'Three Billionth iPhone': Apple Stock (NASDAQ:AAPL) Slips as Sustainability Questions Rise
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Apple CEO Tim Cook revealed the news during the third quarter earnings call, and made it perfectly clear that the iPhone is now one of consumer technology's greatest products of all time. With the iPhone's 20 th anniversary still two years out, demand is strong and rising worldwide as emerging markets step into the ring, out to get their hands on an iPhone.
Reports noted that Apple went from zero to one billion after nine years, crossing that threshold in 2016. Five years later, in 2021, the two billion mark arrived. Now, only four years later, the three billion mark was crossed. As new shoppers pick up iPhones, and old iPhone users continue to replace their old iPhones with newer models, Apple has found a steady and mostly reliable source of revenue over the years.
But Can It Continue?
As anyone with an income stream has asked, at one point or another, how long can this go on? The latest move from two billion to three billion came with surprising speed, and some note that the Trump tariffs gave the newest surge a little something extra. After all, people might well have bought iPhones a little faster than normal to avoid any potential price bump from the tariffs. Thus, the question of front-loaded sales came up.
If it were the case that sales were front-loaded, with people buying new models ahead of potential price jumps from the tariffs, then that would be bad news for end-of-year sales. Going into the holiday shopping season, this might be especially bad news, at a time when Apple would normally clean house.
Is Apple a Buy, Hold or Sell?
Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on AAPL stock based on 14 Buys, 10 Holds and one Sell assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 5.59% loss in its share price over the past year, the average AAPL price target of $230.97 per share implies 14.35% upside potential.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: Trump, Schumer trade barbs over Senate nominations
The Senate voted on some of Trump's nominations before the August recess. 2:17 The Senate on Saturday considered some of President Donald Trump's nominations before the August recess. Earlier this week, Trump issued an executive order slapping tariffs on many of America's trading partners but the new duties are set to go into effect in seven days. Trump also continues to face questions over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and his relationship with the accused sex trafficker. Latest headlines: 3 minutes ago Johnson makes last-minute visit to Israel 57 minutes ago Greer suggests Aug. 12 tariff deadline for China could slide 1 hour and 37 minutes ago Texas state House set to consider new congressional maps on Monday Here's how the news is developing. 46 Updates Jul 28, 2025, 10:00 AM EDT Trump says he is 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, but it's 'inappropriate' to discuss When asked by reporters if he would pardon Ghislaine Maxwell -- the convicted associate of deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein -- President Donald Trump said he is "allowed to give her a pardon" but "nobody's approached me with it." "Nobody's asked me about it. Right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it," Trump said on Monday. He said he hasn't been "overly interested" in the Epstein files, and called the 'whole thing a hoax' in regard to whether his name is in the files. Jul 28, 2025, 9:56 AM EDT Starmer says he has a 'very good relationship' with Trump British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he has a "very good personal relationship" with President Donald Trump, emphasizing that the United Kingdom and the United States have "always stood together." In terms of best interests for the two countries, Starmer added that he and Trump have a "huge amount of common ground." Trump says he is 'not interested in talking' to Putin President Donald Trump said he has "always gotten along" with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but on Monday, he said he is "not interested in talking" to him. "Russia could be so rich right now. But instead, they spend everything on war. I really thought this was going to end. Every time I think it's going to end, he kills people," Trump said. Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would reduce the 50-day window for Russia to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine. Jul 28, 2025, 9:37 AM EDT Trump says Powell 'has to' cut interest rates While meeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, President Donald Trump said Fed Chair Jerome Powell "has to" cut interest rates. "He should cut. A smart person should cut," Trump said. This comes after Trump visited the Federal Reserve on Thursday, repeating calls for lower interest rates while standing alongside Powell.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
How foreign policy could crash Republican midterm prospects
This summer's MAGA revolt over the Epstein Files has challenged the longstanding assumption that President Trump has an unbreakable bond with the Republican base. Trump loyalists from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to Steve Bannon to Tucker Carlson have recently criticized the president not just on the Epstein disclosures but also on Medicaid cuts in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Yet new polling shows that another issue could cost Trump crucial support and substantially lower his standing among independent voters whom Republicans need in order to win future elections. While Republicans largely rallied around Trump following the June 22 bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, recent YouGov polling commissioned by the Center for Economic and Policy Research demonstrates substantial political risks for the president and his party if he supports an expanded war involving Israel and Iran. When respondents consider the economic consequences of a broader conflict, as well as their trust in the justifications offered for involvement in such a war, Trump faces overwhelming dissent among Independents. These voters are about one-third of the electorate and currently about evenly split between Democrat-leaning and Republican-leaning. If an issue becomes important in an election and the Independent voters move strongly in one direction, that can swing the election. A clear majority of voters — 65 percent — reported they would hold Trump responsible if gasoline prices rose to $6 a gallon as a result of expanded U.S. military involvement. Among Independent voters, this sentiment rises to 69 percent. Further, when informed that economists would expect a significant rise in mortgage interest rates to result from an expanded conflict — potentially adding over $100,000 in lifetime payments for a typical home — 72 percent oppose U.S. military involvement, with two thirds of those expressing 'strong' opposition. Most polls treat foreign policy decisions as isolated events, simply asking whether voters support or oppose military action. But major interventions do not occur in isolation — they can impact