logo
Apartment developers gear up for tariffs

Apartment developers gear up for tariffs

Yahooa day ago

This story was originally published on Multifamily Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Multifamily Dive newsletter.
As executives at Houston-based Camden Property Trust underwrite their apartment developments with tariffs on the horizon, they're only figuring in a 2% to 3% increase in construction costs.
With the ever-changing threat of tariffs from President Donald Trump, that number may appear suspiciously low. But it's not a mistake, according to Camden CEO Ric Campo.
'The reason it's not more is that we've been to this movie before,' Campo said on the REIT's first-quarter earnings call last month. 'Under the [Trump] administration 1.0, there were tariffs and there were issues, and COVID created a lot of interesting supply chain issues, as we all know.'
That tariff and pandemic experience created a practice run for apartment developers, setting them up to meet 2025's challenges. 'What a lot of folks have done, including the apartment industry and construction industry, is we have tried to get our supply chain closer to our projects, and a lot of effort has gone into getting supply chains that are not as vulnerable as Asian supply chains,' Campo said.
Though those experiences have helped apartment developers plan for tariffs 2.0, there are still challenges this time around. There is a universal 10% tariff on all imports this time, and uncertainty lingers, with the timing and scale of Trump's levies remaining a moving target.
Then there's the issue of legality.
With the U.S. Court of International Trade striking down April's 'Liberation Day' tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China last week, questions linger about whether the trade war will end before shots are really even fired. A day later, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed that ruling.
But even with the ground shifting beneath them, apartment developers have to plan for the worst, which includes high prices and potential shortages for the materials and products they need to complete their projects. Here is how they're preparing.
Count Rene Bello, founder and CEO of Miami-based real estate investment and development firm BLDG Ventures, among those dusting off his playbook from the first Trump administration.
'Because we have had experience with this before, we're looking at retooling on some of the strategies we use,' Bello told Multifamily Dive.
For Bello, preparing ahead means cutting out the middleman for price-sensitive materials. He went directly to vendors to order 75,000 square feet of flooring for an entire building, for example, six to 10 months ahead of time. 'We can buy in large quantities, well in advance,' he said.
In other cases, Bello is flying to other countries to line up materials. During the winter, he met with his Colombia-based glazing manufacturer.
'We knew that we need to get ahead of that, and then we just had a very clear and honest conversation with our contractors and our suppliers about how can we effectively get on their books well in advance rather than waiting six to nine months down the pipeline and then having to absorb the full run on these tariffs,' Bello said.
Bello isn't the only executive buying more than he currently needs before he needs it. Cameron Gunter, co-CEO of PEG, a Provo, Utah-based owner, operator and developer of multifamily, hospitality and build-to-rent properties, has two multifamily projects currently in development, with one in Tucson, Arizona, slated to open later this year.
'We bought a bunch of our cabinets out of China,' Gunter told Multifamily Dive. 'So we took our first shipment as we started to see this issue on tariffs. We haven't installed it, but it's all stored on property.'
With Trump's May 90-day pause on Chinese tariffs to allow for time to negotiate with different countries, Gunter expects to get his second shipment before the levies kick in. 'We'll be able to get those here in the next 90 days,' he said in May.
Bello isn't just ordering ahead to try to beat tariffs. He's putting his projects through a value-engineering process to avoid countries with the highest tariffs.
'We're not buying things from the Asian markets,' Bello said. 'We should see a higher pricing and tariff on those materials coming from those parts of the globe.'
But so far, the cost increases haven't hit all products in the same way.
'We're seeing, on average, between 3% and 5% increases for trades like glazing, electrical [and] raw materials,' Bello said. 'With fixtures and lighting, you'll definitely see an increase between 10% and 20%. We're also seeing lead times extended.'
Bello is also opening the door to American-made products, like paints and bath fixtures. In May, he was on a call with an architect deciding between two options for toilets — German-made Toto and American Standard made in the U.S. The choice was easy, even if it wasn't what he wanted.
'As much as I'd love to put in a beautiful Toto bath fixture, we said, 'Look, American Standard is American made,'' Bello said. 'We know that there won't be any tariffs implemented on those American-made fixtures. So we'll go in that direction.'
PEG also builds hotels, which require it to purchase furniture, fixtures and equipment. With many of those products, the firm is sourcing from new countries. 'We shifted from China to Vietnam or Taiwan,' Gunter said.
But Gunter said there are limits, specifically related to costs, to buying what is produced in America. 'We're finding some ways around it,' Gunter said. 'I don't think the answer is sourcing stuff out of the U.S., unless rents really climb or AI takes [manufacturing] jobs because it's just tough [to make the numbers work].'
With about 4,500 units in annual starts, Tysons Corner, Virginia-based owner, manager and developer Middleburg Communities can lock in purchasing agreements with suppliers and vendors. So far, CEO Chris Finlay, who has seen tariffs push up costs roughly 3%, said his subcontractors are basically eating the costs of the increases as construction starts have fallen.
'Work is just more scarce now,' Finlay told Multifamily Dive. 'If you're a subcontractor, you're trying to win the business. Taking some tariff risk to win the deal is what I think a lot of people are doing.'
For PEG's Gunter, the goal is to share the burden of price hikes. 'I can create contingencies where they have it as part of their [guaranteed maximum price] and we use that contingency to cover any tariffs based on the general contractor piece,' he said. 'If it goes over that, there's a responsibility. If it comes under that, there's a shared savings clause.'
Still, Gunter said there are some questions about whether general contractors are willing to take those risks going forward, even if work is more scarce. However, even if subs are reluctant to eat the additional tariffs, general savings in labor prices may help developers offset the additional burden of tariffs.
On AvalonBay Communities' first-quarter earnings call last month, Chief Investment Officer Matthew Birenbaum said materials costs are generally 25% to 30% of the Arlington, Virginia-based REIT's overall hard costs and 20% of total project costs.
While tariffs could push overall costs by 3% to 4%, a reduction in labor prices could offset some of that. 'On those jobs we are actively bidding today, our phones are ringing off the hook with deeper bid coverage and stronger subcontractor availability than we have seen in years,' Birenbaum said.
Brad Hill, CEO of Memphis-based REIT MAA, said his development team is getting the same calls. 'Given the reduction in the new starts and the supply pipeline, we're getting better pricing at the moment from many of our GCs and development partners,' he said on the REIT's first-quarter earnings call last month. 'Margins are tightening up a bit, and they're getting a little bit hungrier for new starts.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk And Trump Go To War: Trump Rejects Musk's Truce Attempt (Live Updates)
Musk And Trump Go To War: Trump Rejects Musk's Truce Attempt (Live Updates)

Forbes

time11 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk And Trump Go To War: Trump Rejects Musk's Truce Attempt (Live Updates)

President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's months-long alliance imploded in spectacular fashion Thursday as the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man engaged in a nasty, public back-and-forth on their respective social media platforms—just months after the two formed a friendship so close Musk sometimes slept at the White House. June 6, 8:17 told ABC News in a Friday morning interview he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk right now, alleging Musk has 'lost his mind.' 7:00 price of Tesla's shares, which plummeted 14% on Thursday amid the clash, is up around 4.4% in premarket trading on Friday morning, after Musk signaled he is open to a truce with Trump. 4:00 signals of a truce, continued to attack the president's allies, like Steve Bannon, and Trump's signature spending bill. The billionaire later reposted a follower who said 'Republicans will likely lose the House in 2026.' 1 signaled he is willing to de-escalate his fight with Trump after hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman—who is both a Trump supporter and a Musk ally—tweeted that both of them 'should make peace for the benefit of our great are much stronger together than apart.' Musk replied: 'You're not wrong.' Trump has not yet commented on Musk's latest overture, but Politico reported that White House officials were working behind the scenes to 'persuade the president to temper his public criticism of Musk to avoid escalation,' and they have scheduled a call on Friday with Musk to 'broker peace.' 12:30 appeared to backtrack on his threat to decommission the SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after a follower urged him not to do so, prompting the billionaire to respond 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' June 5, 4:26 P.M. Musk, who previously disagreed with Trump's controversial tariff policies but had remained mostly reserved in his criticism of them in recent months, said the tariffs will trigger a recession in the second half of the year. 4:11 P.M. Musk endorsed one user's suggestion that Trump be impeached, writing 'Yes' in response to an X user who wrote 'President vs. Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. . . Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.' 4:09 said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft used by NASA to transport astronauts to the International Space Station. 3:10 P.M. Musk alleged on X, without evidence, the reason the White House has yet to fully release the 'Epstein files' detailing the FBI's investigation into the late, disgraced former financier Jeffrey Epstein is because Trump is implicated in them. 2:48 said it's 'such an obvious lie' and 'so sad' in response to Trump claiming he asked him to leave the White House because he was 'wearing thin,' then 'took away his EV Mandate,' causing the Tesla CEO to go 'CRAZY!'—referring to a provision in Trump's policy bill that would phase out the EV tax credit by 2026. 2:37 P.M. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote, adding, 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 12:46 said 'without me,' Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would control the House, and Republicans would have a more narrow majority in the Senate, after Musk donated more than $250 million toward Trump's campaign, accusing Trump in a subsequent tweet of 'such ingratitude.' 12:25 accused Trump of lying saying he didn't turn on the bill after the EV tax credit was removed: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk tweeted. 12 making his first comments on Musk's criticism of his bill during an Oval Office press conference, insinuated the Tesla CEO opposes his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which Musk has been ranting about all week, because he is 'upset' the electric vehicle incentive was removed, adding he's not sure he'll remain friends with Musk and alleging Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill.' Trump also suggested Musk is suffering from what he refers to as 'Trump derangement syndrome,' which Trump describes as people turning on the president after they leave his administration. 