Readers weigh in on controversy over Tesla vandalism, Medi-Cal funding in California
1. Trump was elected because of financial support of Musk. Harris outspent Trump 3 to 1 and still lost. Maybe a poor candidate choice was to blame.
2. Ending phone access to Social Security so seniors with walkers have to travel to an office. Completely false.
Starting on April 18, people applying for retirement, survivor or family benefits will need to use an online account or make an appointment at an office to show proof of identity. Applicants for Disability Insurance, Supplemental Income or Medicare can still do so by phone. These are steps to stop massive fraud.
3. Trump had Tesla's parked on White House lawn. Biden in 2021 drove a Jeep Wrangler EV on the White House lawn to promote EV sales. He didn't invite Tesla. Do you think the car manufacturers made any donations to Biden?
Opinion
Maybe the op-ed should have focused more on the title. Chastising people threatening Tesla drivers, Democrats, Republican and independent people all drive these cars and should do so without fear.
I hope your wife feels safe and does enjoy the new Toyota. I hope it was at least a hybrid.
Mike Killus, Visalia
'San Joaquin Valley children will be first impacted by politicians slashing Medi-Cal | Opinion' (fresnobee.com, April 1)
Kaweah Health appreciates the recent article highlighting the critical role Medi-Cal plays in ensuring access to healthcare for the community. However, it is important to correct the inaccurate financial figures presented in the piece.
Medi-Cal is an essential source of funding for Kaweah Health, comprising more than 30% of its revenue. Ensuring adequate Medi-Cal reimbursement is crucial to sustaining high-quality care for patients. Kaweah Health fully supports efforts to prevent cuts to Medi-Cal funding, as such reductions would have a devastating impact not only on the organization but on the entire healthcare system in the region.
That said, the financial losses reported in the article are significantly overstated. While Kaweah Health, like many California hospitals, continues to experience financial challenges, the current situation is not as dire as the article suggested. As of Feb. 28, eight months into our current fiscal year, Kaweah Health's year-to-date, cumulative operating loss was $16 million, with a budgeted $12 million operating loss expected by year-end. Further financial performance improvement is expected in the coming months.
A dialogue on the financial challenges facing hospitals is welcomed, but such discussions must be based on accurate data. Kaweah Health does have financial challenges, but they are not at the crisis level suggested in the article.
Gary Herbst, Kaweah Health Hospital CEO
'Thousands march on Cesar Chavez Day for immigrant rights in Central California' (fresnobee.com, April 1)
The recent outpouring of articles and editorials commemorating Cesar Chavez Day all neglected to mention one notable factor in the great man's bio: Both Chavez and his elderly mother were long-time vegetarians for ethical and moral (not health) reasons, he once told me.
Chavez was a champion of the downtrodden, human and non-human alike; many believe he deserves a national holiday. Consider this excerpt from a treasured December 1990 letter he wrote to me:
'Kindness and compassion towards all living things is a mark of a civilized society. Conversely, cruelty, whether it is directed against human beings or against animals, is not the exclusive province of any one culture or community of people. Racism, economic deprival, dog fighting and cock fighting, bullfighting and rodeos are cut from the same fabric: violence. Only when we have become nonviolent towards all life will we have learned to live well ourselves.'
Words to live by. Sí se puede!
Eric Mills, Oakland
A friend visiting from the Bay Area parked his car outside my house, only to find the window shattered this morning. His crime? He drives a Tesla. Keep in mind he purchased this car when Musk was being hailed a genius, long before he became involved in our government.
Don't you understand this will have no impact on Musk's life, as my friend is the one who will have to pay thousands to have his car repaired. We are becoming a nation of lemmings, where people will run off a cliff simply because the person in front of him has, without any thought of the repercussions. We are a bunch of mindless followers.
To the perpetrator of this crime, ask yourself, how did this hurt Musk? More to the point, how did this cowardly act improve your life? You'll be like those individuals who were tried for the Jan. 6 insurgency, who apologized to the judge, saying they got caught up in the feeding frenzy and followed the mob. In hindsight, they realized their actions were wrong. I hope one day you will come to the same conclusion.
