
Navigate CMS-HCC Model V28 With AI, Accuracy & Clarity
Healthcare organizations are aligning with a sharp regulatory shift. With the CMS-HCC Model V28, clinical documentation needs to be more specific and coding more compliant than ever. Health plans and providers must now collaborate more closely and in more detail as a result of the push for specificity. Broad-stroke diagnoses will no longer qualify under the V28 Risk Adjustment framework, making precise clinical documentation a top priority. In this environment, risk models require coding that reflects real-world complexity rather than administrative simplification.
The implications of the CMS-HCC Model V28 extend well beyond compliance. Delays in preparation put organizations at risk for workflow disruptions, audit risks, and revenue loss. It is no longer optional to have strategic alignment across platforms, people, and processes. The time has come to evaluate, modernize, and take charge of the information that determines financial performance. The Multi-Vendor Puzzle
The operational load tied to risk adjustment is not just about codes and compliance. It's about navigating a fragmented ecosystem of tools, workflows, and vendors. As new models like CMS HCC V28 bring higher specificity, every disconnected system adds more friction. Discussions at the forum demonstrated how important it is for businesses to eliminate inefficiencies and create platform-wide end-to-end visibility. The challenge of fragmented systems
Healthcare organizations face a jigsaw puzzle of disconnected technologies. Executives shared how managing 30+ vendor steps from clinical documentation to CMS submission introduces risk, delays, and confusion. Each vendor operates in silos, making it hard to align processes or ensure consistency. The solution
Reduce complexity. By combining suppliers or implementing integrated technologies that unify everything under a single interface, organizations are simplifying their IT stacks. The outcome? Stronger compliance, improved accountability, and fewer manual interventions. Bridging Clinical Workflows and Coding Standards
Aligning clinical workflows with coding expectations has emerged as a strategic priority due to the strain of new compliance requirements. With the added specificity in CMS HCC V28, the stakes are even higher. Organizations can no longer afford disjointed communication between clinical teams and coding professionals. Bridging this gap ensures not only regulatory compliance but also accurate risk capture and better care quality. Clinical accuracy drives compliance.
One of the biggest pain points? The disconnect between what physicians document and what coders interpret. Misalignment here leads to missed HCCs or even inaccurate risk capture. Leading approaches include: Creating shared documentation protocols across clinical and coding teams
Training on how V28 changes the diagnosis code requirements
Embedding assistive tools into the physician workflow to guide documentation in real time
The emphasis is on precision. Under CMS HCC V28, vague or broad documentation won't cut it. Advancing Interoperability Across Systems
As organizations transition to more complex coding models like CMS HCC V28, interoperability becomes a strategic differentiator. A lack of clean data flow between systems can delay submissions, reduce the accuracy of risk scores, and limit the effectiveness of population health efforts. Aligning platforms, interfaces, and workflows to communicate without friction is central to operational success under evolving models. Making data move where it matters
Timely and clean data exchange is mission-critical. Many organizations still struggle to get real-time data into the hands of decision-makers and coders.
To solve this: Map all data flows between systems to identify gaps
Regularly assess integration performance
Set up rules for quickly resolving discrepancies
Track data exchange metrics to measure progress
When systems communicate effectively, risk scores improve, errors drop, and compliance strengthens. Strategic moves to stay ahead
With implementation due in 2026, organizations have a tight window to prepare. The forum stressed practical steps being taken by leaders across the board.
Key strategies include: Rolling out incentive-based programs to boost staff engagement
Deploying dashboards to monitor V28-specific performance indicators
Running test scenarios that simulate new V28 workflows
Building cross-functional readiness task forces
Structured preparation today translates to fewer surprises tomorrow. Role of AI and NLP in Smarter Risk Adjustment
Modern risk adjustment depends on speed, accuracy, and data-driven insight. That's why the strategic use of AI and NLP is rapidly becoming a cornerstone of success under V28 Risk Adjustment. These technologies, particularly when combined with a scalable, user-friendly system architecture, simplify documentation procedures, identify lost coding opportunities, and comprehend difficult clinical terminology. When used properly, they complement human judgment rather than take its place. Technology fuels accuracy and speed.
V28 Risk Adjustment demands more than manual chart reviews. AI and NLP are being used to process clinical notes, uncover overlooked diagnoses, and deliver coding suggestions rooted in clinical logic.
