Arnault slams France's tax plans: ‘Encouragement to relocate'
Bernard Arnault, CEO of the world's largest luxury firm LVMH, strongly criticised the French government during a hearing in the French Senate. In his argument, he stated that 'it is very bad for the state to interfere in the management of private companies'. This statement came in response to President Emmanuel Macron's recent call for economic patriotism.
The hearing was part of a broader evaluation of state support for large companies. Arnault emphasised that government interference in strategic corporate choices has rarely led to good results in the past. The chief executive said: "In general, that leads to catastrophes." He added that LVMH is 'perhaps the most patriotic company in France', with strong roots in the French economy and culture. 'Tax increase could drive luxury industry out of France'
LVMH – owner of iconic brands such as Louis Vuitton, Dior, Moët & Chandon and Hennessy – had already criticised new fiscal proposals in the French budget for 2025 earlier this year. These include an increase in corporation tax for large companies. Arnault fears that such measures will encourage companies to relocate, moving production to countries with more favourable economic conditions.
The US has become particularly attractive in that regard, especially under the investment climate stimulated by Donald Trump's re-election campaign. LVMH now owns three Louis Vuitton production facilities in the US, including one in Texas. Arnault stressed, however, that this is not a new phenomenon. He said: 'We have been producing in the US since 1989; there is nothing new under the sun.' According to him, the American customs regulations offer significant advantages for locally produced goods. Fashion as a global industry
Arnault's comments touch on a broader tension in the luxury sector: how do companies remain true to their national roots in an industry that operates increasingly globally? The French fashion industry, often seen as cultural heritage, is simultaneously driven by international demand, global production and complex supply chains.
François-Henri Pinault, CEO of rival Kering (parent company of Gucci, Yves Saint Laurent and Balenciaga), agreed with this realistic vision. During a previous hearing, he stated: 'It's no secret that Gucci makes Italian bags from leather from Texas.' Patriotism versus pragmatism
The discussion underlines the growing tension between national policy and the reality of an international market. While political leaders are pushing for economic patriotism, large luxury groups continue to optimise their production and investments worldwide. This presents policymakers, companies and consumers with a difficult balance: remaining true to the French heritage, without losing competitiveness on the world stage.
For the French luxury sector, which accounts for billions of euros in exports and hundreds of thousands of jobs, such debates are anything but theoretical. The outcome of these debates may determine the course of some of the world's most influential fashion houses. This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rome's taxi drivers rev up criticism of Wolff after being likened to Verstappen
Rome taxi drivers are in uproar at the suggestion they drive as badly as mad Max Verstappen, with some challenging Formula One drivers to navigate the traffic and potholes of the Italian capital as skilfully as they do. Verstappen, a four-time F1 champion, was issued with a penalty on Sunday after crashing into George Russell's Mercedes in the Spanish Grand Prix. Responding to questions about the incident from an Italian journalist, Toto Wolff, the Mercedes F1 principal, said: 'This is road rage, like the taxi drivers in Rome or Naples.' The journalist tried to defend his country's drivers, saying: 'We have improved a lot in Italy.' Wolff said: 'There's a lot of aggression in the centre of Rome and Naples, without rules.' While the remarks appear to have been shrugged off by taxi drivers in Naples, their counterparts in Rome, who in recent years have had to contend with wayward electric scooter riders, omnipresent construction sites and tourists being shown around in golf buggies, were outraged. 'Maybe it would be better if Wolff focused on [the performance] of his own team,' Loreno Bittarelli, president of Rome's largest taxi cooperative, told Corriere della Sera newspaper. Nicola Di Giacobbe, from the taxi union, Filt-Cgil, joked: 'We drive like a Mercedes since it only goes 30 miles an hour, just like us.' However, Di Giacobbe conceded that Rome has serious problems when it comes to traffic congestion and rule-flouting, making mobility in the city 'a no man's land'. Roberto, a taxi driver with 40 years' experience, told Corriere: 'We are the best at driving in the chaotic traffic of this city. We are more patient and expert than the average driver. This city has gotten worse in recent years – now it takes 30 minutes to go two kilometres.' Fellow tax driver, Alessandro, referred to Wolff's comments as 'a banal cliche'. 'We are the ones who are first in not having accidents, otherwise we would lose our working day,' he said. 'I would like to see Formula One drivers manoeuvring around construction sites, scooters and golf carts the way we do. Rome is now a jungle, not a Formula One track.'
