
R.I. considers taxing the rich to help offset federal cuts
The Rhode Island
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Representative Karen Alzate, the Pawtucket Democrat sponsoring the House version of the bill, stood on the State House steps, leading the rally in a chant of 'Tax the rich!'
Advertisement
'This is the year to do it,' Alzate said. 'We can no longer wait until next year. We're seeing what's coming out of Washington. And it is important that we get ahead of it before they come for us.'
Behind her a countdown clock ticked down, estimating that there were 20 days and 1 hour left in this year's legislative session.
" This session is almost over," Alzate said. 'This is our last chance to do something right and let them know that we are done waiting.' The bill would take effect on Jan. 1, 2026.
Advertisement
Top legislators have said the Assembly might need
But Alisha Pina, coordinator of the Revenue for Rhode Islanders coalition, said, 'We need our legislators to be proactive, not reactive. We don't want you to come back in the fall and consider it then. We want you to consider it now.'
Pina said Massachusetts is using revenue from the rich for priorities such as child care, roads, bridges, and public transit. And she said Rhode Island has needs of its own. 'We've got a bridge that you can walk over faster,' she said, referring to
Senator Melissa A. Murray, the Woonsocket Democrat who introduced the
Senator Melissa A. Murray, a Woonsocket Democrat, speaks in favor of her bill to raise the income tax rate on the top 1 percent of Rhode Islanders.
Edward Fitzpatrick
" What could we do with $190 million?" Murray asked during the rally. 'We could fully fund our public schools. We could pay for meals for our kids in schools. We could pay for mental health supports for kids in school. We could bolster health care. We could lift children out of poverty. We could restore the cuts to pensions. We could slash the tax on Social Security.'
But during the Senate Finance Committee hearing, Jason Martiesian said the Rhode Island Business Coalition opposes the proposal. He described Massachusetts as 'an outlier' nationally, and said 20 states have lowered their top incomes tax rates since 2020.
Advertisement
'We think it's important to get a broader context,' Martiesian said. 'Since COVID, businesses and people can work anywhere. So it's important, we believe, that Rhode Island sets up a measure of attracting businesses and workers so that we can grow our economy, provide more tax revenue and services.'
Marc Perlman, CEO of Ocean State Job Lot, said the company formed 48 years ago with three people who had zero take-home pay. 'We put everything back in the business,' he said, and the company became deeply involved with philanthropy.
Today, he said, 'We have 1,500 Rhode Island families that depend on us.' But, he said, 'We couldn't do this if we weren't a pass-through organization. We couldn't invest back into our company.'
A pass-through entity is a legal business structure that is not subject to corporate income tax because it passes profits onto the owners.
Perlman said business people can find more favorable tax environments in states such as Florida. 'Even our former governors have left the state,' he said. '(Donald) Carcieri is in New Hampshire, (Philip) Noel is in Florida. I don't know where Gina (Raimondo) is, but they're not here.'
Melissa Travis, chairwoman of the Rhode Island Business Leaders Alliance, objected to the bill, and said, " This doesn't target the wealthy. It's targeting the Main Street business owners. It would increase their taxes substantially."
But Alan Krinsky, director of research and fiscal policy at the Economic Progress Institute, said opponents are presenting " misleading information" about the bill's impact. He said about 90 percent of those who claim pass-through income are not in the top 1 percent and will remain unaffected by the proposed tax.
Advertisement
'Any suggestion that this bill would directly affect most or even a large majority of small and micro business owners is inaccurate,' Krinsky said.
During the rally, speakers said new revenue is needed to plug a state budget deficit of up to $200 million. And they noted Governor Daniel J. McKee
" I think it's only fair that those at the very top should share the burden that the rest of us have all the years,' said Tommy Cute, a bus driver who is about to retire after 45 years at RIPTA. 'It's only fair that they pitch in and contribute more to run these operations and to save RIPTA.'
The Senate bill to tax the rich is cosponsored by new Senate President Valerie A. Lawson, an East Providence Democrat, and new Senate Majority Leader Frank A. Ciccone III, a Providence Democrat.
When asked on Thursday for his stance on the bill, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi, a Warwick Democrat, said legislators have 'no shortage of meritorious proposals that affect state resources' as the session enters its final weeks.
'The magnitude of the uncertainty of the federal funding picture and the numerous holes in the governor's proposed budget complicate both balancing this year's budget and planning for the unknown,' Shekarchi said. 'I continue to keep many options on the table for this challenging task.'
The Senate Finance Committee voted to hold the bill for further study.
