Bursting of US exceptionalism bubble a boon to Chinese stocks
The facts speak for themselves. On June 9, the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI), a gauge of mainland Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong, entered a bull market after having risen 22 per cent since its recent low on April 7. The HSCEI and the MSCI China Index, which tracks Chinese companies listed at home and abroad, have largely outperformed all other major equity markets this year.
That the sharp rally in Chinese shares occurred against the backdrop of
deflationary pressures that show no sign of easing,
low consumer confidence , a festering crisis in the property sector and a dramatic escalation in the US-China trade war makes the gains all the more remarkable.
Several factors are at work. One of them, as Morgan Stanley noted in a report on May 20, is global investors'
'deeply underweight' position in Chinese equities following years of extremely bearish sentiment. This has created a 'sizeable allocation upside potential in moving from [an underweight to a neutral position]', Morgan Stanley said.
A more important factor – and the most unexpected one – is the strong conviction on the part of many investors that the long period of
US exceptionalism in markets has come to an end. US President Donald Trump's ruinous
trade policies , blatant
disregard for the rule of law and planned
reckless tax cuts that add to America's ballooning public debt have cast doubt over the perceived safe haven status of US assets, especially the US dollar.
The mantra of 'Tina' –
There Is No Alternative – to US equities has given way to
diversification as investors seek to rebalance their portfolios away from the United States. While there is intense debate about the pace and consequences of diversification, the waning appeal of US assets is a boon to Chinese stocks.
Morgan Stanley says there is a 'higher willingness to add more positions in Chinese equities, fuelled by global diversification demand'. Nomura says 'the fading of the 'US exceptionalism' theme could help Asian equities', with China, India and Japan best placed to capture 'reallocation flows' given the depth and breadth of their stock markets. Goldman Sachs, meanwhile, notes that Chinese stocks tend to perform well when
the yuan strengthens versus the US dollar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
40 minutes ago
- Asia Times
Why Trump won't kill AUKUS
The Pentagon has announced it will review the massive AUKUS agreement between the United States, United Kingdom and Australia to ensure it's aligned with US President Donald Trump's 'America first' agenda. The US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby is reportedly going to oversee the review. The announcement has raised concerns in Australia, but every government is entitled to review policies made by its predecessors to consider whether there is a particular purpose. The UK has launched a parliamentary inquiry into AUKUS too, so it's not actually unreasonable for the US to do the same. There is a degree of nervousness in Australia as to what the implications are because Australia understandably has the biggest stake in this. But we need to consider what Colby has articulated in the past. In his book, 'The Strategy of Denial: American Defence in the Nature of Great Power Conflict', he made the case the US could 'prepare to win a war with China it cannot afford to lose – in order to deter it from happening.' So, with a deterrent mindset, he sees the need for the US to muscle up militarily. He's spoken about the alliance with Australia in very positive terms on a couple of occasions. And he has called himself an 'AUKUS agnostic', though he has expressed deep concern about the ability of the submarine industrial base in the US to manufacture the ships quickly enough. And that leads to the fear that the US Navy would not have enough submarines for itself if Washington is also sending them to Australia. As part of the deal, Australia would eventually be able to contribute to accelerating the production line. That involves Australian companies contributing to the manufacture of certain widgets and components that are needed to build the subs. Australia has already made a nearly A$800 million (US$500 million) down payment on expanding the US industrial capacity as part of the deal to ensure we get some subs in a reasonable time frame. There have also been significant legislative and industrial reforms in the US, Australia and UK to help facilitate Australian defence-related industries unplug the bottleneck of submarine production. There is no question that there is a need to speed up production. But we are already seeing significant signs of an uptick in the production rate, thanks in part to the Australian down payment. And it's anticipated that the rate will significantly increase in the next 12–18 months. Even still, projects like this often slide in terms of timelines. The leaders of the three nations announced details of the submarine deal in San Diego in 2023. Photo: Etienne Laurent / EPA via The Conversation I'm reasonably optimistic that, on balance, the Trump administration will come down on the side of proceeding with the deal. There are a few key reasons for this: 1) We're several years down the track already. 2) We have more than 100 Australian sailors already operating in the US system. 3) Industrially, we're on the cusp of making a significant additional contribution to the US submarine production line. And finally, most people don't fully appreciate that the submarine base just outside Perth is an incredibly consequential piece of real estate for US security calculations. Colby has made very clear the US needs to muscle up to push back and deter China's potential aggression in the region. In that equation, submarines are crucial, as is a substantial submarine base in the Indian Ocean. China is acutely mindful of what we call the 'Malacca dilemma.' Overwhelmingly, China's trade of goods and fossil fuels comes through the Malacca Strait between Malaysia and Indonesia's island of Sumatra. The Chinese know this supply line could be disrupted in a war. And the submarines operating out of Perth contribute to this fear. This is a crucial deterrent effect the US and its allies have been seeking to maintain. And it has largely endured. Given that nobody can predict the future, we all want to prevent a war over Taiwan and we all want to maintain the status quo. As such, the considered view has been that Australia will continue to support the US to bolster its deterrent effect to prevent such a scenario. As part of the US review of the deal, we could see talk of a potential slowdown in the delivery rate of the submarines. The Trump administration could also put additional pressure on Australia to deliver more for the US. This includes the amount Australia spends on defence, a subject of considerable debate in Canberra. Taking Australia's overall interests into account, the Albanese government may well decide increasing defense spending is an appropriate thing to do. There's a delicate dance to be had here between the Trump administration, the Australian government, and in particular, their respective defence departments, about how to achieve the most effective outcome. It's highly likely that whatever decision the US government makes will be portrayed as the Trump administration 'doing a deal'. In the grand scheme of things, that's not a bad thing. This is what countries do. We talk a lot about the Trump administration's transactional approach to international relations. But it's actually not that different from previous US administrations with which Canberra has had to deal. So I'm reasonably sanguine about the AUKUS review and any possible negotiations over it. I believe the Trump administration will come to the conclusion it does not want to spike the Australia relationship. Australia has been on the US side since federation. Given this, the US government will likely make sure this deal goes ahead. The Trump administration may try to squeeze more concessions out of Australia as part of 'the art of the deal,' but it won't sink the pact. However, many people will undoubtedly say this is the moment Australia should break with AUKUS. But then what? What would Australia do instead to ensure its security in this world of heightened great power competition in which Australia's interests are increasingly challenged? Walking away now would leave Australia more vulnerable than ever. I think that would be a great mistake. John Blaxland is professor, Strategic and Defense Studies Center, Australian National University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The Standard
an hour ago
- The Standard
Top 2,000 companies' net profit grows 9pc despite uncertainty
The logo of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) is pictured at the entrance to its branch in Beijing, China April 1, 2019. Picture taken April 1, 2019. REUTERS
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Zhejiang Sanhua seeks US$1 billion in Hong Kong listing as Chinese firms rush to city
Chinese heating systems supplier Zhejiang Sanhua Intelligent Controls aims to raise up to HK$8.12 billion (US$1.03 billion) in a Hong Kong listing, joining a wave of mainland-traded companies that are tapping the city's red-hot initial public offering (IPO) market. Advertisement The Shenzhen-listed firm plans to offer 360.3 million shares at HK$21.21 to HK$22.53 each, according to a filing to the Hong Kong stock exchange on Friday. The company will allocate 7 per cent of the base offering to Hong Kong investors and 93 per cent to global investors. It may boost the offer size by up to 116.2 million shares to accommodate excess demand, according to the prospectus. This could swell the final fundraising to as much as HK$10.7 billion at the top end of the price range. The stock is expected to start trading on June 23 under the 2050 code. At HK$22.53, Sanhua would be pricing its Hong Kong shares at an 18.5 per cent discount to its onshore shares. The stock fell 2.3 per cent to 25.29 yuan in Shenzhen at noon on Friday, trimming this year's gain to around 7.6 per cent. Sanhua is the world's largest maker of refrigeration and air-conditioning control components by revenue. Photo: Handout Sanhua's offer follows Shanghai-listed Foshan Haitian Flavouring and Food, which began taking investor orders on Wednesday to raise up to HK$9.56 billion. They are among the 40-plus mainland companies that have made announcements or filed their listing applications to the Hong Kong stock exchange. Advertisement
