect in the very near future and I am already upset thinking about how little she will want the children to visit,' she added. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The mom asked commenters to share how often their child's spouses visit and if they expect them to always come together. 'Speaking as a DIL [daughter-in-law], when my PILs [parents-in-law] were in good health, we used to visit them as a family (me and DH [dear husband] and our DC [dear children]) once every couple of months,' one person wrote. 'Then FIL died 18 months ago and MIL is in poor health and needs more support. So now DH goes more frequently than we used to, but usually on his own. Similarly, I do the lion's share when it comes to supporting my parents.' Another commented, 'I was in a relationship with or married to DH for 12 years before his mother died. I never met her, even when we lived 90 mins away and DH went to visit. I finally met his father last year (parents were still together).' A third said, 'I like my MIL very much. I don't go every time my DH goes (live in same city) but often do and she comes to us too. I am not possessive over the kids so if he wants to take them and I can't go/want to do something else, that's fine. Same goes for my mum.' Sharing practical advice, another wrote, 'She doesn't have to like you, I'm afraid. As long as she isn't actually rude to you, you can't complain. She may not actively dislike you, you may just not be her kind of person. Don't nag her or your son unless you want to see him less than you do.' is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! Several responses to the post quizzed the mom on whether she had any other reasons why her daughter-in-law might hate her other than the lack of visits. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! The mother commented that she's never been invited to her son and daughter-in-law's home because they are always 'busy.' 'I was always closest to DS [dear son] as he lived with me the longest! Not anymore. I don't treat the others differently, if anything DS was the baby!' the mom wrote. 'I am closer to my other DIL because they invite me over and I can go and stay the weekend with them, that isn't my fault. 'There was a minor confusion about something before they got married which was my fault and I took responsibility for but I know she's taken that as a reason to hate me,' the mom continued. 'She wasn't bothered about me before then though, just used it as a reason. "When DS lived with me she would pop over all of the time and be very chatty and spend ages talking to me. As soon as he moved out she just wasn't bothered anymore," she added. Read the original article on People
