
Zelensky ‘prepared to cede territory' held by Russia ahead of Alaska summit
This would mean freezing the frontline where it is and handing Russia de-facto control of the territory it occupies in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea. The softening of the negotiating position comes ahead of crunch talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska this Friday.
'The plan can only be related to the current positions held by the militaries,' a Western official said, characterising a frantic weekend of diplomacy between Kyiv and its allies.
Ukraine and Europe have become increasingly concerned that Mr Trump and Putin could negotiate an end to the long-running war over Mr Zelensky's head.
'I have many fears and a lot of hope,' Poland's prime minister, Donald Tusk, said yesterday. He said US officials had pledged to consult European leaders ahead of the face-to-face talks in Alaska.
Chief among European concerns was a purported peace plan endorsed by Moscow, which included freezing the front lines in south-eastern Ukraine if Kyiv agrees to withdraw from areas of Donetsk and Luhansk that it controls.
European capitals have opted to back Kyiv's vision for any territorial swaps in an attempt to convince Mr Trump that there is diplomatic weight behind a single 'Ukraine plus Europe' red line that rejects concessions for Ukrainian-held land.
'Europeans now understand their role as supportive of Ukraine in terms of the diplomatic negotiations,' the Western official said.
'It's a boost for morale, it's also strengthening the diplomatic positions of Ukraine so that it doesn't feel alone.'
At a news conference yesterday, Mr Tusk said: 'For Poland and our partners, it is clear that state borders cannot be changed by force.
'Russia's war with Ukraine must not bring benefits to the aggressor.'
France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Friedrich Merz issued similar statements in support of a hardline approach to territorial concessions over the weekend.
A joint declaration by the leaders of the European Commission, France, Italy, the UK, Poland and Finland said that 'the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations'.
European leaders are expected to hold talks with the US president tomorrow to make their case to him.
This doesn't exclude Mr Zelensky from taking the tough decision to cede territory already in the hands of Russia's invasion forces.
European officials believe the Ukrainian president has leeway with a growing number of voters who would stomach surrendering land to Moscow as the price for the end of the war.
Mr Trump claimed that he would know 'in the first two minutes' of his upcoming meeting with Putin if a peace deal could be reached between Russia and Ukraine.
'We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made,' the president told reporters at a press conference yesterday.
Asked how he would know, the president replied: 'Because that's what I do. I make deals.'
However, Mr Trump later appeared to contradict himself, after saying that it was 'not up to him' if a deal was made or not.
'I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal.
'I think a deal should be made for both,' he said.
Mr Trump briefly appeared to forget the location of the meeting, telling reporters at the press conference that he would be travelling to Russia.
He added that Mr Zelensky 'could' attend, but also appeared to question if it would help a deal be reached.
'He wasn't a part of it,' Mr Trump said, speaking about the setting up of the talks.
'I would say he could go, but he's been to a lot of meetings. You know, he's been there for three and a half years. Nothing happened.'
He added that, should a 'fair' deal be reached, he would inform the European Union as well as Mr Zelensky, who he would call first 'out of respect'.
'And I may say, 'lots of luck, keep fighting.' Or I may say 'we can make a deal,' he said.
(© Telegraph Media Group Holdings Ltd)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
28 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
National Guard troops arrive in Washington DC after Trump order
Members of the National Guard have arrived in Washington DC a day after US President Donald Trump announced he was deploying 800 troops to the capital and temporarily taking over the city's police department. The president cast his actions as necessary to "rescue" Washington from a purported wave of lawlessness. Statistics show that violent crime shot up in 2023 but has been rapidly declining since. It is the second time this summer that the Republican president has deployed troops to a city governed by Democrats. A federal trial began yesterday in San Francisco on whether Mr Trump violated US law by deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom. "Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals," Mr Trump said yesterday. The Republican president has dismissed criticism that he is manufacturing a crisis to justify expanding presidential authority in a heavily Democratic city. Hundreds of officers and agents from over a dozen federal agencies, including the FBI, ICE, DEA and ATF, have fanned out across the city in recent days. Mr Trump said he would also send in the US military "if needed". The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has pushed back on Mr Trump's claims that the city is a "hellscape", saying it is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime fell 26% in the first seven months of 2025 after dropping 35% in 2024, and overall crime dropped 7%, according to the city's police department. Over the past week, Mr Trump has intensified his messaging, suggesting he might attempt to strip the city of its local autonomy and implement a full federal takeover. The District of Columbia, established in 1790, operates under the Home Rule Act, which gives Congress ultimate authority but allows residents to elect a mayor and city council. Mr Trump said last week that lawyers are examining how to overturn the law, a move that would likely require Congress to revoke it. In taking over the Metropolitan Police Department, Mr Trump invoked a section of the act that allows the president to use the force temporarily when "special conditions of an emergency nature" exist. Mr Trump said he was declaring a "public safety emergency" in the city. The deployment of National Guard troops is a tactic the president used in Los Angeles, where he dispatched 5,000 troops in June in response to protests over his administration's immigration raids. State and local officials objected to Mr Trump's decision as unnecessary and inflammatory.


RTÉ News
28 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
What deal might emerge from the Trump-Putin summit?
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky plan to speak with Mr Trump tomorrow amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. What kind of deal could emerge from summit? Mr Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior US diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Mr Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Mr Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Mr Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Mr Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Mr Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Mr Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Mr Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Mr Putin. What if Ukraine objects to any Trump-Putin deal? Mr Trump would face strong resistance from Mr Zelensky and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Mr Zelensky says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Mr Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Mr Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy US weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of US intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. How might a deal affect Trump's support at home? There would be big political risks in the US for Mr Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former US ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice" in Putin's attack on Ukraine. "I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure," he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Mr Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. How might Ukraine's European allies respond? EU member states have said that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form."


Irish Times
42 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Rose of Tralee: Roses use their platform to discuss health issues
US president Donald Trump has said that he could meet with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin "very soon" for talks over Ukraine. Video: Reuters