
‘My time in Sichuan shows harmony of multi-ethnic unity': Global Times
In the third article of the series, Global Times (GT) reporter Ma Ruiqian talked to Paul Zilungisele Tembe (Tembe), director at the SELE Encounters Cross-Civilization Communication Strategies in South Africa and recipient of the 18th Special Book Award of China. He recently participated in a cultural tour to Sichuan Province and shared his perspective on China.
GT: You mentioned that the experience of harmonious living among the multi-ethnic residents of Sichuan, a convergence of diversities toward a united and unique Chinese culture have left an indelible mark in your understanding of Chinese culture. How is this cultural inclusiveness embodied in the call of China-proposed Global Civilization Initiative (GCI) for respecting the diversity of world civilizations?
Tembe: The GCI is rooted in the essence of multi-ethnicity. It starts from local diversity – ethnic, cultural – and expands to national, regional and eventually global dimensions. My time in Sichuan gave me a vivid impression of what unity within diversity can look like.
Coming from South Africa – a country with 12 official languages and a complex multi-ethnic society – I saw parallels. We gained our democracy in 1994, and we are still working through the process of building a unified national identity. My experience in Sichuan gave me a glimpse of what South Africa could aspire to in the long term. All the units are perfect and harmonious.
I truly wish that one day Sichuan and a province in South Africa could become sister provinces. We could learn a lot from each other, especially given our shared experiences with multi-ethnic societies.
GT: During your visit to Siguniang Mountains and the Wolong National Nature Reserve, you've observed a harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. What is your view of China's approach to environmental protection and green development?
Tembe: President Xi Jinping put forward the idea of 'Beautiful China,' meaning care for the environment.
What I took away from my time in Sichuan – beyond the harmony of multi-ethnic unity – was how human development is being balanced with the protection of nature. What touched me even more deeply was my visit to the Wolong National Nature Reserve. It showed that China is able to pursue modernization without sacrificing its traditions or its environment. In addition, I visited the Siguniang Mountains and saw many kinds of precious stones in the museum. Although the region is rich in natural resources, mining is prohibited in order to protect the ecosystem.
These are practical models that can be applied to the UN's 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Although climate agreements are often signed, implementation remains a challenge. What I appreciate about China is that its environmental efforts are scientific and systematic. These models can be transferred to other countries and still function effectively.
I especially hope to see more cooperation within the Global South. Right now, we are a bit behind in terms of climate finance and environmental planning. But if countries in the Global South work together – through South-South cooperation or other multilateral platforms – we could adopt the Chinese model and create a better environmental trajectory.
GT: Although China and Africa differ in terms of geography, culture, history and social structures, they share common values such as peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy and freedom. As a long-time advocate for China-Africa cultural exchanges, how did your travels and experiences in China lead you to recognize and resonate with these shared values?
Tembe: When we talk about values, I believe we should take a step back and look at deeper philosophical roots. For example, if we consider some core tenets of Confucianism, we find values that are deeply relevant both in China and Africa.
Africa stands for peace, values harmony, and is committed to hard work. Africa wants tangible and concrete results. It seeks partnerships based on equality and mutual respect. If we look at China's proposals for cooperation with Africa, especially starting from President Xi's 2013 visit to Tanzania, the four-point proposal – sincerity, real results, amity and good faith – aligns closely with African expectations of partnership. These are not just diplomatic phrases; they reflect deeper cultural values that we can trace both in Chinese civilization and in African traditions.
GT: There are still some narratives in international discourse that promote the 'China threat' rhetoric. Based on your years of living and studying in China – especially your understanding of its peace-oriented cultural traditions – how would you respond to such claims?
Tembe: I will give you both perspectives: The Western one, based on projection and fear; and the Chinese one, based on unity and peaceful development.
First, there's a tendency that if someone has done bad things to others, they begin to judge others through that same lens. That's what we see with how the West views China. They fear that China's rise will mirror their own rise during the 15th and 16th centuries.
Let's recall – the end of the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) saw China's doors to the outside world shut. Meanwhile, the West was expanding, taking advantage of China's absence from the high seas. That period marked the beginning of Western colonialism.
So now, they look at China and assume China will behave the way they did. But that's not about China; that's about them. They project their own past – colonization and domination – onto China, but they also suffer from historical amnesia.
China has always had one consistent focus: unity and development. China has no interest in controlling others. China seeks friendships abroad to create a stable external environment that allows it to survive and thrive in the long run. China has experienced many historical upheavals. So its greatest concern – in development, finance and foreign policy – is preserving a unified China.
I would say, as someone who studies and understands China, the West is worrying for nothing. China is not going to become the kind of global threat they imagine. But there's one thing: Nature does not allow a vacuum. In English, we say 'when the cat's away, the mice will play.' In geopolitics, the same principle applies. China needs to have a strong presence globally. But a strong global presence does not mean colonialism or the control of other countries. These things are not the same.
