
Is this year the beginning of the end of smartphones?
Last month, a curious partnership in the Valley made me wonder on the future of smart devices and the way we access our digital universe. In a rather whimsical blog post, OpenAI announced the acquisition of Jony Ive's studio startup io for $6.5 billion. 'We have the opportunity to completely reimagine what it means to use a computer,' said Altman, adding that despite unprecedented capability and new technologies like AI, the digital experience is being shaped by traditional products and interfaces. A new technology like AI, he explained, requires a complete rethink of tools through which we interact with the digital universe. The first smartphone came into being in the early 1993, when IBM's Simon added email and fax to a phone's capability. (Representative photo)
This acquisition would've become yet another corporate announcement, except for the timing of it. In the last couple of years, there's a feeling across Silicon Valley that smartphone as a device to interact with the digital world is not enough. New technologies like AR/VR, robotics and now AI need new products to explore them with. The new generation is approaching the digital world as an extension of themselves, through speech and not swiping or typing. As technology becomes more intuitive, we need new devices to reflect this change – more immersive and aural, devices that augment the real world and not take you away from it.
Tech companies are putting their heads together to develop devices that are more immersive or approach digital through other senses like aural or even neural. Legacy companies like Meta, Apple and Google and startups like Neuralink are experimenting with smart glasses, wearables, iOT devices, smartwatches, neural computers and even spatial computers (like VisionPro) where digital media is integrated with our real-life experience. So far, none of these devices have worked, but it does feel like we're at a cusp of dramatic change. A senior vice president in Apple even acknowledged that in 10 years, iPhones could go the way of iPods - become irrelevant and retro.
It's time for this change, I would say. After all, our way of interacting with digital spaces – through laptops, desktops and smart devices - has been the same for more than 30 years now. The first smartphone came into being in the early 1993, when IBM's Simon added email and fax to a phone's capability. In 1990s that there was a constant feeling of experimentation as the handheld phones and PDAs that could access the internet were being played with through product design. Companies across the world from USA to Japan wanted to integrate access to internet with a phone. The mid 2000s brought smartphones like Blackberry with QWERTY keyboards, which quickly made tapping and emailing the done thing to do. This changed dramatically when finger-operative touchscreen technology came out into the market. Within a couple of years in 2006, LG had used it to launch a touchscreen smartphone. And then Apple made it the new normal when it launched iPhones in 2007.
Also Read: Do gaming smartphones really make sense in 2025?
Though there have been amazing advances in the smartphone including camera capabilities, chip design and biometrics, the device design itself hasn't changed the way we interact with the digital world. There's a screen we swipe, touch and pinch. We check out social media, upload our photos on cloud and chat and email on the go. This staleness in the design was clear in Apple's recently concluded annual developer conference, WWDC 2025. The new iPhone 17 will be more or less the same as iPhone 16 with a few tiny tweaks.
Jony Ive, whose company OpenAI acquired, was formerly Apple's chief design officer and led design teams for Apple's iconic products – the iPhone, the iPod and even the Macbook Pro – before leaving the company in 2019. This new project that he's working on, has got him (and us) excited. According to him, this time now, 2025, reminds him of three decades ago when he emigrated to Silicon Valley to design products that would interact with the Internet. 'I have a growing sense that everything I have learned over the last 30 years has led me to this moment,' he said in the acquisition announcement. The Wall Street Journal reported that Open AI is considering options that want to move consumers beyond screens into a unique combination of listening devices and cameras. 'Surely there's something beyond legacy products,' says Ive, adding that they've already built a prototype and are currently working on more AI-first devices.
I know what you're thinking and frankly, I'm thinking the same. Smartphones are our lifelines. We do everything on these devices – from chatting to watching shorts and videos, to making payments on the go. We're multi-screen beasts today, our fingers constantly swiping or typing and ridden with RSI, our eyes fatigued.
Also Read: AI needs to be open and inclusive like India Stack
But the world is also changing in ways that make me think maybe we will use devices without screens as the enablers. Voice interaction has caught on. The way we fish for information is going from a typed search to a prompt we ask.