Scottish Sun
32 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Sleep problem that affects 10million people in UK could trigger world's deadliest cancer, first-of-its-kind study warns
Find out if you're at risk of the sleep problem below WAKE-UP CALL Sleep problem that affects 10million people in UK could trigger world's deadliest cancer, first-of-its-kind study warns HEAVY snorers could be at risk of the world's deadliest cancer, a shock new study has revealed. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has previously been linked to an increased risk of certain cancers. Advertisement 1 Obstructive sleep apnoea has been specifically linked to lung cancer Credit: Getty Now, in a world-first trial, a "significant" link has been found between the condition and lung cancer. US researchers, who assessed the health records of more than 2.4 million adults, say they're not exactly sure why it raises the risk. But they believe it could be due to a lack of oxygen people with the condition get during the night - or lifestyle factors such as smoking and obesity. The findings were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference in Chicago. Advertisement Scientists present urged policymakers to consider screening those with OSA for the cancer, and to tackle the condition early, soon after diagnosis. Globally, an estimated 936 million adults aged 30-69 years are affected by OSA. The condition occurs when the muscles in the throat relax too much during sleep, causing the airway to narrow or close, interrupting breathing. This can happen due to several factors, including obesity, a large neck or collar size, structural abnormalities like a small lower jaw or a large tongue, and other medical conditions. Advertisement Common symptoms include breathing stopping and starting, making gasping, snorting or choking noises, waking up a lot, and loud snoring, says the NHS. According to the Sleep Apnoea Trust, as many as 10 million people in the UK suffer from OSA – with up to four million of these suffering either severely or moderately - although it's considered to be underdiagnosed. I'm a doctor and these 5 changes could be a sign of deadly lung cancer It's important to note while snoring is a common symptom of OSA, it's not a guaranteed sign. In the study, researchers at Marshall University in West Virginia tracked lung cancer diagnoses and separated those diagnosed with OSA and those without. Advertisement After accounting for different influential factors, such as age, people with OSA were found to be 1.21 times more likely to develop lung cancer compared to those without the sleep disorder. Dr Jowan Al-Nusair, study co-author and physician at Marshall University told MailOnline it was "one of the first statistically significant studies" to prove a link between the condition and lung cancer. She added: "While further studies are definitely now needed to investigate just how the significant the link truly is, this suggests OSA may be a preventable risk factor for lung cancer. "We should be more closely monitoring patients with OSA. Patients would definitely benefit from screening and early intervention to combat OSA. Advertisement "Additional studies are essential to understand exactly why OSA may increase this risk. "We really hope this will pave the way for future research and testing." Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. In the UK, around 35,000 people die from lung cancer each year. Advertisement The primary cause of lung cancer is tobacco smoke, accounting for the vast majority of cases. But lung cancer cases are now rising among young people who have never smoked, with some experts attributing this to factors like air pollution.
