logo
India, Pakistan compete to sell their feuding narratives abroad. Will this work?

India, Pakistan compete to sell their feuding narratives abroad. Will this work?

Straits Times28-05-2025

Pakistan's Rangers stand guard at the Kartarpur Sahib Corridor complex, which runs along the India-Pakistan border in Kartarpur, on May 22. PHOTO: AFP
- Military action between India and Pakistan might have stopped for now, but the feuding South Asian neighbours are ramping up a war of words.
Both governments are sending teams to key partners including Singapore to press their cases and shape global perceptions on the latest flashpoint that sparked fears of an open conflict between the two nuclear-armed countries.
India's campaign, in particular, is notable for both its scale and its non-partisan nature. Seven delegations are fanning across the world to places from Belgium, Germany and the United States; to Bahrain, Guyana and Panama. In total, around 59 retired diplomats, ruling and opposition politicians are travelling to 33 countries.
New Delhi and Islamabad agreed to a ceasefire on May 10 , after four days of a tit-for-tat military confrontation. India had accused Pakistan of being involved in the April 22 'terror attack' that killed 26 civilians in Pahalgam in Indian-held Kashmir - something Pakistan denied.
India's latest effort, say analysts, is aimed at getting international buy-in from friendly countries for how it approaches what it says is state-sponsored terrorism emanating from Pakistan, to diplomatically isolate its neighbour, and to amplify New Delhi's message that it had little choice but to strike due to the attack; that it was well within its rights to do so.
'The parliamentary delegations will make the world aware that India will consider future terrorist attacks as an act of war and will take retaliatory action,' said Mr Anil Wadhwa, a retired Indian diplomat.
The delegations are also striving to plug gaps in India's messaging amid domestic criticism that it has not articulated its position effectively.
'There is a sense that India's narrative has not fully got across globally. So there is a need to explain to India's friends and key partners,' Professor C Raja Mohan, a visiting research professor at Singapore's Institute of South Asian Studies, told The Straits Times.
He added: 'After nearly a decade of toxic and intense polarisation, this seems to be an effort to bring opposition parties together. Even those who are critical of the government have joined these delegations.'
The delegation to Singapore, which arrived on May 27, met a host of leaders in politics, business and academia including Law Minister Edwin Tong and Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Home Affairs Sim Ann.
'We discussed India's perspective on the situation in Pahalgam following the terror attacks on 22 April 2025. I reaffirmed Singapore's firm stance against terrorism and our strong condemnation of the terror attacks in Pahalgam,' Mr Tong said on social media after the meeting.
The nine-member delegation, led by Mr Sanjay Kumar Jha, a leader of the Janata Dal (United), a regional party, started their messaging campaign in Japan and South Korea, and was in Indonesia on May 28. Their tour ends in Malaysia.
Not to be left behind, Pakistan too has indicated it plans to dispatch a multi-party delegation led by Pakistan People's Party chief Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari.
Starting next week, this delegation will visit Washington, London, Paris and Brussels to 'highlight India's disinformation campaign and its attempts to destabilise regional peace,' according to Pakistani media.
Separately, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is on a visit to Turkiye, Iran, Azerbaijan and Tajikistan from May 25-30 to hold 'wide-ranging discussions' including on the recent hostilities with India.
These visits are also aimed at building global support on issues like water security, after India in retaliation for the Kashmir attack put the Indus water treaty, which governs water sharing of six cross border rivers, in abeyance, said Mr Bhutto-Zardari to The Dawn newspaper.
For India, one key aim is to reverse some earlier missteps in its war of narratives and to rally the home ground.
New Delhi reportedly expected stronger global support in its fight against Pakistan, and was also blindsided by US President Donald Trump repeatedly claiming credit for brokering the ceasefire between the two South Asian neighbours. India abhors third-party intervention in what it views as a bilateral matter, and has insisted the truce was the result of simply an agreement with Pakistan.
It shudders too, at Mr Trump's description of both India Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mr Sharif as 'strong leaders', given India's self-belief in its stature as an emerging global power.
Many Indian commentators thus feel that New Delhi has failed to present its position clearly, partly due to disinformation from mainstream Indian television channels.
Many in India also felt that the Pakistani leadership was more visible on international media in the initial days of the hostilities.
''Pakistan managed to reposition itself diplomatically... and recast the conflict as one of two equals requiring mediation,' wrote former Indian foreign secretary Nirupama Rao in an opinion piece in The Indian Express newspaper.
Mr Salman Khurshid, a former India External Affairs Minister and a member of the country's delegation to Singapore, said that he felt that the trip had been 'successful' given the response in the different countries.
'There is a reiteration of empathy for India, condolences for the people who lost their lives, and condemnation of terrorism. That has been reiterated, and I think that is good ,' Mr Khurshid told ST.
'There is also the entire narrative from the Indian point of view, and it's a good thing that we've come, and we are able to revive that narrative . It's important that the narrative is given a push .'
India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a press release that the delegation 'requested Singapore's support in the fight against terrorism', particularly in multilateral forums like the United Nations and the Financial Action Task Force, a global financial crime watchdog. It did not elaborate on how Singapore responded.
Mr Modi has vowed strong action against cross-border terrorism, adding that any further 'terrorist attack' would be regarded as an 'act of war'. Defence minister Rajnath Singh has framed this as a redefinition of India's policy against terrorism.
India's message through these delegations has also been that it will not make any distinction between the state sponsoring terrorism and the groups carrying out the terror attacks.
India has long blamed Pakistan for cross-border terrorism, accusing its military of abetting and aiding Pakistan-based terror groups that target India, including the Lashkar-e-Taiba. India has blamed The Resistance Front, which Indian authorities believe is a proxy of the Lashkar-e-Taiba proxy, for the Pahalgam attack.
This time round, while India accused Pakistan of triggering the hostilities, Pakistan has in turn accused India of being the aggressor, denying Indian allegations that it is abetting terrorism or using it as state policy.
Crucially, India has not yet managed to arrest the perpetrators of the Kashmir attacks , though officials have said that they have been identified.
'It's not that Pakistan has defeated India when it comes to narrative wars,' said Mr Faran Jeffery of Islamic Theology of Counter Terrorism, a UK-based counterterrorism think-tank.
'Better is expected from India. So when India didn't present any evidence for its claims and didn't even bother to complete its own internal investigation before it escalated with Pakistan, that was seen as irresponsible in some capitals.'
He added: 'Will (delegations) produce any results? I'm not entirely sure.'
With additional reporting by Arvind Jayaram in Singapore.
Nirmala Ganapathy is India bureau chief at The Straits Times. She is based in New Delhi and writes about India's foreign policy and politics.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel says to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg
Israel says to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg

Straits Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Israel says to block Gaza-bound aid boat carrying Greta Thunberg

Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg (far left and far right) on the Gaza-bound aid boat on June 1. PHOTOS: REUTERS – Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz on June 8 ordered the military to block an aid boat headed for Gaza with 12 activists on board, including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg. 'I have instructed the military to prevent the Madleen flotilla from reaching Gaza,' he said in a statement from his office. 'To Greta the anti-Semite and her companions, Hamas propaganda mouthpieces, I say clearly: turn back because you will not reach Gaza,' Mr Katz said. The organisers of the Madleen's voyage said on June 7 that they had reached Egyptian waters and were nearing Gaza, where the war between Israel and Hamas has entered its 21st month. The Madleen, a sailing boat operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, left Italy on June 1 with the stated aim of delivering humanitarian aid and breaking the Israeli blockade on the Palestinian territory. 'Israel will not allow anyone to break the naval blockade of Gaza, which is aimed at preventing weapons from reaching Hamas – a murderous terrorist group holding our hostages and committing war crimes,' Mr Katz said. 'Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or support terror groups – by sea, air or land,' he added. The war was sparked by Hamas' Oct 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people on the Israeli side, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. On June 8 , the Health Ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said the overall toll for the Gaza war had reached 54,880, the majority of whom were civilians. The UN considers these figures reliable. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Pope Leo condemns ‘exclusionary mindset' in Pentecost address
Pope Leo condemns ‘exclusionary mindset' in Pentecost address

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Pope Leo condemns ‘exclusionary mindset' in Pentecost address

