Australian regulator names former RBA deputy governor to ASX probe panel
This appointment follows the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) launch of a broad investigation into ASX last week.
ASIC has also appointed Rob Whitfield as the panel chair, with Christine Holman joining as a panel member alongside former Reserve Bank of Australia deputy governor Debelle.
Whitfield currently serves as the independent non-executive director of Commonwealth Bank (CBA.AX), opens new tab, the largest-listed company on the ASX, while Holman is the non-executive director of Australian firms AGL Ltd (AGL.AX), opens new tab and Collins Foods (CKF.AX), opens new tab.
"The inquiry panel will be asked to make recommendations to address any identified shortcomings or deficiencies in relation to governance, capability and risk management within ASX group," ASIC said in a statement.
The inquiry panel is also expected to submit a report to ASIC by March 31, 2026, outlining its findings and recommending any necessary next steps for the regulator to take.
ASX did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
ASIC's probe into the country's main stock exchange operator escalated tensions that have simmered for years amid a botched software upgrade and a series of trade-processing glitches.
After facing delays, expenses and mandatory industry consultations, ASX abandoned its original upgrade plan in 2022. The following year, it brought on India's Tata Consultancy Services to develop a new, phased upgrade. According to ASX, the first part is scheduled for delivery in 2026.
ASX also attempted to rebuild its clearing and settlement software platform with custom blockchain-like technology from 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Radical push is announced to tax Aussie workers' family home: 'Strong arguments for doing so'
Australians should pay capital gains tax on their family home in order to tackle the housing crisis, a pair of influential economics professors argue. Peter Siminski from the University of Technology, Sydney, and Roger Wilkins from the University of Melbourne, argue the longstanding capital gains tax exemption on the family home favours the rich and costs the government much-needed revenue. They are advocating the tax exemption be abolished ahead of next week's Economic Reform Roundtable in Canberra where Treasurer Jim Chalmers is hoping for ideas to increase productivity. 'Here, we serve some food for thought – the taxation of owner-occupied housing,' the professors wrote in an opinion piece for The Conversation. 'This may seem distasteful, but there are some strong arguments for doing so.' A property owner's principal place of residence has been exempt from the capital gains tax since it was introduced into law in September 1985. Neither major party - not even the Greens - has called for the capital gains tax to be imposed when someone sells the home they live in. But the Prof Siminski and Prof Wilkins argue not taxing the family home costs Treasury $50billion a year in foregone revenue. 'The size of tax concessions for owner-occupied housing is similar to that of superannuation, and much larger than for investment property,' they said. 'Treasury estimates it forgoes more than A$50 billion per year by exempting owner-occupied housing from capital gains tax.' They calculated that average income for outright home owners was 34 per cent higher than for renters, but it was 86 per cent higher when housing income was included. Someone can rent out their home for six years and still be exempt from the capital gains tax when a house or unit is sold. Older Australians who bought their house to live in during the 1980s and 1990s, when property was much cheaper compared with incomes, are spared from paying the capital gains tax when they sell. But younger Australians on average salaries, who are priced out of buying a house in Sydney, often resort to buying investment properties in more affordable cities to build some wealth in real estate as a 'rent-vestor'. When these people sell, they have to pay the capital gains tax, but with a 50 per cent discount that has applied since September 1999. Labor lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ruled out changes to the capital gains tax discount in Opposition, but the ACTU has this week called for the CGT discount to be restricted to one investment property.
The Guardian
9 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Koala habitat would be destroyed by Glencore plan to expand Queensland coalmine
Glencore wants to clear 680 hectares of land, including 600ha of koala habitat, to expand its Hail Creek mine west of Mackay. Campaign group Lock the Gate, the Queensland Conservation Council (QCC) and the Mackay Conservation Group have written to the federal environment minister, Murray Watt, to ask for a moratorium on project applications in the area
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Fixing Australia's broken environmental laws must be the first step in improving productivity
We must reform Australia's broken national environment laws, as they have failed to protect the environment. Projects critical to our future prosperity are bogged down in slow, opaque, duplicative and contested environmental planning and approvals processes based on poor information, and mired in administrative complexity. Matters of national environmental significance (MNES), such as world and national heritage areas and the Great Barrier Reef, must be protected and restored. Protecting the environment while facilitating faster project decision-making demands several important changes to the existing commonwealth legal framework. First, we need regional plans, developed cooperatively with state and local governments. Second, we need stronger resourcing of the newly established Environment Information Australia to identify MNES and monitor the goal to stop and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. Third, we need national environmental standards to provide a basis for the commonwealth to accredit state decision-making processes, permitting the streamlining of project approvals. And fourth, we need an expert, independent and trusted decision-maker in the form of a national Environment Protection Agency. There is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without robust national laws that set clear environmental standards for major projects, along with a strong national regulator respected by all parties and significant improvements in commonwealth and state and territory environmental protection systems. Reformed laws will be critical to enhancing economic resilience and lifting flagging productivity growth, which underpins intergenerational equity and opportunity. Commercial and political vested interests are always tempted to exploit the moments of uncertainty generated by proposed reform. This has been a feature of all previous attempts to achieve reform. For some, the stakes at play in environmental law reform are high. After all, we have whole industries with business models built on the destruction of the natural world. It can be done. But it will take a lot of work over many years to put in place new architecture to protect the environment while also facilitating efficient and transparent project approvals. Reforms of the sort outlined here were recommended by Graeme Samuel's review, published five years ago. The recommendations have enjoyed bipartisan political support. They have also had the support of major business and environmental groups. But when it comes to the details of the legislation, stakeholders have invariably found themselves in deadlock. Generally, developers have favoured the fast-tracking of reforms that reduce complexity and facilitate the accreditation of state approvals systems. Environmental interests have favoured stronger protections. The deadlock must be broken. Reforms will be delivered if there is genuine cooperation and a shared purpose among the commonwealth, states and territories, businesses and environmental groups – to prioritise the interests of future generations. Ken Henry is an economist, policy adviser, former Treasury secretary and chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation
