Mexico, EU Tariff Threats Follow Double-Digit Trend: How Shoe Firms Are Responding
No one knows yet what the way forward will be, but a likely double-digit percent tariff for all countries seems to be where rates are headed.
More from WWD
Summer's Anklet Trend Has Reached New Heights, Here are the Best Styles to Shop Now
These Celeb-Loved Shoes Are Currently 50% Off at Vivaia's End-of-Season Sale
Oleksandr Usyk Readies for Daniel Dubois Fight With Aid From Ukrainian Designer
Based on the reciprocal tariff rates disclosed on April 2 by American President Donald Trump and the current trend in tariff rates, including announced 'trade deals,' double-digit percent rates not far from the reciprocal rates from April 2 are where rates could end up if trade deals aren't reached by Aug. 1.
Based on an outline of agreed terms, the U.S. has said it has two 'trade deals,' one with the U.K. for a 10 percent tariff and the other with Vietnam at 30 percent. Negotiations move to the next stage where the U.S. and the U.K. and Vietnam continue with talks to finalized the trade terms. The U.S. also said it continues its talks with China for a trade agreement. The 90-tariff pause that has rates temporarily lowered to 30 percent is slated to end on Aug. 12.
The reciprocal rate for the U.K. was 10 percent, 46 percent for Vietnam, and 34 percent for China, although that later escalated to as high as 145 percent for certain imported items. That had footwear firms pondering their cost structure going forward, as they worried about their ability to stay in business while maintaining some profitability against a tariff backdrop. While there was a global 90-day reprieve on tariffs to allow for trade talks, Aug. 1 seems to be the cut-off date after Trump declared on his social media platform Truth Social that there would be no more extensions. And nearly four months later, the only certainty shoe companies have is that costs are going up.
American President Donald Trump on Saturday levied a 30 percent tariff on imported goods from two of the nation's largest trading partners, the European Union (EU) and Mexico, starting Aug. 1. Letters were sent to EU Commission President Ursula von de Leyen and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Also included in both letters was a reference to a higher tariff for transshipped goods and that the new levy excludes existing sectoral tariffs.
The EU so far has postponed retaliatory tariffs, hoping to hash out a deal with the Trump administration before Aug. 1. But EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also said in a statement Saturday that the EU would take necessary steps to safeguard its interests, including retaliatory tariffs if talks fail. Trump's letter to the EU Chief says the EU has 'one of our largest Trade Deficits,' noting that 30 percent is 'far less than what is needed to eliminate' the deficit. The initial reciprocal rate was 20 percent, but that later was raised to 30 percent and then to 50 percent.
Trump said in his letter to Sheinbaum that while the country has helped to secure the border, 'what Mexico has done, is not enough.' Trump in February assessed a 25 percent tariff on Mexico after claiming that America's southern border neighbor hadn't done enough to bar the 'pouring' in of drugs like fentanyl into the U.S., nor had it been able to control the activities of criminal cartels. Following a month-long delay to allow for negotiations, the levy was imposed in March, only to be delayed again a few days later. Trump's claims resurfaced in him letter to Sheinbaum as reasons for the new tariff. And while the letter didn't address covered goods under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, those imports are expected to remain duty-free through at least July 2026, when the trade agreement will be subject to a review. Trade talks are expected to continue over the next few weeks.
A Goldman Sachs economics report on the EU noted that Trump's latest threat 'might well be a negotiating tactic,' noting that a 'framework agreement' would likely include a 10 percent tariff rate on all goods and 25 percent for certain other categories, such as steel and aluminum and on critical goods such as pharmaceuticals.
A flurry of tariff letters were sent out last week that included Cambodia, Indonesia and India, countries where their economies rely on footwear production. Cambodia was assessed as 36 percent duty rate, with Indonesia at 32 percent. India faces a 26 percent reciprocal tariff rate, but hasn't yet received the dreaded tariff letter, likely because Trump said the two countries are close to a trade deal. China is the largest shoe producer for imports to the U.S., followed by India. Vietnam is also a large shoe producer in the athletic footwear sector.
While shoe prices in general have been slightly lower versus year-ago levels, the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America's chief economist Gary Raines said recently there is 'mounting evidence upstream in the supply chain of surging average duties per pair on footwear imports.' He said that's an indication that higher duties could soon push the average landed costs of footwear imports higher, which in turn may result in retail footwear prices climbing higher later this year.
Some brands have implemented price increases, although they seem to be working hard to cap the higher prices to an amount that's manageable for consumers.
Steven Madden Ltd. is one example where the company has 'selectively' raised prices to consumers and wholesale customers for its fall items. The increases weren't across the board, and there were differing amounts for select items based on brand, product category and style. While some items will see a 20 percent increase, the average uptick will be in the 10 percent range.
