Long-range PHEVs like Volvo XC 70 are trending
Cars such as the new XC70 could be key in countries with less EV infrastructure, according to Volvo boss, Håkan Samuelsson. New Volvo XC70 is an SUV where the former model was a raised estate.
The XC70 sits between XC60 and XC90 and uses a new range-extender platform.
The new model was previewed last week as a mid-sized PHEV. It has a claimed electric range of almost 200km, far more than any PHEV the brand sells at present.
XC70 uses a platform supplied by owner Geely, and is initially for China only. However, Volvo said it is considering a global launch for the medium SUV. In regions where charging options aren't so comprehensive, a long-range hybrid makes sense.
Read our review of the Volvo EX30 Twin-Motor Performance here.
Most XC70 running will be done with electricity. So it is a long-range plug-in hybrid, Samuelsson says. An electric car with a back-up engine when the battery is flat, which will not happen often.
'It's a pragmatic bridge solution to wait for our customers to really feel comfortable with an all-electric car.'
Technical details remain sparse, but Volvo has promised an electric range of up to 200km, more than double what the XC60 PHEV can achieve.
XC70 is barely larger than the XC60 and resembles a shrunken XC90. However, it uses different architecture.
The Scalable Modular Architecture (SMA) is said to underpin the vehicle with no details available. Volvo XC70 taillights recognisably Volvo in shape.
While fellow Geely brands use combustion engines as a generator to top up a traction battery, Volvo's XC70 is a more conventional PHEV. It follows the recent unveiling of Volkswagen's ID Era REx concept at the Shanghai motor show.
That like-sized car was engineered in partnership with SAIC to target the growing demand for REx cars in China. It too may go global, with particular relevance in Europe and North America.
The XC70 will be key to Volvo which is on a global cost-cutting drive in what it sees as a challenging environment. With 200km of EV range, charging should be a weekly affair.
That said, Volvo is committed to becoming a fully electric car company, even if just 20 per cent of its sales in the first quarter of 2025 were electric. Premium plug-in hybrids are seen as ideal for customers not yet ready to switch to a fully electric vehicle.
The XC70 name hasn't been heard of since 2016, when it was applied to an off-road version of the V70 estate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Autocar
21-05-2025
- NZ Autocar
BYD says its new PHEVs will outperform range extenders
BYD is priming a range of new plug-in hybrids with around 200km of electric-only range. They will also be capable of rapid charging at speeds of more than 150kW. And they're coming within the next 12 to 24 months, badged as DM-i variants. Long range PHEVs are becoming the next big thing in China which seems committed to exporting its popular sellers. To date, not many PHEVs can exceed even 100km of EV range. In the UK, for example, the most range offered by any PHEV is Volkswagen's Golf eHybrid. That manages 141km while the best from BYD is 123km. And that is offered by the Seal U (Sealion 6 here) which can be charged at only 18kW. BYD's executive vice-president, Stella Li, says: 'Our target is really to have people in daily use using the EV [mode], but then if they want long distance, given a chance to charge, they have the freedom to go to anything.' The current DM-i system combines BYD's Blade Battery technology with a petrol engine designed specifically for PHEV use. BYD says it offers particularly high levels of thermal efficiency. The firm also reckons 'PHEV has become the new battleground' for manufacturers. That's 'because everybody is shooting for a revision of the so-called green deal that will open up markets beyond 2035'. And the company states: 'we truly don't see anybody having technology close to the DM-i'. A spokesperson said: 'If you have just 35-45km of range as an EV, you're fundamentally an internal combustion engine with a plug,' he said. 'That's the reason why a lot of manufacturers are now trying to come closer to our plug-in hybrid technology with the range-extender.' Others looking to profit from improved PHEV performance include Ford, Leapmotor, Lotus and Volkswagen. But range-extender (REx) cars are increasingly popular in China. They feature an on-board energy generator in the form of a small petrol combustion engine. Read the NZ Autocar review of BYD's Sealion 6 Premium. Leapmotor's overseas head recently said that REx cars are a 'good interim solution' for Europe and better than PHEVs. That's because the propulsion is always handled by an electric motor. And that means that 'the engine is always operating in the most efficient way'. However, BYD counters, saying that PHEVs are 'definitely superior' than REx cars. That's because 'you can have three different ways of using the car; it's your decision, depending on how much power you need from the engine, [whereas] the REx is always behaving in one way'.
NZ Autocar
18-05-2025
- NZ Autocar
2025 Smart #1 Premium & #3 Premium Review
Smart is back, and it's not the pint-sized city runabout any more. Instead, we have a one-two punch of electric crossovers. There's the cutesy Smart #1 and the swoopier Smart #3, both newly arrived in New Zealand. There's at least one more coming, the #5, a mid- to large-sized SUV but we'll leave that for later. Both are co-engineered by Mercedes-Benz and Geely, with the idea being that they blend European design with Chinese EV tech. The names might be odd (there's no #2), but the goal is clear: take on the booming compact EV segment with style and substance. After a first taste of the #1 Premium and #3 Premium, I'm happy to report that these siblings bring a refreshing mix of playful design, genuine tech cred and real driving chops to our roads. But how do they stack up against each other, and against rivals like the MG4 XPower, Cupra Born, or even Mercedes' own GLA/EQA? From a distance, the Smart #1 and #3 could almost be twins, until you notice the profiles. The Smart #1 is the 'urban SUV' of the pair, chunky and cute, with a rounded front and upright stance. It wears a friendly face with oval LED headlights and a clamshell bonnet, while the rear features a full-width lightbar that cheekily resembles a baby Mercedes EQA. By contrast, the Smart #3 is the swoopier SUV coupé. It's longer and lower, trading some of the #1's bubbly charm for a sleeker silhouette. It's as if someone took the #1 and stretched it into a hot hatch shape. Both sport hidden pop-out door handles (not usually my favourite, but these work okay in practice, as I found) and frameless doors. Both Smarts are compact. The #1 measures 4270mm long, whereas the #3 is slightly longer at 4400mm. That extra length (and a 35mm longer wheelbase) benefits the #3 mainly in the cargo area – the boot space expands from the #1's compact 203 litres to a still-small 260L in the #3. Neither will swallow a family's holiday luggage. To put it in perspective, a Cupra Born hatch holds around 385L. But the #3's boot is at least useful for groceries or a couple of weekend bags. In both cars, the rear seats can slide forward to trade legroom for more cargo room, or fold mostly flat when you need extra space. Climb inside, and you'll be surprised at how airy these little EVs feel. The cabin design is near identical between #1 and #3, but headroom differs slightly due to those opposing roof profiles. The #1 Premium gets a large panoramic sunroof (with a power sunshade) that lets in plenty of light, whereas the #3's 'halo' glass roof stretches even wider across the cabin. As a result, the #3 feels just a tad airier in the back. During my 'giant human test' I found both cars surprisingly accommodating but the #3 offered a smidge more clearance above my head due to the wider glass panel, despite the lower roofline. Legroom is decent for this class; I could sit behind my own driving position in both, though in the #1 my knees brushed against the front seat back. Width is the limiting factor; don't expect to fit three adults across the rear bench comfortably. Smart's Mercedes influence is evident in the cabin design. The dashboard has a flowing, modern style with metallic-look trim and turbine-inspired circular air vents. The Smart #1 Premium we tested featured a slightly more solid-feeling interior in some areas, whereas the #3 Premium had a different trim finish that looked cool but creaked a bit under pressure. Both cars have a mix of soft-touch surfaces up high and harder plastics down lower. Smart does dress up the Premium trim with some genuine upgrades. There's leather seat upholstery (versus cloth/leatherette in the base model) and snazzy LED ambient lighting strips that add a premium vibe at night. Both cars have power-adjustable front seats that are nicely shaped. The #3's front buckets are a touch sportier with integrated headrests and I found them even more comfortable on longer drives. Both cars come with a 12.8-inch central touchscreen and a 9.2-inch digital instrument cluster. The screens are crisp and packed with features. The centre display runs Smart's own UI, though we noted similarities to those found in Lotus and Zeekr cars. It has cutesy graphics and menus that, once learned, are easy enough to navigate. One thing I appreciated is the physical bezel around the touchscreen. It sounds trivial but having a frame to rest your hand on helps stabilise your finger when tapping on the move. Both Premium models are loaded with tech. Highlights include integrated Apple CarPlay and Android Auto (wireless connectivity) and an impressive Beats audio system with 13 speakers and a subwoofer. Smart #1 and #3 both come with the expected ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) as standard, and they work remarkably well. Adaptive cruise with Lane Centering and Traffic Jam Assist are smooth and reliable. The lane-keeping in particular is among the