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
What is Operation Stork Speed? RFK Jr's plan to take on the baby formula industry
Federal health officials are set to overhaul the U.S. food supply, starting with a fresh examination of i nfant formula. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has instructed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct a thorough review of the nutrients and ingredients found in infant formula, a staple for millions of American babies. This initiative, named "Operation Stork Speed," marks the first comprehensive evaluation of these ingredients since 1998. Kennedy stated, "The FDA will use all resources and authorities at its disposal to make sure infant formula products are safe and wholesome for the families and children who rely on them." According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately three-quarters of infants in the U.S. consume formula within their first six months, with about 40% relying on it as their sole source of nutrition. Formula has been widely used in the U.S. for roughly six decades, feeding generations of infants who have flourished, said Dr. Steven Abrams, a University of Texas infant nutrition expert. The broader scientific community has been calling for a reevaluation of infant formula for years and is 'fully supportive of this idea of a comprehensive look,' he said. Current formula products in the U.S. continue to be safe and nourishing, he said. 'But there's been a lot of science and we want the FDA rules to align with the most recent science from around the world,' he said. Here's what you need to know about Operation Stork Speed: What is infant formula and why do so many babies consume it? Infant formula is a manufactured product, usually made from cow's milk or soy, that is intended to mimic human breast milk for kids up age 12 months. It may be the sole source of nutrition or supplement breastfeeding. FDA regulations require that infant formulas contain 30 specific nutrients, with minimum levels for all and maximum levels for 10 of them. The ingredients vary, but all formulas must have a balance of calories from protein, carbohydrates and fat that mirrors what's found in human milk. Federal guidelines recommend that babies be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life and that parents continue breastfeeding for the first year or more while adding new foods to the child's diet. Parents use formula when a mother cannot or chooses not to breastfeed for a wide range of reasons, including medical conditions, work conflicts, to allow other family members to help with feedings and other situations. Why is the government reviewing baby formula now? Kennedy announced the review of infant formula in March as part of his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda for the U.S. food supply. The FDA's review will include increased testing for heavy metals and other contaminants as well as a review of nutrients, the agencies said. U.S. health officials will hold a two-hour roundtable discussion of infant formula on Wednesday. What issues will that cover? The FDA is asking for new scientific data and information about whether required ingredients in infant formula should be added, removed or changed. The deadline for comments is Sept. 11. Scientists say a review is long overdue regarding the most recent data on the composition of human milk and how babies digest and absorb nutrients in breastmilk and formula. In addition, they want the FDA to consider how U.S. formulas compare with those made elsewhere, said Bridget Young, who studies infant nutrition at the University of Rochester. 'How do our regulations differ?' she said. 'Maybe it's time for them to relook at their regulations and consider potential international harmonization.' More international alignment might have eased the U.S. infant formula crisis in 2022, when contamination shut down an Abbott factory, leading to monthslong shortages for American parents, Young said. What about specific ingredients? In recent years, some parents have sought out infant formula made in Europe with the belief that products made overseas are healthier options, experts said. Formula regulations in the U.S. and Europe, including requirements for nutrients and testing, differ somewhat, but are generally similar, Abrams said. 'The differences between the U.S. and Europe should not be considered as 'higher' or 'better' or 'greater' in one vs. the other,' he said. Still, iron, for instance, is included at higher levels in U.S. formulas than in those in Europe — and Abrams suggested that U.S. officials may consider lowering iron targets. Other components have been added to formula in recent years. They include docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, an essential omega-3 fatty acid, and human milk oligosaccharides, complex sugars that are found breast milk but not in cow's milk. Although they may be beneficial, they are not required. 'These have been added to some formulas, but not to other formulas, so we want to take a look,' Abrams explained. Many parents have raised concerns over formula ingredients such as added sugars and seed oils, which are also being targeted by Kennedy as hazards in the wider food supply. Recent research suggests that added sugars such as glucose and corn syrup solids in infant formula may be linked to weight gain in children. Young said that most experts agree that lactose, the primary type of sugar found in breast milk, is preferred. Infant formulas in the U.S. do contain seed oils, Young said. But that's because there are a finite number of vegetable oils that provide the essential saturated and unsaturated fats that babies require. 'They need to provide the variety of fatty acids that you see in breast milk,' she said. What are the next steps? Done properly, the FDA's infant formula review would take 'at least a year,' Abrams said. And it will require broad input from multiple government agencies, formula manufacturers and consumers. 'No shortcuts are possible and no one review, white paper or even committee report will suffice to do it right,' he said. The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