Nike Inc. raised some prices in June, averaging between $2 and $10, but only for select items. Footwear prices between $100 and $150 will see increases up to $5, and shoes starting at $150 and higher will see increases up to $10. A large portion of its assortment mix will remain at their current price range. And in a nod to 'families and the upcoming back-to-school season,' there are no increases on any kids' products, whether for footwear or apparel. Items under $100 will stay the same, and Nike's popular Air Force 1 sneaker will stay at $115. Moreover, there are no planned price increases for any Jordan product.
Shoe brands showing at the June market week — the FFANY and FSNYE shows — appeared to be taking Trumps's tariff threats in stride. Some brands, such as Guess, were able to keep wholesale prices steady. And even when a wholesale price increase was warranted, such as at Söfft Shoe Co.'s new men's shoe brand Align, the increase of $3 translated to just a $5 uptick at retail. That kind of increase — Align shoes average between $150 to $180 at retail — is in line with Nike's sneakers that are priced at $150 and higher.
Those price adjustments suggests that shoe firms are working with their upstream vendors to keep price changes within a certain range at the consumer level, even if it means brands and suppliers might need to each absorb some of higher costs resulting from tariff increases.
Meanwhile, credit ratings firms Fitch Ratings said Monday that discretionary retailers are expected to 'experience near-term operating challenges resulting from the softening consumer sentiment and the evolving tariff policy.' What isn't clear is whether brands and retailers will provide third quarter guidance when they begin posting second quarter earnings results in a few weeks. A Placer.ai report indicated that June foot traffic has decelerated, although that could be due to rainy weather during the tail end of the month and the pulling forward of purchases earlier in the year as consumers bought goods early to get ahead of anticipated tariff-related price increases.
Best of WWD
All the Retailers That Nike Left and Then Went Back
Mikey Madison's Elegant Red Carpet Shoe Style [PHOTOS]
Julia Fox's Sleekest and Boldest Shoe Looks Over the Years [Photos]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
26 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Key Issue Turning Americans Against Trump, CNN Data Shows
CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten on Monday used just one word to sum up Americans' souring views on Donald Trump's handling of immigration. 'Oof!' said Enten in a segment with CNN's Kate Bolduan. Enten pointed to five separate polls from mid to late June showing the president's net approval rating (percent approval minus percent disapproval) on immigration ranging from -7 (Fox) to -27 (Gallup). He described the range of Trump's net approval ratings as 'bad to just downright terrible.' 'The American people have turned against President Donald Trump on what was his best issue,' Enten said. The segment comes just over a month after Enten spotted how Trump's net approval rating on immigration had shot 'up like a rocket' when comparing polling from early June to data from June 2017. The president's aggressive immigration policies have intensified over the course of his second term, with massive raids of legal cannabis farms in California last week — one of which saw a worker fall from a roof, later dying from his injuries, as hundreds of others were arrested. Enten, when asked if there are signs that the polling trend is affecting Trump's overall net approval rating, turned to how the president's net approval rating with Hispanics dropped by double digits over the past few months. In February, Trump was doing 'pretty gosh darn good for a Republican' as his net approval rating with Hispanics sat at -2, per polling from CBS News/YouGov. By June, less than a year after his 'historic performance' with Hispanic voters in the fall, that figure fell to -26, per Enten. 'Now he's basically back where he was during his first term, which is quite a low approval rating, one which has brought his overall approval rating down amongst the entire electorate,' Enten explained. The data analyst went on to point to how Immigration and Customs Enforcement's net approval rating went from averaging 0 during Trump's first term to reaching -17 last month. He added that the immigration crackdowns haven't just brought Trump down, but they've brought ICE 'down with him.'


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
FNC Correspondent Matt Finn reports on Latest Trump Approved ICE raids
Matt Finn, Fox News National Correspondent, joined Guy Benson to discuss the latest on what happened during Trump administration-approved ICE raids of marijuana farms in California. Matt also shares his experience in Westwood, CA and how disgusting it looks today despite high rental and housing prices.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Stock Is at a Peak - What's the Best Play Here for NVDA?