Pope Leo said the Church 'must open the borders between peoples and break down the barriers between class and race'. PHOTO: AFP VATICAN CITY - Pope Leo XIV exhorted the faithful on June 8 to reject an 'exclusionary mindset' he said had led to nationalism around the world. Pope Leo's homily did not call out current events and conflicts nor identify individual leaders. But his choice of language was significant, encouraging people to 'open borders' within their hearts and minds. The address marked a month since the former Robert Prevost from Chicago was elected Pope, and came during a Sunday mass to celebrate Pentacost held under sunny skies in St Peter's Square. Before mass, the 69-year-old pontiff made a turn around the sprawling Baroque square in his popemobile to the enthusiastic cheers of the crowd, estimated by the Vatican at around 80,000 people. Pope Leo said the Church 'must open the borders between peoples and break down the barriers between class and race'. People must move 'beyond our fear of those who are different', he said, noting that the Holy Spirit 'breaks down barriers and tears down the walls of indifference and hatred...' 'Where there is love, there is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms.' Pope Leo did not speak of physical borders but his focus on barriers and walls evoked the politics of US President Donald Trump, who has vowed to stem illegal immigration into the United States. The Pope also said the Holy Spirit was an antidote to toxic relationships marked by 'suspicion, prejudice or the desire to manipulate others'. 'With great pain,' he cited 'cases where relationships are marked by an unhealthy desire for domination, an attitude that often leads to violence, as is shown, tragically, by numerous recent cases of femicide'. In Italy, a slew of femicides have become front-page news over the last month, including the killing of a 14-year girl by her boyfriend last week. Pope Leo also cited the dangers of social media, saying it risked making people 'ever more alone' within a 'vortex of individualism'. 'Constantly connected, yet incapable of 'networking'. Always immersed in a crowd, yet confused and solitary travellers,' he said. Since his election, Pope Leo has offered to mediate between leaders of countries at war and earlier this week, he had his first telephone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Several speeches made by the new pontiff – including among his first words from St Peter's Basilica when he became Pope on May 8 – have focused on building bridges between individuals and peoples. Pentecost marks the end of the Easter season and commemorates the descent of the Holy Spirit on the apostles and disciples of Jesus Christ. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree
Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree

Straits Times

time7 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump rewarding loyalists with pardon spree

US President Donald Trump is doling out pardons 'that look like they're almost quid pro quo for financial donations', said a law professor. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - Reality TV stars. Former lawmakers. A sheriff. A nursing home executive. A drug kingpin. What do they have in common? They are among the Americans convicted of crimes who have received pardons from President Donald Trump since he took office in January. And while US presidents have doled out questionable pardons in the past, Mr Trump is doing so 'in a bigger, more aggressive way with sort of no sense of shame,' said Professor Kermit Roosevelt, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania. 'The pardon power has always been a little bit problematic because it's this completely unconstrained power that the president has,' Professor Roosevelt told AFP. 'Most presidents have issued at least some pardons where people look at them and they say: 'This seems to be self-serving' or 'This seems to be corrupt in some way.'' But Mr Trump is doling out pardons 'that look like they're almost quid pro quo for financial donations,' Professor Roosevelt said. Among those receiving a pardon was Mr Paul Walczak, a nursing home executive convicted of tax crimes and whose mother attended a US$1-million-per-plate (S$1.28 million) fund-raising dinner at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in April. Other beneficiaries of Trump pardons include reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were serving lengthy prison sentences for bank fraud and tax evasion. Their daughter, Ms Savannah, is a prominent Trump supporter and gave a speech at 2024's Republican National Convention. More than half a dozen former Republican lawmakers convicted of various crimes have also received pardons, along with a Virginia sheriff sentenced to 10 years in prison for taking US$75,000 in bribes. On his first day in office, Mr Trump pardoned more than 1,500 supporters who stormed the US Capitol on Jan 6, 2021 as they sought to prevent congressional certification of Democrat Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. The next day, Mr Trump pardoned Mr Ross Ulbricht, who had been serving a life sentence for running the 'Silk Road' online marketplace that facilitated millions of dollars of drug sales. 'Just another deal' Ms Barbara McQuade, a former prosecutor who now teaches law at the University of Michigan, said Mr Trump is not the first president to be accused of 'allowing improper factors to influence their pardon decisions'. Former US president Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon, Mr Bill Clinton's pardon of a commodities trader whose wife was a major Democratic donor and Biden's pardon of his son, Mr Hunter, and other family members all drew some criticism. '(But) Trump is in a class by himself in both scope and shamelessness,' Ms McQuade said in a Bloomberg opinion column. 'To him, pardons are just another deal. 'As long as a defendant can provide something of value in return, no crime seems too serious,' she said. Democratic lawmaker Jamie Raskin, in a letter to Mr Ed Martin, Mr Trump's pardon attorney at the Justice Department, asked what criteria are being used to recommend pardons. 'It at least appears that you are using the Office of the Pardon Attorney to dole out pardons as favours to the President's loyal political followers and most generous donors,' Mr Raskin wrote. Mr Martin for his part has made no secret of the partisan nature of the pardons recommended by his office. 'No Maga left behind,' Mr Martin said on X after the pardon of the bribe-taking Virginia sheriff, a reference to Mr Trump's 'Make America Great Again' slogan. Professor Lee Kovarsky, a University of Texas law professor, said Mr Trump's 'pardon spree' opens up a 'menacing new frontier of presidential power' that he calls 'patronage pardoning'. By reducing the penalty for misconduct, Mr Trump is making a 'public commitment to protect and reward loyalism, however criminal,' Professor Kovarsky said in a New York Times opinion piece. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store