11:20 in his most direct attack on Trump amid his days-long rant against the policy bill, reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words,' after Trump said Wednesday the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of the bill, which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. Musk said repeatedly last year he supports eliminating the EV tax credit—statements that hurt Trump's argument he only opposes the bill because it gets rid of the incentive. 'I think we should get rid of all credits,' Musk said in December when asked by a reporter on Capitol Hill if he supports getting rid of the electric vehicle tax credit, Politico reported. The House-passed version of the bill would phase out the $7,500 tax credit for some EV buyers by 2026. $2.4 trillion. That's how much the bill would add to the federal debt over the next decade, according to an estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released Wednesday that estimates it would cost $4.2 trillion, mostly from tax cuts, and save $1.8 trillion. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said while sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office on Thursday. Musk—who left his White House role Friday—has fired off dozens of tweets this week attacking Trump's policy bill over the amount it's expected to add to the federal debt. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote Tuesday on X in his initial post bashing the legislation, calling it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled . . . disgusting abomination.' Musk attacked Trump directly over the bill for the first time since he began his days-long rant moments before Trump sat down with Merz by reposting the president's 2013 tweet about the debt ceiling. In other tweets this week targeting the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' Musk threatened Republicans who voted for it, warning that 'in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' and calling for lawmakers to 'KILL The BILL.' Until Trump's comments Thursday, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.—who shepherded the bill through the House—was the top Republican defending the legislation against Musk's criticism. Johnson said Wednesday Trump is 'not delighted that Elon did a 180.' The bill, passed by the House in a party-line vote last month after last-minute revisions to appease Republican holdouts, is being negotiated by the Senate. Republican leaders have set a July 4 deadline to put the bill on Trump's desk for signage, but GOP resistance in the upper chamber—and some expressions of regret from a few House Republicans who said they were unaware of certain provisions—threaten to delay its passage. The legislation would fulfill Trump's key campaign promises, including an extension of his 2017 tax cuts, no taxes on tips and overtime and additional border security, paid for, in part, by cuts to Medicaid. Tesla shares dropped 14% as Musk clashed with Trump, closing at $284.70 and completely erasing a month's worth of gains it made in May. The fall marked the 11th-worst single trading day for the electric vehicle maker since it went public in 2010, according to FactSet. Musk, who owns about 12% of Tesla excluding options, saw his estimated net worth tumble by $27 billion to $388 billion (he still remains the world's wealthiest person by far). Trump Media & Technology Group's stock closed down 8% at $20.12, bringing shares to their lowest point since April 16. Multiple cryptocurrencies also slumped amid the spat, with ethereum falling 7%, Solana dropping 6% and the Musk-backed dogecoin sliding 9%. Bitcoin prices did not fall as sharply as its competitors' prices, but still sunk by 3% by Thursday evening. Tensions between Musk and Trump were palpable during the joint press conference they held Friday to mark Musk's last day leading the Department of Government Efficiency. While the two praised each other, their once-lighthearted rapport appeared stiff and uneasy. Musk in particular appeared to be in an odd mood, prompting social media users to claim he was 'tweaking out,' suggesting he may have been under the influence of drugs, as the press conference was held hours after a New York Times report alleging Musk engaged in heavy drug use while he campaigned for Trump last year. Musk also sported a black eye during the press conference, which the Tesla CEO claimed he got from his five-year-old son. 'KILL The BILL': Musk Deepens Rant Against Trump's Signature Policy Legislation (Forbes) Musk Calls For Ending Electric Vehicle Tax Credit—Which Could Help Tesla (Forbes) Musk Cuts Off Reporter Asking About Drug Use Allegations—Including Ketamine, Ecstasy And Adderall (Forbes)