Three weeks ago, we recommended Nvidia Inc. (NVDA) stock in a June 22 Barchart article and shorting out-of-the-money puts. Now, NVDA is near its target prices, and the short play is successful. What is the best play here? NVDA is at $171.30, up over 4.5% today. Trump OK'd an export license to sell its powerful H20 AI chips to China after Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, met with President Trump. The Wall Street Journal said this has been a top seller for Nvidia in China and was specially designed for the Chinese market. How to Buy Tesla for a 13% Discount, or Achieve a 26% Annual Return Alibaba Stock is Well Off Its Highs - What is the Best Way to Play BABA? Generate Income on MSTR Without Owning The Stock (Yet) Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! My prior price target was $178 per share using an estimated 55% forward free cash flow (FCF) margin (i.e., FCF/sales), as well as a 2.85% FCF yield valuation metric (i.e., 35x FCF multiple). Last quarter, Nvidia made a 59% FCF margin. So, if this continues over the coming year, NVDA stock could have further to go. Moreover, analysts have lifted their price targets. Let's look at this. In Q1 ending April 27, Nvidia generated $26.1 billion in FCF on $44.06 billion in sales. That represents a 59.2% FCF margin. Over the trailing months, according to Stock Analysis, it's generated $72.06 billion FCF on $148.5 billion in sales, or a 48.5% FCF margin. So, it seems reasonable to assume Nvidia could make at least a 57% FCF margin going forward. Here's how that would work out. Analysts expect sales to rise to a range between $199.89 billion this year ending Jan. 2026 and $251.2 billion next year. That puts it on a next 12 months (NTM) run rate of $225.5 billion. Moreover, now that it will be able to sell to China again, let's assume this pushes sales at least 5% higher to $236.8 billion: $236.8b NTM sales x 57% FCF margin = $135 billion FCF Just to be conservative, let's use a 55% margin on the lower NTM sales estimates: $225.5 billion x 55% margin = $124 billion FCF So, our estimate is that FCF over the next 12 months could range between $124 billion and $135 billion, or about $130 billion on average Therefore, using a 30x FCF multiple (i.e., the same as dividing by 3.33% FCF yield): $230b x 30 = $6,900 billion market cap (i.e., $6.9 trillion) That is 65% over today's market cap of $4.178 trillion, according to Yahoo! Finance (i.e., at $171.35 p/sh). In other words, NVDA stock could be worth 65% more, or $291.55 per share. $171.35 x 1.65 = $282.73 price target That is what might happen over the next 12 months (NTM) if analysts' revenue targets are hit and its FCF margin averages 56%. Analysts have closer price targets. The average of 66 analysts surveyed by Yahoo! Finance is $173.92. However, that is higher than three weeks ago, when I reported that the average was $172.60. Moreover, which tracks recent analyst recommendations, now reports that 39 analysts have a $200.71 price target, up from $179.87 three weeks ago. One way to play this is to sell short out-of-the-money puts. That way, an investor can set a lower buy-in price and still get paid extra income. In my last Barchart article on June 22 ("Make Over a 2.4% One-Month Yield Shorting Nvidia Out-of-the-Money Puts"), I suggested shorting the $137 strike price put option expiring July 25. The yield was 2.48% over the next 34 days (i.e., $3.40/$137.00). Today, that contract is almost worthless, as it's trading for just 8 cents. In other words, the short seller of these puts has made almost all the money (i.e., the stock has risen, making the short-put play successful). The investor's account has little chance of getting assigned to buy 100 shares per put contract at $137.00 on or before July 25. It makes sense to roll this over by doing a 'Buy to Close" and entering a new trade to 'Sell to Open' at a later expiry period and higher strike price. For example, the Aug. 29 expiry period, 45 days to expiry or DTE (which is after the expected Aug. 27 Q2 earnings release date), shows that $155.00 strike price put has a midpoint premium of $3.93. So, the short-put yield is: $393/$155.00 = 0.2535 = 2.535% over 45 days That works out to an annualized expected return (ER) of +20.28% (i.e., 2.535% x 8). So, even if NVDA stock stays flat, the investor stands to make good money here shorting these puts every 45 days (assuming the same yield occurs). There seems to be a low risk here, given that the delta ratio is just 23%. But, given how volatile NVDA has been, and that the stock is at a peak, it might make sense to use some of the income received to buy puts at lower strike prices. Keep in mind that the breakeven point, i.e., the price where an unrealized loss could occur, is $151.07: $155-$3.93 = $151.07 That is 11.8% below today's price. But it is not uncommon for a stock like NVDA to fall 20% from its peak. That would put it at $137.00. So, using some of the income to buy long puts at $140 or $145 is not unreasonable. That would cost between $144 and $204 ($174 on average) for the $15,500 investment (net of $393 already received): $393 income - $174 long hedge = $219, or $219 / $15,500 invested in short put play = 1.41% New Breakeven = $15,500 = $174 = $15,326 or $153.26 per put contract This means that the investor's potential (unrealized) loss is between $14,250 and $15,326, or -$1,076 net on the $15,326 net investment, or -7%. But keep in mind that this is only an unrealized loss. The investor would have protected himself from a much lower downside by buying long puts from the income received. And, after all, the price target is substantially higher, so the investor might be willing to hold on or even sell out-of-the-money call options to recoup some of the unrealized loss. The bottom line here is that NVDA has room to move higher. Shorting OTM puts with a lower strike price long put hedge is one good way to play this. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio