Labor's debt bombshell after court ruling
The Federal Court handed down its decision on Tuesday that the method the government had been using since 2020 to calculate and collect debt was valid.
The Department of Social Services (DSS) had paused debt repatriation for social security employment checks received before 2020 as it awaited the key court judgment, but the department secretary Michael Lye said the court decision affirmed his 'legal position' and assessment activities would resume.
'Now there is certainty to the legal position, assessment activities will recommence in line with the court's decision and my obligations as secretary,' Mr Lye said.
The department could now reassess the debt of up to 160,000 people as far back as 1979, reportedly worth $1.1bn.
But the Australian Financial Review reported that government officials were aware that Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek was considering options on the overpayments, going as far as to forgive the debts. Tanya Plibersek is reportedly considering forgiving decades-old welfare debts. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
Greens questioning in senate estimates earlier this year revealed that Services Australia was chasing billions of dollars in decades-old debt.
Data showed that up to $4.9bn in unpaid debts were being pursued from more than 829,000 customers.
Ms Plibersek did not comment beyond a joint statement released with Katy Gallagher on Tuesday.
'The Albanese Labor government acknowledges the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court in Matthew Chaplin v Secretary, Department of Social Services,' the statement read.
'Income apportionment is a historical practice which ran from the early 1990s to 2020. It is not used today. It has never been used by the Albanese Labor government.
'Income apportionment was a method used by Centrelink to calculate debts in circumstances where they did not have detailed information about days and hours worked.
'This methodology reduced unreasonable reporting burdens and paperwork on welfare recipients and was a genuine misinterpretation of the law.
'The Chaplin decision has reconfirmed that the process of income apportionment was not lawful. It also confirmed that the process used to calculate debt since 2020 is valid.
'The government will now evaluate its impact and develop a suitable response.' Greens senator Penny Allman-Payne criticised the government for 'aggressively targeting' welfare recipients. NewsWire / Sarah Marshall Credit: News Corp Australia
Greens social services spokeswoman Penny Allman-Payne criticised the government for 'aggressively targeting income support recipients with cruel and ridiculous debt notices based on dubious data matching methods'.
'Income support payments are already below the poverty line, meaning thousands of income support recipients are making tough choices between skipping meals or paying the rent,' she said.
'The last thing they need is the government hounding them to disprove a dodgy debt notice, sometimes from decades ago.
'The Greens will be urging Labor to act to protect welfare recipients and finally put the Robodebt era behind us.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
12 minutes ago
- Perth Now
New MP's defiance against racist ex-PM
Ash Ambihaipahar, the high-profile successor to Linda Burney in the Sydney seat of Barton, says her electorate's namesake and Australia's first prime minister Sir Edmund Barton would not have 'envisioned' someone with her backstory. Giving her maiden speech in parliament, while Ms Ambihaipahar didn't make specific reference to Sir Edmund's policies to restrict immigration, not recognise Indigenous Australians and the promotion of white superiority, she vowed to 'stand up against racism, division and hate'. The new MP also spoke about her Papua New Guinean and Tamil-Sri Lankan heritage while noting that Sir Edmund was the 'champion of the White Australia policy'. Ash Ambihaipahar delivered her maiden speech to parliament MP on Wednesday. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Her references to Australia's contentious founding father follows recent calls to remove his statue from an Indigenous burial site in Port Macquarie, a regional NSW town. In 2020, his great-granddaughter Anne Barton also backed the campaign, describing Sir Edmund as a 'man of his time and was deeply racist'. Addressing her parliamentary colleagues, Ms Ambihaipahar said 'as the architect of Federation' Sir Edmund would have '(recognised) the work needed to forge not just a nation but a just nation'. 'While Barton championed the White Australia policy, I live and breathe multiculturalism,' she told parliamentary colleagues on Wednesday. 'I stand here because others lifted me. That's why I will always fight for antidiscrimination, for safety, for equity and unity. 'I know what it feels like to be different, to navigate different worlds. I've also seen how political tension can quickly mutate into real-world hate if not called out early.' Ms Ambihaipahar previously campaigned for the NSW state seat of Oatley with Jodie Haydon and Anna Minns. NewsWire/ Supplied Credit: NCA NewsWire In comparison to Sir Edmund, Ms Ambihaipahar described her childhood growing up in the suburb of Hurstville. She said she was 'that dark skinned little girl running through the streets of Barton who never felt out of place'. Ms Ambihaipahar also paid tribute to former minister for Indigenous Australia, Ms Burney, who retired from politics ahead of the May 3 poll and urged fellow MPs to 'ensure' this parliament is 'defined by unity, by courage and by decency'. 'Your advocacy for First Nations peoples has shaped this country's moral conscience,' she said. 'I will walk in your footsteps with awe and admiration.' Despite previously narrowly losing out on winning the NSW state seat of Oatley, Ms Ambihaipahar, who hails from the party's Left faction, was hand-picked by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to run for Barton. While the move angered Labor's Right faction, Ms Ambihaipahar retained the Labor stronghold seat and increased the margin by 4 per cent to 12 per cent.