There is an increasing unease about phone-addiction and screen time. We're all looking for a way out. Something that allows us to be digitally connected without exhausting us. Devices that are more intuitive, more immersive, aural and neural that become extensions of us so we can interact with digital spaces without choosing them over real life.
All this signals to an experimentative market which is ready for something new. I can't wait to find out what replaces my screens in the near future. What about you?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
AI now writes 25% of code in the US: Should Computer Science students rethink their career plans?
Artificial Intelligence is no longer just supporting programmers—it's actively writing code. According to insights published by The Atlantic , major U.S. tech companies like Microsoft and Alphabet now rely on artificial intelligence to generate nearly 25% of their code. As generative tools become deeply integrated into software development workflows, they're not only boosting productivity—but also raising difficult questions about the future of entry-level tech jobs. Tech jobs shift as AI takes over AI's growing role in software development isn't just a behind-the-scenes shift—it's showing up in employment data. According to The Atlantic , the number of 22–27-year-olds employed in computer science and math roles has dropped by 8% in recent years. While some of this is attributed to tech layoffs, automation is also playing a central role. Even tech companies acknowledge the shift. Executives at Microsoft and Google's parent company Alphabet have already confirmed the impact of AI on their code output. Meanwhile, at startups like Anthropic, AI models are replacing the need for junior-level coders altogether. Software jobs seen as most at risk These fears aren't just limited to hiring managers and academics. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Mess-Free Dog Toy That's Safer for Heavy Chewers Petsume Undo A 2025 Pew Research Center survey found that 48% of Americans believe software engineers will be among the professions most affected by AI in the coming years. That's a higher percentage than for teachers, journalists, or accountants. While manual labor was long seen as most vulnerable to automation, high-skilled roles are now increasingly at risk—starting with tech. Why students are dropping CS While employees in the tech market are worried, the impact of this phenomenon is also seen among tech students. After years of explosive growth, computer science enrollment is flattening. According to recent data referenced in The Atlantic , national growth in CS majors in the U.S. has slowed to just 0.2% this year. At elite institutions such as Princeton and Stanford, once considered pipelines to Silicon Valley, the number of CS undergraduates has either plateaued or started to decline. Princeton's department, for instance, anticipates a nearly 25% drop in majors within two years. Students have now become increasingly cautious. With mass layoffs in big tech, changing visa norms, and rising uncertainty around the long-term role of junior programmers, CS is no longer the default 'safe bet' it once seemed. The road ahead for Computer Science majors The shifting ground poses serious questions for universities and future students. Should colleges reduce CS department sizes? Are interdisciplinary programs—like CS with ethics, bioinformatics, or design—better suited for an AI-enhanced future? And for students: If AI can write your code, what skills will set you apart? The answer may lie in hybrid expertise—combining technical literacy with creativity, strategy, and human-centered design. The next generation of engineers may need to be less about syntax and more about systems thinking. To be clear, computer science isn't dying—but it's evolving. Demand for AI-literate engineers, machine learning experts, and cybersecurity professionals remains strong. However, the pathway to these roles is becoming steeper and more selective. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
From the Opinions Editor: India needs a well thought out trade strategy, but first it needs a China strategy
Dear Express Reader Over the past 11 years, the Narendra Modi government has taken several steps to shore up the economic momentum, and put the country on a higher growth trajectory. But, despite its efforts to ensure macroeconomic stability, revive private sector investments and boost household consumption, growth has been less than spectacular. Between 2014-15 and 2024-25, the economy grew at an average of just 6.2 per cent. Now, in its third term, whether pushed by Donald Trump's tariff war or the imperatives of growth, the government is making a determined effort to sew up trade agreements, hoping they will help embed the country into global supply chains, catalyse exports, and push up growth. A trade deal has been struck with the UK, and talks are proceeding with the US and the EU, with many of the issues that have previously held back these agreements being either resolved or sidestepped. These agreements will ensure greater market access and bring down tariffs, improving competitiveness of exports. But the question is: Will these trade deals be enough? Can they alone facilitate India's deep integration with global supply chains? Can the country emerge as a major production hub without integrating more closely with the supply chains that run through South and East Asia which form a vital part of global production systems? The case of Apple