Bill Allen, Fresno
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
National Guard in DC May End Up Carrying Weapons—Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., have been told they should prepare to carry weapons in the nation's capital despite previous assurances from officials that the troops would not be armed, according to a Saturday report by The Wall Street Journal. When reached for comment, the D.C. Army National Guard told Newsweek that "Guard members may be armed consistent with their mission and training." Newsweek reached out to the White House by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday afternoon for comment. The Pentagon directed Newsweek to speak with the Washington Guard when reached by email for comment. Meanwhile, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's office told Newsweek it had no comment at this time. Why It Matters President Donald Trump ordered 800 National Guard troops to deploy to Washington, with the troops arriving on Tuesday. The deployment aims to combat crime in the city, even as crime rates have reached a 30-year low, marking one of the most aggressive federal interventions in local law enforcement in recent history. The deployment has prompted strong backlash due to the fact the administration bypassed the city's elected leaders, who have variously described Trump's directive as "unsettling," "unprecedented" and "dangerous." Washington officials sued the administration to block the federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), which prompted U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to issue a memo that leaves the current police chief in charge of the department but also directs the police to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, the Associated Press reported. Anti-Trump protesters demonstrate near U.S. National Guard members at Union Station in Washington, D.C., on August 15. Anti-Trump protesters demonstrate near U.S. National Guard members at Union Station in Washington, D.C., on August 15. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Administration officials had previously said the National Guard would not carry weapons, and troops who have already made the rounds on patrol around the city have done so without carrying them. The Journal, citing people familiar with the plan, reported on Saturday that those troops were told on Friday evening they should expect an order to carry weapons. As of Saturday afternoon, no formal order had been issued. A White House official told the Journal that additional troops may be called to D.C., and they may be armed, but they would not be making any arrests. The Army had stressed the lack of weapons in a press release issued Thursday, writing that the troops were deployed to "provide a visible presence in key public areas, serving as a visible crime deterrent." "They will not arrest, search, or direct law enforcement," the Army wrote. "While they will not conduct arrests, they have the authority to temporarily detain individuals to prevent imminent harm, ensuring that custody is promptly transferred to law enforcement authorities." Most notably, the Army wrote that the troops would be equipped with personal protective equipment (PPE), including body armor, and that "weapons are available if needed but will remain in the armory," while noting that "future requirements will be assessed and determined based on the evolving needs of the supported law enforcement agencies." The shifting framework highlights the tension in the capital and the unease between the administration and local officials. Bondi in her Friday notice wrote of the responses from Washington officials, saying that "unfortunately, the D.C. Attorney General continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety in Washington, D.C.," in contrast to Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser, "who is dedicated to ensuring the safety of residents, workers, and visitors in Washington, D.C." What People Are Saying Captain Tinashe T. Machona, a spokesperson for the D.C. Army National Guard, told Newsweek in an email statement: "Guard members may be armed consistent with their mission and training. Their presence is focused on supporting civil authorities and ensuring the safety of the community they serve. The DC National Guard remains committed to assisting the District of Columbia and serving its residents and visitors whenever called upon." U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi on Friday wrote on X: "I have just issued a new directive to Mayor Bowser requiring MPD to provide the services found necessary by my designee, DEA Administrator Terry Cole, to comply fully and completely with federal immigration law and authorities, regardless of any policies MPD might otherwise have." "Unfortunately, the D.C. Attorney General continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety in Washington, DC. It is important to note that this same D.C. Attorney General is responsible for failing to enforce consequences for dangerous juvenile offenders," Bondi wrote. "We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser, who is dedicated to ensuring the safety of residents, workers, and visitors in Washington, D.C." D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser in an open letter to city residents this week, in part: "...Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across D.C. has created waves of anxiety. I was born one year after Home Rule became law, and while our autonomy has been challenged before, our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now. My jobs are many right now. Part of my job is just managing us through this crisis and making sure that our government continues to operate in a way that makes DC residents proud." ...In fact, this evening, I am pleased to be able to report that, after a day in court and in accordance with Home rule, Pamela Smith remains our Chief of Police, and command and control of our 3,100 men and women at the Metropolitan Police Department. I am incredibly proud of how the chief has handled this experience." She concluded: "...I know that if we keep sticking together, we will make it to the other side of this, we will make future generations of Washingtonians proud, we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy—even when we don't have full access to it."
CNBC
2 minutes ago
- CNBC
West Virginia governor deploys hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey announced Saturday that he is deploying members of the West Virginia National Guard to Washington, D.C., in support of the Trump administration's efforts to ramp up a military presence in the nation's capital. Morrisey's office said that the National Guard mobilization will include 300-400 troops, plus "mission-essential equipment" and "specialized training." "West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital," Morrisey, a Republican, said in a statement. "The men and women of our National Guard represent the best of our state, and this mission reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America." The statement also said Morrisey's decision to deploy his state's National Guard came after a request from the Trump administration and that the troops would be operating under the command of West Virginia's adjutant general, Maj. Gen. Jim Seward. In a statement, a White House official confirmed that the national guardsman had been called to D.C., saying, "As part of President Trump's ongoing effort to make D.C. safe and beautiful, additional National Guard troops will be called in to Washington DC — the National Guard's role has not changed. The National Guard will protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime." The governor's move comes just days after President Donald Trump announced that he was deploying 800 members of the National Guard to D.C. and directing federal law enforcement agents to assist local police with patrolling and executing warrants in the city. Trump's stated aim of cracking down on crime in Washington comes as crime rates in the city are at their lowest levels in decades. Washington residents almost immediately began to notice an increase in law enforcement on the streets, as local police and federal law enforcement set up checkpoints in neighborhoods across the city. Residents and tourists also noticed the increased presence of military and law enforcement around tourist-heavy areas like Union Station and the National Mall. Initially, Attorney General Pam Bondi sought to take over control of the Metropolitan Police Department, but backed down after the city sued the Trump administration. Chief Pamela Smith remains in day-to-day control of the city's police force. Democrats have slammed the president's decision, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries calling the move earlier this week "illegitimate" and an "unjustified power grab."
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Backs Off Cease-Fire Demand in Ukraine War, Aligning With Putin
After their summit in Alaska, President Trump sided on Saturday with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, adopting Mr. Putin's preference for pursuing a sweeping peace agreement based on Ukraine's ceding unconquered territory to Russia instead of the urgent cease-fire Mr. Trump had said he wanted before the meeting. The change could give Russia an advantage in talks to end the fighting, which are due to continue on Monday when President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine visits the White House. It would also be a break from the strategy that Mr. Trump and European allies, as well as Mr. Zelensky, had agreed to before the U.S.-Russia summit in Alaska, and it provoked a chilly reception in Europe, where leaders have time and again seen Mr. Trump reverse positions on Ukraine after speaking with Mr. Putin. Mr. Trump wrote on social media early on Saturday that he had spoken by phone to Mr. Zelensky and other European leaders after his meeting with Mr. Putin. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up,' Mr. Trump posted. Mr. Trump told European leaders that he believed a rapid peace deal could be negotiated if Mr. Zelensky agreed to cede the rest of the eastern Donbas region to Russia, even those areas not occupied by Russian troops, according to two senior European officials briefed on the call. In return, Mr. Putin offered a cease-fire in the rest of Ukraine at current battle lines and a written promise not to attack Ukraine or any European country again, the senior officials said. Mr. Putin has broken similar promises before. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a private conversation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