gas prices, mortgage rates and overall confidence in politicians and their political parties. A true measure of public sentiment on expanded military involvement must account for these potential and even likely consequences, which often drive voter attitudes more than abstract strategic considerations. Donald Trump rose politically by highlighting Americans' declining trust in institutions, from government regulators and health experts to traditional media. But the polling shows that Trump himself faces serious accusations from his base of breaching public trust and caving to wealthy donors advocating unconditional support for Israeli policies that millions of voters view as wrong and dangerous. Sixty-three percent of respondents expressed concern that Trump's decision to attack Iran could be influenced by major campaign donors, a concern particularly strong among Independents. And two-thirds of voters — including nearly one-third of Republicans — feel that intervening in an Israel-Iran conflict contradicts Trump's core 'America First' promise. In June, Tucker Carlson accused Trump of being 'complicit in the act of war' following Israel's attacks on Iran, and influential MAGA voices like Steve Bannon echoed similar skepticism. Yet commentary alone is unlikely to shift conservative public opinion. People respond to tangible impacts in their lives. If Trump once again follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into major military action in the Middle East, the consequences may extend beyond geopolitics and significantly impact the president's party in next year's midterm elections. Consider some midterm math. On all five questions related to U.S. intervention in Iran, voters who identify as Republican or Democrat overwhelmingly aligned with their respective parties. For example, by a ratio of 88 percent to 12 percent, Democrats said they did not believe that 'Trump is getting involved in this war for the sake of U.S. national security.' Republicans held the opposite view, with 77 percent believing national security was the reason and 23 percent not believing it. This leaves Independent voters as potentially decisive. According to current polling data, Independents are evenly divided between 'Republican-leaning' and 'Democrat-leaning,' generally indicating close national elections. However, on questions regarding U.S. participation in a war against Iran, Independents are solidly opposed, by a margin of two to one. This leads to an overall result of 63-37 saying that they do not believe that U.S. involvement in such a war is 'for the sake of national security.' While the June war between Israel and Iran appears to be over, another Israeli attack in the near future remains quite possible. Should Trump decide to join such an operation before the next election, it could significantly undermine Republican chances of retaining Congress. Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He is the author of 'Failed: What the 'Experts' Got Wrong About the Global Economy (Oxford University Press). Justin Talbot Zorn is a senior adviser at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Truman National Security Fellow, and served as legislative director for three members of Congress.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jobs market stalls as US adds only 73K in July; huge revisions in May, June
The U.S. added only 73,000 jobs in July and the unemployment rate ticked slightly higher to 4.2 percent, according to data released Friday by the Labor Department. The July jobs report showed the labor market stalling out as consumers and businesses navigated President Trump's ever-evolving trade policies and steep new tariffs. The report came in well below the expectations of economists, most of whom projected job gains of at least 100,000 in July, according to consensus estimates. Job growth in May and June was also far lower than first reported, according to the Labor Department, which shaved 258,000 jobs off of its past two reports. The U.S. only added 19,000 jobs in May compared to an initial report of 144,000, and only 14,000 in June after an initial report of 147,000. Some economists were predicting a dip as investment and business sentiment resulting from trade uncertainties has languished. Accounting firm EY-Parthenon put the July number at 40,000 jobs earlier this week. '[The] July jobs report will be payback for June,' Oxford Economics economist Nancy Vanden Houten wrote in a commentary, predicting 90,000 would be added in the July report. The health care sector led the employment increase, with 73,300 jobs added in July. Retail added 15,700 jobs, hospitality added 5,000, and transportation and warehousing added 3,600. The manufacturing sector, a focus for Trump in delivering many of his economic policies, lost 11,000 jobs in July after shedding 15,000 in June. Professional services jobs were down by 14,000, temp work was down by 4,400, and mining and logging jobs lost 4,000. Uncertainty about U.S. economic policies has been weighing on businesses, which have been eating the increased costs coming from the tariffs but have also started to pass them along into prices. The Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures price index increased more than expected last month, rising to a 2.6 percent annual increase. The Labor Department's consumer price index popped to a 2.7 percent annual from a previous reading of 2.4 percent. Both metrics have been moving away from the Federal Reserve's target rate of 2 percent inflation in the last two readings. Businesses have been reporting cautious approaches to hiring in anecdotal surveys. 'Hiring proceeded cautiously in part because of ongoing policy uncertainty,' the Boston Fed reported in the central bank's latest beige book. Businesses are also increasingly adopting artificial intelligence in the workplace, which is affecting employment conditions. 'Multiple other business contacts reported increased use of artificial intelligence (AI), with one contact saying AI replaced some call center employees, and another contact noting how AI led to a reduction in accounting jobs,' the Philadelphia Fed reported. U.S. gross domestic product expanded by a sizable 3 percent in the second quarter after contracting in the first, but this was in large part due to trade irregularities stemming from tariffs. Second-quarter final purchases increased by a more modest 1.2 percent, the Commerce Department reported this week. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has described growth as having moderated. The Fed is projecting 1.4 percent growth for this year, down from a robust 2.8 percent last year. Weakening economic metrics are likely to fuel Trump's pressure campaign on the Fed for rate cuts. Trump has been telling the Fed to resume cuts for months. The Fed held overnight rates steady between 4.25 percent and 4.5 percent this week, though two Fed governors took the rare step of dissenting from the decision. Many had viewed those dissents as being political in nature, but Friday's weaker jobs print backs up the view that the economic conditions are weakening and could use support. Updated at 9:15 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
