Bitcoin hits record high
Bitcoin hit a record high on Thursday during early Asian trading, surpassing $124,000, driven by favourable US legislation and a rise in US equities.
The cryptocurrency rose above its previous July record, briefly exceeding $124,500 before retreating.
US stocks ended higher Wednesday, with the S&P 500 index and the tech-heavy Nasdaq reaching new heights this week, contributing to the cryptocurrency's rise.
Bitcoin's value has recently soared, fuelled by US regulatory changes under US President Donald Trump, a strong backer of the crypto sector.
Its price has also been boosted by large holders of cryptocurrency, referred to as "whales".
"The crypto market is enjoying a period of highly favorable fundamentals," said Samer Hasn, senior market analyst at XS.com.
"President Donald Trump has moved to end restrictions that previously prevented banks from doing business with companies flagged for reputational risk concerns, a category in which crypto firms were often unfairly placed," he added.
Trump may also be inclined to "accelerate the integration of cryptocurrencies into the national financial system and lift additional restrictions, given his and his family's growing involvement in the sector", Hasn said.
Trump's media group and Tesla, the electric carmaker owned by tech billionaire Elon Musk, are among an increasing number of companies buying huge amounts of bitcoin.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
8 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Investing in What Matters – And Avoiding What Doesn't
Recent global investor discussions have tended to focus on macro challenges, Trump tariffs, and the concentration of market value in a small number of technology companies. In addition, our Laurium Capital global equity team has spent a lot of time highlighting to investors the runway of growth benefiting electrification stocks as well as select pharmaceutical companies. In the case of the electrification investment thesis, the companies in our portfolio remain ongoing beneficiaries of positive demand growth as well as the need to renew and upgrade the existing electricity grid infrastructure as new generation sources are added and load management becomes more complex. In the pharmaceutical arena, we have been confronted with the opportunities presented by significant advances in oncology treatments as well as weight-loss drugs – the GLP-1 (or 'Ozempic') boom. These specific areas have provided for much of the content of our investor debates and discussions, and we have often expanded on this in our written market commentaries. However, there is another aspect of our work that we have hardly mentioned. This is what has been the 'missing' element from our global equity portfolio in recent periods – the areas of the global economy and stock market that we have actively avoided investing in, and why. In our case, the most noteworthy of these has been in consumer goods. In recent times, we have generally steered clear of companies that produce discretionary consumer goods and even those involved right through the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) value chain, save for some Coke bottlers and Heineken (we will touch on those later). This underweight is unusual for a fund that follows a 'quality' style-bias, as we do, where a company's strong financial health, pricing power, and enduring end-demand for the underlying product or service usually appeals to us as investors. These characteristics have often been closely associated with the large, successful FMCG and consumer blue-chips. So, what has kept us from investing a greater proportion of the portfolio in these consumer goods businesses, and why has this view been justified? The Concept of 'Over-Earning' Many consumer-focused businesses benefited from a unique, favourable confluence of events following the pandemic—boosted demand out of lockdown, limited competition, and enhanced pricing power. On this latter point, many companies used this strong inflation period to push prices up very meaningfully, in some cases well ahead of the level that customers are willing and/or able to pay. As a result, we believe that many of these discretionary goods companies (even in the luxury goods space) are now 'over-earning' relative to their long-term potential. This raises the risk of earnings normalization or even decline, which could leave valuations exposed. Cyclical and Macro Headwinds Consumers globally are grappling with higher interest rates, tighter credit, and renewed cost-of-living pressures. These factors weigh particularly heavily on discretionary spending and have started to challenge the revenue growth and margin stability of many traditional consumer goods companies. Meanwhile, elevated cost inflation continues to pressure input costs, making it more difficult for companies to maintain historical profitability levels. This pressure will be exacerbated by tariffs and trade barriers that raise the costs for the end-consumer. Structural Behaviour Shifts Consumer behaviour has been evolving. There is increasing demand for health-conscious, sustainable, and locally relevant brands, which challenges the dominance of traditional global FMCG giants. Digital-first and direct-to-consumer brands are growing in market share, and brand loyalty is no longer as dependable. Private label brands are of good quality, and easy to buy. As such, many of the previously 'defensive' brands in the consumer space may be less well-positioned for the next phase of consumer evolution. Hurdles to the Flow of Goods Ongoing global tensions have created several friction points in global trade, notably between producers in China and consumers in the US: Tariffs and protectionist policies, some originating during the first Trump administration as well as under Biden, remain in place and have expanded in scope. Strategic near-shoring and shifts in supply chains have increased costs and reduced efficiency. Immigration controls and labour shortages in certain markets have impacted production and distribution. Cultural fragmentation and regionalization are making global brand strategies more complex and costly. Taken together, these headwinds introduce structural challenges for global consumer businesses, especially those heavily reliant on scale and smooth cross-border logistics. Selective Exposure While we've generally remained underweight in consumer goods, we have made selective investments in companies like Coca-Cola bottlers and Heineken. These companies have demonstrated resilient demand, strong local execution models, and better ability to adapt to regional nuances and price ladders. Their exposure to emerging markets and beverages (a relatively defensive consumption category) makes them more attractive in the current environment and have helped the fund to deliver strong overall performance during a challenging period. DM About the Fund The Laurium Global Active Equity Fund is an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of