Crypto's Newest Stablecoin Is Inflation-Linked Bond Alternative
(Bloomberg) -- A new cryptocurrency aims to occupy the final frontier of investor safety — cash that doesn't lose purchasing power to inflation.
How Did This Suburb Figure Out Mass Transit?
Even Oslo Has an Air Quality Problem
NYC Tourist Helicopter Crashes in Hudson River, Killing Six
Lisbon Mayor Wants Companies to Help Fix City's Housing Shortage
$15 Million Fund Bets Leadership Training Can Improve Chicago Policing
USDi, being launched by two veterans of US inflation-protected and foreign-exchange derivatives, is a dollar tracking stablecoin whose value is determined by the increase in the US consumer price index since December 2024. On April 15, it was $1.00863.
Inflation protection in US markets has been available to investors since 1997 via Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS — government bonds whose principal is indexed to the US consumer price index, or CPI. But as bonds, they're subject to losses when interest rates rise, an outcome that took by surprise some of the investors who piled into TIPS ETFs as inflation accelerated in 2021.
USDi is comparable to TIPS principal or, theoretically, to an inflation-protected savings account, if such a thing existed, according to Michael Ashton, who began his career in inflation-protected investing at Barclays Plc in the early 2000s.
'The riskless asset doesn't actually currently exist, and that's inflation-linked cash,' Ashton said. 'Holding cash is an option on future opportunities, and the cost of that option is inflation. If you create inflation-linked cash, that's the end of the risk line.'
As described by USDi Partners LLC in a statement, the token will have as much purchasing power as the dollar did in December 2024. USDi will mint and burn the coin at its stated value, which, like TIPS principal, will be a function of that day's CPI.
While the government publishes CPI only once a month, it interpolates daily values that TIPS investors use to calculate accrued interest. CPI values determine TIPS and USDi index values with a two-month lag, meaning that the December CPI maps to March 1, and values have been published through May 31. The April 15 value of USDi is calculated by dividing that day's CPI — interpolated between the January and February monthly values — by the December CPI, which will always be the denominator in the equation.
It's different in that sense from stablecoins whose value is pegged to the dollar — of which there are dozens, with combined market value exceeding $200 billion. Initially they were used primarily as a conduit for trading other cryptocurrencies. Newer tokens have been created for use as collateral.
'It's a coin that is stable in real space,' Ashton says. Real, as in the real GDP figures that measure US economic growth, means adjusted for inflation.
The inspiration for the product comes from Chile's unidad de fomento, an accounting unit indexed to the country's price level since 1967. Used in contracts to insulate the sums involved from inflation, the UF is a non-circulating currency.
USDi, by contrast, will be backed by a reserve fund that Ashton will manage in parallel to the Enduring US Inflation Tracking fund he's been running for accredited investors since October 2021. The fund holds TIPS, regular US Treasury debt, foreign exchange and commodity futures and options. It doesn't use leverage.
The fund, administered by Trident Fund Management, returned an annualized 4.48% over the three years ended in March, with a median monthly return exceeding the CPI by 15 basis points, according to Ashton.
In contrast to algorithmic tokens, whose value depends on the assets that back them, USDi's reserve fund isn't staked to a blockchain, and the value of the coin is unrelated to how the assets perform, Ashton said. Rather, the coin is a primary obligation of USDi Partners, whose other assets would be available in the event that everyone cashed out and the reserve fund assets were exhausted, he said.
'The value here is derived from real-world assets earning real-world returns, not from the blockchain itself,' he said. Nor is the value of the coin tied to value of the assets, rather, 'it depends on the exogenous march of CPI.'
As a practical matter, that means the backers will mint or burn USDi at its daily value, less a transaction fee between zero and 1 basis point depending on size. That will be true regardless of the coin's market capitalization, which will have no initial minimum.
USDi Partners will mint and burn coins for institutions in exchange for dollars. The token will be available to accredited investors from approved market-making firms, which haven't been named yet, that are able to mint and burn it directly. On those platforms USDi will be exchangeable for USDC, the dollar stablecoin managed by Circle Internet Financial Group. It will trade on the Ethereum blockchain.