Advertisement
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk feud explodes in public view
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – President Donald Trump and his former adviser Elon Musk are now in a very public feud. The dustup erupted on social media Thursday after days of Musk criticizing the president's signature tax and spending bill. The world's richest man and the president of the United States didn't hold back on how they now feel about each other on social media. They were once allies, now Elon Musk is calling for President Trump to be impeached. Just one week ago, President Trump praised Elon Musk. Now, he's taking a very different tone. 'I am very disappointed in Elon,' said Trump. The president's comments follow days of intensifying criticism from Musk, who blasted the president's massive budget bill, especially cuts to electric vehicle mandates. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody,' said Trump. Musk unloaded on X, his own platform, slamming Trump's bill, his trade policies, and even accusing the president of ties to Jeffrey Epstein, claims the White House strongly denies. Trump fired back on Truth Social, threatening to cancel federal contracts worth billions for Musk's companies. 'If you want to go after Elon Musk's contracts, like, we are here for the fight, bro,' said Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M). Democrats see an opening while Republicans are caught in the middle. 'This isn't personal, policy differences should not be personal,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). On social media Musk said Republicans would not have won the House in November without him. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Property taxes, book bans and resolutions: Three Grand Forks lawmakers discuss recent session
Jun. 6—GRAND FORKS — Through an hour-long conversation looking back on the 2025 legislative session, three Grand Forks state lawmakers found moments of agreement and professed similar opinions on issues more than they disagreed. Rep. Nels Christianson, Rep. Erik Murphy and Rep. Zac Ista, all from Grand Forks, went through some of the topics from the session with different mindsets but familiar answers. For example, on the matter of property tax and Gov. Kelly Armstrong's bill — which expanded the primary tax credit to a maximum $1,600 and capped local-level tax increases to no more than 3% annually — Christianson said they found some common ground. Property tax was one of the several issues discussed during the legislative wrap-up, held at the Grand Forks County office building on Thursday, June 5. All 18 members of districts 17, 18, 19, 20, 42 and 43 were invited, but Ista, Murphy and Christianson were the only ones in attendance. Joel Heitkamp, host of KFGO News and Views and a former state senator, served as moderator. Some issues involved public funding to private schools, Medicaid, the North Dakota Republican Party and what bills the legislators worked on. Property tax was among the most newsworthy issues during the session. Armstrong discussed it prior to his November election and his bill, HB 1176, was not passed until May 2, near the end of the session. "Did we deliver relief? Yes," Christianson said. "Reform? Maybe not so much." Murphy said property taxes are typically something outside of the Legislature's lane, but that he begrudgingly supported Armstrong's property tax bill. "Property tax is part of the reality of living in a nation such as ours," he said. "Property tax, to me, is a local issue." Ista, the only Democrat among the three, said there will be a trade-off. Homeowners will get some tax relief, but political subdivisions will have to figure out how to continue to pay for things. "Now the burden is going to fall on our local, county, city, school districts to see how to live within this new reality. I think it's going to be a challenge going forward for the state and locals to balance it," he said. One issue on which all three agreed was the matter of banning books. Each legislator was against it, though they had different thoughts on the matter. Ista said he has voted against every book censorship bill, and will continue to do so every chance he gets. "The issues in our state that affect our kids are not what books are displayed where in our libraries," he said. "I love taking my kids to Grand Forks Public Library and watch them go down that big pink slide, and I've never once worried about what book they might stumble into." Christianson said that, under no circumstances, should books be banned. Instead, he said, they should be placed in the appropriate area, and that he wants his daughters to be able to go around the children's section of the library and look at any books they would like in that section. "I absolutely do not support taking anything out of the ability for people to check out from the library," he said. "I just want to make sure that ... parents have a chance to be in the loop, just that parents can understand what their children are reading, especially in the younger ages." Murphy said there are better things to do and think about in North Dakota than book bans, and he mentioned Senate Bill 2307, which would have required libraries to make material considered sexually explicit unavailable to minors, and could penalize failure to comply. One issue he took with the bill was the difference between what was said about it versus what it would really do, he said. "What it really did is, opened up every library in the state, whether it's UND's library, it opened up the (North Dakota Museum of Art)," he said. "If there's a nude in there, that could be considered pornography, therefore we need to take that picture down." Two resolutions that failed during the session — House Concurrent Resolution 3013, which requested the U.S. Supreme Court overturn gay marriage, and House Concurrent Resolution 3020, declaring that "Christ is King" of North Dakota — drew disagreement between Christianson, who voted "yes" on both, and the other two legislators, who voted against them. Christianson's thought on HCR 3013 was that issues such as marriage need to be defined at the state level, not through a court decision, referencing Obergefell vs. Hodges, the 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding same-sex marriages. Ista said that it was probably the darkest day of the session for him when the resolution came to the floor, and that he was caught "flat-footed" by it. He said he had thought everyone had moved beyond the issue of marriage equality. Murphy said it's not up to him to decide who any individual should love. He also said that during this recent school year, he knew of students who were transgender and transitioning. The resolution sends the wrong message to North Dakota residents and creates a division in the state, he said. As for HCR 3020, Murphy simply said "absolutely not" when Heitkamp asked if he thought North Dakota should be in the business of declaring that Christ is king. Ista said that the faith leaders in his life respected a foundational concept of no official religions in America, and that, while he respects the religion of his colleagues, the state should be accommodating to all religions and not place one above the others. Christianson said the resolution would have no effect on state policies, claiming that he voted for what he believes is the truth. "It was simply a statement, and that's a statement that I will make every day, that Christ is king," he said.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump: ‘I'm not even thinking about Elon'
President Trump insisted Friday morning that he's not ruminating over his explosive fallout with tech billionaire Elon Musk a day earlier. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon,' Trump told CNN's Dana Bash in a phone call. 'He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' The president also signaled that he doesn't expect to make up with the tech mogul in the near future, despite ongoing attempts by their mutual allies to broker a truce and Musk's subtle acknowledgment that he may be inclined to put their issues aside. 'I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump told Bash. Trump and Musk took aim at each other as their previously close relationship came to an explosive end on Thursday. Cracks in their alliance had begun to show in recent days as Musk took aim the House GOP's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' The tax and spending measure — a key component of the president's domestic policy agenda for his second term — narrowly passed the House last month and is currently up for review in the Senate. Musk, who left his role in Trump's administration under the White House's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last week, has argued that the Trump-backed bill doesn't cut spending enough and will increase the federal debt. Trump, meanwhile, suggested that Musk was upset that the proposal doesn't include subsidies for electric vehicles that would benefit Tesla, the automaker Musk owns. A senior White House official told NewsNation's Tanya Noury on Friday that the president plans to sell or give away the Tesla that he purchased earlier this year after the company faced backlash over Musk's White House work.