global equities that aims to outperform the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI). The Fund is managed by Rob Oellermann, who brings extensive experience in global markets, and is supported by Laurium's broader Investment, Trading, and Quants teams. The team follows a disciplined, quality-oriented investment approach, focused on long-term value creation while remaining highly attuned to macroeconomic shifts, sector dynamics, and structural changes shaping the global landscape. The Laurium Global Active Equity Fund was launched in August 2021 and has delivered excellent performance since inception. It is up 20.3% in USD for the 12 months ended 31 July 2025, versus the MSCI All Country World Index return of 15.9%. It is available for USD and ZAR investments either directly or via select platforms. For more information, visit Disclaimer: Laurium Capital (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider (FSP 34142). Collective Investment Schemes in Securities (CIS) should be considered as medium to long-term investments. The value may go up as well as down and past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. CISs are traded at the ruling price and can engage in scrip lending and borrowing. A schedule of fees, charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the Manager. A CIS may be closed to new investors in order for it to be managed more efficiently in accordance with its mandate. There is no guarantee in respect of capital or returns in a portfolio. Performance has been calculated using net NAV to NAV numbers with income reinvested. The performance for each period shown reflects the return for investors who have been fully invested for that period. Individual investor performance may differ as a result of initial fees, the actual investment date, the date of reinvestments and dividend withholding tax. Full performance calculations are available from the manager on request. Annualised performance shows longer term performance rescaled to a 1-year period. Annualised performance is the average return per year over the period. Actual annual figures are available to the investor on request. Highest and lowest is returns for any 1 year over the period since inception have been shown. NAV is the net asset value represents the assets of a Fund less its liabilities. Prescient Management Company (RF) (Pty) Ltd is registered and approved under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act (No.45 of 2002). For any additional information such as fund prices, fees, brochures, minimum disclosure documents and application forms please go to
TimesLIVE
12 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Indian PM Modi vows to protect farmers, pushes self-reliance amid Trump tariff tensions
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged the country on Friday to move towards more self-reliance, manufacture everything from fertilisers to jet engines and EV batteries, and vowed to protect farmers in the face of a trade conflict with Washington. With the punishing tariffs imposed on Indian exports by US President Donald Trump expected to hurt growth in the world's fastest growing major economy, Modi announced lower goods and services taxes from October, a move that could help boost consumption. Modi was addressing the nation on the occasion of its Independence Day at a time New Delhi has been struggling with Trump's tariffs and the collapse of trade talks, largely due to differences over imports of American farm and dairy products. 'Farmers, fishermen and cattle rearers are our top priorities,' Modi said in his customary annual address from the ramparts of the Red Fort in New Delhi. 'Modi will stand like a wall against any policy that threatens their interests. India will never compromise when it comes to protecting the interests of our farmers,' he said. Modi did not mention the tariffs or the US in his speech that lasted nearly two hours. Last week, Trump imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil in a move that sharply escalated tensions between the two nations.
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Warren Hammond's Personal View: March 2016 Forecast 'The USA - The next 18 years' at the halfway mark
' Radical change, transformation, and upheaval ' – in a note released on March 14, 2016, I forecasted that these characteristics would define the USA's next 18 years. Nearly a decade later, the picture is clear. The forecast was designed to inform investment choices, providing a framework for regional, asset class, sector, and security selection, to ensure decisions were both well-informed and highly effective in investment selection and duration. I identified three key areas where change would be most visible and landscape-shaping: Technology Boom: Exponential, accelerating growth across all things technical. Debt Reckoning: An inevitable restructuring of finance, breaking the cycle of cheap money and debt-led consumption. Environmental Revolution: Sweeping policy changes, with water at the centre. I noted that the USA had entered a long-term pattern of radical change, transformation, innovation, and upheaval. It wasn't just policy shifts; a structural overhaul was essential to heal its dependence on cheap money, debt-led consumption, and risky investment. The political backdrop was already unconventional, and the Clinton vs. Trump race signalled that the USA had entered a non-traditional era of leadership choices, reflecting broader systemic shifts. Based solely on the characteristics of this forecast, with no personal preference or bias, The Personal View, in a separate note reiterated throughout 2016, forecast Donald Trump's first presidential win. The original note warned that while long-term results could be positive, the cycle would be marked by volatility and upheaval, especially as debt and risky investment remained 'the nectar of the Gods'. I wrote that the USA might face significant brand damage and public discredit before structural reform and overhaul could take hold. On the environmental side, I foresaw not just policy shifts but a revolution in attitudes toward managing natural resources, with water playing a pivotal role. Almost 10 years on, how close was this to today's reality? Looking ahead to 2033, will these trends continue? Remember, for The Personal View, 'expected' in the context of this forecast, was stated as being 'disorderly, disruptive, fiery, unexpected, and transformative change that upends the status quo, sweeps away what has served historically, and installs deep structural change'. In 2016, I closed the note with a challenge: 'In 18 years, we will see to what extent this view is verifiable.' At the halfway point, that question remains open and is worth asking again today. Do these trends reflect what you see unfolding in the USA? Share your perspective and join the conversation on the next 18 years of transformation. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