Hawley Breaks With Republicans to Oppose a Major Crypto Bill
Hawley Breaks With Republicans to Oppose a Major Crypto Bill

New York Times

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Hawley Breaks With Republicans to Oppose a Major Crypto Bill

While the clash between Elon Musk and President Trump captivated Washington on Thursday, another drama was playing out behind closed doors over a bill to regulate the $250 billion market for stablecoins, which could transform America's relationship with the dollar, upend the credit card industry, and benefit both Musk and Trump. The bill, the GENIUS Act, is poised to pass the Senate within days. But a prominent Republican, Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, said that he will vote against the bill in its current form, warning that it would hand too much control of America's financial system to tech giants. 'It's a huge giveaway to Big Tech,' Hawley said in an interview. Mr. Hawley, who previously voted against the bill for procedural purposes, is concerned that the legislation would allow tech giants to create digital currencies that compete with the dollar. And he fears that such companies would then be motivated to collect even more data on users' finances. 'It allows these tech companies to issue stablecoins without any kind of controls,' he said. 'I don't see why we would do that.' Similar worries scuttled an effort by Meta to get into stablecoins. In 2019, Jay Powell of the Fed, among others, raised 'serious concerns' about Meta's cryptocurrency initiative, called Libra and then Diem. It abandoned the project in 2022. The GENIUS Act has exposed divisions in both parties. Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts oppose the bill, warning it would make it easier for Trump, whose family announced its own USD1 stablecoin in March, to engage in corrupt practices. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Elon Musk escalates feud with Trump: 'Time to drop the really big bomb'
Elon Musk escalates feud with Trump: 'Time to drop the really big bomb'

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk escalates feud with Trump: 'Time to drop the really big bomb'

WASHINGTON – Elon Musk alleged that President Donald Trump's name is mentioned in undisclosed classified files related to the financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as a feud between Trump and the world's richest man devolved into deeply personal attacks. "Time to drop the really big bomb," Musk said in a June 5 post on X. "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Trump did not respond to shouted questions from reporters about Musk's Esptein claim following a White House event with Attorney General Pam Bondi and members of the National Fraternal Order of Police. The White House sent USA TODAY a statement from Trump press secretary Karoline Leavitt in response to the Epstein allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again," Leavitt said. More: Trump and Musk's bromance ends after personal attacks over criticism of tax bill Musk provided no evidence for his allegation but wrote: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." His attack came after Trump, in posts on Truth Social, threatened to end government contracts with Musk's companies and said Musk left the White House's Department of Government Efficiency because Trump asked him to leave. More: Trump overpowers Musk's attacks on mega tax bill with blizzard of orders After hyping up the release of declassified government files on Epstein, Bondi on Feb. 27 disclosed about 200 pages of documents that implicated no one else in Epstein's orbit other than Epstein, who died in a federal prison in 2019. The 'Epstein list,' and the scandal surrounding the multimillionaire's exploitation of teenage girls offers plenty of red meat for partisans on the right and left. Trump and Epstein were filmed and photographed together at parties, and in 2002 he praised the wealthy businessman as a "terrific guy.' 'He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump told New York Magazine. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side." Former President Bill Clinton, like Trump, appears on flight logs for Epstein's private jet. Clinton's spokesman said in 2019, after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges, that the former president had flown on Epstein's jet to destinations in Europe, Africa and Asia. Earlier in the day, Trump said he was "very disappointed" with Musk and signaled his close relationship with the former top White House adviser was over as he publicly addressed Musk's efforts to kill his so-called "big, beautiful bill." Musk quickly fired back with several attacks, including saying that Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would be in the minority on both sides of Capitol Hill were it not for the quarter of a billion dollars he pumped into his 2024 campaign. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk said in a post on X, the social media company he owns. "Such gratitude." Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Elon Musk turns on Trump: 'Time to drop the really big bomb'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store