The Advertiser
38 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
'Anti-democratic': Labor seeks controversial change to rules in the House
The Albanese government is seeking to expand the powers of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to kick MPs out of the chamber if they misbehave and reduce the number of questions Coalition members get during Question Time. Opposition manager of business in the house Alex Hawke blasted the move as "anti-democratic and not transparent." "These changes that are proposed ... are something very sneaky." The proposed changes, if passed, would empower Speaker Milton Dick to order MPs to leave the chamber for three hours, instead of one. Government leader of the house Tony Burke said when introducing a package of amendments to the standing orders, including the three-hour change under standing order 94a, that it had been a unanimous recommendation of the procedure committee, which had previously considered it in 2021. Other amendments introduced on Wednesday include changes to the number of questions to the crossbench during question time - with crossbenchers to receive more chances to speak after the first 10 questions - and amendments to the number of votes required for a full division count. Independent MPs have also questioned the proposed amendments. Warringah MP Zali Stegall introduced an amendment that sought to "clarify what constitutes disorderly conduct so that when it occurs it is not left to vague interpretation and can be quickly addressed allowing MPs to return to productive policy debate." Ms Steggall said there was "a balancing act between robust parliamentary debate and having a safe, respectful, and discrimination-free workplace." READ MORE: Mr Burke said the issue would be referred to the procedural committee. Independent MPs Helen Haines and Kate Chaney supported Ms Steggall's amendment. The Albanese government is seeking to expand the powers of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to kick MPs out of the chamber if they misbehave and reduce the number of questions Coalition members get during Question Time. Opposition manager of business in the house Alex Hawke blasted the move as "anti-democratic and not transparent." "These changes that are proposed ... are something very sneaky." The proposed changes, if passed, would empower Speaker Milton Dick to order MPs to leave the chamber for three hours, instead of one. Government leader of the house Tony Burke said when introducing a package of amendments to the standing orders, including the three-hour change under standing order 94a, that it had been a unanimous recommendation of the procedure committee, which had previously considered it in 2021. Other amendments introduced on Wednesday include changes to the number of questions to the crossbench during question time - with crossbenchers to receive more chances to speak after the first 10 questions - and amendments to the number of votes required for a full division count. Independent MPs have also questioned the proposed amendments. Warringah MP Zali Stegall introduced an amendment that sought to "clarify what constitutes disorderly conduct so that when it occurs it is not left to vague interpretation and can be quickly addressed allowing MPs to return to productive policy debate." Ms Steggall said there was "a balancing act between robust parliamentary debate and having a safe, respectful, and discrimination-free workplace." READ MORE: Mr Burke said the issue would be referred to the procedural committee. Independent MPs Helen Haines and Kate Chaney supported Ms Steggall's amendment. The Albanese government is seeking to expand the powers of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to kick MPs out of the chamber if they misbehave and reduce the number of questions Coalition members get during Question Time. Opposition manager of business in the house Alex Hawke blasted the move as "anti-democratic and not transparent." "These changes that are proposed ... are something very sneaky." The proposed changes, if passed, would empower Speaker Milton Dick to order MPs to leave the chamber for three hours, instead of one. Government leader of the house Tony Burke said when introducing a package of amendments to the standing orders, including the three-hour change under standing order 94a, that it had been a unanimous recommendation of the procedure committee, which had previously considered it in 2021. Other amendments introduced on Wednesday include changes to the number of questions to the crossbench during question time - with crossbenchers to receive more chances to speak after the first 10 questions - and amendments to the number of votes required for a full division count. Independent MPs have also questioned the proposed amendments. Warringah MP Zali Stegall introduced an amendment that sought to "clarify what constitutes disorderly conduct so that when it occurs it is not left to vague interpretation and can be quickly addressed allowing MPs to return to productive policy debate." Ms Steggall said there was "a balancing act between robust parliamentary debate and having a safe, respectful, and