Source: Global Times: Company: Global TimesContact Person: Anna Li
Email: [email protected] Website: https://globaltimes.cnCity: Beijing
Disclaimer: This press release may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies (including product offerings, regulatory plans and business plans) and may change without notice. You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
New Zealand and Australia seek closer military ties following Chinese live-fire naval exercise
'A big focus for us has been interoperability with Australia. We want to be a force multiplier,' Luxon told reporters. 'We want to be one, sort of, essential Anzac force essentially operating within our region,' he added, referring to the Australian New Zealand Army Corps in which the two nations' soldiers first fought together during World War I. Advertisement The summit follows a Chinese naval flotilla firing weapons in February in the Tasman Sea, which separates Australia and New Zealand. The exercise forced commercial airlines to divert flights. The Chinese navy rarely ventures so far south and the mission that partially circumnavigated Australia was seen as a demonstration of China's growing military reach. Albanese said last month that he complained to China's President Xi Jinping during a state visit to Beijing about the lack of notice the Chinese had given of the live-fire exercise. Xi replied that Australia also engaged in exercises, referring to freedom of navigation missions conducted by Australian military in the disputed South China Sea. Albanese and Luxon recognized their countries face the most unpredictable and dangerous strategic environment in decades and their alliance plays a critical role in protecting and advancing their shared interest in the region, they said in a joint statement. Advertisement The prime ministers also commended progress over the past year to intensify defense cooperation and integration. While the statement did not mention China, the prime ministers confirmed their most important trading partner was discussed. 'Of course, the geostrategic competition, in particular between the great powers, is something that countries like Australia and New Zealand do discuss together and we cooperate politically,' Albanese said. Luxon said 'both countries have followed pretty much the same playbook' in their bilateral dealings with China. 'China's an important world power. It's important that we can engage,' Luxon said. 'We genuinely are able to have a conversation — I think a very mature one now — to say, look, we do have very different histories, we do have different systems, we do have different values, that does mean we do have differences. Good partners should be not afraid to talk about those things,' Luxon added. Luxon announced in April a plan to make the New Zealand Defense Force more combat capable that would double defense spending to more than 2% of GDP. He described the rise from around 1% over the past two decades as 'a big step up for us.' In a demonstration of Tokyo seeking deeper strategic ties in the South Pacific, Japanese warships docked in New Zealand on Friday for the first time in almost 90 years. Australia announced this week Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries will build a fleet of 11 Australian naval frigates with a contract expected to be worth $6.5 billion. Australia's most expensive defense expansion is a submarine deal with the United States and Britain that is expected to cost up to $245 billion. Under the trilateral partnership known by the acronym AUKUS, Australia will acquire a fleet of eight submarines powered by U.S. nuclear technology. Advertisement U.S. President Trump has urged western countries to increase their defense budgets and rely less on the U.S. for their security. Albanese told reporters on Saturday: 'If people argue that we should increase our defense spending, we are.'


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump offers hope for the homeless —Newsom's progress tour is a sham
President Trump took bold action to tackle America's homelessness crisis with his July 24, 2025, executive order, 'Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets.' By prioritizing federal funding for states and cities that enforce bans on public camping and redirect resources to treatment for addiction and mental illness, Trump is showing the kind of leadership California desperately needs. Meanwhile, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is on a progress tour, touting what he claims are improvements in the state's homelessness crisis. As someone who has spent years working directly with the homeless — veterans abandoned on Skid Row, downtown San Diego and countless other streets — I see Newsom's campaign for what it is. It is a shallow public relations stunt designed to gloss over his failures while our heroes are left to die. Newsom isn't solving the crisis — he is sweeping it under the rug, just as he did before Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to San Francisco. He didn't clean up homelessness for Californians; he did it for a foreign rival. Now, with cameras rolling and higher political ambitions in mind, he's pretending the problem didn't fester under his watch. But the numbers tell the truth: California accounts for 28 percent of the nation's homeless population, with over 187,000 people on our streets, 66 percent of them unsheltered. Veterans, who served our country with honor, are among the hardest hit, discarded by a state that prioritizes photo ops over people. I have seen the human cost of this neglect up close. In Los Angeles, I met Army veterans sitting silently on a curb outside a housing facility built for them. They were denied entry because of past jail time — often for offenses tied to untreated mental health issues from their service. One veteran told me, 'It feels like we don't matter. Like our service never happened.' In San Diego's 'swamp,' a female Navy veteran broke down when I hugged her, saying, 'I thought everyone gave up on me.' She wasn't asking for a handout—just a moment of dignity. And then there's Mike Dolbow, a veteran living on the streets for over a decade with no outreach, no help, no recognition. He said, 'Veterans are just a tool politicians use to get elected. They pretend to care when the cameras are on, then vanish.' Buzzwords such as 'curb to condo,' 'affordable housing' and 'resilience hubs' sound polished in press releases, but they have failed to deliver. Since 2019, Newsom has poured more than $24 billion into homelessness programs, yet the crisis persists. This includes one veterans' housing project that the California American Legion says has an anticipated total cost exceeding $1.4 billion for at least 1,200 units. That averages to approximately $833,000 per unit. This isn't progress — it's a betrayal of those who served. President Trump, in contrast, has a record of action. In May, he ordered the Veteran's Administration to reclaim the West Los Angeles Veterans' Affairs land to build housing for veterans — cutting through bureaucracy with speed and focus. The executive order also empowers local governments to clear encampments and fund treatment programs, ensuring people aren't just moved but helped. As White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, by 'removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs,' the administration will 'ensure that Americans feel safe in their communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles get the help they need.' What California needs isn't more of Newsom's over-funded photo ops — it's base camps: infrastructure-based transitional communities modeled after the military. These disciplined, supportive environments, as I have advocated in my work with veterans, would provide not just shelter but a pathway to stability, offering veterans food, mental health services, addiction recovery, VA benefits assistance, and job training under one roof, with discipline and dignity. Not shelters. Not stopgaps. Real solutions. Newsom's 'progress tour' is nothing but an audition for his next job. Californians, especially our veterans, know the truth: years of inaction, empty promises and neglect. Veterans don't need more words — they need action. President Trump's executive order is a step toward delivering it, showing what leadership looks like when it's driven by results, not headlines.


Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Dr. Marc Siegel explains why chikungunya virus will not lead to global pandemic
Senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel weighs in after the U.S. issued a travel warning in response to the chikungunya virus outbreak in China.