These tools: Flag incomplete documentation instantly
Suggest valid HCCs based on medical language
Analyze patient history across multiple systems
A strong Digital Health Platform ties these elements together, driving both speed and precision. Strengthening Trust Between Stakeholders
As organizations move toward more accountable risk models like CMS HCC V28, fostering trust across stakeholders becomes non-negotiable. Providers need visibility into how their documentation translates into coding. Payers seek consistency and accuracy in submissions. Patients deserve clarity on how their care is categorized. Without mutual trust, even the best tools can falter. Strengthening these relationships begins with shared visibility and audit-ready transparency. Documentation done right supports everyone.
Risk adjustment works best when there's transparency. Trust between payers, providers, and patients grows when everyone sees how diagnoses are captured and why they matter.
Trusted strategies include: Giving clinicians control over accepted or rejected HCCs
Showing clearly why AI flagged a certain condition
Using audit-friendly interfaces to back every decision with data
This is not just about compliance, it's about empowering the entire ecosystem. Integrating Instead of Layering
Fragmented tools and disconnected workflows create noise, not clarity. Leaders at the forum stressed how layering new technologies on top of outdated systems only amplifies complexity. As expectations around risk adjustment grow sharper under CMS HCC V28, organizations must shift focus from stacking systems to integrating them. Unified platforms simplify operations, reduce rework, and promote data integrity across departments. Solving the multi-system chaos
Risk adjustment shouldn't rely on patchwork systems. The forum echoed one truth loudly: integrated tools that span documentation, coding, and submission outperform cobbled-together vendor networks.
With unified platforms, organizations: Avoid duplicate data entry
Improve turnaround times
Keep all departments aligned on coding priorities
This approach supports real-time updates, especially vital when transitioning to CMS HCC V28. Sustaining Change Through Smart Execution Turning strategy into outcomes
Execution matters. Tools alone won't move the needle unless they're tied to smart processes and metrics.
Practical execution tips: Monitor workflow efficiency weekly
Pilot innovations before system-wide rollout
Get regular feedback from clinical and coding users
Continuously adapt documentation protocols to match V28 standards
This adaptive, measurement-driven approach ensures compliance is never a one-time event. Final Thoughts
CMS-HCC Model V28 changes the game. Healthcare organizations that invest in interoperability, data accuracy, AI tools, and smarter workflows are best positioned to adapt. Documentation needs to be intentional, specific, and traceable. Experience Integrated Intelligence with Persivia
Healthcare doesn't need more vendors, it needs better ones. Persivia offers Risk Adjustment Solution that empowers providers with transparent AI, NLP-backed insights, and full V24/V28 compatibility. With bidirectional EHR connectivity and a white-box AI engine, it enables clinicians to act on real opportunities without second-guessing algorithms. Learn more today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta Faces Italy Probe Over WhatsApp AI
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) sees Italy's antitrust watchdog taking a hard look at its AI?WhatsApp tie?up. Ask Italy's Competition Authority and you'll learn it opened a probe into bundling Meta AI within WhatsApp without users asking for it. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with META. Working with the Special Antitrust Unit of the Italian Financial Police, AGCM even inspected Facebook Italy's offices last week. The regulator warns that forcing AI into a familiar chat app risks trapping users in services they didn't choose. Meta insists it's simply giving millions of Italians free access to AI where they already spend time, and says it's fully cooperating with investigators. Regulators aren't convinced. They fear that as Meta AI learns from chats and grows more useful, users will become dependentand competitors will be squeezed out. Under EU rules, fines could reach 10% of Meta's global turnover if the probe finds antitrust breaches. This investigation highlights Europe's tougher stance on default AI integrations and could force Big Tech to unbundle or face heavy penalties. Investors will be watching AGCM's findings through year?end as the outcome may set a precedent for AI bundling across the EU. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These are the cities where an Uber ride is going to cost you the most