best I've tried – it centres confidently without the ping-pong wobble some systems exhibit and, crucially, it isn't overly intrusive. The Smarts also read speed signs and can even automatically adjust your cruise speed. I rarely use such systems as they can be rather abrupt but this one isn't. There's a wireless phone charger in the console, and multiple USB-C ports for device charging. Practical storage up front is decent – the centre console has an open bin beneath and a sliding cover over the cupholders. Both models have a powered tailgate (with a kick sensor on Premium) for easy access to that small boot. The #1 and #3 Premium share the same powertrain: a 66kWh (usable) lithium NMC battery hooked up to a rear-mounted electric motor. Peak output is a healthy 200kW with 343Nm of torque, which is more than enough oomph for cars of this size. In fact, that's hot-hatch territory: by comparison, a VW Golf GTI makes about 180kW. On the road, the acceleration feels brisk; the #1 launches from 0-100 km/h in roughly 6.7 seconds. The slipperier #3 is quicker still: Smart quotes about 5.8 seconds 0-100km/h. In real-world terms, both RWD Smarts feel punchy. There's instant electric torque to scoot out of intersections, and plenty of midrange power for highway passes. Unless you simply must have a sub-four second 0–100 time, the single-motor versions are more than quick enough. Smart also offers Brabus dual-motor AWD variants with a whopping 315kW – those will rip 0-100 in about 3.7s, but that's another story and another $10k+ on the sticker. Both the #1 and #3 use that 66kWh NMC battery to good effect. Despite their small size, they're not ultralight (the #1 Premium weighs 1800kg, #3 Premium 1810kg), but the efficiency is respectable. The official WLTP range is up to 440km for the #1 Premium and 455km for the #3 Premium. That slight difference likely comes down to aerodynamics and possibly tyre choices – the #3 cuts through air a bit better and recorded a marginally lower energy consumption in testing (around 16.3kWh/100 km versus ~16.8 for the #1). In practice, you're looking at real-world 350–400 km on a charge for either car, depending on driving style. Charging is another strong suit. There's a CCS2 port supporting up to 150kW DC fast charging, so a 10–80 per cent top-up can take as little as 30 minutes under ideal conditions. All NZ-spec Premiums also include 22kW AC charging, which is rare in this class and very handy if you've got access to three-phase charging at home or work. The base Pro+ models stick with a more common 7.4 kW onboard charger. On the road, both cars are surprisingly engaging to drive. With 200kW to the rear wheels, these Smarts can even be a bit tail-happy if you provoke them. The ESC isn't overly intrusive; in Sport mode, you can actually get a hint of rear-wheel rotation on damp pavement before the electronics step in. Both cars are rear-drive, which contributes to their balanced feel in corners. Steering is a strong point: light at parking speeds but firming up nicely as you go. It's quick and responsive, making the #1 feel nippy around town, true to the Smart brand's city-car roots. The #3, with its wider track and longer wheelbase, actually feels even more composed and confident when cornering at speed. Push it on a winding road and it hunkers down more like a hot hatch than an SUV, with great grip. In fact, the chassis tuning is genuinely impressive – there's a dash of that driver's car vibe, unexpected in a small electric crossover. Credit likely goes to the Geely SEA platform they're built on (shared with the likes of the Volvo EX30 and Zeekr X), which has its batteries down low and a well-sorted suspension set-up. For a high-riding EV, the Smart #3 might be one of the best handlers in its class. Now for the big question: do these Smarts make sense in the NZ market, and which one should you pick? On price alone, Smart has come in higher than the mainstream, but lower than traditional luxury brands, effectively carving out a premium niche of its own. The Smart #1 Premium is priced at $69,990, and the Smart #3 Premium at $74,990 (before on-road costs). For the Pro+ models, subtract $5000. That positions the #1 just above some mainstream options at list, and the #3 well below premium options. It's also well below something like a Mercedes EQA (which starts around $92k). For your money, the Smarts come relatively fully loaded. The biggest strengths of the Smart #1 and #3 are their blend of attributes. They give you zippy EV performance, usable range, and genuine style in a compact package that's perfect for city dwellers. They also offer tech and features that outshine many competitors – the 22kW AC charging capability, for example, is rare and super-useful. The driving experience is another highlight; these cars are actually fun to drive, with tight handling that can put a grin on your face on a winding road. No car is perfect. The Smarts' main weaknesses boil