Footprints shed new light on dinosaur social interactions
The tracks show different dinosaur species, including horned and armoured dinosaurs, travelled together, similar to modern wildebeest and zebra.
Researchers also found tracks of two tyrannosaurs walking alongside the herd, suggesting multispecies herding may have been a defence strategy against apex predators.
The findings, detailed in the journal PLOS One, shed new light on social interaction among prehistoric beasts.
Further excavations at the site are expected to reveal more details about how dinosaurs of different species interacted and behaved in their natural environment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
A science journal pulled a controversial study about a bizarre life form against the authors' wishes
A microscopic discovery in a California lake sparked buzz and controversy more than a decade ago when it was first revealed. Scientists said they'd discovered bacteria that used the element arsenic — poisonous to life as we know it — to grow. If true, it expanded the possibilities for where life could exist on Earth — or on other worlds. Several research groups failed to replicate the results, and argue it's not possible for a living thing to use something so toxic to make DNA and proteins. Some scientists have suggested the results of the original experiments may have been skewed by undetected contaminants. On Thursday, the journal Science, which first published the research, retracted it, though not because of misconduct on the researchers' part. 'If the editors determine that a paper's reported experiments do not support its key conclusions, even if no fraud or manipulation occurred, a retraction is considered appropriate,' the journal's editor-in-chief Holden Thorp wrote in the statement announcing the retraction. The researchers disagree with the journal's decision and stand by their data. It's reasonable to pull a paper for major errors or suspected misconduct — but debates and disagreements over the findings are part of the scientific process, said study co-author Ariel Anbar of Arizona State University. 'One doesn't retract a paper because the interpretation is controversial, or even because most disagree with the interpretation,' wrote Anbar in an email. 'At least, that hasn't been the case until now.' Science has more frequently retracted papers for reasons beside fraud in recent years, said Thorp and Vada Vinson, Science's executive editor, wrote in a blog post. NASA helped fund the original work. The space agency's science mission chief Nicky Fox said in a statement that NASA does not support the retraction and encourages Science to reconsider. —- The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Neanderthals were not ‘hypercarnivores' and feasted on maggots, scientists say
For hungry Neanderthals, there was more on the menu than wild mammals, roasted pigeon, seafood and plants. Chemical signatures in the ancient bones point to a nutritious and somewhat inevitable side dish: handfuls of fresh maggots. The theory from US researchers undermines previous thinking that Neanderthals were 'hypercarnivores' who stood at the top of the food chain with cave lions, sabre-toothed tigers and other beasts that consumed impressive quantities of meat. Rather than feasting on endless mammoth steaks, they stored their kills for months, the scientists believe, favouring the fatty parts over lean meat, and the maggots that riddled the putrefying carcasses. 'Neanderthals were not hypercarnivores, their diet was different,' said John Speth, professor emeritus of anthropology at the University of Michigan. 'It's likely maggots were a major food.' Neanderthals were thought to be top of the food chain because of the high levels of heavy nitrogen in their bones. Nitrogen builds up in living organisms when they metabolise protein in their food. A lighter form of the element, nitrogen-14, is excreted more readily than the heavier form, nitrogen-15. As a result, heavy nitrogen builds up in organisms with each step up the food chain, from plants to herbivores to carnivores. While the levels of heavy nitrogen in Neanderthal bones place them at the top of the food chain, they would not have been able to handle the amount of meat needed to reach those levels, the researchers say. 'Humans can only tolerate up to about 4 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, whereas animals like lions can tolerate anywhere from two to four times that much protein safely,' said Speth. Since many Indigenous groups around the world routinely consume maggots in putrefied meat, the researchers decided to explore their potential role. The experiments were not for the squeamish. Dr Melanie Beasley, a member of the team at Purdue University in Indiana, was formerly at the Forensic Anthropology Center, or Body Farm, at the University of Tennessee. There, researchers study donated human corpses that are left to decompose. The work helps forensic scientists hone their techniques, for example, to ascertain for how long people have been dead. Beasley measured heavy nitrogen in putrefying muscle and the maggots that infested the corpses. Heavy nitrogen rose slightly as muscle putrefied, but was far higher in the maggots. The same process would have occurred in carcasses the Neanderthals stored, Beasley said. The finding, reported in Science Advances, suggests that rather than consuming meat as ravenously as lions and other hypercarnivores, Neanderthals acquired high levels of heavy nitrogen by eating maggots, which themselves were enriched with heavy nitrogen. 'The only reason this is surprising is that it contradicts what we westerners think of as food,' said Karen Hardy, professor of prehistoric archaeology at the University of Glasgow. 'Elsewhere in the world, a very wide range of things are eaten, and maggots are a great source of protein, fat and essential amino acids.' 'It is a no brainer for Neanderthals,' she added. 'Put out a bit of meat, leave it for a few days then go back and harvest your maggots, its a very easy way to get good nutritious food.' 'How does it shift our thinking? The Neanderthals as top carnivores was nonsense, it was physiologically impossible. So this makes sense, but also explains these high nitrogen signals in a way that nothing else has done so clearly,' Hardy said.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Resident Alien has been canceled after four seasons
Resident Alien has been canceled after four seasons on USA Network despite its near-perfect score on Rotten Tomatoes. It was announced on Thursday that the current season, which began on June 6, would be the last. As it stands, the final episode is scheduled to air on August 8. Created by Chris Sheridan, the sci-fi comedy drama – based off the comic book of the same name – premiered in January 2021. The show follows the adventures of extraterrestrial Harry Vanderspeigle, played by Alan Tudyk, who lands on Earth and assumes the identity of a small-town doctor after accidentally killing him. Based in Colorado , the alien soon becomes enthralled by human beings and instead of exterminating, forms connections with them. Resident Alien has proved to be hugely popular since its release. On the review-aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, it has an impressive average score of 98 percent. Its Rotten Tomatoes score surpasses that of other wildly popular shows like The Last of Us , which sits at 93 percent, as well as Stranger Things , which has a score of 83 percent. Showrunner Sheridan broke his silence on the series' axe in a statement shared with TV Insider. 'I knew going into it that this was likely going to be our final season,' he said. 'Creatively, that was exciting because I knew we could spend the time wrapping up some storylines and driving toward an ending. 'I'm so proud of how good season four is and especially proud that we were able to finish as strongly as we did, with a finale that is probably my favorite episode of the series.' Despite his words, devastated fans expressed their disappointment over the news on Reddit. One said: 'You know what? This is some [expletive].' 'My day just got immeasurable worst,' another wrote. A third continued: 'Seriously! What the heck.' 'Sad,' another simply penned. 'Love this show.' A fifth added: 'I'm devastated… They effectively killed a great show. Shame on them.' 'Seems inevitable that every show I like gets canceled,' continued a sixth. 'I feel extra bad because it's my dad's current favorite of everything we watch together.'
