Dhs1,000 fine for not installing 'Hassantuk' fire detection system in Abu Dhabi buildings
He emphasised that UAE legislation mandates its installation and maintenance, with penalties for non-compliance.
Violators, according to Al Kathiri will first receive a warning and a grace period to rectify the issue. If non-compliance persists after the deadline, a fine of Dhs1,000 will be imposed.
It is worth noting that the system aims to enhance fire safety and rapid response in residential buildings, aligning with national safety standards. Homeowners are urged to comply with regulations to avoid penalties and ensure the safety of their properties and occupants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
6 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Minor without driving licence steals car, totals it in Abu Dhabi accident
The Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Cases Court ruled that a guardian must pay Dhs74,081 to an individual in a case involving the guardian's minor son stealing a car, driving it, and causing an accident resulting in the car's damage. The court also ordered the guardian to pay the fees and expenses of the lawsuit. The court heard that a minor without a driving licence stole a car without the owner's permission. Due to his recklessness and lack of consideration for road conditions and traffic instructions, as well as his failure to respect applicable laws, he caused an accident that resulted in damage to the car. This resulted in irreparable damage, rendering the car unfit for use. The car owner was therefore forced to rent a car from a rental office, which resulted in significant financial losses. He filed a lawsuit demanding that the minor's guardian pay him Dhs200,000 for the value of the car, compensate him for renting a vehicle for over one year and six months, and pay the value of the vehicle release invoices. This was to be paid in his personal capacity and as the natural guardian of his son, who caused the damage as a result of his proven mistake. The owner also demanded legal interest at a rate of 9% from the date of the legal claim until full payment and the payment of fees, expenses and attorney's fees. As a juvenile under sixteen years of age, the minor was referred to the Public Prosecution Office, which investigated the incident and ultimately referred him to the Misdemeanour Court. A criminal case was filed against him as a family prosecution case, and he was found guilty. As the minor and his guardian could not appeal this ruling, it became final and binding. The Court appointed an expert to determine the damages incurred by the car owner as a result of the accident, as well as the market value of the damages caused by the minor. In his report, the expert concluded that the car was not roadworthy and a total loss, as the cost of repairing it exceeded 50% of its market value of Dhs80,000 at the time of the incident. The market value of the wreckage was estimated at Dhs15,000. Therefore, the car owner was entitled to Dhs65,000 for the car's market value, plus Dhs1,081 for releasing the car from impoundment. According to the expert's assessment, the car owner is also entitled to compensation for loss of use of his vehicle in the amount of Dhs5,000 and compensation for moral damages in the amount of Dhs3,000. Therefore, the court ruled that the minor's guardian must pay the car owner Dhs74,081. Regarding the car owner's claim for compensation for the cost of renting a vehicle for over one year and six months, the court clarified that the case documents contained no evidence that he had rented a replacement car. Instead of invoices for the rental of a replacement car, a price quote for the rental of a replacement car was attached. Therefore, the court ruled to reject this part of the claim for financial compensation in its current form.
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
Man fined Dh25,000, licence suspended for drunk driving in Dubai
An Asian man has been fined Dh25,000 and had his driving licence suspended for three months after causing a traffic accident in Dubai while under the influence of alcohol, according to court record. In a Gulf News report, the man admitted to driving in an impaired state after consuming alcohol without a permit. Prosecutors charged him with three offences: drinking alcohol without legal permission, driving under its influence, and causing damage to public property. Court documents showed that the driver lost control of his vehicle, swerved suddenly, and crashed into a metal pole on a public road, damaging both the pole and his car. The court based its verdict on a traffic accident expert's report and the defendant's confession.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Employee wins Dhs57,400 in wages and gratuity after 15-year service in Abu Dhabi
The Abu Dhabi Primary Labour Court has ordered a company to pay a former employee a total of Dhs57,400, covering unpaid wages, end-of-service gratuity, and the issuance of an experience certificate. The court also obligated the company to cover the fees and expenses of the lawsuit. The employee stated that he had worked for the company for more than 15 years, but the company failed to provide him with all his entitlements. The case began when the employee filed a complaint with the Labour Department at the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE) against his employer. The department later referred the case to the court. In his lawsuit, the employee demanded payment of unpaid wages for five months amounting to Dhs17,500, leave allowance for eight years totalling Dhs24,500, end-of-service gratuity of Dhs37,800, and overtime pay for six months amounting to Dhs1,500. He also requested that the company be obligated to issue him an experience certificate. The plaintiff stated that he was employed under an indefinite-term contract for more than 15 years, with a monthly salary of Dhs3,500. According to the case file, the Wage Protection System revealed that the plaintiff was entitled to wages for only four months, totalling Dhs14,000; leave allowance for the last two years, calculated based on his basic monthly salary, amounting to Dhs5,600; and end-of-service gratuity for a period of 15 years, six months, and 26 days, totalling Dhs39,399. However, since the employee requested Dhs37,800 as his end-of-service gratuity, the court awarded him the amount he claimed. Therefore, the total amount the employee was entitled to was Dhs57,400, which the court ordered the company to pay. The court clarified that regarding the employee's claim for overtime pay of Dhs1,500, he did not provide any documents proving that he had worked extra hours. Consequently, he was not entitled to overtime pay.
