Quebec Conservative leader to seek vacant Arthabaska seat in eventual byelection
VICTORIAVILLE – The leader of the Conservative Party of Quebec has formally announced his intention to seek a seat in the legislature by running in the riding of Arthabaska when a yelection is eventually called.
Eric Duhaime made the announcement during a speech on Sunday afternoon.
The Arthabaska riding in central Quebec has been vacant since the March resignation of Éric Lefebvre, an Independent who had previously left the governing Coalition Avenir Québec to run in the recent federal election. He won the riding of Richmond-Arthabaska for the Conservatives, one of 11 seats the party claimed in the province.
Duhaime's Conservatives did not win any seats in the 2022 provincial campaign despite the party capturing more than 530,000 votes and growing their share of the popular vote to nearly 13 per cent.
Duhaime lost his own attempt to capture the Quebec City area riding of Chauveau in 2022, finishing second to Coalition Avenir Québec.
Poll aggregator Qc125 predicts a very close three-way race in Arthabaska between the Coalition Avenir Québec, Parti Québécois, and Duhaime's party.
Premier François Legault has not yet called a byelection, which must come within the next six months.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 4, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
2 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Drimonis: CAQ's vision of integration looks disconnected from reality
As part of the Coalition Avenir Québec's ever-growing list of policies aimed at dictating how new Quebecers should act, live and look, a new bill has been added to the mix. Bill 84 — ' an act respecting national integration ' — aims to define a Quebec integration model the government says will be 'distinct from Canadian multiculturalism.' While announcing the bill, Immigration, Francization and Integration Minister Jean-François Roberge gleefully stated multiculturalism has been relegated to the 'limbo of history.' All I can say is: Good luck with that. While it's true that multiculturalism — a policy enshrined in federal legislation in 1988 — is seen by some Quebecers as malicious and aiming to undermine the majority culture and the French language, it's ultimately also a sociological reality. Multiculturalism is the organic byproduct of a pluralistic society that contains multiple languages, ethnicities, faiths and cultures. You cannot have a country or province actively benefiting from immigration for centuries without naturally evolving into a place where a multitude of differences coexist. Neither can you have language policy actively forcing newcomers to send their kids to French school and then be blindsided when these now-French-speaking 'neo-Quebecers' also start influencing the province's majority culture with elements of theirs. One quick look at Montreal and so much of what makes it shine is precisely its diversity and plurality. We didn't become one of the most exciting cities in North America by dimming our light, by making ourselves identical, by intentionally stifling our creative, culinary and cultural differences and artificially removing what makes us different to appease an enforced vision of homogeneity. While the CAQ says Bill 84 was 'inspired by interculturalism,' that concept — like multiculturalism — allows room for a society where different cultures feel welcome to coexist and thrive. Does Roberge expect us to believe that is the intent of this bill or any other it has advanced relating to language, education and secularism? Or do the actions of this government point to a majority culture to which all others must conform? To be fair, the goal of a 'common society' isn't unique to Quebec. Setting aside questions of language, what the CAQ touts as 'Quebec values' are pretty much the same across Canada: respect for human rights, gender equality and adherence to the law. So while immigrants might be expected to retain markers of their culture, there's an equal expectation that they try to integrate and participate fully in Canadian society. In the end, immigrants' behaviour won't be dictated by some federal model of multiculturalism — and neither will it be defined by the CAQ's attempts to assimilate or remove elements of other cultures and languages. Maybe this government lacks a basic understanding of human psychology and behaviour. The overwhelming majority of immigrants — regardless of where they come from — work hard to integrate. But it's only natural that they also might continue to value and safeguard their mother tongue, culture and traditions. Just like a francophone Quebecer would if they were to emigrate elsewhere. You wouldn't amputate fundamental parts of who you are the minute you cross a border; to expect others to do so is not only absurd, it's also unworkable. Sure, the CAQ can make good on vaguely worded threats to withhold funding from cultural events that fall short of what the Quebec government deems such events should look like. But that won't stop newcomers with a plurality of identities from including other languages, cultures and traditions in their evolving version of what it means to be a Quebecer. A recent headline on the satire site The Beaverton says it all: 'Quebec passes bill requiring immigrants to not be different.' You know it's bad when satire starts to look like reality.
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Listen: Conservative fundraiser caller casts doubt on vote recounts
CBC News obtained a phone call recording that shows a Conservative Party fundraiser casting doubt on whether all of the federal election votes were accurately counted. CBC's Kate McKenna breaks down that conversation.
Toronto Star
8 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Opposition parties slam Ford government for legislature's long summer break
We're busy. See you Oct. 20. That's the rationale from Premier Doug Ford's Progressive Conservatives in adjourning the legislature Thursday for another unusually long summer break, infuriating opposition parties who said the move makes it harder to scrutinize the government's actions. The lengthy recess comes a week after MPPs voted themselves pay increases of 35 per cent with a pension plan and as Ford repeatedly talks about the need for Ontarians to work together in fighting U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Government House Leader Steve Clark said the break is necessary because the Conservatives passed 10 laws — including the controversial Bill 5 that fast-tracks mining and infrastructure development by bypassing provincial and local rules in which critics call a blank cheque for damage to the environment, endangered species, labour laws and Aboriginal treaties. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW 'It's been an ambitious sitting,' Clark added in reference to the six weeks MPPs spent at Queen's Park this spring in the wake of the Feb. 27 election. 'The government now is looking for time to implement that policy.' Not so fast, said his New Democrat counterpart John Vanthof, who called Bill 5 a 'case in point' on why the legislature needs more sitting days with more daily question periods, committee hearings and public hearings on proposed legislation. 'When you rush things through the legislature, when you shorten the time the legislature sits, you make bad legislation,' Vanthof told MPPs before the Progressive Conservatives used their majority to pass the motion for a 20-week break, which ends seven days after Thanksgiving. 'It's just actually not wanting to be accountable,' charged Liberal House Leader John Fraser. After MPPs return Oct. 20, they will sit for seven weeks until their Christmas break, meaning the legislature will have been in session for just 13 of 52 weeks this year. During breaks, MPPs typically work in their ridings. For 2026, the legislative calendar has legislators returning from their summer break on a more traditional and earlier timeline, on Sept. 14. Unless that changes. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