Taking Ubers is getting expensive across the nation but a half-hour ride in certain states and cities is going to do far more damage to your wallet than in others, according to a new analysis. Net Credit collected the average price of a 30-minute ride in an Uber in locations across the U.S., and found ride-share passengers in Washington state are paying the most, with a half-hour drive costing on average $53.46. On the other side of the list is Indiana, where the average half-hour ride in an Uber will cost around $30.35. Other states with less expensive rides include Texas at $30.96, Utah at $30.71, and Oklahoma at $31.54. But a ride in plenty of other states is going to cost upwards of $40. The average price of a half-hour Uber ride in California, Oregon, Wyoming, Montana, Louisiana, Alabama, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York are all at least $40, and rides in several other states — South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arkansas, and Nevada — will cost just under that mark. When it comes to individual cities, Seattle tops the list as the most expensive city for a half-hour Uber ride. In Seattle a half-hour ride costs almost $60, according to the analysis. The nine next most expensive cities for Ubers aren't necessarily each the sprawling, wildly expensive, cities one might expect. Those are Cheyenne, Reno, New York City, San Diego, Baton Rouge, Newark, Anchorage, San Jose, and Portland. The cheapest overall city for Uber for a half-hour ride is Indianapolis where it'll cost around $28.33. Following Indianapolis, the most affordable cities for taking an Uber are Fort Worth, Tucson, Mesa, Omaha, Miami, Oklahoma City, Raleigh, Houston, and Memphis. According to Net Credit, the price of Uber rides increased by 7.2 percent across the country in 2024. Net Credit noted that part of what may be driving down prices in Indianapolis is the appearance of a competitor, inDrive, which allows riders to propose a price for their ride, and drivers can counter-bid for a higher fee. 'We're giving both the driver and passenger the freedom to kind of choose their own adventure," Adam Warner, the company's head of U.S. operations, told Net Credit. 'So you get to select the driver. Are you willing to wait 10 minutes for this person to pick you up in a Tesla Model Y, or are you comfortable with the Chevy Malibu that's only two minutes away to pick you up?' Net Credit also worked out which city's Uber costs were the most and least expensive relative to the average wages of its residents. The city with the most affordable Uber rides — relative to its residents' average hourly wage — is Washington, D.C., where a 30-minute trip will still cost riders 106.5 percent of their average hourly wage. Following the nation's capital, the most affordable cities for Ubering relative to residents' average hourly wages include San Jose, San Francisco, Fort Worth, Indianapolis, Stamford, Raleigh, Boston, Mesa, and Baltimore. The least affordable city was determined to be Cheyenne, Wyoming, where a ride is 224 percent of a resident's average hourly wage. Reno, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Jackson, Seattle, Fresno, Las Vegas, Augusta, and Buffalo made up the rest of the list.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fairholme Fund's Strategic Moves: The St. Joe Co Sees a -2.08% Portfolio Impact
Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s Investment Philosophy and Recent Portfolio Adjustments Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with JOE. Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted its N-PORT filing for the second quarter of 2025, shedding light on its strategic investment decisions. Managed by Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio), the fund has a remarkable history, achieving a 253% gain in its first decade since inception in 1999, while the S&P 500 experienced losses. This portfolio is distinct from the broader portfolio under Berkowitz's name, which encompasses various accounts and funds he manages. Known for his concentrated investment approach, Berkowitz seeks companies with strong management and cash flow, adhering to his motto: "Ignore the Crowd." Key Position Increases Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of one stock, notably: The most notable increase was in Bank OZK (NASDAQ:OZK), with an additional 229,300 shares, bringing the total to 244,200 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 1,538.93% increase in share count, a 1.15% impact on the current portfolio, and a total value of $10,825,390. Key Position Reduces Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced positions in three stocks. The most significant changes include: Reduced The St. Joe Co (NYSE:JOE) by 410,600 shares, resulting in a -2.37% decrease in shares and a -2.08% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $44.57 during the quarter and has returned 21.56% over the past three months and 14.84% year-to-date. Reduced Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET) by 80,000 shares, resulting in a -32.44% reduction in shares and a -0.16% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $17.62 during the quarter and has returned 11.23% over the past three months and -4.57% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview As of the second quarter of 2025, Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included six stocks. The top holdings were concentrated as follows: 85.7% in The St. Joe Co (NYSE:JOE), 10.3% in Enterprise Products Partners LP (NYSE:EPD), 2.09% in Imperial Metals Corp (TSX:III), 1.22% in Bank OZK (NASDAQ:OZK), and 0.36% in Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA). The holdings are primarily concentrated in four of the eleven industries: Real Estate, Energy, Basic Materials, and Financial Services. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data