down to space and perhaps brand perception. The limited boot capacity is the most obvious practical drawback. When stacked against the MG4 XPower and Cupra Born, the Smarts hold their own. The MG undercuts on price and overwhelms with power but it can't match the Smart's interior finesse or tech. The Cupra Born is a closer fight: similar price, more range, very stylish, and backed by the Volkswagen Group. But the Cupra isn't quite as quick, and its interior isn't as feature-packed. Mercedes GLA/EQA comparisons highlight the value of the Smart – a GLA 250 petrol or an EQA 250+ electric will cost you at least $15k–$20k more and yet come with similar or even fewer features. Smart's #1 and #3 Premium models are impressive debut acts for the brand's return to NZ. They deliver an appealing mix of style, performance, and technology that feels well-suited to our market. Personally, I find myself drawn to the Smart #3, its sleeker looks and marginally greater practicality win me over. If it were my money, I'd spend the few grand extra. That said, if you prioritise a smaller footprint and $5k saved, the #1 Premium won't disappoint. Both prove that EVs can be chic yet sensible, fun yet efficient. A smart choice, then. Smart #1 Premium$69,990 / 16.8kWh/100km / 0g/km0-100 km/h 6.7s (claimed)Motor output 200kWMax torque 343NmBattery 66.0kWhRange 440kmDrivetrain Single-speed auto / RWDFront suspension Mac strut / swaybarRear suspension Multilink / swaybarTurning circle 11.0m (2.2 turns)Front brakes Ventilated discsRear brakes DiscsStability systems ABS, ESP, TVSafety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHBTyre size f/r-235/45R19Wheelbase 2750mmL/W/H 4270 / 1822 / 1636mmLuggage capacity r-203L Tow rating Not rated to towService intervals 12 months / 20,000kmWarranty 5yrs / 150,000 kmANCAP rating ★★★★★ (2022) Weight (claimed) 1788kg Smart #3 Premium$74,990 / 16.3kWh/100km / 0g/km0-100 km/h 5.8s (claimed)Motor output 200kWMax torque 343NmBattery 66.0kWhRange 455kmDrivetrain Single-speed auto / RWDFront suspension Mac strut / swaybarRear suspension Multilink / swaybarTurning circle 11.0m (2.2 turns)Front brakes Ventilated discsRear brakes DiscsStability systems ABS, ESP, TVSafety AEB, ACC, BSM, LDW, RCTA, ALK, AHBTyre size f/r-235/45R19Wheelbase 2785mmL/W/H 4400 / 1844 / 1556mmLuggage capacity r-260L Tow rating Not rated to towService intervals 12 months / 20,000kmWarranty 5yrs / 150,000 kmANCAP rating ★★★★★ (2023) Weight (claimed) 1810kg
NZ Autocar
17-05-2025
- NZ Autocar
Long-range PHEVs like Volvo XC 70 are trending
Cars such as the new XC70 could be key in countries with less EV infrastructure, according to Volvo boss, Håkan Samuelsson. New Volvo XC70 is an SUV where the former model was a raised estate. The XC70 sits between XC60 and XC90 and uses a new range-extender platform. The new model was previewed last week as a mid-sized PHEV. It has a claimed electric range of almost 200km, far more than any PHEV the brand sells at present. XC70 uses a platform supplied by owner Geely, and is initially for China only. However, Volvo said it is considering a global launch for the medium SUV. In regions where charging options aren't so comprehensive, a long-range hybrid makes sense. Read our review of the Volvo EX30 Twin-Motor Performance here. Most XC70 running will be done with electricity. So it is a long-range plug-in hybrid, Samuelsson says. An electric car with a back-up engine when the battery is flat, which will not happen often. 'It's a pragmatic bridge solution to wait for our customers to really feel comfortable with an all-electric car.' Technical details remain sparse, but Volvo has promised an electric range of up to 200km, more than double what the XC60 PHEV can achieve. XC70 is barely larger than the XC60 and resembles a shrunken XC90. However, it uses different architecture. The Scalable Modular Architecture (SMA) is said to underpin the vehicle with no details available. Volvo XC70 taillights recognisably Volvo in shape. While fellow Geely brands use combustion engines as a generator to top up a traction battery, Volvo's XC70 is a more conventional PHEV. It follows the recent unveiling of Volkswagen's ID Era REx concept at the Shanghai motor show. That like-sized car was engineered in partnership with SAIC to target the growing demand for REx cars in China. It too may go global, with particular relevance in Europe and North America. The XC70 will be key to Volvo which is on a global cost-cutting drive in what it sees as a challenging environment. With 200km of EV range, charging should be a weekly affair. That said, Volvo is committed to becoming a fully electric car company, even if just 20 per cent of its sales in the first quarter of 2025 were electric. Premium plug-in hybrids are seen as ideal for customers not yet ready to switch to a fully electric vehicle. The XC70 name hasn't been heard of since 2016, when it was applied to an off-road version of the V70 estate.
