
Australia has to stop being so dumb or things will get out of control
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Saving thousands of local jobs amongst ‘most important' parts of Whyalla Steelworks sale, McKell Institute CEO says
Preserving thousands of local jobs and skills is one of the 'most important' aspects of the Whyalla Steelworks' potential sale, a thinktank leader has declared. BlueScope on Monday announced it was partnering with Japanese, Indian and Korean steelmakers to make a bid for the Whyalla Steelworks after it was forced into administration earlier this year. The steelworks, which employs 1,100 workers directly and supports an additional 2,000 in related industries, supplies 75 per cent of the country's structural steel and remains the only domestic producer of long steel products. Whyalla received a $2.4b government bailout package in February from the federal and South Australian governments after becoming "irredeemable" under British billionaire Sanjeev Gupta's company, GFG Alliance. About $500 million was set aside for transforming Whyalla into a green steel powerhouse. The McKell Institute's chief executive Edward Cavanough said maintaining the Whyalla Steelworks and the local industry surrounding it was critical for ensuring Australia's green steel future. 'The fact is we can't get to a green steel future if we lose the Whyalla plant in the first place,' Mr Cavanough told Business Now. 'You're not going to be able to recreate that out of thin air. 'The most important thing initially is preserving what is there, recapitalising the plant so it's actually sustainable and making sure that the skills in Whyalla aren't lost. 'If we lose all of those then there's certainly no hope for a green steel future, let alone any steel future.' He also stressed the expression of interest from the consortium, which featured major international steel makers, was a 'really positive step' for the steelworks. 'It was a really big risk by the government to intervene earlier in the year,' Mr Cavanough said. 'I think the fact that we have the likes of BlueScope putting their hand up and saying there is a future here is really, really positive.' BlueScope is joined by Japan's Nippon Steel, Indian multinational JSW Steel and Korea's POSCO in its bid to snap up Whyalla and turn it into a green steel maker. BlueScope told the ASX on Monday: 'The consortium has identified Whyalla as a prospective location for future production of lower emissions iron in Australia for both domestic and export markets, with the potential to play an important role in the decarbonisation of the global steelmaking industry." KordaMentha, an Asia-Pacific advisory firm, was appointed as the steel mill's administrator after the government forced its shutdown. The plant has been plagued with issues including frequent shutdowns of its coal-fired blast furnace, delays in necessary upgrades, and a lack of stable financial backing. The company owed tens of millions of dollars in unpaid royalties to the SA government and an additional $15 million to SA Water. Mr Gupta purchased the plant for $700m in 2017 with ambitions to transform it into a green steel plant by using hydrogen. The BlueScope-led consortium revealing its interest in acquiring Whyalla about six months after its forced administration comes as a relief for many as it originally took 17 months for Mr Gupta to purchase it.

Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump's efforts to control information echo authoritarian playbook
Washington: An old rule in Washington holds that you are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts. President Donald Trump seems determined to prove that wrong. Don't like an intelligence report that contradicts your view? Go after the analysts. Don't like cost estimates for your tax plan? Invent your own. Don't like a predecessor's climate policies? Scrub government websites of underlying data. Don't like a museum exhibit that cites your impeachments? Delete any mention of them. Trump's war on facts reached new heights on Friday when he angrily fired Erika McEntarfer, the Labour Department official in charge of compiling statistics on employment in America, because he did not like the latest jobs report showing that the economy wasn't doing as well as he claims it was. Trump declared that her numbers were 'phony'. His proof? It was 'my opinion'. And the story he told supposedly proving she was politically biased? It had no basis in fact. The message, however, was unmistakable: government officials who deal in data now fear they have to toe the line or risk losing their jobs. Career scientists, long-time intelligence analysts and nonpartisan statisticians who serve every president regardless of political party with neutral information on countless matters, such as weather patterns and vaccine efficacy, now face pressure as never before to conform to the alternative reality enforced by the president and his team. Trump has never been especially wedded to facts, routinely making up his own numbers, repeating falsehoods and conspiracy theories even after they are debunked and denigrating the very concept of independent fact-checking. But his efforts since reclaiming the White House to make the rest of the government adopt his versions of the truth have gone further than in his first term and increasingly remind scholars of the way authoritarian leaders in other countries have sought to control information. 'Democracy can't realistically exist without reliable epistemic infrastructure,' said Michael Patrick Lynch, author of the recently published On Truth in Politics and a professor at the University of Connecticut. 'Antidemocratic, authoritarian leaders know this. That is why they will seize every opportunity to control sources of information. As Bacon taught us, knowledge is power. But preventing or controlling access to knowledge is also power.' British philosopher Sir Francis Bacon published his meditations on truth and nature more than four centuries before Trump arrived in Washington, but history is filled with examples of leaders seeking to stifle unwelcome information. The Soviets falsified data to make their economy look stronger than it was. The Chinese have long been suspected of doing the same. Just three years ago, Turkey's autocratic leader fired his government's statistics chief after a report documented rocketing inflation.

Sky News AU
10 hours ago
- Sky News AU
British government silences critics by flagging anti-migrant social media posts
Writer and broadcaster Esther Krakue says the British government has flagged videos with supposedly concerning narratives about illegal immigrants, warning these videos are allegedly exacerbating tensions on the streets. 'The home office now has set up a new task force to look up anti migrant sentiment online that they fear could be sparing the kinds of protests that we're seeing,' Ms Krakue told Sky News host Andrew Bolt. 'To make matters worse, now it seems you can't even complain about it.'