discrimination-free workplace." READ MORE: Mr Burke said the issue would be referred to the procedural committee. Independent MPs Helen Haines and Kate Chaney supported Ms Steggall's amendment. The Albanese government is seeking to expand the powers of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to kick MPs out of the chamber if they misbehave and reduce the number of questions Coalition members get during Question Time. Opposition manager of business in the house Alex Hawke blasted the move as "anti-democratic and not transparent." "These changes that are proposed ... are something very sneaky." The proposed changes, if passed, would empower Speaker Milton Dick to order MPs to leave the chamber for three hours, instead of one. Government leader of the house Tony Burke said when introducing a package of amendments to the standing orders, including the three-hour change under standing order 94a, that it had been a unanimous recommendation of the procedure committee, which had previously considered it in 2021. Other amendments introduced on Wednesday include changes to the number of questions to the crossbench during question time - with crossbenchers to receive more chances to speak after the first 10 questions - and amendments to the number of votes required for a full division count. Independent MPs have also questioned the proposed amendments. Warringah MP Zali Stegall introduced an amendment that sought to "clarify what constitutes disorderly conduct so that when it occurs it is not left to vague interpretation and can be quickly addressed allowing MPs to return to productive policy debate." Ms Steggall said there was "a balancing act between robust parliamentary debate and having a safe, respectful, and discrimination-free workplace." READ MORE: Mr Burke said the issue would be referred to the procedural committee. Independent MPs Helen Haines and Kate Chaney supported Ms Steggall's amendment.
The Advertiser
38 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Graduates to pocket thousands with uni debt law to pass
Laws to cut debts for university students and graduates are expected to be waved through parliament, saving people hundreds of dollars a year in repayments. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said legislation to slash HECS debts by 20 per cent and increase income thresholds before minimum repayments kick in will make the system fairer. "It means you start paying off your uni degree when uni starts to pay off for you," he said while introducing the bill to the House of Representatives on Wednesday. It is the first bill the Albanese government put before parliament at the start of its second term. People earning between $60,000 and $180,000 will save hundreds of dollars each year under the changes. Someone on $70,000 will save the most - $1300 a year - on minimum repayments due to an increase to the thresholds at which the debts must be paid back. "That's real cost-of-living help," Mr Clare said. "More money in your pocket, not the government's, when you really need it." The bill is set to sail through both houses of parliament after the opposition flagged it would support the measure. The coalition originally opposed the bill, calling it "elitist", but changed its tune after a thumping election loss in May. "We will be constructive where we can," Opposition Leader Sussan Ley told Sky News. "That doesn't mean a blank cheque of goodwill for everything that comes across the table from the Labor Party." Bruce Chapman, the architect of the HECS scheme, said the relief would make the system fairer by giving those on lower salaries more money in their pockets. But the top priority should be reviewing the price of each degree because humanities students finish with the highest level of debt and end up being the lowest-paid graduates. "All the prices are wrong," Professor Chapman told AAP. Mr Clare said further reforms were being looked at after the failure of the former Liberal government's job-ready program. The program aimed to fill skills shortages by making it cheaper to take courses like teaching, nursing and psychology, while doubling the cost of popular degrees including law, communications, business, humanities and the arts. "If the intention there was to reduce the number of people doing arts degrees, it hasn't worked," Mr Clare said. "People study the courses they're interested in, that they want to do, that they love." The universities' accord final report branded the program "deeply unfair" because it punished students who followed their interests. It recommended that fees reflect future earning potential as part of 47 recommendations to reform the sector. Other aspects about how HECS debts were paid off also needed to be addressed, Prof Chapman said. HECS repayments are taken from a person's pay slip if they're earning above an income threshold. But the money isn't immediately taken off the total debt and is instead deducted as a lump sum at the end of the financial year after indexation has been applied. The university accord recommended the arrangement be changed to make the system fairer. The Australian Tertiary Education Commission has been established in an interim capacity to implement long-term university reform and will review the HECS system over the next 12 months. Mr Clare will introduce further legislation in the coming months to set the commission up as a permanent body. Laws to cut debts for university students and graduates are expected to be waved through parliament, saving people hundreds of dollars a year in repayments. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said legislation to slash HECS debts by 20 per cent and increase income thresholds before minimum repayments kick in will make the system fairer. "It means you start paying off your uni degree when uni starts to pay off for you," he said while introducing the bill to the House of Representatives on Wednesday. It is the first bill the Albanese government put before parliament at the start of its second term. People earning between $60,000 and $180,000 will save hundreds of dollars each year under the changes. Someone on $70,000 will save the most - $1300 a year - on minimum repayments due to an increase to the thresholds at which the debts must be paid back. "That's real cost-of-living help," Mr Clare said. "More money in your pocket, not the government's, when you really need it." The bill is set to sail through both houses of parliament after the opposition flagged it would support the measure. The coalition originally opposed the bill, calling it "elitist", but changed its tune after a thumping election loss in May. "We will be constructive where we can," Opposition Leader Sussan Ley told Sky News. "That doesn't mean a blank cheque of goodwill for everything that comes across the table from the Labor Party." Bruce Chapman, the architect of the HECS scheme, said the relief would make the system fairer by giving those on lower salaries more money in their pockets. But the top priority should be reviewing the price of each degree because humanities students finish with the highest level of debt and end up being the lowest-paid graduates. "All the prices are wrong," Professor Chapman told AAP. Mr Clare said further reforms were being looked at after the failure of the former Liberal government's job-ready program. The program aimed to fill skills shortages by making it cheaper to take courses like teaching, nursing and psychology, while doubling the cost of popular degrees including law, communications, business, humanities and the arts. "If the intention there was to reduce the number of people doing arts degrees, it hasn't worked," Mr Clare said. "People study the courses they're interested in, that they want to do, that they love." The universities' accord final report branded the program "deeply unfair" because it punished students who followed their interests. It recommended that fees reflect future earning potential as part of 47 recommendations to reform the sector. Other aspects about how HECS debts were paid off also needed to be addressed, Prof Chapman said. HECS repayments are taken from a person's pay slip if they're earning above an income threshold. But the money isn't immediately taken off the total debt and is instead deducted as a lump sum at the end of the financial year after indexation has been applied. The university accord recommended the arrangement be changed to make the system fairer. The Australian Tertiary Education Commission has been established in an interim capacity to implement long-term university reform and will review the HECS system over the next 12 months. Mr Clare will introduce further legislation in the coming months to set the commission up as a permanent body. Laws to cut debts for university students and graduates are expected to be waved through parliament, saving people hundreds of dollars a year in repayments. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said legislation to slash HECS debts by 20 per cent and increase income thresholds before minimum repayments kick in will make the system fairer. "It means you start paying off your uni degree when uni starts to pay off for you," he said while introducing the bill to the House of Representatives on Wednesday. It is the first bill the Albanese government put before parliament at the start of its second term. People earning between $60,000 and $180,000 will save hundreds of dollars each year under the changes. Someone on $70,000 will save the most - $1300 a year - on minimum repayments due to an increase to the thresholds at which the debts must be paid back. "That's real cost-of-living help," Mr Clare said. "More money in your pocket, not the government's, when you really need it." The bill is set to sail through both houses of parliament after the opposition flagged it would support the measure. The coalition originally opposed the bill, calling it "elitist", but changed its tune after a thumping election loss in May. "We will be constructive where we can," Opposition Leader Sussan Ley told Sky News. "That doesn't mean a blank cheque of goodwill for everything that comes across the table from the Labor Party." Bruce Chapman, the architect of the HECS scheme, said the relief would make the system fairer by giving those on