is instructive. The dramatic scaling up of the Apple ecosystem in the country — the company has recently said that iPhones sold in the US market will be mostly sourced from India — is a remarkable development. It is a consequence of both the government's production linked incentive scheme and the firm wanting to diversify its production bases away from China. Now, Apple provides a supplier list — a list that represents 98 per cent of the company's direct spend for materials, manufacturing and assembly of its products worldwide. This would include suppliers not only those involved in the production of the iPhone but also in other Apple products. As per this list, in 2023, 156 of the company's suppliers had manufacturing locations in China, 42 suppliers were located in Japan, 35 in Vietnam and 33 in South Korea, and 14 in India. Two years later the numbers would have changed slightly — as per a recent report there are now more than 20 component suppliers in India — but, they would still point towards the centrality of South and East Asia, and China in particular, to the global production system — a fact that cannot be ignored. If India wants to be a part of the production chain of other Apple products and grab a greater share of the value addition in the production process, it would need the smooth flow of components/materials into the country and more component manufacturers to be located here. And therein lies India's conundrum. What is India's China strategy? Should the country also be a part of RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) and CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership)? In 2019, India chose not to be part of RCEP — the trade agreement that spans China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and the 10 ASEAN member states (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam). The decision to not join was in large part attributed to concerns over China. But the trade relationship with China has only deepened since. And that is the reality, contrary to the desire of reducing the dependence on China. In 2018-19, before India withdrew from RCEP, its trade deficit with China stood at $53.5 billion. By 2024-25, it had surged to $99.2 billion, without RCEP. India, though, is not alone. Even as the US has tried to reduce its reliance on China, its deficit with the country, though it has declined in recent years, stood at a staggering $295 billion in 2024. And this does not account for rerouting of exports through other countries. But, it's not just about companies like Apple. The issue around rare earth minerals — used in a range of sectors such as smartphones, TVs, EV cars, solar panels and jet engines — underlines China's centrality to the global production system. This reality cannot be wished away. China accounts for 90 per cent of global processing of rare earths. With the country placing restrictions on its exports, EV manufacturers in India have reportedly sought the government's intervention in the matter. If these supplies continue to be restricted, India's EV push, and thus its efforts in shifting towards a cleaner vehicle fleet, risk being affected. And that won't be the only sector that is likely to be impacted. There are some reports which suggest that the government has raised the issue of export curbs on rare earth minerals and magnets with China. But it's not just India. Even the US has been affected. In fact, one of the key aspects of the US-China agreement that was announced by Donald Trump is the upfront export of full magnets, and any necessary rare earths by China. It is difficult to see companies move their production to India on the scale that is needed for the country to emerge as a manufacturing powerhouse unless they can be sure of stable trade relations, of supply chains working smoothly, of the seamless movement of components/personnel from other jurisdictions. India needs a well thought out trade strategy. The lack of clarity partly explains the sluggish pace of investments in the country by domestic as well as foreign firms — both of whom seem to be more inclined to invest in other jurisdictions presumably because the risk-return matrix is not as favourable in India. A clear strategy should give these firms the confidence needed to invest in the country. Take care, Ishan


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Career gaps are the new cool among young professionals? Micro-retirement is the rising trend to fight workplace burnout
The mainstream hustle culture commonly depicts a career as strictly linear, if not full-time, then at least freelance, always on, always producing something. The concept of breaks clashes with the expected ambitious drive, and in the end, typically gets dismissed as laziness. But there's a growing trend where young professionals are turning the tide, embracing the career gap with acceptance rather than insecurity. These 'breaks' are no longer viewed as setbacks but rather as a strategic means to personal growth. This trend is 'micro-retirement' and it transforms hustle to hiatus for young professionals to find purpose and renewed vigour. The younger generation is quitting their jobs and, before hopping onto another, is choosing to follow their passions, like travelling.