Media Watch refuses to investigate allegations ABC covered up involvement of presenter Myf Warhurst in violent altercation between neighbours
The incident occurred in December 2022 when popular Spicks and Specks presenter and her then-partner, architect Brian Steendyk, raised concerns about a concrete wall being built along their shared boundary with neighbour Karla Martinez.
The couple claimed part of the structure crossed into their property.
Tensions boiled over on December 28, when Mr Steendyk used "a chainsaw and grinder" to cut through approximately 26 metres of the newly constructed fence, according to The Australian.
Ms Martinez alleged the incident quickly descended into chaos.
Warhurst claimed to the police she and her partner had been assaulted "by the neighbour".
A story, which has since been taken down, was published on the ABC's website in May 2024 and targeted the actions of Ms Martinez but didn't even name Warhurst for her role in the disagreement.
Ms Martinez reached out to Media Watch over the article in an attempt to expose "conflicts of interest, journalistic deceit, misrepresentation, manipulation and plagiarism" in an act "out of desperation" late last year, but was met with a message saying it was "not interested" in exploring the claims.
The mother of three is now prepared to sure the ABC for damages, following the effects the article has had on her life and career.
'I've faced a lot of tough things in my life – I came to Australia as a refugee from El Salvador in 1990 and had to work hard for everything I've got,' she told The Australian.
'But what I've gone through with the ABC is worse than anything else I have experienced – they've ruined my life while protecting their own employee, and they're refusing to take any responsibility for it whatsoever.
'I called and spoke to a producer at Media Watch about my treatment at the hands of the ABC and everything I had been through last December. But they said they weren't interested in having a look at it. I was very surprised.'
Ms Martinez reportedly spoke to Media Watch when the show was in between hosts after long-serving presenter Paul Barry left and before Linton Besser joined the program.
During the heated feud in 2022, police from nearby Eltham station attended the scene and separated the parties.
Mr Steendyk made a formal complaint, leading to Ms Martinez being charged with assault- a charge that was later dropped.
The conflict escalated in the weeks that followed, with both sides taking out interim intervention orders (IVOs) against each other.
An ongoing dispute over a new concrete wall Ms Martinez was building sparked the ABC's article about the woman but in the story, Warhurst wasn't named and was only referred to as an "ABC contractor" despite the fact her partner's police statement was quoted in it.
However Mr Steendyk was also not identified by name, but only as a "neighbour".
Ms Martinez has called for Warhurst to be suspended without pay but the presenter has denied knowing about the story until after it was published.
In a statement to SkyNews.com.au, the ABC said: "The ABC is assured it acted appropriately in this matter.
"Myf Warhurst had no involvement in publishing the story. Myf is highly valued by the ABC."
SkyNews.com.au has also approached Ms Warhurst for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Walter Sofronoff fights against corruption findings during inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution
Lawyers have rejected suggestions a corrupt motive could've driven a former judge to prematurely send out copies of a report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to journalists, arguing 'at worst' it was an 'erroneous attempt' to ensure accuracy in public discourse. Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. A subsequent investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists – ABC's Elizabeth Byrne and The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen – prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission. The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned by the Federal Court. Barrister Adam Pomerenke SC argued there was 'overwhelming evidence' Mr Sofronoff genuinely believed he was acting in the good of the public to ensure accurate media reporting by sending out the report to the journalists – an essential part of his role investigating a matter of public interest. Therefore, his conduct couldn't amount to having a corrupt, dishonest, or malicious motive, regardless of whether reasonable people disagreed with Mr Sofronoff's views. 'In my respectful submission those views of Mr Soffronoff are not rationally capable of amounting to a corrupt dishonest or malicious motive,' Mr Pomerenke told the court. 'A person can be wrong without being negligent, much less corrupt, dishonest or malicious.' He said even if Mr Sofronoff was 'wrong', he genuinely and honestly held his view. 'At worst, it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in public discourse, and an attempt at accuracy and transparency in public discourse cannot rationally, in my respectful submission, be described as corrupt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Even if one vehemently disagrees with what Mr Soffronoff did, that statute does not authorise a misuse of language by describing it as corrupt.' This fell under Mr Sofronoff's sixth ground of appeal, which claims the commission's finding that his conduct was a 'breach of public trust' is affected by jurisdictional error. Further, Mr Pomerenke argued an error by the commission in finding Mr Sofronoff had engaged in contempt was a 'serious offence against the administration of justice' and cannot be 'disentangled' from the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct. He also claimed the Juno report couldn't be 'saved by reconstruction'. 'Our submission is given this entanglement, the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct is affected by jurisdictional error because its material …(there's a) realistic possibility that the conclusion could have been different if the respondent had not wrongly found that Mr Sofronoff could have committed a serious offence of contempt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'And as I say if this is the right … serious corrupt conduct cannot stand.' Turning to the other grounds of appeal, he claimed if any of the first 11 grounds were established, they couldn't be 'disentangled' from the 12th ground relating to the finding of corrupt conduct itself, as each error was 'bound up in the rolled up conclusion of serious corrupt conduct'. 'Your Honour can't have regard to one error in isolation,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Each additional error we establish beyond the concession in ground two fortifies that conclusion that … there was jurisdictional error, entitling Mr Sofronoff to relief.' He also argued there was a 'basic misuse of language' and a 'distortion' of the concept of corruption by the commission in interpreting 'integrity' as meaning soundness or efficacy as distinct from probity of government or public administration. 'In our respectful submission that's not correct: it seriously dilutes and distorts the very notion of corruption, which has probity at its heart,' Mr Pomeranke said. 'On the respondent's approach, it can include findings in its reports which stigmatise conduct as corrupt even though it is disconnected from probity in government or public administration.' Documents filed by the retired judge's legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'. The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'. The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Lehrmann inquiry chair fights ‘corrupt' claims
Lawyers have rejected suggestions a corrupt motive could've driven a former judge to prematurely send out copies of a report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to journalists, arguing 'at worst' it was an 'erroneous attempt' to ensure accuracy in public discourse. Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. A subsequent investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists – ABC's Elizabeth Byrne and The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen – prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission. The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned by the Federal Court. Barrister Adam Pomerenke SC argued there was 'overwhelming evidence' Mr Sofronoff genuinely believed he was acting in the good of the public to ensure accurate media reporting by sending out the report to the journalists – an essential part of his role investigating a matter of public interest. Walter Sofronoff KC led an inquiry into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. NewsWire/Tertius Pickard Credit: News Corp Australia Therefore, his conduct couldn't amount to having a corrupt, dishonest, or malicious motive, regardless of whether reasonable people disagreed with Mr Sofronoff's views. 'In my respectful submission those views of Mr Soffronoff are not rationally capable of amounting to a corrupt dishonest or malicious motive,' Mr Pomerenke told the court. 'A person can be wrong without being negligent, much less corrupt, dishonest or malicious.' He said even if Mr Sofronoff was 'wrong', he genuinely and honestly held his view. 'At worst, it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in public discourse, and an attempt at accuracy and transparency in public discourse cannot rationally, in my respectful submission, be described as corrupt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Even if one vehemently disagrees with what Mr Soffronoff did, that statute does not authorise a misuse of language by describing it as corrupt.' This fell under Mr Sofronoff's sixth ground of appeal, which claims the commission's finding that his conduct was a 'breach of public trust' is affected by jurisdictional error. Further, Mr Pomerenke argued an error by the commission in finding Mr Sofronoff had engaged in contempt was a 'serious offence against the administration of justice' and cannot be 'disentangled' from the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct. He also claimed the Juno report couldn't be 'saved by reconstruction'. 