
Make America Healthy Again Through Prevention, Says Ethicist
Hi. I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
There was an announcement I received February 13, establishing an order from the White House for a new commission. It's called the Make America Healthy Again Commission. I've got the order printed out in my hand.
It's something that everyone watching this video needs to be aware of and attentive to. The commission is meant to advise the federal government, chaired by the new Department of Health and Human Services leader, Robert F.Kennedy, Jr, on all matters regarding health and disease.
The executive order creating it begins with what I have to say is one of the toughest, meanest indictments of American healthcare, as it now exists, that I've read anywhere. This is not something that was cooked up by some sort of civil rights group or some kind of foundation fighting against corporate American healthcare. This is right out of the world of the president and his top health advisors.
What they're saying is that American healthcare is a grim failure because of the mess that Americans are in with respect to their health. The highest cancer rates, double the next highest rates of comparable countries. Asthma is twice as common than in most of Europe, Asia, and Africa, and the same for autoimmune diseases like inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and multiple sclerosis.
It basically says the American people are on a trajectory, if we don't do something about the whole healthcare system, that is leading them to premature death and disability due to chronic illness. It also suggests that children, in particular, are at grave risk because of the way healthcare is organized and delivered now.
This is one huge indictment, and what it says is that we want fresh thinking. The charge is what can we do about better nutrition, more physical activity, change to healthy lifestyles,get off medications, try to assess new technology habits — they're talking about cell phones, I presume — and food and drug quality and safety.
It's hard to be against any of those bits of advice. I think, in many ways, what the commission is charged to do is come up with new ways to think about prevention as opposed to disease treatment. That won't come as a shock to many of you physicians watching.
Many people would like to see our healthcare system pay for more prevention, which it doesn't, and see more resources devoted to counseling and supporting people with respect to maintaining their health.
I have to say, I don't think there are any big mysteries that have to be examined here.The creation of this commission hints that somehow there are secrets out there that we don't know about. I don't believe that.
I think we know that lifestyle change is very important. We just don't know how to get it done. I think we know that better diet would be great. We just don't know how to get people to do it.
There's a huge food industry in America that stands in the way of transitioning to healthier diets. Our agriculture is built around unhealthy foods, including sugar and everything. It's going to be very tough to move what I'll call a fast-food society over to healthy lifestyles.
I don't agree with the rationale given here about the need for new thought completelybecause I think many people know that we are too oriented toward fixing, treating, and rescuing people who have diseases and not doing enough to preserve health. I don't think that's a mystery of poor or limited thinking.
There are also some concerning aspects in this order to create the committee of what they want this commission to do. For example, they say pay attention to things like cell phone towers; toxic exposures, with the suggestion being perhaps vaccines; and worrying about what's going on with children with respect to too much exposure to nasty elements of the environment.
Again, I think what's going on with children is pretty well understood: obesity. We've got a big obesity challenge, and I hope that this commission can think about ways to battle obesity. One of the things that the commission's chair, RFK Jr, wants to do is shift lifestyle. I think many of you who practice, regarding children and families, know that efforts to change lifestyle have not ended well.
It's very difficult to do it in the climate and environment in which we live when we're bombarded with ads for unhealthy food and portion sizes that are far bigger than in the rest of the world and on and on. Getting lifestyle change is so tough that we're turning more and more to the injectable weight loss drugs.I don't think that's something that RFK Jr is going to be willing to support.
I don't think we need novel thinking about how to solve it in terms of what the causes are. If we're going to make progress, my comment would be that we have to change reimbursement and what we pay for. We have to intervene earlier with people long before they're sick, with better wellness visits and better well-baby visits.We have to shift how the system delivers prevention.
I'm not quite on board with new thinking. I'm on board with new modes of thinking about how to deliver prevention to the American people.
I'm Art Caplan, at the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Thanks for watching.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithfield Lifts Full-Year Outlook as Hog Unit Returns to Profit
(Bloomberg) -- Smithfield Foods Inc., the largest pork supplier in the US, raised its full-year profit expectations as a rebound in its hog business counterbalances the impact of tariffs. US hog prices have risen this year amid tight supplies, helping lift profits for suppliers already benefiting from low feed costs. Virginia-based Smithfield has streamlined its own pig production to focus on its more profitable packaged food business, shutting down unprofitable farms and transferring part of its farming operations to a new venture. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park The manufacturer of Farmland bacon and Farmer John sausages has been able to minimize the impact of China tariffs on US pork exports by tapping alternative markets, while subsequently resuming shipments to the Asian nation, according to Chief Executive Officer Charles Shane Smith. 'While we are not immune to the impacts of tariffs, we have built flexibility into our system and established multiple outlets for our fresh pork products,' Smith said during a conference call with analysts. The return to profit for hog operations was a major driver for the company's improved outlook. Smithfield is now projecting adjusted operating profit to range from $1.15 billion to $1.35 billion in 2025, an increase of $50 million at the midpoint from the prior guidance, according to a Tuesday statement. Shares of Smithfield dropped 0.7% as of 10:19 a.m. in New York, extending a retreat after reaching an all-time high last week. (Updates share move.) Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vermont Secretary of State Sarah Copeland-Hanzas announces 2026 re-election campaign
Vermont's incumbent Secretary of State announced the bid in an email to supporters Monday. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed's policy rate should stay on hold for now, Schmid says
(Reuters) -The U.S. central bank should not take tariffs' muted effect on inflation so far as an opportunity to cut interest rates, but rather as a sign that monetary policy is "appropriately calibrated," Kansas City Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Schmid said on Tuesday, in remarks that contrast with the increasingly dovish tone of some of his colleagues. "With the economy still showing momentum, growing business optimism, and inflation still stuck above our objective, retaining a modestly restrictive monetary policy stance remains appropriate for the time being," Schmid said in remarks prepared for delivery to an economic development conference in Oklahoma. "While increased tariffs seem to be having a limited effect on inflation, I view this as a rationale for keeping policy on hold rather than an opportunity to ease the stance of policy." Schmid said his "patient approach" to changing the policy rate, currently in the 4.25%-4.50% range, shouldn't be seen as a "wait and see" approach because he does not think that it will be clear in the next few months whether tariffs are pushing up on prices temporarily or persistently. Rather, he said, he feels the current policy rate is not very far above the neutral rate, where activity is neither stimulated nor restrained, and the labor market is still looking solid despite a sharp drop in job growth in recent months. And while the cooling labor market is keeping a lid on the pass-through of tariffs into inflation, boosting demand aggressively could raise the risk of an outsized increase in price pressures, Schmid said. "In my view, and in discussion with my contacts, growth remains solid, inflation remains too high, and therefore policy should remain modestly restrictive," he said. "That said, as I stated earlier, inflation is determined by the balance of supply and demand, and if I see indications that demand growth isweakening significantly, I will adjust my views accordingly." 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