(Shutterstock) Peter Duris, CEO and Co-founder of AI career app Kickresume, shared with HT lifestyle about this emerging career trend seen among young working professionals that is rooted in the concept of 'break' in a more bold and empowering manner. Peter said, 'Micro-retirement is a new career trend that involves younger workers taking short breaks between jobs to focus on their hobbies, well-being, and personal aspirations. This trend allows them to focus on fulfilling personal goals and ambitions now, rather than having to wait until retirement age. It is a pause in your career to travel, work on passion projects, or simply have a well-deserved break. This trend is growing among younger generations, allowing them to focus on fulfilling personal goals, rather than having to wait until retirement age." There may be initial confusion around the term, since the word 'retirement' typically implies the end of one's career. However, for the younger generation, this micro-break may not indicate permanent exit but just a temporary halt before beginning something new. Peter clarified, 'Micro-retirement doesn't mean leaving the workforce forever. People will often return to their careers after some time away. This time off can result in employees feeling refreshed and ready to jump right into a new role once they're back. Micro-retirement is a great way for workers to balance their careers with their personal lives. While some have ambitious career goals that see them climbing the ladder quickly, others have different priorities. Micro-retirement offers the freedom to explore those personal aspirations sooner rather than later. Putting your career on hold doesn't have to be a bad thing; it can give young people the chance to do things that grow their confidence.' Importance of taking 'breaks' Breaks help you come back with more energy. You can travel or follow your passion during this break.(Shutterstock) Breaks are often not taken in today's work culture, where there's a hyper-fixated need to always be available and ready. The ambitious drive that relentlessly pushes one up the ladder comes at the silent cost of burnout. Deepti Chandy, Therapist and COO, Anna Chandy & Associates, shared with HT Lifestyle the importance of taking breaks. Requiring a break from the career itself isn't a weakness, but it helps to come back with renewed energy. Deepti shared her insights on the mental importance of breaks and said,'In today's always-on hustle culture, taking a break isn't a luxury, it's essential. When we don't pause, our emotional and cognitive health quietly take a hit. We slip into autopilot, going through the motions at work, relationships and life, without truly feeling connected to any of it. When we push ourselves without pause, our creativity, focus, and motivation fade. We may be physically present, but mentally and emotionally, we're drained. This is especially important for young people navigating high-pressure careers and constant digital connectivity. Taking time off, whether to travel or pursue a passion, helps set you up to thrive in the long run. Even therapists intentionally take breaks because our work is emotionally intensive. Every time I step away, I return more energised and reminded of why I love what I do.' Strategies to execute 'micro-retirement' Micro-retirement helps employees reflect on their career trajectory better instead of driving forward with tunnel vision.(Shutterstock) Peter Duris shared a guide to help understand and incorporate micro-retirement for employees. The guide also includes tips for employers to better facilitate the process, ensuring smooth transitions. Here's the guide: Tips for employees Choose your timing wisely: The best time to go on a micro-retirement is when you feel ready to leave your current job and take on a new experience. It involves a lot of planning and preparation. You need to make sure your notice period ends before you begin your micro-retirement, and that you have enough funds to last during your time away from work. Make sure you have a financial backstop before quitting: It's important that you are prepared financially for your micro-retirement. If you plan to travel, for example, you should make sure you have enough funds saved up to cover all your expenses while you're away. Also, bear in mind that you may not find the right job immediately after coming back, so make sure you have additional savings to see you through until then. Make a plan: Taking the time to plan out what you'll be doing during your career break and what you plan to do when you return can help your micro-retirement go a lot smoother. Refresh your resume: If you take a break between jobs, think about the best way to present this on your future job applications when you're back in the job market. You can list it on your resume as a 'sabbatical' or 'career break'. If you learned any new skills while you were in micro-retirement, don't forget that this can be a selling point, whether you were volunteering or exploring creative hobbies. Tips for employers Plan for employee departure: If a team member is planning on going on a micro-retirement, it's a good idea to have a plan in place to help with the transition. Start by wishing your employee well, and ask them to finalise any projects during their notice period. Make sure to let the rest of your team know and offer support where you can. Reach out when they're back: If a team member is setting off on a micro-retirement, they may want to come back. Depending on several factors, it could be worth having a conversation about their return if they've expressed interest in remaining in the industry. ALSO READ: International Yoga Day 2025: Experts share benefits of yoga at workplace and 5 strategies to include it in daily routine Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.