Ashton's partner in the venture is Andrew Fately, who began a four-decade career in foreign exchange options in the early 1980s. It included long stints at Lehman Brothers and Barclays, advising corporate clients on use of options to hedge their cash flows.
USDi is a comparable project in the sense that it 'is kind of like an exchange rate,' Fately said. 'The exchange rate in your life is time-based. At any given point in time you estimate as your base rate, as prices rise, your personal exchange rate is devaluing.'
Ashton says USDi has the potential to solve a problem he's been obsessed with since at least 2004, when as head of inflation derivatives at Barclays he presented at a conference a way in which TIPS could be disaggregated such that investors could buy inflation protection against a subset of the CPI they were most exposed to, as opposed to the entire index.
For example, one could theoretically buy protection against inflation in medical care or college tuition. It never happened because there wasn't enough demand for the other pieces of the CPI basket.
In traditional finance, Ashton said, 'you have to be able to sell all the pieces.' In crypto, if USDi is split into all the components of the CPI, and their combined price is less than than the coin's value, 'we'll take them and give you USDi back. Joint arbitrage limits how ridiculous the price can get.'
The Beauty Salon Recession Indicator
GM's Mary Barra Has to Make a $35 Billion EV Bet Work in Trump's America
Trump Is Firing the Wrong People, on Purpose
Cheap Consumer Goods Are the American Dream, Actually
How Mar-a-Lago Memberships Explain Trump's Tariff Obsession
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves braced for OBR forecasts to blow £20bn hole in tax and spending plans
Rachel Reeves is braced for revised forecasts by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to blow a £20bn hole in her tax and spending plans before the autumn budget. Even without changing the totals the chancellor set out in her spending review on Wednesday, a weaker forecast from the the Treasury's independent watchdog could force her to find significantly more money at the budget to meet her 'non-negotiable' fiscal rules. Reeves has said repeatedly that flexing her fiscal rules – designed to provide certainty over UK public finances – is not an option even if the economic outlook deteriorates. At her spring statement, she left herself on course to meet those rules with less than £10bn of headroom to spare, on a total budget for day-to-day spending of more than £1.3tn. Amid trepidation at the Treasury, the OBR has kicked off its annual summer review of the 'supply side' of the economy – including productivity, which it has consistently overestimated. Sources with knowledge of the OBR's thinking told the Guardian that the watchdog was 'uncomfortable', with the fact its current forecast for productivity growth was more positive than the consensus from other economic forecasters, and wanted to 'rein it in'. Productivity is one of the key determinants of economic growth, and revising it down would have a significant knock on effect on the OBR's forecasts for gross domestic product. The consultancy Oxford Economics estimates that moving the productivity forecast back in line with the average independent projection, would knock 1.4% off forecast GDP at the end of the OBR's five-year forecast period. That would force Reeves to increase taxes or cut spending by an eye-watering £20bn, to meet her fiscal rules and maintain her slim £10bn of headroom. That would be roughly equivalent to raising both the main and higher rates of income tax by 2p. A more cautious approach, taking the middle path between two alternative 'scenarios' the OBR set out in its March economic and financial outlook, could still force the chancellor to make a £12bn correction. The OBR could send an early signal of its intention to revisit its productivity outlook as soon as 1 July, in its regular forecast evaluation report. Andy King, a former member of the OBR's budget responsibility committee, now at the consultancy Flint Global, said: 'The reason why anyone in the Treasury who cares about this will be worried, is that the OBR is currently more optimistic than everyone else. 'What can happen next? Either everyone else thinks, 'We're too pessimistic'; or the OBR thinks, 'We are too far away from the pack, there's been more bad news than good since March, we should revise down.' I think that's the expectation for many.' The Treasury is likely to point the OBR to policies it hopes will be positive for productivity growth in the long term, including infrastructure investment, though the scale of this was already known before the OBR's last forecast in March. Alongside weaker productivity, slower net migration as a result of the government's recent white paper could also prompt the OBR to be more pessimistic. James Smith an economist at ING, said: 'Further downgrades to trend productivity growth projections, as well as net migration, mean the chancellor is likely in the red, before even considering the mounting pressures on the public purse. 'The overall shortfall may amount to at least £20bn, and that means tax rises are highly likely.' Adrian Pabst, the deputy director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, said the prospect of another significant forecast revision underlined the current instability of tax and spend policy. 'We're in this vicious circle where we've got these fiscal rules, then the OBR have to take a view, because that's their remit, that's their mandate; and then we're constantly speculating about what is going to happen at the next fiscal event,' he said, adding: 'It's not a good place for fiscal policy to be.' In a recent speech, Reeves said: 'Strong and transparent fiscal rules are an indispensable safeguard for working people – and that is why my rules are non-negotiable.' The Treasury declined to comment on the prospect of an OBR growth downgrade but underlined Reeves's determination to stick to her fiscal rules. The OBR declined to comment.


New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
The Israel-Iran conflict is shaking the markets — but nervous investors aren't panicking
Wall Street's myopia was on full display in the immediate aftermath of the Israeli airstrikes against Iran. Many of us were worried about the possibility of World War III as we saw the attacks almost in real time Thursday night. Many of my sources were trying to gauge impacts on the Dow, oil prices and interest rates. Advertisement You can make a good case that there is a place for such shortsightedness. Leave the far-reaching geopolitical analysis to those who are better equipped to game-plan those outcomes, and the investor class should stay in its lane. People still have to save for retirement, invest those savings, even if the Middle East is imploding. Advertisement That said, the Wall Street take on the contretemps is certainly worth dissecting. You can glean, if you look through the conflict's short-term impact on specific pieces of economic data and push the smart money on their meaning, some interesting broader conclusions about how the Israel-Iran conflict will ultimately shake out. The market's top-line response was muddled. Stocks initially sold off sharply, then came back only to tank into the close as Iran retaliated against Tel Aviv. Advertisement Oil prices — which are always sensitive to conflicts in the Middle East — jumped about 7%. But we've all seen worse on less existentially serious stuff. The Dow closed down less than 800 points; the rollout of the Trump tariff plan — before Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent began putting the old genie back in the bottle to prevent an economic meltdown — saw far more wild moves in all sorts of investments. When the trade war was raging, bond prices at one point tanked so much, you would think we were on the verge of the apocalypse. Advertisement On Friday, the 10-year bond yield rose but is still below 4.5%, meaning people weren't rushing to the safe haven of Treasuries to plan for the worst. Gold rallied, but it's been running hot for weeks amid the fears of tariff-induced inflation. Not panicking In other words, it seems like investors are nervous, but also they're not panicking because something good could follow something scary. Namely, Israel neutered not just a foe that is developing nukes and threatening its destruction. It also has degraded the world's most aggressively belligerent nation — the leading state sponsor of terrorism — by decapitating much of Iran's military leadership, key scientists that were on the verge of developing nukes, as well as large swaths of its armed forces. In saving itself, Israel did us all a favor — even the Arab world, much of which abhors Iran's destabilizing militarism. For investors, it could mean at the very least lower energy prices in the future. Rich Arab countries finally might agree to recognize Israel, and the investment opportunities that will bring. Advertisement I know saying the conflict could be long-term good for the markets sounds ignorant given what's at stake. But life isn't mostly binary. Fortunately in this case, what's good for stocks could be good for the world. Of course, one day in the market is just one day. Advertisement So much more will happen. Israel says it's not done with its military action. Iran retaliated, landing missiles in the heart of Tel Aviv after a first wave of deadly drones was largely swatted away by Israel's defenses. Advertisement I have family in Israel so I pray for their safety as I've done almost every day since Oct. 7. US military installations could be attacked. But some of my trading desk sources are pointing out that Israel seems to have its game plan down pretty solid, and the Iranian attack against us would be foolish since it already has its hands full. The Israelis knew who to take out — the generals and scientists — and it clearly knew how Iran could respond. It has already largely eliminated Iran's proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas. Advertisement Notice how Israel didn't take out Iran's oil infrastructure, at least not yet. If it did, oil prices would be higher and markets far more volatile. And maybe Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is betting on the Iranian people. I've never been to Iran, but I know plenty of Iranian Americans. They tell me the country is largely secular, run by a fanatical minority that Israel might be weakening significantly. This could be the push for regime change that we've been talking about for years. Trump kept in the loop President Trump here has been at his best, my Wall Street sources remind me, another reason they're not panic-selling. Israel kept him in the loop. He alerted the world that the attacks would happen Thursday. He then began distancing himself and our country from the direct conflict, while prodding Iran to get back to the negotiating table and end its nukes program. Who knows, they might finally listen. Wall Street is always looking for 'black swan' events — stuff most people don't see that could lead to catastrophic market results. Wars are terrible. It would be great if Iran chose peace, but maybe eliminating it as a threat to Israel and a lot more is a black swan that produces some long-term peace and prosperity. Let's hope so and pray for the peace dividend it should deliver.