lower salaries more money in their pockets. But the top priority should be reviewing the price of each degree because humanities students finish with the highest level of debt and end up being the lowest-paid graduates. "All the prices are wrong," Professor Chapman told AAP. Mr Clare said further reforms were being looked at after the failure of the former Liberal government's job-ready program. The program aimed to fill skills shortages by making it cheaper to take courses like teaching, nursing and psychology, while doubling the cost of popular degrees including law, communications, business, humanities and the arts. "If the intention there was to reduce the number of people doing arts degrees, it hasn't worked," Mr Clare said. "People study the courses they're interested in, that they want to do, that they love." The universities' accord final report branded the program "deeply unfair" because it punished students who followed their interests. It recommended that fees reflect future earning potential as part of 47 recommendations to reform the sector. Other aspects about how HECS debts were paid off also needed to be addressed, Prof Chapman said. HECS repayments are taken from a person's pay slip if they're earning above an income threshold. But the money isn't immediately taken off the total debt and is instead deducted as a lump sum at the end of the financial year after indexation has been applied. The university accord recommended the arrangement be changed to make the system fairer. The Australian Tertiary Education Commission has been established in an interim capacity to implement long-term university reform and will review the HECS system over the next 12 months. Mr Clare will introduce further legislation in the coming months to set the commission up as a permanent body. Laws to cut debts for university students and graduates are expected to be waved through parliament, saving people hundreds of dollars a year in repayments. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said legislation to slash HECS debts by 20 per cent and increase income thresholds before minimum repayments kick in will make the system fairer. "It means you start paying off your uni degree when uni starts to pay off for you," he said while introducing the bill to the House of Representatives on Wednesday. It is the first bill the Albanese government put before parliament at the start of its second term. People earning between $60,000 and $180,000 will save hundreds of dollars each year under the changes. Someone on $70,000 will save the most - $1300 a year - on minimum repayments due to an increase to the thresholds at which the debts must be paid back. "That's real cost-of-living help," Mr Clare said. "More money in your pocket, not the government's, when you really need it." The bill is set to sail through both houses of parliament after the opposition flagged it would support the measure. The coalition originally opposed the bill, calling it "elitist", but changed its tune after a thumping election loss in May. "We will be constructive where we can," Opposition Leader Sussan Ley told Sky News. "That doesn't mean a blank cheque of goodwill for everything that comes across the table from the Labor Party." Bruce Chapman, the architect of the HECS scheme, said the relief would make the system fairer by giving those on lower salaries more money in their pockets. But the top priority should be reviewing the price of each degree because humanities students finish with the highest level of debt and end up being the lowest-paid graduates. "All the prices are wrong," Professor Chapman told AAP. Mr Clare said further reforms were being looked at after the failure of the former Liberal government's job-ready program. The program aimed to fill skills shortages by making it cheaper to take courses like teaching, nursing and psychology, while doubling the cost of popular degrees including law, communications, business, humanities and the arts. "If the intention there was to reduce the number of people doing arts degrees, it hasn't worked," Mr Clare said. "People study the courses they're interested in, that they want to do, that they love." The universities' accord final report branded the program "deeply unfair" because it punished students who followed their interests. It recommended that fees reflect future earning potential as part of 47 recommendations to reform the sector. Other aspects about how HECS debts were paid off also needed to be addressed, Prof Chapman said. HECS repayments are taken from a person's pay slip if they're earning above an income threshold. But the money isn't immediately taken off the total debt and is instead deducted as a lump sum at the end of the financial year after indexation has been applied. The university accord recommended the arrangement be changed to make the system fairer. The Australian Tertiary Education Commission has been established in an interim capacity to implement long-term university reform and will review the HECS system over the next 12 months. Mr Clare will introduce further legislation in the coming months to set the commission up as a permanent body.