'Our submission is given this entanglement, the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct is affected by jurisdictional error because its material …(there's a) realistic possibility that the conclusion could have been different if the respondent had not wrongly found that Mr Sofronoff could have committed a serious offence of contempt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'And as I say if this is the right … serious corrupt conduct cannot stand.' Bruce Lehrmann's criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct. NewsWire / John Gass Credit: News Corp Australia The Federal Court found that Mr Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. NewsWire / Gary Ramage Credit: News Corp Australia Turning to the other grounds of appeal, he claimed if any of the first 11 grounds were established, they couldn't be 'disentangled' from the 12th ground relating to the finding of corrupt conduct itself, as each error was 'bound up in the rolled up conclusion of serious corrupt conduct'. 'Your Honour can't have regard to one error in isolation,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Each additional error we establish beyond the concession in ground two fortifies that conclusion that … there was jurisdictional error, entitling Mr Sofronoff to relief.' He also argued there was a 'basic misuse of language' and a 'distortion' of the concept of corruption by the commission in interpreting 'integrity' as meaning soundness or efficacy as distinct from probity of government or public administration. 'In our respectful submission that's not correct: it seriously dilutes and distorts the very notion of corruption, which has probity at its heart,' Mr Pomeranke said. 'On the respondent's approach, it can include findings in its reports which stigmatise conduct as corrupt even though it is disconnected from probity in government or public administration.' Documents filed by the retired judge's legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'. The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'. The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
7NEWS
5 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Award-winning ABC journalist Peter Ryan dies at 64 after long battle with cancer
Veteran ABC business journalist and Walkley Award winner Peter Ryan has died aged 64 after a battle with cancer. His family confirmed he passed away on Friday night in Sydney, following a 45-year career in journalism. In recent years, Ryan was known to Australians as a trusted source of business news on ABC Radio and TV, a role he held until his retirement in June. He was first diagnosed with metastatic thyroid cancer in 2014, which ultimately led to his decision to retire. According to his LinkedIn profile, Ryan began his journalism career as a copyboy at the Daily Mirror in 1980. Over the years, he held various roles, including stints at the BBC and Nine Network, before returning to and spending much of his career with the ABC. During more than 35 years at the ABC, Ryan held a number of senior positions, including Washington bureau chief, head of TV news and current affairs in Victoria, and executive producer of Business Breakfast. He was the founding editor of Lateline Business, the program that would later become The Business, and eventually served as the ABC's business editor. From 2016 until his retirement, he was the network's senior business correspondent. Ryan won a Walkley award in 2017 for his groundbreaking investigative report on the Commonwealth Bank scandal, which revealed serious breaches of anti-money laundering laws and sparked widespread calls for reform in Australia's banking sector. He was also recognised as the National Press Club Finance Journalist of the Year in 2018 for his coverage of the banking royal commission. In 2022, Ryan was honoured with the Order of Australia Medal for his service to journalism. At the time of his retirement, Treasurer Jim Chalmers described him as 'an absolute legend'. 'Every day as you wake up and you think about what's happening in the economy, if you only needed to listen to one voice to be sure that you got its essential elements, it would be Peter's,' he said. ABC News director Justin Stevens said Ryan left a 'significant legacy'. 'Through his mentorship, friendship, and professionalism, he directly touched the lives of many at the ABC,' he said. 'Through his journalism, he had a profound impact on the lives of Australians and our society. It was a privilege to know him and work alongside him.' Former ABC News Breakfast presenter Michael Rowland paid tribute on Sunday night, recalling that Ryan was 'full of old stories and good cheer' even when hospitalised. 'If you wanted to know what was going in corporate Australia, Peter was your man. His contacts and record of story-breaking were unrivalled,' Rowland said. 'On top of his courageous journalism, Peter was also a generous mentor and boss to so many over the years, including me. He had a big impact on so many ABC careers.' On his departure from the ABC, Ryan offered words of advice to colleagues across generations. 'Avoid cynicism — be passionate,' he said. 'A good team can often be a very small team — I've worked in some of the best. 'Be proactive — come to the table with a great story so no-one else comes up with a dud that might waste your time. 'Work closely with top people — shut up and absorb like a sponge. 'Maintain a fastidious contact book — some low-profile contacts could soon move into higher-powered roles or, more importantly, work in backrooms where the big decisions are often made. 'Show up to work early and prove that you're ready to take on the big story of the day. 'Try to have a Plan B in your back pocket just in case your original brilliant idea doesn't go anywhere and the EP comes walking your way. 'Finally: Be kind and caring to people who need it.'