New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
DC's new $500K private club The Executive Branch launches
On Friday night, tech billionaires and cabinet secretaries celebrated the opening of Washington, DC's 'The Executive Branch' — the members-only club co-founded by Donald Trump Jr. and 1789 Capital partner Omeed Malik Trump Jr. and Malik hosted the party for founding members who paid a $500,000 initiation fee, with their co-founders: 1789 partner Christopher Buskirk and Alex and Zach Witkoff, the sons of Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. While the president was not in attendance, Witkoff was, along with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, PayPal mafia member Keith Rabois, crypto billionaires Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, New York Jets owner Woody Johnson and Dr. Oz. Advertisement 4 The Executive Branch's Omeed Malik and Donald Trump Jr. and their co-founders wanted to create a MAGA-friendly haven in Washington, DC AFP via Getty Images From the Trump administration, crypto and AI czar David Sacks, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent were spotted, as well as Attorney General Pam Bondi, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. In September, the Executive Branch will open to its new members with a $150,000 initiation fee and annual dues of $15,000. Advertisement Caviar, champagne and lobster were plentiful Friday, with one attendee describing it as a 'Gilded Age' experience. The club's menu is said to be MAHA-approved, with the chef using beef tallow in lieu of seed oils. I'm told several former Navy SEALs have been hired to handle security full-time. 4 Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attended the club's opening Friday along with a host of other cabinet members. REUTERS Advertisement Other opening-night guests included newly minted Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth Jacob Helberg, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, UAE ambassador to the US Yousef Al Otaiba, and Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer. Also on hand: Deputy Chiefs of Staff Taylor Budowich, Dan Scavino and James Blair; FHFA Director Bill Pulte; Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski; and Emil Michael, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. Notably absent were members of the media, whose presence is strictly forbidden. Adding to that layer of secrecy, no photos are allowed and stickers must cover phone cameras. 4 The Executive Branch is located in the former home of Georgetown's The Clubhouse, and the founders redesigned the space to include millions of artwork. Google Maps Advertisement Malik said he sees it as an extension of his existing work investing in the parallel economy. The club 'is the first of its kind in Washington, DC — there is nothing else like it,' Malik told me. 'It's consistent with our efforts at 1789 to invest in the parallel economy or, in this place, creating an entirely new experience.' He also said they want the Executive Branch to be a haven for members and are extremely cautious about not admitting members who may not be aligned with their values. 4 Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang attended the opening of the Executive Branch. Getty Images Private club The Ned also opened in DC earlier this year, albeit to a far less curated group who pay just $5,000 in initiation fees and $5,000 for membership. But while The Ned is near the Capitol and attracts an overwhelming group of politicos, The Executive Branch is Georgetown. Its Wisconsin Avenue address was formerly home to The Clubhouse, a bar that was a favorite of billionaires and world leaders. The co-founders renovated the space and added more than 10-million-dollars' worth of art, including 'a stunning array of original oil paintings and bronze sculptures celebrating US stories of bravery, service and politics,' as well as oil paintings of the club's founding class.